Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0591, written 1 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 1 Nov 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0591 |
| Deceased | Phyllis Tromans |
| Coroner | Vanessa McKinlay |
| Coroner area | Birmingham and Solihull |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust CORONER I am Vanessa McKinlay, Assistant Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 13 June 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Phyllis TROMANS. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was: Mrs Tromans died as a result of an infected pressure ulcer to her right hip which developed when she was an inpatient in Queen Elizabeth Hospital, to which gaps in her pressure area care during that admission made a contribution. 1 2 3 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mrs Tromans was a long term resident at Cotteridge House Residential Home. She had Parkinson's disease and was in a frail condition. On 17 March 2024 she was admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital where she was treated for pneumonia but where her condition did not improve and she was assessed as being for end of life care. Whilst in hospital, she developed a grade 4 pressure ulcer of her right hip, to which gaps in her pressure area care made a contribution. She died at Cotteridge House on 24 May 2024. 4 Following a post mortem performed by to be: , the medical cause of death was determined 1a Infected Pressure Related Ulcer Right Hip 1b 1c 1d II Frailty, End stage Parkinsonism with immobility CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 5 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. It is likely that Mrs Tromans' tissue damage started during her period in the Emergency Department. On admission, her Waterlow score indicated a high risk of pressure sores. That score was underestimated and the correct score would have indicated a very high risk. She spent almost 18 hours in ED, during which time she was positioned on a trolley without pressure area care. 2. Mrs Tromans had a repositioning schedule in place when she was admitted to the Acute Medical Unit and subsequently to ward East Ground B. This required repositioning at no greater intervals of four hours to mitigate the risk of pressure sores. On a total of 22 occasions the schedule was not adhered to. This led to occasions where Mrs Tromans was left in the same position for up to 14 hours. 3. East Ground B ward had a paper version of a wound care plan which was designed to provide detailed monitoring of her skin condition and a treatment plan for pressure sore care. This was not completed at any stage. 4. The Matron's investigation into these gaps in care did not seek to establish why they had occurred. This raises a concern about the quality and efficacy of the Trust's post-death investigations which in turn raises a concern for future deaths. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 27 December 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: (Mrs Tromans' daughter) I have also sent it to the Medical Examiner, ICS, NHS England and CQC. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 1 November 2024 Signature: Vanessa McKinlay Assistant Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull 6 7 8 9
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Executive Office of the Chair & Chief Executive
Chair
Chief Executive
Executive Office
:
:
:
27th December 2024
Mrs Louise Hunt
HM Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull
By way of email only:
Dear Mrs Hunt
Inquest touching the death of Mrs Phyllis Tromans
Response to Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths
I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 notice issued following the conclusion of the
inquest on 31 October 2024, into the death of Mrs Tromans at Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham.
We have carefully considered the concerns raised within your report to prevent future deaths
and our response is set out below.
1.It is likely that Mrs Tromans' tissue damage was exacerbated during her period in the
Emergency Department. On admission, her Waterlow score indicated a high risk of pressure
sores. That score was underestimated and the correct score would have indicated a very high
risk. She spent almost 18 hours in ED, during which time she was positioned on a trolley
without pressure area care.
It is probable that Mrs Tromans' tissue damage accelerated during her prolonged stay in the
Emergency Department. Her Waterlow score upon admission indicated a high risk of pressure
sores, but the actual score should have indicated a very high risk i.e. the tissue substrate was
poor. She was positioned on a trolley for nearly 18 hours in the ED without adequate
heightened levels of pressure area care, which likely contributed to the development of her
pressure sores.
In response to this, several measures are being taken to prevent future occurrences. Due to
the increasing demand on the ED, which has led to patients spending longer than desirable
periods in the department, the Tissue Viability team has collaborated with ED Matrons to
implement a project aimed at reducing pressure ulcers in the ED. This includes:
• Education: A targeted training program for ED staff covering topics such as pressure
ulcer categorization, reporting mechanisms, skin inspections, and repositioning
techniques.
• Equipment: The introduction of new trolley mattresses with deeper pressure-relieving
foam and the use of pillows to offload pressure from patients’ heels. This equipment is
not conventionally used in ED but will now be available in this setting.
• Documentation: A booklet supporting accurate completion of Waterlow scores is
being updated and will soon be relaunched to ensure proper documentation across
the Trust.
Furthermore, skin champions have been introduced in the ED, with staff undergoing
comprehensive training. The department is also working on auditing trolley mattresses to
ensure they provide effective pressure reduction, with plans for a trolley audit program in
place.
Assurance: The implementation of these measures will be monitored through regular audits
of pressure ulcer data in the ED to assess effectiveness and identify areas requiring further
intervention.
2.Mrs Tromans had a repositioning schedule in place when she was admitted to the Acute
Medical Unit and subsequently to ward East Ground B. This required repositioning at no
greater intervals of four hours to mitigate the risk of pressure sores. On a total of 22 occasions
during her inpatient stay, the schedule was not adhered to. This led to occasions where Mrs
Tromans was left in the same position for up to 14 hours.
Mrs Tromans was admitted to the Acute Medical Unit (AMU) and subsequently to Ward East
Ground B, where she had a repositioning schedule that required her to be repositioned every
four hours to prevent pressure sores. However, the schedule was not adhered to on 22
occasions, resulting in her remaining in the same position for up to 14 hours, likely contributing
to the deterioration of her condition.
In response, several actions are being taken:
• Training: In December, two Tissue Viability Link Worker events focused on
repositioning were held, with support from therapy teams using pressure mapping
devices to identify pressure points and promote effective repositioning. The sessions
also provided education on anatomy and physiology, with an emphasis on safe side-
lying techniques to relieve pressure.
• Compliance Monitoring: A weekly audit of repositioning practices in the AMU is now
being conducted, with real-time feedback provided to staff. The AMU also receives
regular communications emphasizing the importance of following the repositioning
schedule and completing daily care plans.
• Response Assessment Tool (RAT): The Tissue Viability team has implemented the
RAT to scope trust-acquired pressure ulcer events. This tool, which will be used by
senior staff to ensure repositioning strategies are being followed, will be audited for
compliance and quality.
Assurance: The implementation of regular audits and ongoing educational efforts will be
monitored, with results reviewed in the spring of 2025 to assess improvements in repositioning
practices and a reduction in pressure ulcer incidence.
3.East Ground B ward had a paper version of a wound care plan which was designed to
provide detailed monitoring of her skin condition and a treatment plan for pressure sore care.
This was not completed at any stage.
On Ward East Ground B, there was a paper-based wound care plan designed to monitor Mrs
Tromans’ skin condition and provide a treatment plan for her pressure sores. However, this
plan was not completed at any point during her stay, which hindered the timely and effective
management of her pressure sores.
The Trust has responded by updating its wound care tools and processes:
• Updated Wound Assessment Chart: The Wound Assessment Chart has been
recently updated as part of the Wound Product Formulary review. This document is
now available to staff, who are being trained in its use during patient reviews. The chart
will be used to document skin assessments and treatment plans.
• Education and Training: The clinical educator for the Healthcare of Older Patients
(HCOP) service is delivering additional training across ward areas, with senior staff
leading bi-monthly sessions to reinforce pressure ulcer prevention and care.
Assurance: The use of the updated wound assessment chart will be monitored through
patient assessments and quarterly audits to ensure proper documentation and adherence to
care plans.
4. The Matron's investigation into these gaps in care did not seek to establish why they had
occurred. This raises a concern about the quality and efficacy of the Trust's post-death
investigations which in turn raises a concern for future deaths.
The Matron's investigation into the gaps in care did not thoroughly explore why these failures
occurred, which raises concerns about the effectiveness of post-death investigations within
the Trust. A more comprehensive investigation would involve speaking directly with staff
involved in care delivery to understand the root causes of care failures.
In response to this, the leadership team has reflected on the investigation process and
acknowledged the need for individual fact-finding interviews with staff involved in care delivery.
Moving forward:
•
Improved Investigation Process: The investigation process will be revised to include
individual statements from staff involved in care, ensuring that all aspects of care
delivery are fully explored. These findings will be embedded into roundtable reports to
provide greater assurance that all contributing factors are understood and addressed.
• Learning Dissemination: The findings from the investigation will be shared across all
relevant clinical teams, with regular updates and action plans to ensure that lessons
are learned and improvements are made.
Assurance: The Trust will continue to focus on improving its investigation process to ensure
that the causes of care gaps are thoroughly examined and that appropriate corrective actions
are taken. Regular reports will be presented to senior leadership to track progress.
Wider Learning and Improvement
The issues identified in Mrs Tromans’ care have prompted widespread changes across the
Emergency Medicine, Acute Medicine, and Healthcare of Older People (HCOP) services. The
case has been shared at the QEHB Care Quality Meeting to disseminate learning, and actions
are being reported through clinical delivery groups’ Quality and Safety meetings. Additionally,
improvements in care delivery, monitoring compliance with standards, and preventing future
incidents of pressure ulcers will continue to be a focus for ongoing staff education, audits, and
process improvements across the Trust.
These actions aim to enhance patient safety, improve pressure ulcer prevention, and ensure
that staff are equipped with the necessary knowledge and resources to provide high-quality
care.
I would like to assure you that the concerns raised within the Regulation 28 Report have been
taken extremely seriously, which I hope is demonstrated in the steps that have been taken
following Mrs Tromans’ death.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.