Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Thomas McAuley

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0426, written 2 Aug 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report2 Aug 2024
Reference2024-0426
DeceasedThomas McAuley
CoronerBrendan Joseph Allen
Coroner areaDorset
CategoryAccident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

, Chief Executive 
Health and Safety Executive 

1  CORONER 

I am Brendan Joseph Allen, Area Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Dorset 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act  2009  and  regulations  28  and  29  of  the  Coroners  (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  the  13th  July  2022,  an  investigation  was  commenced  into  the  death  of 

Thomas Joseph McAuley, born on the 1st April 1968. 

The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 19th July 2024. 

The Medical Cause of Death was: 

1a Multiple Injuries 

1b  

1c  

2  

The conclusion of the Inquest recorded that Thomas Joseph McAuley died as a 

consequence of an accident. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Thomas  Joseph  McAuley  was  employed  by  Kiely  Brothers  Limited  (“KBL”)  as 

part of a crew of men undertaking road resurfacing works. On 5th July 2022, Mr 

McAuley, together with a crew of 6 others, was undertaking resurfacing work 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 in  Redwood  Drive,  Ferndown.  At  approximately  11  am  Mr  McAuley  placed 

himself within the area between the third and fourth axles of a four axle, 32 

tonne grab lorry that was on site. This was likely so that he could urinate. The 

driver of the grab lorry was unaware of Mr McAuley’s presence within this area 

and moved the grab lorry forward a short distance and at low speed, causing 

Mr McAuley catastrophic injuries that caused his death.  

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:   

1.  During the inquest evidence was heard that: 

i. 

It  is  common  practice  for  members  of  roadwork  crews  to  use 

the space between the rear axles of LGVs to urinate, even when 

a  welfare  van  has  been  provided  on  site.  A  witness  who  had 

worked  for  at  least  one  company  as  part  of  a  roadwork  crew 

prior to joining KBL gave evidence that it was a practice that he 

was  aware of  “since  starting  on the roads”.  Although it  would 

seem  that  KBL  employees  no  longer  engage  in  this  practice, 

likely because of the tragic death of Mr McAuley, there was no 

evidence available at the Inquest to suggest his death had had 

an impact on the industry more widely. 

2.  I have concerns with regard to the following: 

i. 

If the practice of using the space between the rear axles of an LGV 

is  ongoing,  there  remains  a  risk  of  future  deaths,  as  any  small 

movement of the vehicle can cause fatal injuries.  I am not aware 

of any safety notice(s) being issued since Mr McAuley’s death or any 

wider  publicity  that  may  have  highlighted  the  risk.  Ensuring  that 

companies undertaking road resurfacing work or similar are made 

aware of the risk that this practice is ongoing will enable them to 

take measures to address this potential ongoing risk.                  

2 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion  urgent action  should  be taken  to prevent future deaths  and  I 
believe you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action.    

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of 
this report, by 27th September 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following 
Interested Persons: 

, Thomas McAuley’s sister; 

, Thomas McAuley’s mother; 

(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(4) 
(5) DWF Law, representing KBL; 
(6) Dolmans Solicitors, representing Dorset Council. 

, Thomas McAuley’s brother; 
, Thomas McAuley’s partner; 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or 
summary  form.  He  may  send  a  copy  of  this  report  to  any  person  who  he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated 

2nd August 2024 

Signed

Brendan J Allen  

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Hse (PDF)
Health and Safety
Executive

Head of Construction Sector

HSE Engagement and Policy
Division

Floor 11
William Morgan House
6 Central Square
Cardiff
CF10 1 EP

Tel: 

http://www.hse.gov.uk/

Deputy Director

Mr Brendan Joseph Allen
HM Area Coroner – Dorset
Civic Centre
Bourne Way
Bournemouth
BH2 6DY

Sent by email to

Date

Dear Sir,

MR THOMAS JOSEPH MCAULEY – DECEASED
REPORT TO PREVENT FURTHER DEATHS
CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013

Thank you for your Regulation 28 letter dated 2nd August 2024 addressed to 
letter has been passed to me as Head of HSE Construction Sector to provide a response. May I take
this opportunity to express my sadness and condolences at the tragic circumstances that gave rise to
the inquest.

. Your

I understand from your report that your concerns centre on two main areas, welfare provision and
workplace transport safety on construction sites.

Industry Awareness of the Law and Guidance Pertaining to Welfare Requirements and
Construction Site Traffic Management.

The construction industry is aware that welfare must be provided on all sites and during all phases of
construction work, from commencement to completion, even for short duration or mobile work such as
road works. HSE will take enforcement action where welfare is not provided.

Similarly, workplace transport is present on all construction sites and industry is aware that the risks
posed by vehicles must be planned and managed to prevent people coming into contact with vehicles
and plant.

As the health and safety regulator for construction sites, HSE enforces legal requirements and works
with industry stakeholders to raise awareness of the required standards to those who create the risk so
that they understand the measures they need in place to control those risks.

Availability of Construction Welfare Guidance

HSE provides detailed guidance on construction site welfare requirements which is freely available.
Examples of this guidance are:

Provision of welfare facilities during construction work (hse.gov.uk)
This guide gives good advice on the minimum standards to be achieved at all construction sites.

 Construction: Welfare - Managing occupational health risks in construction (hse.gov.uk)
This HSE webpage offers clear information on the welfare standards to be provided and maintained
during construction works. It also contains a number of additional links to relevant guidance and
legislation. It applies to all sites including roadworks.

Health and safety in construction HSG150 (hse.gov.uk) – page 11 onwards (para 41 to 68)
This guidance document contains an extensive section relating to the provision and management of
welfare on construction sites. The key message is that everyone who works on any site must have
access to adequate toilet and washing facilities, a place for preparing and consuming refreshments and
somewhere for storing and drying clothing and personal protective equipment.

Welfare facilities What you need to know as a busy builder CIS62 (hse.gov.uk)
This simple guide gives an overview of the basic welfare requirements needed for all construction sites,
even small ones or those which are of short duration.

HSE also produces internal guidance to assist Inspectors and Visiting Officers in achieving a uniform
benchmark when considering these risks.

In November 2022, a detailed operational guidance document was published concerning welfare
provision for construction sites - Construction welfare standards (hse.gov.uk). This document is
published on the HSE website and can be seen and used by industry and the public to better
understand the benchmarks to be achieved and how HSE regulates welfare in construction work.

Construction Traffic Management

The risks from moving vehicles on construction sites are well known across industry and each year, on
average seven to ten people die as a result of being struck by moving vehicles. In addition, there are
hundreds of other preventable accidents and injuries involving workplace transport.

Accidents involving vehicles occur across all work activities from groundworks to finishing works.
Managers, workers, visitors to sites and members of the public can all be at risk.

Availability of Traffic Management Guidance

HSE publishes guidance relating to workplace transport safety which is freely available on our website
www.hse.gov.uk. The core message of this guidance being that duty holders must ensure that vehicle
movements and traffic routes are organised such that pedestrians and vehicles are segregated so far
as reasonably practicable. It is important to note that controls for transport safety cover segregation of
pedestrians from vehicles whether moving or stationary, as unauthorised access to vehicles should be
prevented and there are risks that stationary vehicles can move unexpectedly.

Examples of this guidance, which is freely available to all industries are as follows:

Construction - Traffic management on construction sites (hse.gov.uk)
This HSE webpage deals with traffic management in relation to construction works and contains links to
additional guidance, the key message given is that construction site vehicle incidents can and should be
prevented by the effective management of transport operations throughout the construction process.

The safe use of vehicles on construction sites: A guide for clients, designers, contractors, managers,
and workers involved with construction transport - HSG144 (hse.gov.uk)
This guidance document covers the safe use of vehicles on construction works in some detail. The key
message throughout the document is that every effort should be made to keep people and vehicles
segregated from one another.

Workplace transport safety: A brief guide INDG199 (hse.gov.uk)
This short guide covers the basic principles of workplace transport safety and makes segregation a core
part of the management of risk.

2

 Workplace transport - HSE
This HSE webpage gives wide ranging guidance for all industries on workplace transport safety and risk
management

Health and safety in construction HSG150 (hse.gov.uk) – page 54 onwards (para 264 to 307)
This guidance document contains practical advice on all aspects of construction site traffic management
and has a focus on segregation.

All these links and documents are freely available on the HSE website.

Having reviewed the circumstances of this fatal accident, it is HSE’s view that the need to provide
adequate welfare facilities and control risks associated with transport safety are well known to industry
and legislation and suitable and sufficient guidance already exists to assist duty holders in complying
with their duties and adequately control the risks involved in this accident.

Through our stakeholder engagement networks, we will continue to raise awareness of maters arising
in this case with industry to ensure they manage them appropriately. These topics will also be raised at
inspections where appropriate.

The responsibility to achieve legal compliance, source suitable advice or information for their individual
circumstance’s rests with the duty holder.

Where HSE finds non-compliance, we use the standards in the above guidance to decide whether to
take enforcement action. Our approach to enforcement decisions, including the role of guidance can be
found on the HSE website - How we regulate health and safety law (hse.gov.uk).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current legislative requirements and expected industry standards for welfare provision
and transport safety are well known and there is a significant amount of supporting guidance to enable
duty holder compliance.

Where suitable welfare facilities are provided, and their use is appropriately managed by duty holders,
and adequate controls are in place to ensure the safe movement of vehicles, tragic incidents like this
should be prevented.

I hope the above shows that the guidance provided by HSE provides a range of resources that are
readily available to support the successful management of the risk from vehicle movements and
inadequate welfare on construction sites.

It is also to be noted that this incident has been widely reported in the construction industry press.

I trust my response has been of use and am happy to help explain any of the contents of this letter
should you require me to.

I would like to reassure the family of Mr McAuley that HSE will seek to share the lessons learned from
this tragedy to inform duty holders of these risks and prevent a reoccurrence.

Yours faithfully

Head of Construction Sector

3

Related reports

More reports categorised “Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths”

See all →

Track Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.