Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Cynthia Gilbert

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0061, written 24 Jan 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report24 Jan 2025
Reference2025-0061
DeceasedCynthia Gilbert
CoronerVanessa McKinlay
Coroner areaSomerset
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedSomerset NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

1

2

3

4

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

CORONER

I am Vanessa McKinlay, Assistant Coroner for Somerset

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 27 December 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Cynthia Mary Gilbert.
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 23 January 2025.  The conclusion
of the inquest was that Mrs Gilbert died as a result of natural causes contributed to by gaps
in the implementation of the pressure ulcer care plan in hospital.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Against  a  background  of  cardiac  and  respiratory  illness,  Mrs  Gilbert’s  mobility  had
deteriorated at home.  She was found on the morning of 30 August 2023 on the toilet, where
she had been all night having been unable to stand herself up.  She was admitted to Musgrove
Park  Hospital  where  she  was  discovered to  have  an  infective  exacerbation  of  her  chronic
obstructive pulmonary diease and grade 2 tissue injuries to the sacrum and buttocks.  During
a long hospital admission, Mrs Gilbert’s pressure ulcers deteriorated and became infected,
owing in part to her multiple co-morbidities and in part to gaps in the implementation of her
repositioning care plan. This caused septicaemia from which Mrs Gilbert died in hospital on
20 December 2023.

The medical cause of death was determined by 
Consultant Physician) to be:

 (Mrs Gilbert’s treating

1a Septicaemia
1b Pressure ulceration
1c Immobility
2 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Congestive cardiac failure, Atrial fibrillation

 5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances
it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:

a) Mrs Gilbert was noted to have grade 2 tissue damage on admission to hospital.  She
was assessed as being at very high risk of pressure ulcer development.  Her care plan
included  repositioning  every  1  to  2  hours.    The  Intentional  Rounding  documents
show  that,  during  her  time  spent  on  the  Old  Acute  Medical  Unit  and  Coleridge
Respiratory Unit (1/9/23 to 20/12/23), Mrs Gilbert remained in the same position in
bed for periods of many hours on multiple days.

b) Evidence  given  by  the  tissue  viability  nurse  was  that  the  tissue  viability  team
emphasised the importance of repositioning on five separate occasions to the ward
staff.    The  lack  of  adherence  to  the  repositioning  plan  continued  despite  these
communications.

c) Mrs Gilbert’s grade 2 tissue damage deteriorated to a grade 4 pressure ulcer during

her admission, leading to septicaemia.

d) The lack of adherence to the repositioning care plan for a patient at very high risk of

developing pressure ulcers raises a concern for future deaths.

e) The  evidence  given  by  the  Trust  at  the  inquest  did  not  provide  a  satisfactory
explanation as to why the repositioning care plan was not adhered to.  This raises a
concern about the quality and efficacy of the Trusts’ post-death investigation which
in turn raises a concern for future deaths.

6

7

8

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my  opinion action should be taken to  prevent future deaths  and I believe you have the
power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely
by 21 March 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:

 (Mrs Gilbert’s daughter).

I have also sent it to the Medical Examiner, ICS, NHS England and CQC.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

 The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.

She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of
interest.  You  may  make  representations to  me,  the  coroner,  at  the  time  of  your  response,
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

24 January 2025

Vanessa McKinlay
Assistant Coroner for Somerset

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
31 March 2025 

Mrs Samantha Marsh 
c/o Taunton Coroners Court 

Sent via email to  

Dear Mrs Marsh 

Trust Management Office
Musgrove Park Hospital

Barton House South  

Parkfield Drive
Taunton
TA1 5DA

REGULATION 28 REPORT – PREVENTION OF FUTURE DEATHS – Cynthia GILBERT 

I am writing in response to your correspondence dated 24 January 2025 regarding the 
Regulation 28 of the Coroner’s (investigations) Regulations 2013 following the inquest 
regarding the death of Cynthia Gilbert which concluded on 23 January 2025.  

We have set out the matters of concern as raised in the report and our response to them.  

MATTERS OF CONCERN 

1. 

Adherence to the repositioning guidance and documentation in our Intentional 
Rounding (IR) chart 

At Somerset NHS Foundation Trust it became clear that there was a lack of clarity around 
the purpose and process associated with the meaningful delivery of Intentional Rounding 
(IR) across the Trust. Some staff reported that they felt it had become a ‘tick box’ exercise 
and another theme was that with capacity and workforce issues on the ward, it was not 
always possible to complete it correctly.  A staff survey was completed across both acute 
hospitals and the data showed that not all staff had a full enough understanding of the 5 
elements of patient care that make up Intentional Rounding (pain, position, personal 
needs, patient wellbeing and prevention).  There are many factors for this, including a lack 
of consistency in its application with varying versions of the documentation used, and the 
lack of knowledge and experience/training of new nursing and Healthcare assistant (HCA) 
staff.  

In response to this, a Quality Improvement (QI) project was commenced in September 
2024 with an aim to address these variances and improve the overall understanding, 
application and staff culture, leading to increased patient safety, a reduction in harm and 
ultimately better outcomes for patients. Since testing the specific role modelling approach 
for IR across 5 pilot wards, there has been an improved awareness and understanding 
from colleagues, a reduced number of reported incidences and / or concerns, with fewer 
patients suffering harm through the adverse effects of pressures leading to pressure 
damage. A new tool was developed which will capture more accurately the care delivery 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ‘in real time’ and be patient centred to reflect the needs of the individual patient. We aim 
to have the tool and training package rolled out across the organisation by June 2025. 

2.  How we are addressing training around management of vulnerable patients 

Our Head of Tissue Viability, 
improvements over the last year, including:  

, and her team have led a range of 

• 

Introduction of a mandatory eLearning module for Pressure Ulcer Prevention – 
which notes the importance of repositioning patients and highlights immobility as a 
key risk factor for developing pressure ulcers.  Most recent figures demonstrate 93% 
compliance with substantive staff mapped to the training. 

•  They are using the national recognised framework “aSSKINg” to support pressure 

ulcer prevention processes and education – with the K being “keep moving”.  This is 
around mobility and supporting repositioning to aid prevention/management of 
pressure ulcers. 

•  They now have a Tissue Viability Education and QI Co-ordinator whose key function 
is to drive the development of the learning frameworks and competencies around 
tissue viability; the first framework they are looking at is pressure ulcers.  They have 
developed further resources to add to LEAP (learning platform) to support this plus a 
How to complete Waterlow (risk assessment) and eAssessment to support the 
above eLearning module.   

•  Education project 2023-24 – which saw 1251 education contacts, pre (1161) and 

post (481) knowledge questionnaires and audits that saw approximately 500 patient 
records reviewed within inpatient settings across the project. Further QI projects 
(with 6 ward areas with higher pressure ulcer rates) were commenced on the back of 
the results. 

• 

 has been a key stakeholder in the group reviewing the quality metrics tools 

across both the acutes. This set of metrics is a monthly audit which looks at the 
quality of care delivered across 9 domains, one of which is pressure ulcer 
prevention. The results of the audit are reviewed monthly by the senior ward 
managers and matrons, they look for areas of concern, share ideas and learning and 
plan improvement programmes.  

In addition to this, there is further planned work to:  

•  Align the selection of pressure relieving equipment (PRE) guide across the 

organisation. 

•  Review and alignment of care plan templates/documents across the inpatient 

settings, which will incorporate the aSSKINg framework as a basis. 

• 

further align the PRE across the inpatient areas; working with procurement, medical 
electronic/equipment library and other key stakeholders to ensure to appropriate 
options are procured.  This includes standardising the standard foam mattresses, air 
mattresses, heel protection devices and cushions across settings with either 
awarded contracts or preferred products lists.  In addition, industry supported 
equipment audits to be scheduled within the tissue viability and infection prevention 
& control services work programmes to appropriate equipment is available, clean 
and fit for purpose. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  There is work, as a national safety alert (cot sides and bed accessories), to review 
the use of lateral turning devices (integral to mattress or separate support device to 
aid lateral turning/repositioning.  This will include what devices are available to 
ensure equity of access, risk assessment tools for their use and developing a 
Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) document. 

•  Following engagement with the Executive Team, Non-Executive Directors, 

Governors, senior leadership team and the Associate Directors of Patient Care 
(ADPC’s), a clearer programme of Board and Service Group reporting is under 
development relating to this topic.  This is to improve Ward to Board understanding 
of challenges, assurance and actions/learning at all levels, with co-ordination 
through the Pressure Ulcer Steering Group.  In addition, there has been agreement 
to develop a reduction/improvement programme across key settings within the Trust. 

3.  Are we encouraging use of a positioning chart? The IR form is where we record 

position changes  

The Head of Tissue Viability, and her team have been instrumental in helping to develop 
the new IR tool. The document reports the patient’s position, frequency of required 
position change to promote skin integrity, and, if a patient declines, prompts the nursing 
staff to have a conversation with the patient around the benefits of position changes and 
the consequences of the adverse effects of pressure.  

4.  Engagement with families from all members of the MDT –  

The ADPC is carrying out patient and relative engagement walk rounds across all of our 
wards, during visiting hours, this have been very positive and allows us to hear about 
areas of notable good practice and areas of concerns that need to be addressed. A plan 
has been put in place to carry out a 15 steps challenge on several wards across the 
trust. Night walk rounds are ongoing by the ADPC across both acute sites and have been 
well received by both staff and the wider MDT. The matrons are now working 20% clinical 
on our wards weekly supporting with training and education and supporting with the 
identification of our high-risk patients and are leading on ward rounds and safety huddles 
with the ward senior leadership team. We are due to launch a test of change on 
Coleridge ward with a 5 day a week supernumerary role, titled the Quality and Safety 
Nurse, with clear aims and objectives and job planning, this will follow QI methodology. 
The ADPC supports a daily review of all incidents reported and the matrons will also 
review and ensure that all measures and steps have been taken to mitigate any further 
risk of harm for our patients.  All ward-based staff are encouraged to complete the 
pressure ulcer training on LEAP. 

The organisation has a personalised care improvement group that is focussing on ‘no 
, Director 
decision about me without me’. This work is being led by 
of Allied Health Professions, and will be based on good communication with patients and 
those that matter to them. The basis for this is understanding what matters to patients 
and family, carers and ensuring they are involved in decision making.  We are currently 
identifying projects on wards to help deliver care in this way.  

5.  Lack of learning identified following the death of Mrs Gilbert 

Within the Trust there has been a change in learning responses to patient safety 
incidents, since December 2023 due to the change from the Serious Incident Framework 
to Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). Previous methodology has 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 been changed, and we are continuing to develop robust learning responses, supported 
by new guidance and training. This change is being led by Head of Tissue Viability with 
support from Head of PSIRF implementation; current areas of test and change are 
happening across the Trust and learning from reviews will be shared within clinical areas 
and within service group governance and safety meetings, allowing for shared learning. 

Two Matrons within the medical service group (there is also one allocated for surgery in 
their portfolio) are now topic leads for pressure ulcer management within the medical 
service group. Their purpose, aim and involvement are to influence, support, guide and 
cascade wider learning across the service group via monthly matron portfolio meetings, 
patient safety review committee meetings which are held monthly, and additionally 
shared learning is also discussed at our 4 weekly Service Group Governance committee 
meetings. 

I hope that the above information has been helpful. Can I also take this opportunity to once 
again, express my condolences to the family for their loss of Mrs Gilbert. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further information. 

Your sincerely 

Chief Executive Officer 
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

Related reports

Other reports by Vanessa McKinlay

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.