Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0152, written 10 Mar 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 10 Mar 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0152 |
| Deceased | Darryl Johnson |
| Coroner | Emma Whitting |
| Coroner area | Bedfordshire and Luton |
| Category | Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHSNOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHSTHIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:1 CEO Ordnance Survey1CORONERI am Emma WHITTING, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Bedfordshire and Luton Coroner Service2CORONER’S LEGAL POWERSI make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.3INVESTIGATION and INQUESTOn 12 March 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Darryl JOHNSON aged52. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 09 March 2026. TheNarrative Conclusion of the inquest was that:The Deceased died from an untreated pulmonary thrombo-embolism.4CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATHThe Deceased had resided at 27b Market Square in Sandy since 2015. After failing toattend his work as expected on 24 February 2025, at around 21.55 hours that evening, his co-workers discovered him deceased at his home. Police attended and confirmed his death at 23.09 hours. Investigations revealed that at 06.17 hours earlier that morning, the Deceased had called ambulance services complaining of breathing problems and feeling faint. An ambulance crew was despatched just under an hour later. However, even though he had provided the correct address, the ambulance call handler, relying on the Ordnance Survey Map Database, had directed the crew to attend a different address, namely, 27a Market Square. When there was no response at that address, the crew called the Fire Service to force entry, but when no-one was found to be there the call response was closed. Had the crew been sent to the right address, the Deceased may have been found alive, although it remained unclear whether his death would have been avoided.5CORONER’S CONCERNSDuring the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:(brief summary of matters of concern)The East of England Ambulance Services Trust confirmed that their CAD system utilises an address and map database supplied by Ordnance Survey but that postal addresses listed in this database along with mapping coordinates to locate the property are not always accurate. Whilst it is it is accepted that it is not feasible for the database to be 100% accurate and up to date because it will take time for the system to be updated (as for example in the following situations:Regulation 28 – After InquestDocument Template Updated 30/07/2021 • New builds• Change of property name/number• Change of use for a property/dwelling)the Deceased had purchased his property over 11 years ago and had been paying Council Tax since that time. It is, therefore, of concern why the database still did not have full details of his address.6ACTION SHOULD BE TAKENIn my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/oryour organisation) have the power to take such action.7YOUR RESPONSEYou are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by May 05, 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period.Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.8COPIES and PUBLICATIONI have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following InterestedPersonsEast of England Ambulance ServiceI am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful orof interest.The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.9Dated: 10/03/2026Emma WHITTINGSenior Coroner forBedfordshire and Luton Coroner ServiceRegulation 28 – After InquestDocument Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Ordnance Survey
Explorer House, Adanac Drive,
Southampton, SO16 0AS.
+
Senior Coroner Emma Whitting
Central Bedfordshire Council
Coroner's Office
The Court House, Woburn Street, Ampthill, Bedfordshire
MK45 2HX
Via email:
19 May 2026
Ref // NB/JOM/CW (8681.1)
Dear Senior Coroner Whitting
Subject: Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 10 March 2026
Inquest into the death of Darryl Johnson (Deceased)
Introduction
I refer to the Regulation 28 report referenced above which Ordnance Survey
Limited ('Ordnance Survey') received on 13 March 2026. This letter sets out
Ordnance Survey’s response as required under section 7 of the Regulation 28
report.
Firstly, on behalf of Ordnance Survey and GeoPlace LLP (‘GeoPlace’, who I describe
below) I would like to take this opportunity to extend our sympathies to Darryl
Johnson's family and friends. This is a tragic matter and we are grateful to you for
bringing it to our attention and for the opportunity to review the matters of concern
identified within your Regulation 28 report.
Ordnance Survey and GeoPlace are taking the matters of concern very seriously.
We have undertaken an extensive fact-finding investigation into the circumstances
giving rise to your concerns and carefully considered the actions that we can take
in response, which we believe will support Emergency Service response in relation
to location queries and therefore help prevent future deaths.
As part of our investigation, we have worked closely with GeoPlace, whose role we
explain in detail in Schedule 1, and made enquiries with other relevant stakeholders
involved in the compilation and use of the address data supplied by Ordnance
Survey. In consultation with GeoPlace, we have also identified a number of
Registered in England and Wales under number 09121572
Registered Office: Explorer House, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS
2
corrective and improvement actions which I detail below, as well as a timetable for
completion of these actions (see Schedule 2).
Matters of concern
I note the matters of concern set out in your report as follows:
'The East of England Ambulance Services Trust confirmed that their CAD system
utilises an address and map database supplied by Ordnance Survey but that
postal addresses listed in this database along with mapping coordinates to locate
the property are not always accurate. Whilst it is it is accepted that it is not
feasible for the database to be 100% accurate and up to date because it will take
time for the system to be updated (as for example in the following situations:
•
•
•
New builds
Change of property name/number
Change of use for a property/dwelling)
the Deceased had purchased his property over 11 years ago and had been paying
Council Tax since that time. It is, therefore, of concern why the database still did
not have full details of his address.''
Executive summary of our response to the matters of concern
The key points to note from our detailed fact-finding investigation set out in
Schedule 1 are as follows:
- Ordnance Survey's address products that were being used by East of England
Ambulance Services Trust did not include any address information for 27B Market
Square, Potton, SG19 2NP ('27B') at the relevant time.
- Ordnance Survey’s address products rely on the provision of accurate addresses
through an established supply chain, whereby data is provided to Ordnance Survey
(via its associated organisation, GeoPlace) by local authorities, Royal Mail and the
Valuation Office Agency ('VOA').
- At the time of the incident, Ordnance Survey’s address products only included
addresses that had been verified through an address matching process with the
relevant local authority (see further details in Schedule 1). This is because local
authorities have statutory responsibility for street naming and numbering and
maintaining address information in the official register of addresses known as the
Local Land and Property Gazetteer (‘LLPG’). The local authority is therefore
considered to be the authoritative source of the address.
- Royal Mail had created address data for 27B in 2013 in the course of mail delivery,
and this address was included in Royal Mail’s Postcode Address File (‘PAF’)
database which is a key source of address data for GeoPlace and Ordnance Survey.
Registered in England and Wales under number 09121572
Registered Office: Explorer House, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS
3
However, whilst GeoPlace had identified 27B’s inclusion in Royal Mail PAF data and
had notified this to Central Bedfordshire Council for investigation, the address had
not been reviewed by Central Bedfordshire Council and not 'matched' with their
LLPG.
- Central Bedfordshire Council have now confirmed that they do not hold any
records referring to 27B Market Square in their LLPG or other internal datasets.
This explains why 27B is 'unmatched' and was not included in the Ordnance Survey
address products at the relevant time. Central Bedfordshire Council have also
confirmed that their Council Tax system holds two residential addresses at 27
namely “27A Market Square" and "The Cottage, 27 Market Square" whilst the LLPG
only holds "27A Market Square".
- Whilst 27B was included within Royal Mail’s PAF database, the property appears to
have been identified in a number of other sources with different and inconsistent
descriptors. For instance, HM Land Registry do not hold any record of “27B” and
Mr Johnson was the proprietor of a freehold title registered with the description of
“Land to the South of 27 Market Square”, and not 27B.
- Similarly, 27B is not included in the Valuation Office Agency’s Council Tax rating
lists (another key source dataset used by GeoPlace and Ordnance Survey).
Although VOA does contain records for “27A Market Square” and “Flat at 27”. We
note that whilst Central Bedfordshire Council hold a Council Tax record for “27A
Market Square”, they do not hold a record of “Flat at 27” for Council Tax purposes,
but do hold “The Cottage, 27 Market Square”: we do not have confirmation that
these two addresses are the same rateable properties.
I wish to make it clear that I do not include this context (nor the detailed
explanations in Schedule 1) by way of excuse or justification for 27B not being
included in Ordnance Survey address products, rather to explain the scale and
complexity of the task, the multiple stakeholders and sources involved, and to
explain why addresses were only included within Ordnance Survey address
products once matched to the local authority LLPG address.
Further details of our fact-finding investigation can be found in Schedule 1.
Corrective and improvement actions
Before I set out a summary of the actions Ordnance Survey is taking in response to
the matters of concern, it is notable that the latest version of our most recent
Address product - NGD Address Version 3 (‘NGD Address V3’) which was released
in October 2025 - already includes unmatched Royal Mail address data, including
27B, in the 'Royal Mail Address' feature type. Since 27B remains unmatched with
any Central Bedfordshire Council LLPG record, the product only includes the
address of 27B and an estimated position at the beginning of Market Square, rather
than assigning geographic co-ordinates to the specific building to which 27B relates.
Registered in England and Wales under number 09121572
Registered Office: Explorer House, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS
4
Regarding the actions we are taking, these fall into two categories, the first of which
relate to Data Quality and Improvement and the second of which relate to
Customer adoption, awareness and guidance.
In relation to the first category of Data Quality and Improvement, the actions are
summarised as follows:
1. Ordnance Survey and GeoPlace will undertake a comprehensive analysis of
unmatched address records across England and Wales, and will use the results of
the analysis to prioritise unmatched records for resolution by individual local
authorities.
2. As part of this, Ordnance Survey and GeoPlace will work with Central
Bedfordshire Council to address unresolved and unmatched VOA and PAF records,
including 27B.
Ordnance Survey and GeoPlace will also seek to work with Royal Mail on how we
could improve collaboration on national address sharing and management. We will
also seek to agree new resolution targets with local authorities in relation to this
review and for future management of unmatched addresses, although this will of
course be subject to agreement with local authorities.
However, I must stress that whilst Ordnance Survey and GeoPlace will do
everything they reasonably can to help facilitate the resolution process, the
success of this review will depend on the co-operation and engagement of local
authorities including Central Bedfordshire Council. As such, we will be seeking
support from the Local Government Association (LGA) which is the national
membership body for local authorities in England and Wales.
In relation to the second category of Customer adoption, awareness and guidance,
the actions are summarised as follows:
1. We will promote the adoption and use by the Emergency Services (and by our Licensed
Partners who include Ordnance Survey data within their products and services and
work with the Emergency Services) of NGD Address V3, which as noted above, includes
Royal Mail addresses such as 27B which have not been matched.
2. We will review and update our best practice guidance to Ordnance Survey’s
Emergency Services working group in relation to determining location and position. This
will include guidance for situations where an emergency call handler is working with
unmatched addresses and locations. This guidance will be extended to local authority
address custodians and local authority emergency planners for information and
awareness.
Details of the action plan, including timescales, can be found in Schedule 2.
Registered in England and Wales under number 09121572
Registered Office: Explorer House, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS
5
Conclusion
Having conducted a thorough investigation into the matters of concern, it has
become apparent that there were a number of complexities associated with this
particular address, both in terms of its address data history and competing source
information, HM Land Registry title registration, physical location, and signage, as
detailed in Schedule 1.
We trust this letter (and the attached schedules) provide sufficient explanation
regarding the detail and circumstances relating to the particular address 27B, but
also provide a clear explanation of the overall process of address data creation,
maintenance and supply. Although collating and maintaining address data is
complex and relies on a number of sources, this does not reduce our regret that
Ordnance Survey's products did not include address information for Mr Johnson’s
residence at the relevant time.
Moreover, this investigation has highlighted some areas for improvement from
which we have been able to identify actions that we and other key stakeholders can
focus on to drive improvements to the accuracy and reliability of address data for
the benefit of Emergency Services, citizens and the nation as a whole.
The matters of concern in your Regulation 28 report are being taken very seriously
by Ordnance Survey and GeoPlace and we are working with relevant stakeholders
to ensure, to the extent of our control and influence, that the issues and action
plans identified are being addressed. Should you consider it helpful, we can provide
you with an update on progress against the above actions at the end of September
2026.
Furthermore, should you require further clarification on any part of our response, I
would be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
CEO Ordnance Survey Limited
Registered in England and Wales under number 09121572
Registered Office: Explorer House, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.