Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0221, written 14 Apr 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 14 Apr 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0221 |
| Deceased | James Stewart |
| Coroner | Robert Cohen |
| Coroner area | Cumbria |
| Organisation named | North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Miss K J Gomersal LLB | Senior Coroner | Cumbria
HM Coroner's Courts, Allerdale House, Workington, Cumbria CA14 3YJ
| Web: hmcoronercumbria.org.uk
Case Ref:
14 April 2026
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation
Trust
1) CORONER
I am Mr Robert Cohen, HM Assistant Coroner for Cumbria
2) CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
3) INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 3 January 2025 an investigation was commenced into the death of James Patrick. The
conclusion of the inquest was:
Suicide.
Mr Stewart's death was contributed to by neglect, being the decision to prematurely
discharge him and the failure to intervene when concerns were raised as to his safety prior to
his discharge.
I found that the medical cause of death was:
1a Multiorgan Failure
1b Cardiac Arrest
1c Hanging
II
4) CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
My conclusions as to the circumstances of Mr Stewart's death were as follows:
James Stewart was 52 years old. He had a past medical history of mental illness and drug
and alcohol abuse. On 21st December 2024 he came to the notice of Cumbria Police and
made threats to harm himself. He was detained under the Mental Health Act. It was identified
that Mr Stewart was also in alcohol withdrawal and he was admitted to the Cumberland
Infirmary. His initial period of detention under the Mental Health Act expired. Thereafter, Mr
Stewart continued to express a settled intention to harm himself. He was detained under
section 5 of the Mental Health Act but it was then determined that detention was not required
and that he would remain in hospital voluntarily for alcohol detoxification. A decision was
made to discharge Mr Stewart on 26th December 2025. This was premature: Mr Stewart was
still suffering from the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal, had not been reassessed by the
Psychiatric Liaison Team, and required ongoing treatment. Mr Stewart had understood that
transport would be provided to return him to his home in Wales, but the hospital did not
consider that this was necessary or appropriate. Mr Stewart went to leave the hospital. As he
did so he made a gesture indicating an intention to hang himself. Despite a Health Care
Assistant raising concerns, the discharge continued. Mr Stewart went to a nearby hotel where
he placed a ligature around his neck and rendered himself unconscious. He was found and
returned to the hospital, but had sustained catastrophic injuries which were incompatible with
life. Mr Stewart's death was confirmed at 2:10 on 27th December 2024.
5) CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
(1) I heard evidence from a Flow Coordinator who was responsible for taking the practical
steps to arrange a patient's discharge after the treating clinicians had determined that the
patient was medically fit. I understand that the Flow Coordinator is to make the necessary
logistical arrangements for discharge, not to decide whether discharge is appropriate.
However, the evidence was that the Flow Coordinator would not necessarily be briefed on
any particular vulnerabilities that a patient had. For instance, in this instance Mr Stewart had
made repeated threats to harm himself, including on the railway, which the Flow Coordinator
did not know of. She considered making arrangements for him to travel home by train, which
might have been especially risky. Whilst these matters did not eventuate in this inquest, I
consider that not giving Flow Coordinators information about patient vulnerability risks them
making unsuitable arrangements.
6) ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you North
Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust have the power to take such action.
7) YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 10th June 2026 . I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8) COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the Interested Persons. I am also
under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
14 April 2026
Signature
Robert Cohen HM Assistant Coroner for Cumbria
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Thursday, 04 June 2026 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Robert Cohen HM Assistant Coroner for Cumbria HM Coroner's Courts Allerdale House Workington Cumbria CA14 3YJ Dear Mr Cohen Re: North Cumbria Integrated Care’s Regulation 28 Response and Action Plan Concerning the Inquest into the death of James Patrick Stewart I write following the inquest held on 13 and 14 April 2026 into the death of Mr James Stewart. You concluded that Mr Stewart died on 27 December 2024 at the Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, Cumbria. The medical cause of death was recorded as: 1a Multiorgan Failure 1b Cardiac Arrest 1c Hanging You further concluded that Mr Stewart died due to suicide, contributed to by neglect, specifically the premature decision to discharge him and the failure to intervene when concerns were raised regarding his safety prior to discharge. During the inquest, you identified matters of concern which give rise to a risk of future deaths unless action is taken. In accordance with your statutory duty, you issued a Regulation 28 Report to the Trust. On behalf of the Trust, I would like to reiterate our sincere condolences to Mr Stewart’s family. We recognise the profound impact of his death. For completeness, I would note that the Trust’s learning response completed in January 2025 was based on the contemporaneous evidence available at the time, including accounts from staff directly involved in Mr Stewart’s care. These accounts did not indicate that an explicit expression of intent to end his life by hanging had been escalated immediately prior to discharge. Notwithstanding this, I acknowledge your careful consideration of the evidence and accept the seriousness of your findings. The Trust has undertaken extensive reflection on the circumstances of Mr Stewart’s care, and is fully committed to ensuring that the learning identified is embedded into clinical practice and operational delivery. Pillars Building, Cumberland Infirmary, Infirmary Street, Carlisle, Cumbria, CA2 7HY Safe, high quality care every time Matters of Concern and Trust Response - Information available to Flow Coordinators You raised concern regarding the adequacy of information provided to Flow Coordinators in relation to patient vulnerability, and the associated risk of inappropriate discharge arrangements. I recognise that Flow Coordinators fulfil a non-clinical coordination role once a patient has been deemed medically fit by registered clinical professionals for discharge. However, I accept that this function requires sufficient awareness of relevant risks, particularly where patients present with vulnerability, mental health needs, or safeguarding concerns. Actions Taken and Planned 1. Flow Coordinator Role and Discharge Processes I have commissioned a review of the Band 4 Flow Coordinator role and associated discharge processes. This includes: • Clarification of role scope, responsibilities, and accountability • Strengthening the flow of relevant clinical and risk information during discharge coordination • Clear escalation expectations where vulnerabilities or risks are identified • Reinforcement that discharge decisions remain clinically led and have a multidisciplinary approach 2. Transport and Discharge Arrangements I have commissioned a review of discharge transport and planning processes, with particular focus on vulnerable patients. This includes: • Clarification of roles and responsibilities for transport decisions • Strengthened escalation pathways where transport arrangements present risk • Enhanced documentation of agreed arrangements and contingency planning This work is intended to ensure that discharge coordination is supported by appropriate risk awareness and system oversight. While I recognise that the following was not identified by you as a matter of concern within your Regulation 28 report, I note your findings that Mr Stewart’s discharge was premature, as he was still suffering from the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. We have therefore identified the following actions to address this and to reduce the risk of recurrence: 3. Alcohol Withdrawal and Detoxification Guidance A full review of Trust guidance relating to alcohol withdrawal and detoxification has been initiated. This includes: • Clear expectations for discharge decision making during detoxification • Defined escalation requirements where Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA-Ar) scores remain elevated or fluctuate • Guidance on involvement of specialist mental health or liaison services 4. Assurance of CIWA-Ar Scoring and Clinical Response We are strengthening audit and assurance processes relating to CIWA-Ar scoring, including: • Accuracy and consistency of scoring and documentation • Timeliness of reassessment • Clinical response and escalation to elevated scores • Oversight of discharge decisions where withdrawal symptoms persist Learning from this work is being embedded through governance and clinical education structures. Learning from this case will continue to be shared across the organisation through governance and leadership forums. Key areas of focus include: • Early recognition and escalation of patient safety concerns • Strengthening multidisciplinary challenge and professional curiosity • Communication and coordination at the point of discharge • Management of co-existing physical health, alcohol dependence, and mental health risks • Standards of documentation and escalation recording I want to assure you that the Trust has given careful and thorough consideration to the concerns raised within your Regulation 28 Report. We are taking forward a programme of work designed to deliver sustainable improvement and reduce the risk of future harm. I will continue to oversee this work through our governance framework and ensure that patient safety remains central to our organisational priorities. I hope this response provides assurance that the matters identified have been taken seriously and that meaningful action is being undertaken. Yours sincerely, Deputy Chief Executive, Executive Medical Director and Responsible Officer North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust Ref Action 1 Implement process for risk sharing clinical information during discharge coordination and led ensure MDT- discharge all for patients. This includes mental health services. incident Strengthen reporting and management process in relation to mental health patients to allow of triangulation and information escalation of risk Trust wide learning shared Lead Collaborative Lead Nurse Emergency Care Timescale 31/08/2026 Assurance / Monitoring Emergency Care Collaborative Workforce Group to Evidence of Completion Update discharge documentation include: - Mental health section. Has involvement the patient had any in mental health services during their admission or inpatient stay. If patient has been involved in mental health services – consider a referral to PLT prior to discharge. - Patient System Manager Safety 31/10/2026 Incident reporting and management floor walk and engagement training. Delivering Quality Safety Group and Training record. Corporate Manager Risk 31/05/2026 Patient Safety Group 2 3 Pillars Building, Cumberland Infirmary, Infirmary Street, Carlisle, Cumbria, CA2 7HY Safe, high quality care every time
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.