Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Mavis Dewey

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0435, written 7 Aug 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report7 Aug 2024
Reference2024-0435
DeceasedMavis Dewey
CoronerSteve Eccleston
Coroner areaSouth Yorkshire (West)
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

1 

2 

3 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

The Chief Executive, Monarch Health Care C/O Heeley Bank Care Home, 

CORONER 

I am Steve Eccleston Assistant Coroner for South Yorkshire West  

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 8 April 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death 
of Mavis DEWEY. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 
07.08.24 The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative, namely: 

Mavis Dewey died on 29.03.24 at the Northern General Hospital Sheffield 
following a fall at the Heeley Bank Care Home Sheffield on the 23.03.24 when 
staff used incorrect equipment to help her stand in breach of her care plan. 
Her death was contributed to by neglect from Heeley Bank Care home. 

The Medical Cause of Death was: 

1a   Multiorgan failure   

1b   Covid 19 infection and open fracture of right proximal tibia and fibula 

1c    

 II    Alzheimer's Disease, Heart Failure 

On 07.08.24 I heard the inquest touching the death of Mavis Dewey.  Mavis 
was 89 years old and becoming frailer with a number of underlying health 
conditions. Her level of need was such that she required residential care which 
was provided by Heeley Bank Care Home in Sheffield. Mavis' needs were set 
out in her care plan and there was no dispute that, to be moved or mobilised, 
she required two members of staff to help her stand together with a standing 
aid and sling.  

On 23.03.24 Mavis was being assisted to stand by two members of staff in her 
own room. A stand aid was present in her room but so also was a Zimmer 
frame. It was not possible to establish how the Zimmer frame got there. 

Ms Davison for Monarch and Heeley Bank accepted that it was entirely 

  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 inappropriate for the two members of staff to use the Zimmer frame to help 
Mavis stand, but this is what they did. As she was being helped to stand, 
Mavis asked to use the toilet. One member of staff left her with her colleague 
and supported on the Zimmer frame. Mavis legs gave way and she fell to the 
floor sustaining a severe gash to her right leg.  

An ambulance was called, and she was taken to the Northern General 
Hospital Sheffield where a fracture to the right proximal tibia and fibula was 
identified together with a diagnosis of Covid 19. 

Despite appropriate care in hospital, Mavis did not recover and she died there 
on 29.03.23 
It remained unclear after evidence why the carers failed to comply with the 
care plan. I was taken to the care plan which was clear about how moving and 
handling should take place. The evidence from 
 was that no full 
reason was established as to why this happened. Rather, the fact was that the 
carers simply used the Zimmer frame which was to hand. She said that the 
carers had sufficient time to work with Mavis. I found that there was no good 
reason for what they did. This failure led directly to Mavis eventual death. 

In evidence it was stated by 
 that agency staff continued to fail to 
read care plans on occasion. This concerned me. The care plan sets out the 
essential requirements to ensure that a resident is safely cared for. I consider 
that if agency staff are not reading care plans then they may place residents at 
risk of harm or death just as Mavis was 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless 
action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  - 

(1) the admitted failure of agency staff, on occasion, to read care plans such 
that there can be confidence that residents are safe 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe 
you as the Chief Executive of the Monarch Group and operator of Heeley 
Bank Care Home have the power to take such action. 
YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 03.10.24. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 
COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons: 
, son of Mavis I have also sent it to The 
Director of Adult Social Care Sheffield Council and to the CQC as regulator 

5 

6 

7 

8 

 
 
 
  
  
  
 who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 
7 August 2024 

9 

Signature 

Steve Eccleston H.M Assistant Coroner for South Yorkshire (west)

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Monarch Healthcare (PDF)
Monarch

Healthcare
RECEIVED
{  19SEP 2024

| 29293 731 ¢ 24. Je

to “4. Sve Eccleskn .

Office of HM Coroner
The Medico-Legal Centre
Watery Street

Sheffield S3 7ES

Regulation 28 Report To Prevent Future Deaths

Date of Response: 14°" August 2024

1. Background

Following receipt of the Coroner's Inquest into the death of Mrs Mavis Dewey, we acknowledge and respect
the medical cause of death, reported by Steve Eccleston H.M. Assistant Coroner for South Yorkshire (west)
as follows:

e 1a Multi organ failure
e 1b Covid 19 and open fracture of right proximal tibia and fibula
e || Alzheimer’s Disease, Heart Failure

As stated in evidence, Monarch Healthcare (HB) Ltd accept the fact a carer directly employed at Heeley
Bank Care Home, and another carer regularly retained through the agency, neglected to follow direct
instructions clearly stated in Mrs Mavis Dewey’s care plan and culminating in her untimely death.

As also stated in evidence all staff, including regularly retained agency staff receive moving and handling
training and undergo practical assessment to ensure they are competent to carry out moving and handling
procedures. This training and assessment includes where to find the information relating to a resident's
care needs.

It was confirmed the 2 carers cited had received their training and assessment as follows:

Carer 1 (employed by Heeley Bank Care Home) received Moving and Handling training with sign off of
practical assessmenton 24/01/2024. She was due forher3 month competency assessment on 24/04/2024.

Carer 2 (retained by agency agreement) received Moving and Handling training with sign off for practical
assessment on 25/10/2023 and further competency assessment signed for on 06/02/2024

The above detail was taken fromthe home’s training matrix at the time of the investigation following Mrs
Dewey’s fall. Monarch Healthcare (HB) Ltd believes appropriate instruction and assessment was in place
and the accident occurred because the carers failed to adhereto the care plan and failed to carry out correct

Page 1of4

Heeley Bank Care Home | Heeley Bank Road | Sheffield | S2 3GL
www.monarchhealthcare.co.uk | Email: heeleybank@monarchhealthcare.co.uk | Tel: 0114 2245100 | Fax: 0114 2555803
registered in england no, 13239535

moving and handling techniques. Mrs Dewey’s care plan clearly stated a stand aid should be usedto assist
her to stand and further stated that a walking frame must not be used. The appropriate stand aid was
available in Mrs Dewey’s ensuite bathroom at the time it was required for use.

Following the accident, immediate action was taken to suspendboth carers, removing them fromthe home.
Appropriate HR procedures followed and neither carer returned to work at Heeley Bank Care Home, or for
any other Monarch Healthcare Service.

Areferralto the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) was submitted for carer 1and a requestto the agency
for carer 2 to undergo similar proceedings and to also be referred to the DBS.

Evidence during the inquest raised concern to the Coroner in respect of age ncy workers not always reading
residents’ care plans.

An explanation for this is that care plans are often lengthy and detailed documents. An agency carer may
be allocated to supporta number of residents during the working shift. It would not be possible for them
to read and remember the entire care plan for all residents they are expected to interact with and to provide
supportfor. We recognise this is a risk to residents if staff are not fully aware of a person’s specific needs.

2. Risk Mitigation

To mitigate this accepted risk the following processes were already in place for agency workers, (and
regularly employed staff) prior to 23% March 2024:

e Working with a preferred and limited number of agencies.

© Obtaining profiles for all agency workers and checking NMC PIN, references, DBS and training
status, prior to accepting and commencing the shift.

e Requesting agency workers who have worked in the home previously and who are reported as
knowledgeable and competent.

® Completingan Inductionto ensure the agency workeris familiar with the building, fire safety and
infection control procedures; also the correct use of the systems for safe medication administration
and care plans.

e Allocation of agency staff to work with an experienced member of the team for guidance.

e Access to Monarch Healthcare’s suite of training and competency assessments for regular agency
workers retained and working to Heeley Banks staff rota.

¢ Summary Care Plans are available to all staff via hand-held mobile point of care devices.

@ Summary Care Plans are available to all staff via electronic tablet devices located around the home
(larger viewing platform).

e Full Care Files are available to all staff via the nurses’ laptops.

© Handover Form — The document includes a photo of the resident, their room number and key
identifiable information, including their diagnoses and care needs. The Handover Form also
includes information about a resident’s recent presentation to impart between shifts.

e Manager walkarounds to monitor and complete spot checks.

e Regional Manager visits and clinical oversight. (Visits were increased to minimum 3 days/week
from January 2024 in conjunction with support from Sheffield Council and ICB.

e Adhocviewing of CCTV followinga fall in a communalarea, to establish cause and assess likelihood
of injury. Please note, this is in addition and does not replace the nurse examination or protocol
for actions to be taken following a fall.

The above actions have been reviewed and are confirmed as embedded into practice as of the date of
this report.

Page 2 of 4

Despite the above procedures in place and both carers having received training and confirming they were
familiar with Mrs Dewey’s moving and handling care plan, they chose not to follow it, for reasons we were
unable to fully establish during the pursuing investigation. For this reason the carer employed directly by
Monarch Healthcare was referred to the DBS as unsafe to continue practicing. Arequest was also made to
the agency for similar proceedings to take place.

3. Actions implemented

Following Mrs Dewey's accident and subsequent investigation, we implemented additional processes
between 23” March and 15t June 2024, for all staff:

e Key Care Plan details transferred to individual posters for display in residents’ bedraoms(on inside
of wardrobe door to maintain GDPR regulations for sensitive information).

e KeyCare Plan details transferred to ‘key chains’, issued to all staff on shift for easy reference and
planning of residents’ care.

e Reading out and reiterating each resident’s diagnoses and referencing key care and clinical needs,
including their moving and handling requirements, the equipment to be used (and not used),
number of staff and reminder of risks.

e {implementation of the Daily Clinical Oversight Form and increased management spot checks, to
report to Sheffield Council and ICB.

© Appointment of 2 Clinical Leads to provide guidance to the care and nursing teams and to complete
clinical governance and the Daily Clinical Oversight form.

The above actions have been reviewed and are embedded into practice as of the date of this report.
4. Further Actions to Prevent Future Deaths

Following the Coroner's Inquest on 7 August 2024, we further reviewed risks and are in the process of
implementing the following:

e A review and implementation of a new Clinical Oversight form to further breakdown
observations of moving and handling practice, to ensure robust recording of the observation.

e Regular observation of the CCTV to monitor staff carrying out moving and handling
procedures in communal areas, when they are not aware they are being watched. Trainers
also have access to CCTV footage to support completion of training needs analysis.

e Implementation of routine audit for checking residents’ bedrooms to ensure all required
equipment is in place and no surplus equipment is in the room.

e All staff to sign attendance to the handover meeting, as indicated on the handover form.

The timeframe for implementation of the above actions is 31°t August 2024.
The timeframe for review of the above actions is 30" September 2024

We deeply regret the accident and tragic consequences for Mavis and herfamily. Mavis was a much-loved
resident of Heeley Bank Care Home. She was a larger-than-life character known to all the team, as well as
to Senior Management and other visiting Monarch employees and external professionals. We miss her
banter, her expressionsand most of all her affection for everyone who cared forher. We again express our
sincere apologies to Mavis’ family for failing Mavis and for the loss of their trust.

Page 30f4

We wish to reassure all reading this report that we have reviewed our policies and procedures in depth and
also sought and acted upon advice and guidance from various professionals, and continue to do so.

The above response to the Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Death Reportis an accurate andtrue account
to the best of my knowledge.

Th
Signed: Date: 39 Avgrsh Zoey

Managing Director Monarch Care Group, on behalf Heeley Bank Care Home

Page 4of 4

Related reports

Other reports by Steve Eccleston

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.