Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0576, written 25 Oct 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 25 Oct 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0576 |
| Deceased | Sylvia Prichard |
| Coroner | Anna Crawford |
| Coroner area | Surrey |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS The Inquest Touching the Death of Sylvia Prichard A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 Chief Executive Officer Avery Healthcare Group 3 Cygnet Drive Swan Valley Northampton NN4 9BS 1 CORONER I am Anna CRAWFORD, HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey for the coroner area of Surrey 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 5 to The Coroners and Justice Act 2009. 3 INQUEST An inquest into Mrs Prichard’s death was opened on 11 April 2024. The inquest was resumed on 26 September 2024 and concluded on 27 September 2024. The medical cause of Mrs Prichard’s death was: 1a. Traumatic Acute Subdural Haemorrhage With respect to where, when and how Mrs Prichard came by her death it was recorded at Box 3 of the Record of Inquest as follows: Mrs Prichard was 91 years old and frail due to her age. On 28 March 2024 she had an unwitnessed fall at her care home as a result of which she sustained a head injury, resulting in her death at the Royal Surrey County Hospital on 3 April 2024. The inquest concluded with a short form conclusion of ‘Accidental Death’. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mrs Prichard had been assessed as being at high risk of falls. Some falls minimisation measures were recorded in her mobility care plan, however, she did not have a falls minimisation plan in place. Mrs Prichard had her own apartment at Moorlands Lodge Care Home. She had emergency buttons on the walls of her sitting room and her bedroom which could be used to attract immediate attention in the event of a medical emergency. She also had a call button on a pendant around her neck which could be used to alert staff that she needed routine assistance of any kind. At 10:11 on the morning of 28 March 2024 Mrs Prichard pressed her call button. The call button was responded to at 10:28, at which time Mrs Prichard was found on the floor. It is Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 not known whether she pressed the call button before of after the fall. Following her fall she was unable to move so would have been unable to use the emergency button on the wall. Previously Moorlands Lodge Care Home was owned by a company called Signature, during which time there was a ten minute response time for call bells. However, in Summer 2023, Avery Healthcare acquired Moorlands Lodge Care Home, at which time a response time of two to five minutes should have been introduced in accordance with Avery Healthcare’s policy. However, at the time of Mrs Prichard’s death, the Manager of Moorlands Lodge Care Home was not aware of the Avery Healthcare policy and the home was continuing to aim to respond to call bells within ten minutes. It took seventeen minutes to respond to Mrs Prichard’s call bell on the day of her fall, which was a twelve minute delay. The court found that this was not an isolated delay but was part of a broader pattern of delayed response times to call bells, including for Mrs Prichard but also other residents at Moorlands Lodge Care Home. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS The MATTER OF CONCERN is: - Mrs Prichard’s mobility care plan contained out of date and conflicting information. The Coroner is concerned that other residents’ care plans may contain out of date and conflicting information. - Mrs Prichard did not have a falls minimisation plan in place and the Manager of the care home was not aware that Avery Healthcare had a falls minimisation plan document which needed to be completed for residents at risk of falls. The Coroner is therefore concerned that other residents who are at risk of falls do not have falls minimisation plans in place. - - - Audits show that, despite efforts to improve call bell response times, a significant number of call bells are still not responded to within two to five minutes. This is of concern as residents who are unable to move due to a medical emergency or fall are not able to use the emergency buttons on the wall. Since Mrs Prichard’s death Moorlands Lodge Care Home has introduced watches which can be worn on the wrist and used to attract immediate attention in the event of a fall or other medical emergency. However, the watches have only been provided to residents who have been assessed as high risk of falls, meaning that others who have a fall, or another type of medical emergency, are still reliant on the pendant call button to gain assistance. The Coroner is concerned that Avery Healthcare’s oversight and auditing measures failed to identify that the call bell response time policy was not being implemented at Moorlands Lodge Care Home for many months and further failed to identify that falls minimisation plans were not being completed for residents. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that the people listed in paragraph one above have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I may extend that Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 period on request. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES I have sent a copy of this report to the following: 1. Chief Coroner 2. Mrs Prichard’s family 3. Care Quality Commission 9 Dated: 25/10/2024 Anna CRAWFORD HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey for Surrey Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Avery Anna Crawford Surrey Coroner's Service HM Coroner's Court Station Approach Woking Surrey GU22 7AP 18'" December 2024 Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report into the Death of Mrs. Sylvia Prichard — Action to Prevent Future Deaths We write further to your report made under Regulation 28 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, dated 25 October 2024. At the outset, we, along with everyone at Moorlands Lodge Care Home (“the Home’), wish to express our deepest condolences to Mrs. Prichard’s family and friends for their loss. This letter serves as our formal response to the concerns raised by His Majesty’s Assistant Coroner for Surrey, Anna Crawford. We confirm that actions that have been taken by the Home to address these concerns, are outlined below. We acknowledge the gravity of the issues raised following Mrs. Prichard’s death and are committed to immediate and sustained improvements to prevent future deaths. We reviewed the senior operational structure and as a result we have recently appointed a new Regional Director and Home Manager to enhance the operational and quality support for the Home and a robust action plan has been developed alongside the personnel changes to address the concerns. After the incident, the Director of Quality conducted a Lessons Learned Workshop which was delivered to all registered managers across the whole organisation to discuss the incident and ensure the areas of concern were shared across all teams. Below, we respond to each of the identified concerns: 1. Outdated and Conflicting Information in Mobility Care Plans Actions Taken: e A full audit of all residents’ care plans has been completed by the Regional Quality Team to ensure they are accurate, up-to-date, and consistent. e A Care Plan Tracker has been introduced. This is a live document which records all care plans required for each resident and the date they were last reviewed. This is checked daily by the Home Manager. The tracker is completed and reviewed in Avery addition to rolling monthly audits of at least 10% of all care records to ensure the quality and person-centred detail. ° All key staff have undergone additional training on care planning and record-keeping, with 100% compliance achieved for falls-related training. Refresher training is scheduled to address record accuracy, falls management, and risk recognition. e All new starters receive falls training as part of their induction plan. Ongoing Measures: e All residents’ care plans and risk assessments are reviewed monthly in line with Avery “Resident of the Day” policy. e Any changes in a resident's condition and/or needs are assessed with appropriate changes made within the care plans and risk assessments. Any changes are reviewed within the daily meetings held by the team and immediately communicated to relevant staff. e The Person-Centred Software (“PCS”) electronic care planning system is utilised to minimise human error and ensure version control. Care plans and risk assessments are reviewed and updated monthly, and residents with capacity are involved in their care plan reviews. Relatives are invited to care plan reviews with residents where appropriate. e Managers conduct regular audits of care records, providing feedback and further training as necessary. e The care plan tracker is checked by the Home Manager daily and reviewed by the senior operations team weekly to ensure that improvements are sustained. 2. Lack of Falls Minimisation Plans Actions Taken: e Allresidents have a falls risk assessment completed on admission. For those residents identified as having an increased risk of falls, a further multifactorial falls risk assessment is indicated and completed on the electronic care planning system. e Falls minimisation care plans are then completed for all residents identified at risk of falls, utilising the information contained within the risk assessment to ensure all risks identified have a mitigating action. e All residents at the Home have been reassessed for their risk of falls and all residents identified as being at risk have a multifactorial falls risk assessment and minimisation plan in place. Avery e The new General Manager has been trained in Avery Healthcare’s falls minimisation protocols and policies to ensure proper implementation, consistency and to continue to drive improvements. e Further Falls risk training has been cascaded to specifically coach staff and develop their knowledge, understanding and reasoning in respect of their completion of entries in the care plans with a higher emphasis of the risk management to be embedded within all the care documentation. Ongoing Measures: e Falls risk assessments and care plans are reviewed monthly or sooner if there are any changes to the residents’ care needs and/or if there is an incident in respect to mobility. e Weekly clinical risk meetings analyse the trends and patterns of falls that week and oversee and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. e Monthly governance meetings, chaired by the General Manager and Deputy Manager, oversee the implementation of these measures. e The Home Manager conducts daily reviews of all incidents to ensure all actions are taken and to actively identify any inconsistencies within the care plans and risk assessments. 3. Delayed Call Bell Response Times Background: By way of background the Home was initially under the ownership of Signature Senior Living but had been taken over by Avery Healthcare in June 2023. The Home Manager had previously worked for Signature Senior Living, and she confirmed that at the time of the incident she still believed the call bell response time was 10 minutes. The Home Manager confirmed that she had received a notification via the Incident Management System (RADAR) to embed new Avery policies but had not circulated this to staff or implemented them, so the Home was still working from the 10-minute response time rather than Avery’s new policy of 2 to 5 minutes. The policy in place at the time of Mrs Prichard’s death was that call bells should be responded to as soon as possible, ideally within 2 to 5 minutes. Actions Taken: Call bell response times have been improving through the following: e Staffing levels during peak hours have been reviewed to ensure they align with residents’ care needs. Avery e Staff allocation has been optimised to improve efficiency. e The updated call bell response policy has been relaunched, and all staff are now fully aware of the expected 2-5-minute response time. e A technology review within the Home has been undertaken to ensure all staff have access to the correct equipment ensuring they are all notified of calls. During the busy times of the day care managers support the team on the floor to ensure minimisation of response times. e Staff are also reminded to check that all the call bell technology is in full working order. e In May, the Home issued a Significant Learning briefing regarding call bell response times and adherence to the policy. Ongoing Measures: e Managers now receive daily log reports on call bell response times, allowing immediate intervention for delays and further investigation for non-compliance. The call bell logs are reviewed by the Home Manager on a daily basis and shared with the senior Operations Team for further oversight. e Staff performance in responding to call bells is reviewed during regular performance reviews, with non-performance, other trends and patterns addressed during supervised sessions. 4. Reconfiguration of the call bell system and discontinuation of Wrist-Worn Emergency Watches Actions Taken: e As of November 2024, wrist-worn emergency watches for high-risk residents have been discontinued. e The decision followed the implementation of the correct Avery call bell policy being put in place and improvements in call bell response times, e Furthermore, there has now been a full review and reconfiguration of the call bell system. This work will ensure that any call bell activated from any source, i.e. pendant or call point will ring for 3 minutes on the ordinary tone. If the call bell is not answered within 3 minutes, the call bell will be automatically escalated and change to an emergency call bell which has a different tone. The team are aware that emergency bells must be answered immediately, and this response is a whole home approach. This new system has made the use of the wrist-worn emergency watches unnecessary. Avery e Staff have been fully briefed in the change in policy and the changes have been embedded into the induction training on the use of call bells. Ongoing Measures: e Daily audits are undertaken by the home manager to review any non-compliance with the Avery call bell policy. Any delays in call bell response times are investigated by the Home Manager to identify causation with appropriate actions taken. 5. Oversight and Auditing Failures Actions Taken: e The Falls Prevention Policy and Multi -Factorial Falls Risk Screening Tool was sent to all Home Managers and General Managers to read and familiarise themselves with the changes and to update their staff and teams. e Weekly Clinical Risk meetings are held within the Home, chaired by the General Manager and/or Deputy manager to analyse falls, accident and incidents, infections, admission, weight loss and medication reviews. Actions are agreed with timescales and ownership. e Monthly Clinical Governance Meetings analyse data from the RADAR management incident system to provide immediate insights into clinical risks. All aspects of the governance review are shared with the Regional Director, for upward escalation as appropriate. Some key areas included in the governance meeting are falls, accident and incidents, infections and medication reviews. These meetings are recorded, with a summary submitted to the Quality Team each month. The Quality Team and Operational Director then review these minutes and if there are concerns, they can address these with the Regional Director and provide further support where required. Ongoing Measures: e Weekly clinical risk meetings, attended by key staff, ensure formal reviews of residents’ care plans and risks. Key areas reviewed include falls, infections, and accidents/incidents. e There is a clinical risk register in place for each home, which identifies resident risks including that of falls. This is reviewed weekly as part of the clinical risk meeting and supports the team to ensure that all of the correct care plans are in place for each resident. e A Falls steering group has been introduced to the home. This takes place monthly with a focus on preventative actions. e A “Resident of the Day” programme is fully operational within the Home, involving a comprehensive review of a resident's care plan with their keyworker to ensure it - Avery remains person-centred and responsive to real-time risks to establish whether all necessary actions are in place to mitigate the risks. e A new internal audit framework has been introduced, focusing on critical areas such as call bell response times and falls minimisation plans. All audit results will be shared transparently with staff to foster accountability. e Internal Compliance Inspections are conducted by the Quality Team, which oversee all audit findings and ensure that actions are completed promptly and consider whether they may prompt an inspection on emerging risks. e The RADAR Incident Reporting System has been fully reviewed to ensure clear visibility and analysis of falls within the Home. This has included creating a falls category within the Incident Reporting System to ensure better analysis to a finer detail on falls trends and patterns. e Weekly Regional Director visits occur, and there is a weekly performance call with the home to monitor progress against actions, attended by the Senior Operations and Quality Team. e Monthly calls take place with the Director of Quality and Operations Director to review all the clinical KPIs and serious incidents within all of the Homes. Conclusion We are committed to providing the highest standards of care and believe the measures outlined above will significantly enhance the quality and safety of services at Moorlands Lodge Care Home. The steps we have taken are designed to prevent a recurrence of the issues observed in Mrs. Sylvia Prichard’s case. We will continue to monitor these improvements to ensure their sustained effectiveness. We hope this correspondence provides reassurance to the Coroner and Mrs. Prichard’s family that the identified issues have been comprehensively addressed. We remain committed to continuous improvement in care quality. Yours sincerely, Chief Executive Officer Avery Healthcare Group
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.