Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0486, written 10 Sep 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 10 Sep 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0486 |
| Deceased | James Astley |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) Downshaw Lodge 2) Care Quality Commission CORONER 1 I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 25th January 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of James Astley. The investigation concluded on the13th August 2024 and the conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from natural causes contributed to by dehydration and poor nutritional status. The medical cause of death was 1a) Urosepsis, vascular dementia II) Frailty, dehydration, poor nutritional status. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH James Astley had dementia and was immobile. His nutritional status declined significantly from November 2023. In December his swallow deteriorated and led to him becoming increasingly frail. On 2nd January he was started on antibiotics. On 3rd January he was seen again by a GP and found to have deteriorated further. He was admitted to Tameside General Hospital where he was treated for urosepsis and dehydration. Despite treatment he continued to deteriorate due to his frailty. He died at Tameside General hospital on 22nd January 2024. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. The inquest heard evidence that Mr Astley was at significant risk due to poor nutrition and fluid intake. However the MUST documentation was 1 not correctly completed and the overall quality of fluid and nutrition charts was poor. As a consequence he became increasingly frail and the risk to his overall wellbeing and physiological reserves continued. 2. Overall documentation at the home was limited and lacked detail 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 5th November 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely find it useful or of interest. on behalf of the family, who may I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Alison Mutch Senior Coroner 10/09/2024 2
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Alison Mutch OBE HM Senior Coroner 1 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG Via email: HSCA Further Information Citygate Gallowgate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4PA Telephone: Fax: 12 November 2024 Our Reference: Your reference: Dear HM Senior Coroner Alison Mutch OBE, Prevention of future death report following inquest into the death of Mr James Astley Thank you for sending Care Quality Commission (CQC) a copy of the prevention of future death report issued following the sad death of Mr Astley. We note the legal requirement upon the CQC to respond to your report within 56 days, that being by 5 November 2024. Please accept our sincere apologies for the delay due to one of our staff being on sick leave from work. The registered provider of Downshaw Lodge is Qualia Care Limited. Qualia Care Limited has been registered with CQC as a service provider since 11 November 2016. The provider’s location, Downshaw Lodge, is located in Downshaw Road, Ashton Under Lyne, OL7 9QL. At the time of Mr Astley’s death, the provider was registered for the regulated activities of ‘Accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care’ and ‘Treatment of disease, disorder or injury’. 1 A5 The role of the CQC & Inspection methodology The role of CQC as an independent regulator is to register health and adult social care service providers in England and to assess whether or not the fundamental standards as set out in the Health and Social Care Act 2008, and amendments, are being met. CQC also have civil and criminal enforcement powers should providers be assessed to have breached the fundamental standards set. The regulatory approach used during previous inspections of Downshaw Lodge considered five key questions. They asked if the service was Safe; Effective; Caring; Responsive; and Well Led. Inspectors used a series of key lines of enquiry (KLOEs) and prompts to seek and corroborate evidence and obtain reassurance of how the provider performed against characteristics of ratings and how risks to service users were identified, assessed and mitigated. The regulatory framework includes providers being required to meet fundamental standards of care; the standards below which care must never fall. We provide guidance to providers on how they can meet these standards (Regulations 4 to 20A of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014). On 6 February 2024 CQC’s Operations Network in the North region went live with our new Single Assessment Framework. This approach covers all sectors, service types and levels and the five key questions remain central to this approach. However, the previous key lines of enquiry (KLOEs) and prompts have been replaced with new ‘quality statements’. The quality statements are described as ‘we statements’ as they have been written from a provider’s perspective to help them understand what we expect of them. They draw on previous work developed with Think Local Act Personal (TLAP), National Voices and the Coalition for Collaborative Care on Making it Real. They set clear expectations of providers, based on people’s experiences and the standards of care they expect. We have introduced six new evidence categories to organise information under the statements; these are feedback from people, feedback from staff and leaders, feedback from partners, our observations, processes and outcomes. This approach will allow CQC to use a range of information to assess providers flexibly and frequently, collect evidence on an ongoing basis and update ratings at any time; tailor our assessment to different types of providers and services; score evidence to make our judgements more structured and consistent; use site visits and data and insight to gather evidence to assess quality and produce shorter and simpler reports, showing the most up-to-date assessment. Background 2 A6 CQC first became aware of the death of Mr Astley on 30 January 2024 when a statutory notification of death was submitted by the provider. This was assessed by an inspector at the time who sought further information due to the notification indicating that a safeguarding referral had been raised against the care home. The safeguarding investigation records were reviewed and although areas of learning were noted for the provider, CQC was assured that the necessary actions were already in progress. These actions included ensuring all people living at the home had up to date and relevant care plans as well as training for staff around the use of the digital health service in order to effectively escalate health concerns. Downshaw Lodge has been under the multi-agency concerns (MAC) process since the provider Qualia Care Limited appointed an administrator on 18 October 2022. The last MAC meeting CQC attended in May 2024 raised no concerns about the care people were receiving. CQC was advised that work was planned to ensure all staff had completed the care certificate, there were plans in place to manage the challenge of recruiting staff to health and social care roles, to review and update care plans and that Downshaw Lodge were working well with local authority quality improvement and commissioning teams. Regulatory History At the time of Mr Astley’s death there was no registered manager in post The previous registered manager had deregistered from the role on 12 June 2023. A manager registered with CQC as the registered manager of Downshaw Lodge on 5 June 2024 but has subsequently left this role although no application to deregister has currently been received. The first inspection of Downshaw Lodge was completed in November 2018. The overall rating for the service was ‘requires improvement’ and the key questions ‘Is the service safe?’ and ‘Is the service well led?’ were found to require improvement, with the key questions ‘Is the service effective?’ ‘Is the service caring?’ and ‘Is the service responsive?’ all being rated good. At that time breaches of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 were identified. The provider was found to be in breach of Regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment) due to shortfalls in the management of medicines and infection prevention and control, and Regulation 17 (Good governance), due to systems for audits and checks not being effective. The next comprehensive inspection of Downshaw Lodge was commenced on 9 January 2020 and the service was rated good in all five key questions. Previous breaches of regulation found during the inspection of 2019 had been resolved. 3 A7 CQC last visited the service to complete a targeted inspection looking at infection prevention and control on 17 February 2022 as part of the response to the Covid 19 pandemic. No concerns were identified at that time. Matters of Concern 1. The inquest heard evidence that Mr Astley was at significant risk due to poor nutrition and fluid intake. However, the MUST documentation was not correctly completed and the overall quality of fluid and nutrition charts was poor. As a consequence, he became increasingly frail and the risk to his overall wellbeing and physiological reserves continued. CQC were made aware of the sad death of Mr Astley in a notification submitted by the provider (via the home manager) on 30 January 2024. This notification informed CQC not only of Mr Astley’s death but also of the safeguarding concerns raised by the family at the point Mr Astley was admitted to hospital, in relation to which a strategy meeting had been arranged for February 2024. CQC reviewed the minutes from the strategy meetings as part of the initial triage of this notification. This meeting was held on 22 February 2024 via teams. The strategy meeting focused on a number of areas including: • • • the use or lack thereof of a hospital passport or red bag scheme when Mr Astley was admitted to hospital, the accuracy of care plans and risk assessments, with areas of shortfall being found in the medication care plan, choking risk assessment and nutritional risk assessment, lack of contact with external professionals as Mr Astley’s condition declined, including the speech and language therapy team and dietitian, • and failure to utilise the digital health systems. The strategy meeting found that there was evidence of relevant referrals being made and followed up although this was impacted by the holiday period. The safeguarding investigation found evidence that weekly weights for Mr Astley were being completed and recorded in a weight folder, which up until the 5 December 2023 had been reasonably stable. Mr Astley’s weight had deteriorated between the 5 December when it was recorded as 47.1kg and 1 January 2024 where it was recorded as being 43.9kg. The dietitian had been contacted on 22 December 2023 and confirmed they would review in 3-4 weeks. The strategy meeting also looked at concerns in relation to the calling of an ambulance. The finding was that a call came from the home on 3 January 2024 at 12:02 and an update was provided at 13.47 to inform that the GP was making a home visit. The safeguarding minutes noted ‘GP had attended and re-assessed and initially stated that 4 A8 he could be treated at home, however when the GP returned to the surgery, he recontacted the care home and instructed the nurse to recall an ambulance to take Mr Astley to hospital.’ No evidence of a direct call from the GP was found. Learning was identified for the home at the point of the strategy meetings including education sessions for staff in relation to the use of the digital health service in Tameside, the use of hospital passports and red bag scheme to aid the transfer of important information as people transfer between services and clinical meetings and reflective supervision with staff in relation to record keeping and care planning. The final action from the strategy meeting was that all covert medication, care plans, best interest and GP discussions would be reviewed by the home to ensure all paperwork was correct and documented. Since this strategy meeting was held the home continued to be engaged with a MAC process with monthly or bi-monthly meetings being held with key stakeholders including the local authority commissioning team, safeguarding team, the home manager and representatives from indicate the provider. Records improvements have been made and the situation at Downshaw Lodge is positive. these meetings from Following the issuing of the Regulation 28 report to Downshaw Lodge, CQC have reviewed the response and learning from the provider and sought further assurances. The provider has shared their response to the Regulation 28 report which included action taken in regard to documentation, oversight, communication and training. We have reviewed example documentation shared by the provider as part of the assurance given including care records and systems for oversight and analysis. There are indications that the necessary processes for appropriate assessment and documentation are available for use. Subsequent to the Regulation 28 preventing future death report CQC have commenced an assessment at Downshaw Lodge to ensure the required changes have been made, especially in regard to ensuring staff have received the training and support needed to complete accurate assessment of people’s needs, take appropriate action and following care plans in line with people’s needs to ensure all care needs are met, and maintain accurate and contemporaneous needs. This assessment was commenced on 16 October 2024. Once this has been completed a report will be published on the CQC website with our findings. This can be found on the link https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-4019291170/reports 2. Overall documentation at the home was limited and lacked detail 5 A9 CQC have reviewed Mr Astley’s care plans and what daily records were available. There were a number of shortfalls regarding the levels of detail, frequency and accuracy of recording. CQC have reviewed 2 weeks of daily records in relation to Mr Astley eating and drinking for the period of December 2023. The service has been unable to locate other records relating to this time period, in particular we have not been able to review the daily records in relation to Mr Astley’s hospital admission where the evidence is that there was a dramatic deterioration in Mr Astley’s health and presentation. The records reviewed indicated that Mr Astley had been monitored regarding his eating and drinking and was supported and encouraged to eat and drink by staff throughout the day. Some documentation was not available for review as the provider was not able to locate these. The quality of the records varied, and it was not possible to determine to what extent Mr Astley’s nutritional needs were met, although records indicate he was prescribed a supplement drink to increase his nutritional intake on a daily basis. Mr Astley appeared to have had a fluid target of 2000ml per day. It was unclear whether this was an appropriate target given Mr Astley’s weight and frailty and subsequently was rarely achieved on the records reviewed. However, the fluids accepted were often in excess of 1200ml based on the records available for review. As noted above regarding the safeguarding strategy meeting, the provider had identified and accepted improvements were needed and implemented an action plan which has been reviewed at the MAC meetings led by the local authority. When CQC receives information in relation to an incident of this kind, we consider what action we need to take; firstly in relation to whether the information received suggests that there may be ongoing risk which requires CQC to inspect a service and secondly whether the information received suggests criminal enforcement action should be considered. As noted earlier an inspection of the service has been commenced on the 16 October 2024 to review any matters in relation to ongoing risk and our findings will be published once the process has been concluded. CQC have also undertaken an initial assessment in respect of this death to determine whether criminal enforcement action should be considered. The assessment has involved reviewing information available regarding Mr Astley’s care, including information from the inquest and information provided by the care home provider. At this time, the initial assessment has concluded that there is no evidence of a registered provider level failure and therefore the threshold at which criminal enforcement would be considered has not been met in this matter. An inspection of Downshaw Lodge was commenced on 16 October 2024. As part of this inspection and assessment of the service, CQC will review documentation within the home to assess whether it is accurate, up to date and sufficiently detailed to ensure people’s needs are met. Our finding will be published on the CQC website when the process is completed at https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-4019291170/reports Yours sincerely, 6 A10 Deputy Director of Operations Network North, CQC 7 A11
Drakes Court (> Qualia Care i 7 ia 7 Birmingham (in administration) B47 6JR HM Coroner Manchester South Coroner’s Court 1 Mount Tabour Street Stockport SK1 3AG Date: 4 November 2024 Dear Sirs, Re: Regulation 28 Report into the death of James Astley We write further to your report made under Regulation 28 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 dated 10 September 2024. At the outset we, and everyone at Downshaw Lodge (‘The Home’), would like to express our condolences to Mr Astley’s family and friends on their loss. Please take this as our formal response to the concerns raised by His Majesty’s Senior Coroner, Alison Mutch OBE, regarding: e the quality of record keeping and, in particular, that relating to fluid and nutrition documentation at The Home; and e understanding of the MUST system to inform the delivery of care at the Home. We confirm that steps and actions have been taken by the Home to address these concerns as is outlined below. By way of background, the Registered Manager commenced employment at the Home in early December 2023 following an induction into the service. In December 2023, the Regional Manager identified a need for improvement in the completion of documentation by staff, and an action plan was developed. Due to the concerns identified, a Quality Manager subsequently completed an internal IMPACT audit in January 2024. The key areas of concern highlighted in the internal IMPACT audit were: « Food intake records were generally completed well, but where pureed meals were provided, they lacked details about the meal contents. A general term, “blended meal’, was used instead of specifying the ingredients. e There was limited evaluation of food and fluid intake records to ensure that residents had adequate nutritional intake and were receiving a varied diet. www.qualiacare.co.uk | Registered in England No. 10060267 Al -2- e Whilst the majority of assessments were completed correctly, a nutrition risk assessment, a Waterlow assessment, and a MUST were noted to have been scored incorrectly. Actions taken to address concerns: Following the audit, and prior to service of the Regulation 28 report, the Home implemented several measures to improve record-keeping and ensure that the errors identified do not recur. Further detail is provided below. Additionally, regular meetings have taken place with multiple agencies to discuss The Home's progress and share information. These meetings occur monthly and include the following attendees: the Team Manager of Tamside (who chairs the meeting), the Home Manager, the Regional Manager, the Clinical Lead for Continuing Healthcare and Neuro Rehabilitation, Individualised Commissioning Nurses, the Head of Individualised Commissioning and Quality Improvement, the Safeguarding Lead, representatives from Digital Health, District Nurses, the Infection Prevention Officer, and the Contract Performance Officer. The agenda for these meetings includes the following: 1. Updates on the agreed priority areas. 2. Update on administration. 3. Feedback from reviews and visits conducted by each stakeholder, focusing on the agreed priorities and any new issues identified. 4. Input from residents, caregivers, and families. 5. Commissioning updates regarding visits and communication with the provider about any concerns. 6. Updates on Care Quality Commission (CQC) notifications. 7. Updates on communication strategies. 8. Decisions on further actions required or recommendations, including the escalation or de-escalation of issues. MUST Training and Competency: On 31 January 2024, all nurses and senior staff completed a mandatory training workshop on the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). The training covered the correct calculation of MUST scores using the BAPEN calculator. Evidence of attendance, course details, and syllabus are attached for the benefit of HM Coroner as Exhibit SA/1. We are pleased to report that the current staff team has been open to learning and has demonstrated a strong commitment to improving their documentation. Nutritional Monitoring: At the end of January 2024, the Registered Manager conducted a full nutritional analysis of all residents’ weights. Any resident experiencing significant weight loss was flagged, and their care plan updated. A copy of the Resident MUST Care Plan is attached for the benefit of HM Coroner as Exhibit SA/2. www.qualiacare.co.uk | Registered in England No. 10060267 A2 -3- Since January 2024, at the end of each month, the Registered Manager is provided with a report on residents’ weight. Again, any resident experiencing significant weight loss is flagged, and their care plan updated. An example of the monthly report is attached for the benefit of HM Coroner as Exhibit SA/3. The Chef at The Home is kept appraised of changes to resident care plans in order that action can be taken to meet the nutritional needs of residents identified as being at risk. This includes, for example, fortifying food or preparing tailored meals. Staff at the Home have ready access to all resident care plans and the Registered Manager also conducts daily walkarounds to ensure that care plans, including nutritional needs, are being adhered to. Regional Manager’s Oversight: Weekly visits to the Home have been conducted since January 2024 (an continue as at today’s date) by the Regional Manager iii to ensure that nutritional monitoring arrangements are being effectively implemented. These visits involve reviewing high-risk residents’ MUST scores, ensuring they are accurately calculated, and verifying that care plans contain appropriate detail for managing residents’ dietary needs. Training and Compliance All staff have undergone comprehensive training in key areas: e Fluid and Nutrition Training: This course covers the principles of hydration, nutrition, and food safety and ensures that staff understand how to provide adequate nutrition in line with care plans. » Documentation and Record-Keeping Training: This course reinforces the importance of accuracy, clarity, and completeness in documentation. e MUST Training: as detailed above. Refresher training will be completed annually at the home for all new starters. The above training programs ensure that staff members accurately document dietary and fluid intake, escalate concerns about significant weight loss, and follow the appropriate procedures to mitigate risks, such as referring residents to a dietician when necessary. The courses also include guidance on the completion of the ‘Resident 7-day Booklet’ which documents the following criteria in accordance with the individuals’ identified risks: Dietary intake choking risk IDDSI level Review of food intake Fluid intake Target: ... mls Review of fluid intake Review of output Handovers www.qualiacare.co.uk | Registered in England No. 10060267 A3 -4- All staff have now completed the training courses detailed above, and as such, we are confident they are competent and understand the level of detail required when completing fluid and nutrition intake charts. The staff also understand how to escalate when a resident experiences a significant weight loss by reporting to the Registered Manager and considering the fortification of food or a referral to a Dietician. This is evidenced through frequent ‘dip-sampling’ of care records which confirm records are now completed correctly to the required standard. A list of all training courses provided to staff is detailed in the Training Matrix which is provided for the benefit of HM Coroner as Exhibit SA/4. Oversight and Additional Improvements: Since the death of Mr. Astley, we have introduced further improvements to enhance The Home’s performance: e Regular spot checks and ‘dip-sampling’ of care records are now conducted by the management team. This process ensures compliance with documentation standards and identifies any need for additional staff training. e Fluid and food intake charts are closely monitored, and detailed handovers take place at every shift change so as to ensure no gaps in communication. e Enhanced communication between care staff and kitchen teams has improved the quality and variety of food provided to residents, with specific attention given to residents identified as at risk. « The outcome of the Inquest into the death of Mr. Astley has been shared with the staff team. Conclusion We are committed to ensuring the highest standards of care and have taken substantial measures to address the concerns identified during the January 2024 IMPACT audit and those raised by the Senior Coroner. These include improved staff training, regular reviews of documentation, and enhanced oversight processes. The steps we have implemented are intended to prevent a recurrence of the issues observed in Mr. Astley’s case. We firmly believe that these improvements will enhance the quality of care provided at The Home and ensure that our residents receive safe and effective care. We hope this correspondence provides reassurance to the Coroner and Mr. Astley’s family that the issues identified have been comprehensively addressed and that we are dedicated to continuous improvement in service quality. Kind regards, Managing Director, for and on behalf of Qualia Care Limited (In Administration) www.qualiacare.co.uk | Registered in England No. 10060267 A4
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.