Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Hannah Jacobs

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0465, written 20 Aug 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 Aug 2024
Reference2024-0465
DeceasedHannah Jacobs
CoronerShirley Radcliffe
Coroner areaEast London
CategoryChild Death (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

DR  SHIRTEY  RADCTIFFE

ASSISTANT  CORONER

EAST  TONDON

East London Coroner's  Court,  Queens Road Walthamstow,  E17 8QP

Telephone 

 Email 

REGULATION 28: REPORT  TO PREVENT FUTURE  DEATHS (1)

REGULATION  28 REPORT  TO PREVENT  FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT  TO:

Ref: 

1. 

2. 

SocialCare
Sent  via email: 

Sent  via email:

1 CORONER

,  Secretary of State for Dept.  Health  &

of State for Education

I am Dr Shirley Radcliffe  assistant coroner,  for the coroner area of East  London

2 CORONER'S  LEGAL  POWERS

I rnake this report  under paragraphT,  Schedule 5, of the Coroners and  Justice
Act 2009  and Regulations  28 and 29 of the Coroners (lnvestigations)  Regulations
2013.
http://www.  leeislatío  n.eov. u k/u kpea/2009/25lsched  ule/S/pa  raera  ph/7
http://www.lesislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013  / 1629 / part/7 / made

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 17th February 2023  I commenced an investigatíon  into the death of Miss
Hannah Eniola  Angela  Ayomipo Jacobs aged 13 years. The investigation
concluded at the end of the inquest  on 19th August  2024. The conclusion of the
inquest  was a narrative  conclusion:

On 8th February 2023  Hannah  was served  a dairy hot chocolate at Costa Coflee
Barking  despite her mother informing  staff  of a dairy allergy. Neither  she nor her
mother  were carrying  an Epi-pen  which had been  prescribed. Next,  they  went to

1

 the dentist  where Hannah  took some  sips of her drink and  developed  symptoms
of excessive  saliva. During  the brief time  they  were at the  dental  surgery it was
not recognised  that  this was the beginning  of an anaphylactic  reaction. Hannah
and  her mother  rushed  to the Day and Night  pharmacy  where Hannah  collapsed
LAS attended promptly,  began  resuscitation,  and took her  to Newham University
Hospitalwhere  she was pronounced  dead  the  same  day.

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Hannah  was 13 years old and had  been  diagnosed  with severe  allergies  to eggs,
wheat and dairy milk. She was prescribed  an Epi-pen  and  antihistamines  to
manage  her allergy.

On Bth February  2023  she was going  to school  after  a dental  appointment.  She
was accompanied by her mother.  Neither  of them  carried an EpiPen  with  them.
The  school kept 2 at the school  and if Hannah  went in with one  it would be
confiscated  for the  duration  of the  day.

Hannah  and  her mother  went into Costa  Coffee  Station Road  Barking just  before
11am on 8th February  2023.They had done  this before  with no problems.  As
usual  her mother  ordered  2 soya milk  hot chocolate drinks.  There  was a lack  of
communication between  the mother  and the barista.  The barista  acknowledged
that  she heard that Hannah  had an allergy  but did not  follow  the correct procedure
in place, which  was to show  them  the allergy book  kept  at the till and clarify  which
drink  they could  safely have.

Hannah  and her mother  were served  dairy milk hot chocolates.

They  took  them into the dental practice  and  at 10.59  Hannah  took 3 sips and felt
unwell.  She went into the toilet and  rang her mother  by mobile  phone  and
informed  her she didn't  think the  drink  was made with soya milk. When  she came
out of the toilet  and went up to the dentist,  she was spitting out what seemed
excessive  saliva.  She then refused  the treatment, left the dentist's room to go
back to the toilet. Her  mother  followed shortly  after  and  decided  to go the
pharmacy  opposite  to get some antihistamines.  The entered the pharmacy  at
11.11 am  and  as they  did, Hannah  collapsed  to the floor. Her  mother  asked  for
cetirizine  which had  previously  helped  before. lt was given  to no effect.  An EpiPen
was requested but due  to a national  shortage of adrenaline auto injectors  the
pharmacist  had only 1 paediatric  injector  which  was of an insufficient  dosage.
However,  it was given,  and the LAS were called.  They attempted  to resuscitate
Hannah  but she  died  at Newham University  Hospital  as a result  of anaphylaxis
due to consumption of dairy.

5 CORONER'S  CONCERNS

During  the course  of the inquest  the evidence  revealed matters  giving  rise to
concern. ln my opinion  there is a risk that future deaths could  occur  unless  action
is taken. ln the circumstances it is my statutory  to

The MATTERS OF CONCERN  are as follows

a

a

Hannah  was regularly prescribed Epi-pens  (AAl) and had 2 at home  and
2 at school.  There  was  no consideration about how to contain  the risk of
anaphylaxis  on the journey to and from school.

Her  paediatrician  gave  evidence at the inquest  and  acknowledged it was
a difficult issue  as the pens  can be misused,  lost, forgotten, leaving  an
absence  of pens  at home  at the weekend.  However,  the largest  cause of
mortality  in anaphylaxis is the absence  of a readily  available  adrenaline
autoiniector.

2

 a

The risk  of future deaths in the  context  of anaphylaxis remain in the
absence  of an appropriate structure  to educate  the school, patients  and
the  parents  of the importance  of carrying  an AAI on their way to and from
school.

6 ACTION  SHOULD  BE TAKEN

ln my opinion  action should be taken to prevent  future deaths and I believe  you
IAND/OR  your organisation] have  the power  to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under  a duty  to respond  to this report  within 56 days  of the  date  of this
report,  namely by 1Sth  October  2024.1,  the coroner, may  extend  the period.

Your response must  contain  details of action  taken  or proposed  to be taken,
setting  out  the  timetable  for action. Otherwise  you must  explain  why no action is
proposed.

I

COPIES  and PUBLIGATION

I have  sent  a copy of my report  to the Chief Coroner  and  to the following
lnterested Persons Hannah's  family,  FSA,  Costa  Coffee,  SBR  Trading Royal  Free
NHS Trust,  LBBD,  to the Child Death  Overview Panel  (CDOP) (where  the
deceased  was under 18). I have also  sent it to the local  Director  of Public Health
who may find it useful  or of interest.

I am also under  a duty  to send a copy  of your response  to the Chief  Coroner and
all interested  persons  who in my opinion  should receive it.

I may also  send a copy of your response  to any other person  who  I believe may
find it useful  or of interest.

The Chief Coroner may  publish  either or both  in a complete or redacted  or
summary  form. He may  send a copy of this report  to any person  who he believes
may find it useful  or of interest.

You may  make  representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response,
about  the release  or the publication  of your response.

[DArEl  20th Ausust2024  [slcNED  BY coRoNERI (  [A,ð LltÇ

J

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dhsc (PDF)
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health and Prevention 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

Our ref: 

Dr Shirley Radcliffe,  
HM Assistant Coroner,  
East London Coroner’s Office  
Queens Road 
Walthamstow, E17 8QP 

By email:

Dear Dr Radcliffe,  

15 October 2024 

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 20 August 2024 sent to the Secretary of State at 
the  Department  of  Health  and  Social  Care  (DHSC)  and  to  the  Secretary  of  State  for 
Education about the death of Hannah Jacobs. I am replying on behalf of both Secretaries of 
State  as  I  am  the  Minister  in  DHSC  with  responsibility  for  long-term  conditions,  including 
allergies.  In  preparing  this  response,  my  officials  have  liaised  with  the  Department  for 
Education (DfE), the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and NHS 
England.  

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of  Hannah’s 
death, and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. Hannah’s loss at 
such  a  young  age  must  be  extremely  distressing  for  them  and  I  am  grateful  to  you  for 
bringing these concerns to my attention.  

Your report raises concerns over: 

•  A lack of consideration about how to contain the risk of anaphylaxis on the journey to 

and from school. 

•  The lack of a readily available adrenaline autoinjector (AAI) especially where they are 

misused, lost or forgotten, leaving an absence of an AAI over the weekend. 

•  The need for appropriate structures in place to educate schools, patients and parents 

of the importance of carrying an AAI on their way to and from school.  

I also understand that in a separate report that you have issued to NHS England, you raised 
concerns  about  supplies  of  AAIs  as  the  pharmacy  at  which  Hannah  and  her  mother 
attempted  to  obtain  an  EpiPen  did  not  have  any  adult  doses  in  stock  and,  by  that  point, 
Hannah required two doses from an adult EpiPen. 

On the issue of educating patients parents and schools, the message to use an AAI at the 
first signs of a severe reaction before calling for help, and the recommendation for patients 
to carry two AAIs has been reinforced through a series of advice and guidance.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 In June 2023, the MHRA launched new guidance to highlight the latest safety advice from 
the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM’s) working group on the safe and effective 
use of AAIs. The guidance included advice for healthcare professionals to provide to 
patients and carers and reinforces the importance of carrying 2 AAIs at all times, and using 
AAIs without delay if anaphylaxis is suspected, even if in doubt about the severity of the 
event. The guidance can be accessed at the following link:  
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/adrenaline-auto-injectors-aais-safety-
campaign/adrenaline-auto-injectors-aais 

The MHRA has also produced a toolkit of resources which is available for health and 
social care professionals to support the safe and effective use of AAIs. These resources 
are freely available and include an infographic about the correct use of an AAI. Health and 
social care professionals are asked to use the materials to inform patients and caregivers 
what to do if they suspect anaphylaxis and how to use AAIs and that prescribers should 
prescribe two AAIs to make sure that patients always have a second dose. The resources 
are available at the following link: 

https://aaisafety.campaign.gov.uk/resources/ 

The information set out in the guidance remains current and we have been advised by 
MHRA that there are currently no plans to revise it. MHRA continues to signpost the 
public, media and charities to the guidance to encourage safe use of AAIs wherever 
possible. 

Information is also contained in the British National Formulary (BNF) and the BNF for 
children (BNFc), that patients should carry two AAI devices (AAI) at all times; on the 
importance of training as well as on the importance of training patients and carers in the 
use of the particular AAI prescribed. The BNF and BNFc are joint publications of the British 
Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and are accessible from the 
National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence’s (NICE) website. The information 
referred to above can be found at: 

https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/adrenaline-epinephrine/#important-safety-information 

Prescribers are expected to refer to information within the BNF to help inform prescribing 
decisions made with Individual patients and carers. This expectation is set out in the 
GMC’s publication on ‘Good practice in prescribing and managing medicines and devices', 
which I have referred to above, within the section titled: keeping up to date and prescribing 
safely. This section can be found at the following link:  

https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/professional-standards-for-doctors/good-
practice-in-prescribing-and-managing-medicines-and-devices/keeping-up-to-date-and-
prescribing-safely. 

Advice on preventing anaphylaxis is provided on the NHS.UK website and this also 
recommends that patients carry two AAIs with them at all times. The advice can be 
accessed at the following link:  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/anaphylaxis/#:~:text=Immediate%20action%20required%3A
%20Call%20999%20if%3A&text=your%20skin%2C%20tongue%20or%20lips,and%20can
not%20be%20woken%20up 

Section 100 of the Children and Families Act 2014 places a legal duty on schools to make 
arrangements for supporting pupils at their school with medical conditions. The 
accompanying statutory guidance - Supporting Pupils at School with Medical Conditions - 
is not voluntary; schools are legally required to have regard to this guidance when carrying 
out their section 100 duty.  

The guidance makes clear to schools what is expected of them in taking reasonable steps 
to fulfil their legal obligations and to meet the individual needs of pupils with medical 
conditions, including allergies. Schools should ensure they are aware of any pupils with 
medical conditions and have policies and processes in place to ensure these can be well 
managed.  

The guidance can be accessed at the following link:  

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25 

DfE included a reminder to schools of these duties in its regular schools’ email bulletin in 
both March and September this year. Copies of the bulletin are available here:  

March 2024 - Update to all education and childcare settings and providers 
(govdelivery.com) 
September 2024 - Update to all education and childcare settings and providers 
(govdelivery.com) 

In the same communication DfE also alerted schools to the newly created Schools Allergy 
Code. The Code was developed by The Allergy Team, Independent Schools’ Bursars 
Association (ISBA) and the Benedict Blythe Foundation, who are all trusted voices on the 
matter of allergies. DfE has now also added a link to the Code to its online allergy 
guidance on Gov.uk. The Code can be accessed at the following link:  

https://theallergyteam.com/schools-allergy-code/ 

In 2017, the Department of Health published non-statutory guidance to accompany a 
legislative change to allow schools to purchase spare AAIs from a pharmacy, without a 
prescription and for use in an emergency situation. This guidance gives clear advice to 
schools on the recognition and management of an allergic reaction and anaphylaxis, and 
outlines when and how an AAI should be administered for pupils in schools. The guidance 
states that children at risk of anaphylaxis should have their prescribed AAIs at school for 
use in an emergency, and in line with MHRA advice, those prescribed AAIs should carry 
two devices at all times. The guidance also states that depending on their level of 
understanding and competence, children and particularly teenagers should carry their 
AAIs on their person at all times or they should be quickly and easily accessible at all 
times. I understand that it is not uncommon for schools, particularly primary schools, to 
request a pupil’s AAIs are left in school to avoid the situation where a pupil or their family 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 forgets to bring the AAIs to school each day. Where this occurs, the guidance states that 
the pupil must still have access to an AAI when travelling to and from school.  

‘Guidance on the use of adrenaline auto-injectors in school’ can be accessed through the 
following link and DHSC keeps the guidance under review.  

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a829e3940f0b6230269bcf4/Adrenaline_au
to_injectors_in_schools.pdf 

An Expert Advisory Group for Allergy (EAGA) has been established, which brings together 
key stakeholders with the aim improving the quality-of-life of people with allergies. Chaired 
jointly by DHSC and the National Allergy Strategy Group, EAGA identifies priority areas for 
DHSC, NHS England and other government departments and agencies relating to allergy 
that require policy change or development and advises on how to best achieve improved 
outcomes and improve support for people with allergies.  

In relation to shortages of AAIs, DHSC works closely with all suppliers of AAIs to ensure 
supplies remain available for patients. We understand that in February 2023 all suppliers 
of adrenaline 0.3mcg auto-injectors were in stock, including EpiPen. One supplier of 
0.15mcg had been out of stock since early 2020 but the remaining two suppliers, including 
EpiPen, were available in sufficient quantities to support patient demand. The sole supplier 
of the 0.5mcg pen (Emerade) was also in stock during this time. 

Officials continue to work with MHRA, the pharmaceutical industry, NHS England and 
others operating in the supply chain to help prevent shortages and to ensure that the risks 
to patients are minimised when shortages do arise.  

I hope this response is helpful in demonstrating the ways in which your concerns are being 
addressed and will continue to be addressed. Thank you for again for bringing to the 
attention of the Secretaries of State and their respective departments the concerns that 
have followed the inquest into the tragic death of Hannah Jacobs.   

Yours sincerely,

Related reports

Other reports by Shirley Radcliffe

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.