Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0431, written 27 Jun 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Jun 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0431 |
| Deceased | Emily Collishaw |
| Coroner | Andrew Harris |
| Coroner area | Outer South London |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Organisation named | Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust · South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. NHS England 2. Minister for Public Health, Department of Health & Social Care 3. Parliamentary Under Secretary for local government funding, Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities 4. SE London Integrated Care Board 1 CORONER I am Andrew Harris, assistant coroner for the coroner area of Outer South London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 21 September 2023 an investigation was commenced into the death of Emily Rose Collishaw, aged 35. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18 June 2024. The medical cause of death was recorded at inquest as Sudden Unexplained Death in Alcohol Misuse. The narrative conclusion read: Alcohol Related Death: Neither intoxication nor ketoacidosis were the direct cause of death. she was recovering from a recent high alcohol intake and probably died from an associated arrhythmia. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH As recorded on the Record of Inquest: Emily was found dead with rigor mortis in her flat on Wednesday 6th September 2023 in non suspicious circumstances. She was suffering from alcohol dependency, drinking several bottles of wine daily. She had begun treatment for substance misuse with Pier Road Project in December 2022, having regular contact with a key worker. In June 2023 Bexley Home Treatment Team managed her mental health care, following admission to hospital with injuries from a fall, whilst intoxicated. Her family felt that she was not competent to self discharge, a view not supported by a psychiatrist. Clinical staff visited and she was often intoxicated until discharge from their care on 4th July to Pier Road Project. She was referred for in patient rehabilitation suitability assessment, but a placement was not available until November 2023. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1 1. Emily’s mother reported that it took some time for the organizations working with her daughter to agree their roles and that the degree of support was insufficient to maintain her physical health or promote abstinence over such a long period of six months before she died. The family felt that the referral for residential care should have been made earlier, especially as her housing situation was a risk to her health. It was accepted that Emily did not engage consistently but did reduce intake on a number of occasions, only to relapse. 2. The inquest heard from professionals that the period of waiting for a residential rehabilitation placement was about three months, but could be as long as seven months. Evidence was heard from the manager of the Pier Project that the delay in accessing residential care had been progressively getting longer over the last 10 years, which posed risks such as sudden death to patients. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisations have the power to take such action. The increasing delays in accessing residential alcohol rehabilitation services is brought to the attention of organizations that commission and fund services. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 28 December 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: (mother) and South London & Maudsley NHS Trust (Pier Project) Oxleas NHS Trust (Bexley Home Treatment Team) Royal College of Psychiatrists (brother) The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 27 June 2024 Assistant Coroner Professor Andrew Harris 2
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health and Prevention at Department for Health and Social Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU Our ref: HM Coroner Andrew Harris South London Coroner’s Service, 2nd Floor, Davis House, Robert Street, Croydon CR0 1QQ By email: 2 October 2024 Dear Mr Harris, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 27th June 2024 sent to the Minister for Public Health, Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Emily Collishaw. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for Public Health and Prevention. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Emily Collishaw’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises the following concerns: 1. Emily’s mother reported that it took some time for the organizations working with her daughter to agree their roles and that the degree of support was insufficient to maintain her physical health or promote abstinence over such a long period of six months before she died. The family felt that the referral for residential care should have been made earlier, especially as her housing situation was a risk to her health. It was accepted that Emily did not engage consistently but did reduce intake on a number of occasions, only to relapse. 2. The inquest heard from professionals that the period of waiting for a residential rehabilitation placement was about three months but could be as long as seven months. Evidence was heard from the manager of the Pier Project that the delay in accessing residential care had been progressively getting longer over the last 10 years, which posed risks such as sudden death to patients. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with the Care Quality Commission to ensure we adequately address your concerns. My department recognises the need to improve specialist drug and alcohol treatment services. Additional funding has been available since 2022/23 for local authorities to improve the quality and capacity of drug and alcohol treatment, including inpatient detoxification and residential rehabilitation services, and an additional £266.7 million was made available to them this year. I am aware of variability across the country in access to inpatient detoxification and/or residential rehabilitation. To address this (as part of the increased funding provided since 2022/2023), combinations of ring-fenced funding, targets, additional guidance and targeted support have been used to improve capacity and quality of inpatient detoxification and residential rehabilitation. We also plan to publish further guidance for local areas on improving access to residential rehabilitation later this year. In London in 2021, following the steady closure of the city’s inpatient detoxification units due to increasing costs and an unsustainable spot purchase funding model, the PanLondon Inpatient Detoxification Programme was established to address the issue and an 11-bed unit in St Thomas’ hospital was opened. The unit provides a high level of care for a small cohort of people with complex needs. Work is currently underway, led by the London Regional Team of the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) to further develop sustainable inpatient detoxification provision in London. At a local level we would expect alcohol and drug treatment services to do what they can to minimise delays in accessing inpatient detoxification and residential rehabilitation, provide individual support to anyone waiting for it, and to regularly review their needs. The UK Clinical guidelines on alcohol treatment (to be published later this year) will include recommendations to promote this good practice. Guidance has been issued on the importance of integrated and co-ordinated care for people with co-occurring mental health and alcohol or drug conditions including NICE Guidance 58 and Better Care for people with co-occurring mental health and alcohol/ drug use conditions. OHID’s Commissioning Quality Standard provides guidance for service commissioners on improving services for people with co-occurring mental health and alcohol or drug conditions. Local services should work together so that people can access the help they need for both their mental health and their alcohol or drug use. We do, though, recognise that improvement is still needed across England, and OHID and NHSE will continue to work closely together to improve integrated and co-ordinated care for people with comorbidities, including co-occurring mental health conditions and alcohol and drug use conditions. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely,
Me Subject: FW: Death of Emily Rose Collishaw - Coroner's Reg. 28 report ref OFFICIAL Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 8:51 AM To Subject: RE: Death of Emily Rose Collishaw - Coroner's Reg. 28 report (Ref: | Dear Diane, Many thanks for sharing a copy of this coroner’s report into the death of Ms Emily Rose Collishaw. After reviewing the report, MHCLG officials do not consider that there is a specific policy angle here for us to respond to, solam writing to confirm that there will not be a response from this Department. | have informed the Department for Health and Social Care who will be the lead Department responding to this report. Thank you again, and please let me know if you have any questions. Best wishes, | a Ministry of Housing, Correspondence Unit Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government Communities & gov.uk/mhclg | @mhelg Local Government
Mr Andrew Harris
Assistant Coroner
South London Coroner’s Service
2nd Floor
Davis House
Robert Street
Croydon
CR0 1QQ
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
26/09/2024
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Emily Rose Collishaw
who died on Wednesday 6 September 2023.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 27
June 2024 concerning the death of Emily Rose Collishaw on 6 September 2023. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Emily’s family and loved ones. NHS England are
keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Emily’s care
have been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised the concern that the organisations working with Emily took time to
agree their different roles, that the level of support provided was insufficient and that
the referral for residential care should have been made earlier. You also raised that
the delay in accessing residential care has progressively been getting longer over the
past 10 years, which poses risks such as sudden death to patients.
NHS England has been engaging with South East London Integrated Care Board (SEL
ICB), who we note you have also sent your Report to. We are advised by SEL ICB
that Mental Health colleagues have reviewed Emily’s care and consider that there is
evidence of coordination between the Home Treatment Team and the Pier Road
Project (PRP) interface, to include joint visits and information sharing, as well as
consultation with the family. I would refer you to SEL ICB’s full response to your Report
for further information.
The PRP is commissioned locally by the Local Authority, London Borough of Bexley,
as is usual for drug and alcohol rehabilitation services for which responsibility sits with
local government, overseen by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). I
note that you have also addressed your Report to the DHSC, as well as the
Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and it would be more
appropriate for the government to comment on your concerns about wait times for
residential rehabilitation placements.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Emily,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.