Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0625, written 20 Sep 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 20 Sep 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0625 |
| Deceased | Susan Dear |
| Coroner | Hannah Godfrey |
| Coroner area | Berkshire |
| Category | Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Care 2. NHS ENGLAND 1 CORONER , Secretary of State for Health and Social I am Hannah Godfrey Area Coroner for the coroner area of Berkshire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. A prevention of future deaths report raises issues and is a recommendation that action should be taken but does not recommend what that action should be. That is a matter for the recipient. It is important to note the case of R (Dr Siddiqui and Dr Paeprer-Rohricht) v Assistant Coroner for East London. This case clarifies that the issuing and receipt of a Regulation 28 report entails no more than the coroner bringing some information regarding a public safety concern to the attention of the recipient. The report is not punitive in nature and engages no civil or criminal right or obligation on the part of the recipient, other than the obligation to respond to the report in writing within 56 days. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 23 May 2024 I opened an inquest into the death of Mrs Susan Dear on 4 January 2023 aged 72. The inquest concluded on 9 September 2024. The family requested that I refer to Mrs Dear as Susan, which this report will reflect. The conclusion of the inquest was that Susan had died of natural causes (Pulmonary Embolism due to underlying Deep Vein Thrombosis). 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Susan was suffering abdominal pain, and her family called 999 at 10.20 pm on 3 January and that call was triaged at category 3 (meaning that an ambulance was expected to be on scene within 120 minutes). At that time the inquest heard that there were 48 patients awaiting ambulances, 7 were waiting for category 2 ambulances with the longest wait time being 1 hour 12 minutes, 19 patients were waiting for category 3 ambulances with the longest wait time being 7 hour 55 minutes. Susan’s symptoms deteriorated and a second 999 call made at 2.32 on 4 January was triaged at category 2 (meaning that an ambulance was expected to be on scene within 1 40 minutes). At that time the area was in OPEL 4, the highest OPEL level, indicating Extreme Pressure on resources. There were 37 patients waiting for ambulances. 9 patients were awaiting category 2 ambulances with the longest wait being 5 hours 53 minutes, and 26 patients were awaiting Category 3 ambulances, with the longest waiting time being 14 hours 39 minutes. There was no ambulance resource available to respond at any time to Susan. At around 5 am Susan’s family decided they could wait no longer and drove her to hospital, where she was recognised as deceased shortly after arrival at 6.02 am. On the evidence at inquest I did not find that the ambulance delay contributed to Susan’s death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation and inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (1) South Central Ambulance Service (‘SCAS’)’s internal investigation established that there had been no missed opportunity to send an ambulance during the time that Susan was waiting overnight on 3 to 4 January 2023 as none was available; and (2) overnight between 3-4 January 2023 patient’s lives were put at risk because SCAS did not have ambulances available to meet the level of demand resulting in severe delay and ambulance response times far outside the national expected standards; and (3) this was not unprecedented but was reflective of a picture of a chronic situation whereby there was a continuing risk that demand for emergency ambulances would outstrip resources and SCAS were unable to reassure me this was a situation that had been resolved; and (4) SCAS have an SCAS wide improvement programme which is aimed at increasing capacity, which is monitored by NHS England and the Trust’s own commissioners. There was no evidence indicating anything that it was within SCAS’s power to change on this occasion; and (5) SCAS’s service was operating at under the number of planned staff for that night, (despite the service taking all reasonable steps to meet requirements) due to chronic understaffing of the service with recruitment and retention issues with paramedic and other emergency response staff that the inquest heard are problems nationally; and (6) handover delays at the Royal Berkshire Hospital and the Wexham Park Hospital were found to be a substantial root cause of the problem (due to ambulance staff being delayed at hospital with patients who could not be admitted to Accident & Emergency as other patients were unable to be admitted to the wards until beds were available) and that this was a problem that required improvement at a national level with changes to the social care system to ease the discharge of patients who required care in the community from the wards back into the community; and (7) resources were being wasted due to ignorance of some of members of the 2 public engaging with the service, and the inquest heard that it was unlikely this would improve substantially without a programme of public education regarding when it is appropriate to call 999, and when it is not. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you AND/OR your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14 November 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons (Susan’s husband), 1. 2. South Central Ambulance Service and 3. The Finchampstead Surgery. I have also sent it to The CQC and The Association of Ambulance Chief Executives who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 20 September 2024 Hannah GODFREY Area Coroner for Berkshire 3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Minister of State for Health (Secondary Care) 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 15th November 2024 Our ref: HM Coroner Hannah Godfrey Berkshire Coroners Court, Reading Town Hall, Blagrave Street, RG1 1QH By email: Dear Ms Godfrey, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 20 September 2024, sent to the Secretary of State about the death of Mrs Susan Dear. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for urgent and emergency care. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mrs Dear’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns over service pressures at South Central Ambulance Service NHS Trust (SCAS) and ambulance handover delays at Royal Berkshire Hospital and Wexham Park Hospital. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England to ensure we adequately address your concerns. I understand NHS England are writing to you regarding regional service improvements and actions being taken by SCAS. I am also informed they will respond to your concerns on appropriate public education about the circumstances in which it is appropriate to call 999. At a national level, this government is committed to returning to the safe operational waiting time standards set out in the NHS Constitution. In doing so we will be honest about the challenges facing the health service and serious about tackling them. The Health Secretary ordered an independent investigation of NHS performance to provide an assessment of the issues and challenges it faces. This reported on 12th September 2024 and the investigation’s findings will feed into the government’s work on a 10-year plan to radically reform the NHS and build a health service that is fit for the future. In the short-term, a range of action is being taken by the NHS this year to improve urgent and emergency care performance, including by maintaining capacity gains in acute hospital beds and ambulance hours on the road achieved in 2023-24, increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute services across bedded and non-bedded capacity, and directing patients to more appropriate services in the community where these can better meet their needs. Turning to your concerns on ambulance handover delays, this government is working to improve hospital flow to make sure people do not spend longer than necessary in hospital and reduce delayed discharges. We will tackle delayed discharges by developing local partnership working between the NHS and social care – and making sure people get the right support from health and social care services to return home as soon as possible. We have also ensured that every acute hospital has access to a care transfer hub. These hubs bring together professionals from the NHS and social care to manage discharges for people with more complex needs who need extra support. In the integrated care systems that face the most discharge delays, the Department is working directly with partners across health and social care to drive improvements. Health and care systems and providers should work together to ensure that efforts to discharge individuals from hospital into social care are joined up and make best use of available resources, in line with the duty to cooperate set out in Section 82 of the NHS Act 2006. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, MINISTER OF STATE FOR HEALTH
Ms Hannah Godfrey
Area Coroner
Berkshire Coroner’s Office
Reading Town Hall
Blagrave Street
Reading
RG1 1QH
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
11 November 2024
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Susan Dear who died on
4 January 2023
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 20
September 2024 concerning the death of Susan Dear on 4 January 2023. In advance
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express
my deep condolences to Susan’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to
assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Susan’s care have
been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raises concerns over the level of demand on South Central Ambulance
Service (SCAS), and notes that there was a continuing risk that demand for
emergency ambulances would outstrip resources. Your Report also raises that a
substantial root cause of the problem was handover delays at the Royal Berkshire
Hospital and the Wexham Park Hospital.
NHS England recognises the significant pressures on all NHS services, including
ambulances, and continues to prioritise improvements to Category 2 response times,
as well as 4 hour performance in Emergency Departments (EDs) to recover and
improve urgent and emergency care (UEC) services. Despite significant challenges,
including unprecedented industrial action and higher than anticipated demand, there
has been a marked improvement in 2023/24, with over 2.5 million more people
completing their A&E treatment within 4 hours compared to 2022/23.
Work has also focused on the need to increase ambulance capacity through growing
the workforce, improving flow through hospitals and reducing handover delays,
speeding up discharges from hospital and expanding new services in the community;
all of which support improved patient flow. The NHS is also working more closely with
local authorities to improve the timely discharge of patients and has developed
discharge metrics to monitor performance improvements.
Response times for Category 2 ambulance calls have improved over the past year,
with an average response time over 13 minutes faster compared to the previous year.
Other benefits for patients include:
•
tens of thousands more people received the care they needed to return home
quickly and safely due to expansion of same day emergency care (SDEC)
services
• on average, around 500 fewer patients a day had to spend the night in hospital
because of a discharge delay, and 13% more patients received a short-term
package of health or social care to help continue their recovery after discharge
• urgent community response teams provided 720,000 people with an alternative
to going to hospital between April and January.
• virtual wards have supported more than 240,000 people to get the hospital-
level care and monitoring they needed in the comfort of their own home
The ambitions for 2024/25 have recently been set out in the NHS priorities and
operational planning guidance. These are:
•
•
improve A&E performance with 78% of patients being admitted, transferred, or
discharged within 4 hours by March 2025
improve Category 2 ambulance response times relative to 2023/24, to an
average of 30 minutes across 2024/25
the NHS standard contract states
Within Emergency Departments,
that all
handovers of patients between ambulances and A&E must take place within 15
minutes, with none taking more than 30 minutes. The clock begins when an
ambulance arrives outside an A&E department and stops when a clinical handover
has been fully completed to A&E staff. Key Lines of Enquiry (KLOEs) have previously
been developed by NHS England to support ambulance and acute providers to identify
key opportunities to reduce ambulance handover delays and improve patient flow, as
outlined in the UEC Recovery Plan (2023).
Ambulance handover times vary across England and, at a local level, acute hospital
providers are working with ambulance providers to accept patient care transfers as
soon as the patient enters the hospital site, with some acute hospital providers having
designated clinical teams to accept ambulance handover patients, with escalation
plans in place when demand increases beyond current capacity levels. This continues
to be a focus for recovery at a national level for year two of NHS England’s UEC
Recovery Plan.
My regional colleagues in the South East have engaged with SCAS on the concerns
raised in your Report. There are number of local initiatives and improvement
programmes underway to improve their performance and ensure that the Trust is
delivering the best care to its patients. They advise that they are on target to employ
an additional 100 paramedics this year, through an international recruitment
programme, and that they have purchased additional ambulances through the national
procurement framework. They recently received the first batch of 53 new ambulances
and are expecting delivery of a further 71 next month. They are also working hard to
increase efficiencies across the service, and have been working closely with all of their
providers to identify suitable care pathways that avoid patients being unnecessarily
conveyed to EDs and ensure quicker admittance to the correct specialty.
My regional colleagues are also in the process of engaging with Buckinghamshire,
Oxfordshire and Berkshire West Integrated Care Board (BOB ICB) and Frimley ICB,
the responsible commissioners for Royal Berkshire Hospital and Wexham Park
Hospital ED services, regarding your concerns about ongoing handover delays. We
would expect the Department of Health and Social Care’s response to the Coroner to
respond to your concerns over the national social care system.
Your Report also raised the concern that UEC resources were being wasted due to
the ignorance of some members of the public, and that this was unlikely to improve
without a programme of public education regarding when it is appropriate to call 999.
There are national efforts underway to educate the public on when it is appropriate to
call 999. NHS England runs a series of national public education campaigns
signposting to the range of different services available. These also include resources
around symptoms such as those which indicate a possible stroke or heart attack and
require emergency treatment, as well as how and when to use NHS 111, a GP and
pharmacist.
Systems and providers are also encouraged to use the variety of campaign resources
available to run their own local campaigns such as Stay Well this Winter, focusing on
prevention and encouraging the uptake of Covid-19, flu and RSV vaccinations.
SCAS advise us that they regularly publish articles on social and other platforms
during periods of high demand, directing the public to contact other health care
services such as 111 or their local pharmacy for conditions that can be managed
through that service.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Susan, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us
to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.