Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0447, written 13 Aug 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 13 Aug 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0447 |
| Deceased | Daphne Austin |
| Coroner | Robert Cohen |
| Coroner area | Cumbria |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Kally Cheema LLB | Senior Coroner | Cumbria
Fairfield, Station Road, Cockermouth, Cumbria CA13 9PT
Tel:
| Email:
Case Ref:
8 August 2024
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Trust
CORONER
I am Robert Cohen HM Assistant Coroner for Cumbria
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 22 June 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Daphne Gillian AUSTIN.
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 8th August 2024. The conclusion
of the inquest was a narrative.
I found that the medical cause of death was:
1a Urosepsis and Acute Kidney Injury
1b
1c
II Right cerebral Infarct
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
1
2
3
4
Ms Austin was 71 years old. She suffered from diabetes. On 22nd May 2023 Ms Austin
was admitted to the Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle. She had had a stroke. Whilst in
hospital, Ms Austin's glucose levels were poorly controlled. She also became dehydrated.
Ms Austin's fluid balance was not monitored in an effective manner. On 14th June 2023 it
became apparent that Ms Austin had sustained an acute kidney injury. Blood testing was
not carried out on 15th or 16th June, it is more likely than not that this was because of
industrial action by junior doctors. On 17th June 2023, Ms Austin's condition deteriorated
and it became apparent that she had developed sepsis. Despite treatment, Ms Austin
2023.
died
condition
result
June
18th
that
on
as
of
a
Neglect (being the ineffective monitoring of Ms Austin's fluid balance and the fact that
blood testing was not carried out on 15th or 16th June 2023) contributed to Ms Austin's
death.
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
(1) I received evidence of the planning that had gone into preparing the trust for strikes.
However, there was evidence from one of the Trust's consultants that on the day of the
strike she had to "look after nearly 25 patients" and that "due to the junior doctor’s strike
on 14/06/2023, Mrs Austin did not receive any medical input that day". Another consultant
gave evidence that despite being listed as one of the consultants covering the unit (in the
contingency planning evidence) he was probably dealing with other duties on that day. In
the circumstances I am concerned that the planning that seeks to ensure safe levels of
cover during periods of industrial action was insufficient to meet need and that this gave
rise to a risk of future deaths.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you North
Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Trust have the power to take such action.
5
6
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 8th October 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
7
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the family of Ms Austin. I
have also sent it to the Secretary of State for Health and the British Medical Association
who may find it useful or of interest given the potential national aspects of these
concerns.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
13 August 2024
Signature
Robert Cohen HM Assistant Coroner for Cumbria
8
9
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Your ref:
Our ref:
07 October 2024
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
Mr Robert Cohen
Fairfield
Station Road
Cockermouth
Cumbria
CA13 9PT
Via email only:
Dear Mr Cohen
Re: North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust’s (“the Trust”) Regulation 28
Response concerning the Inquest into the death of Ms Gillian Austin
I write following the inquest that you resumed on 08/08/2024 into the death of Ms Gillian Austin
at the Coroner’s Court in Cockermouth. You concluded that Ms Austin sadly died on
18/06/2023 at the Cumberland Infirmary in Carlisle with a medical cause of death as:
1a Urosepsis and Acute Kidney Injury
II Right cerebral Infarct
A Narrative Conclusion was recorded, together with a finding of Neglect.
During the inquest, you commended the excellent work the Trust had undertaken in improving
fluid balance management and were reassured that your duty to issue a Regulation 28 Report
in this regard was not triggered. The Trust remains committed to ensuring that staff
understand that the assessment and management of patients’ fluid and electrolyte needs is
absolutely fundamental to providing good patient care. Healthcare professionals need to
consider this as part of every review to reduce the potential serious impact of inadequate fluid
balance on all our patients. An urgent patient safety alert was therefore issued to all Trust
staff on 30/08/2024 that as a minimum requirement, the following group of adult patients all
have a Fluid Balance Chart completed, reviewed and acted upon as needed:
•
•
•
All non-elective inpatients
Elective patients who have a length of stay >24 hours
Patients who have an alteration in their NEWS score
The cessation of this monitoring should only occur following a documented clinical decision.
The Nursing Directorate will be monitoring compliance with this notice. In addition to the
urgent patient safety alert, a Trust wide improvement plan for fluid/hydration is being launched.
Notwithstanding this, the Trust’s written witness evidence set out that one Consultant
(Consultant A) covered 25 patients on 14/06/2023 during Ms Austin’s admission, during a
period of industrial action, and that due to the industrial action, Ms Austin did not receive any
medical input on 14/06/2023. The inquest also heard that another Consultant (Consultant B)
who was rostered to ensure medical cover on the ward on 14/06/2023, may not have been on
duty in line with the rota. You were concerned that the Trust’s planning which seeks to ensure
safe levels of cover during periods of industrial action, was insufficient to meet the need, and
that this may lead to future deaths if action is not taken by the Trust. Your statutory duty to
issue a Regulation 28 Report to the Trust was therefore engaged.
I was extremely saddened to learn of the circumstances surrounding Ms Austin’s death and
on behalf of the Trust, I wish to extend my sincere condolences to her family and friends.
I am grateful to you for raising your concerns to me. It is imperative to the Trust that safety
issues are identified and rectified to ensure our services are safe and effective. Please accept
this letter as the Trust’s formal response to the Regulation 28 Report.
To ensure a thorough review of Ms Austin’s care and the concerns raised within the Regulation
28 Report, the Trust has reviewed the following:
ICE system for requesting bloods and reviewing results
The Trust’s witness evidence to the inquest
Ms Austin’s medical records
WebV nursing documentation
Collaborative (formerly known as Care Groups) industrial action strike plan
Trust industrial action strike plan
June 2023 staffing rota, including industrial action confirmed staffing plans
Review of quarterly weekend staffing at that time, in order to obtain an average
Industrial action logs
indication of weekend staffing
Preparation for industrial action
The Trust would like to offer assurance of the planning process undertaken before the
proposed industrial action on 14/06/2023 to 16/06/2023, which includes utilising the framework
for managing industrial action. The priorities were to maintain patient safety and access to
services, and to identify the level of service disruption and risk. An initial planning meeting
was undertaken on 25/05/2023 which informed all Senior Managers and Clinical Directors of
the confirmed industrial action and the impact that the Trust would be required to navigate,
namely the lack of Foundation Doctor in training availability during this period. Staff from
across the Trust were contacted to ask if they would be able to support and Consultants from
other services, including in the community were available to be redeployed to other areas.
There were offers of clinical skills updates if required, to ensure that individuals working
outside their usual clinical area were confident. The key services that were required to be
maintained were identified and risk assessments were undertaken for services that needed to
be cancelled, in order to free up medical and support staff to work in other areas.
Daily meetings were subsequently held for a two week period up to 13/06/2023, to effectively
plan for this period of disruption. Planning meetings were chaired by the Resilience Team
with attendance including Executive Directors, a senior member of the Medical Directorate
team, Care Group Senior Managers, Support Team managers, People Services and
Communications. Rotas were reviewed by each Care Group, with contingency plans in place
to ensure service continuity; namely that Consultants were covering designated ward areas
with the support of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) members such as Advanced Clinical
Practitioners (ACPs), and Specialist Nurses. ACPs are highly trained individuals, in this
instance, from a nursing background and have developed skills to allow them to offer clinical
support in expanded roles. ACPs are deployed across various settings within the Trust within
the composite workforce model and are able to work autonomously, utilising advanced
practice and skills to support patients with complex clinical needs.
The planning was agreed with a collaborative approach across all services, including the
Executive Medical Director and Executive Chief Nurse. It was understood that due to the
predicted impact of the industrial action, medical cover during this time would not be at usual
weekday levels, but was representative of usual weekend cover.
A daily situational report was expected to be completed which updated the Trust on the staff
group affected, number of team members striking, actions taken short of a strike, and the
impact on the service, for example any delays to diagnosis, treatment or discharge. A risk
assessment was also completed to support with risk identification and mitigation plans. All
Care Groups were represented at the below meetings, whereby escalations, updates and
situational reports were provided by all affected Care Groups:
Situational updates during the period of Industrial Action were provided on:
14/06/2023
15/06/2023
16/06/2023
Tactical Co-ordination Group 08:15 and 13:00
Strategic Co-ordination Group 10:00 and 16:00
Tactical Co-ordination Group 08:15 and 13:00
Strategic Co-ordination Group 10:00 and 16:00
Tactical Co-ordination Group 08:15 and 13:00
Strategic Co-ordination Group 10:00 and 16:00
During this period of industrial action, as would be expected, there was reduced medical cover
available, however, this was reflected throughout the medical wards and the Collaborative can
confirm that no other incidents, other than the case of Ms Austin, were reported at this time,
during the period of industrial action.
To support with any escalations that may have required attention during the industrial action
period, Operational Managers were assigned to dedicated areas and tasked to liaise with the
ward teams (this would include the Consultants, ACPs, Specialist Nurses, and other members
of the MDT covering the wards) on a daily basis, and to escalate any unresolved concerns
raised through the Tactical Co-ordination Group. The rota for this has been reviewed and we
can confirm that no concerns were raised from any of the Elm A team during this period of
industrial action.
Following the period of Industrial Action, a debrief was led by the Resilience Team, during
which all Care Groups had the opportunity to share any learning from the period. No concerns
were escalated to the debrief regarding the planned staffing mitigation plan. Had escalations
been made to the Tactical Co-ordination Group and/or during the debrief, this would have
been acted upon.
Detailed staffing plans for the Stroke Unit
Specifically focussing on the provision of stroke care during the industrial action, as an
overview, the Stroke Unit at the Cumberland Infirmary comprises a 10 bedded Hyper Acute
Stroke Unit (HASU) and a 33 bedded Stroke Rehabilitation ward (Elm A). Both units are
staffed separately due to the acuity of the patient cohort. Although staffed separately, the
HASU is located within the same footprint as Elm A and staff are able to move between the
departments as required.
The usual medical staffing for the HASU from Monday to Friday is:
1 Consultant 09:00 – 17:00
Minimum of 2 Advanced Clinical Practitioners (ACPs)/Trainee ACPs 09:00 – 17:00
1 Foundation Doctor in training also covering Elm A and Elm C (Elderly Care ward)
1 Foundation Doctor in training also covering Elm A, Elm C and Larch C (Elderly Care
17:00 – 21:00
wards) 21:00 – 09:00
The usual staffing for Elm A ward from Monday to Friday is:
1 Consultant 09.00 to 17.00
1 Specialist Trainee Doctor Year 3 09.00 to 17.00
4 to 6 Foundation Doctors in training 09:00 – 17:00
1 Foundation Doctor in training also covering HASU and Elm C (17:00 – 21:00)
1 Foundation Doctor in training also covering HASU, Elm C and Larch C (Elderly Care
wards) 21:00 – 09:00
The usual weekend cover for Elm A and HASU (combined) is:
1 Consultant 09.00 – 15.00, based on HASU but available for Elm A should there be
an escalation which requires expert decision maker review
1 Foundation Doctor in training on Elm A
2 ACPs on HASU
During the period of industrial action (Wednesday 14/06/2023 to Friday 16/06/2023), it is
recorded that approximately 78% of Foundation Doctors in training rostered to work on a
specialist medical ward at the Cumberland Infirmary opted to take strike action, as is their
right. During the same period, 100% of the Foundation Doctors in training rostered to work
on Elm A between the hours of 09:00 and 21:00 took strike action. As a result, medical cover
on Elm A during this period did not fully replicate the rota compared to when there are resident
doctors present.
An alternative rota was comprised of the composite workforce of individuals skilled and trained
in the care of stroke patients. The rota was agreed at the Trust tactical planning meeting and
was felt to be safe. The ward had Consultant cover between the hours of 09:00 – 21:00 on
all days of the industrial action, therefore the Trust was assured of senior medical oversight,
supported by Specialist Nurses and ACPs.
There were no concerns regarding staffing levels overnight (21:00 – 09:00). To note, other
support services available to support if required or escalated to included wrap around services
of Phlebotomy, Critical Care and the Hospital at Night Team.
The staffing during the period of industrial action was as follows:
Wednesday 14/06/2023 09:00 – 17:00
Consultant A on Elm A (Stroke Rehabilitation patients)
Consultant B – carrying out an outpatient clinic for urgent patients (morning only)
Consultant C on Elm A (Neuro Rehabilitation patients)
Consultant D on HASU with 1 Trainee ACP HASU
Consultants A and C were supported by two Trainee ACPs, a nursing team, and
Consultant B was available if required
The ACPs on duty during the strike period were in training, therefore were not qualified
to work independently or carry out the full range of duties expected of a qualified ACP,
however were under the supervision of a Consultant.
Consultant B was on site on 14/06/2023 and was undertaking an urgent clinic in the morning
assessing acute neurovascular cases who are required to be seen within 24 hours of symptom
onset. All other non-urgent clinics within stroke were cancelled in order to ensure Consultants
were available for ward cover. However, Consultant B was available to support the ward
teams if concerns had been escalated. We have been unable to evidence any escalations
made on this day that would have necessitated Consultant B to attend the ward to provide
support.
Between the hours of 17:00 and 21:00, Consultant D was on site providing medical cover to
patients on Elm A and HASU.
Thursday 15/06/2023 09:00 – 17:00
Consultant A on Elm A (Stroke Rehabilitation patients)
Consultant C on Elm A (Neuro Rehabilitation patients)
Consultants A and C were supported by 1 Trainee Advanced Clinical Practitioner
(ACP) and 1 Advanced Nurse Specialist in the afternoon (available if required in the
morning) and a nursing team
Consultant D on HASU with 2 Trainee ACPs
Between the hours of 17:00 and 21:00, Consultant C was on site providing medical cover to
patients on Elm A and HASU.
Friday 16/06/2023 09:00 – 17:00
Consultant A on Elm A (Stroke Rehabilitation patients)
Consultant A was supported by 1 Trainee ACP and 1 Advanced Nurse Specialist in
the afternoon (available in the morning) if required and a nursing team
Consultant D on HASU with 2 Trainee ACPs
Between the hours of 17:00 and 21:00, Consultant A was on site providing medical cover to
patients on Elm A and HASU.
For overnight provision throughout the period of industrial action, Elm A and HASU were
covered by 1 Foundation doctor in training and 1 contactable Medical Registrar (Specialist
Trainee). In total, overnight provision across the 8 medical wards was 2 junior doctors and 1
Consultant, which was greater than in normal circumstances when no industrial action was
ongoing. Usual overnight provision across the 8 medical wards is 2 Foundation doctors in
training and 1 contactable Medical Registrar.
The staffing plans were devised with the operational teams working closely with the senior
clinical staff to determine what cover was needed. The Emergency Care and Medicine Care
Group’s (subsequently known as a Collaborative) confirmed the staffing plan, detailing the
staff rosters for 14 to 17/06/2023, was submitted to the Resilience Team, Associate Medical
Director and Associate Director of Operations on Monday 05/06/2023. To note, the plan
initially detailed just 1 Consultant working on Elm A on 14/06/2023, however, as documented,
the Care Group were able to provide 2 Consultants on this day.
The staffing plan was discussed throughout the tactical planning meetings, led by the
Resilience Team with attendance by a number of senior clinical and non-clinical managers in
the weeks before industrial action took place. Whilst it was recognised that medical staffing
across all of the medical wards was anticipated to be significantly impacted by the industrial
action, all wards were covered by at least 1 Consultant during the core hours of 09:00 – 17:00
(with usual out of hours Consultant cover in place) and some mitigations from other staff
groups (i.e specialist nurses and ACPs). This was not deemed to be unsafe.
Learning
The Trust has reviewed the planning process and staffing plans and is satisfied that it ensures
safe levels of cover during periods of industrial action to meet need, and that this does not
give rise to a risk of future deaths. The process and plans will therefore be maintained during
any future periods of industrial action. However, despite the Trust’s robust framework in
ensuring appropriate medical cover during periods of industrial action, the Trust has identified
areas of learning which could contribute to the Trust’s resilience:
1. The Ward Teams to embed extraordinary safety huddles twice daily during periods of
industrial action to allow MDT members to attend and discuss concerns/escalations.
2. Operational Teams/Matrons to embed twice daily touch bases with each ward area,
to support and address any areas of
industrial action,
during periods of
concern/escalation.
Whilst the Trust already had robust systems in place for Operational Managers to visit areas
affected by industrial action and groups for any concerns to be escalated to, the additional
safety MDT huddles and twice daily visits from the Operational Teams/Matrons, provides an
additional forum/opportunity for concerns/escalations to be made, and highlights the
importance to the MDT of doing so.
In view of the Trust’s assurance that there is safe levels of cover during periods of industrial
action to meet patient needs, the Trust is satisfied that this did not cause or contribute to any
missed opportunities within Ms Austin’s care. However, the Trust unreservedly acknowledges
that there is a need to establish what the causal and/or contributory factors were in Ms Austin
not receiving medical input and basic, fundamental observations and interventions during her
hospital admission. The Trust will therefore carry out a review into this to identify any learning
and take immediate action to embed the learning to prevent recurrence and ensure that the
care we provide is safe, effective, and of a high quality.
Once again, thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I hope that the above
provides assurance to you, Ms Austin’s family, and the public, that the Trust has taken them
seriously and appropriate action is being taken.
I appreciate not all of the actions are yet implemented and I would be happy to provide updates
on these in the future, should you require this. Please also let me know if you require clarity
on any of the responses I have provided above.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
For and on behalf of North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.