Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Mark-Anthony Summersett

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0015, written 10 Jan 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Jan 2025
Reference2025-0015
DeceasedMark-Anthony Summersett
CoronerJoseph Turner
Coroner areaWest Sussex, Brighton and Hove
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

The Chief Executive University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust

1

CORONER

I am Joseph TURNER, Area Coroner for the coroner area of West Sussex, Brighton and
Hove

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 16 February 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mark-Anthony
SUMMERSETT aged 58. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 09
January 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was that:

On 5 February 2024 Mark-Anthony Summersett attended the Emergency Department at
Worthing Hospital in the company of a Police Officer. Suicidal thoughts were reported and
recorded by reception staff but Mr Summersett left around an hour later before being
triaged or assessed for treatment. Over thirty six hours later he was sadly found deceased
in his car in the Crown Car Park, Arundel on 7 February 2024, with self-inflicted wounds to
his neck; Police ruled out any 3rd party involvement.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Mr Summersett was known to local Mental Health Services (ATS), although he had
cancelled multiple appointments for a full clinical assessment. He approached Police on 5
February 2024, at the station in Littlehampton trying to hand himself in for fraud. He
stated that he felt he should be punished and everyone would be better off if he was dead.
He said a decline in his mental health had led to him self-harming a number of times, but
he didn't think he could actually end his life and had thrown away a razor blade just before
coming to the police.

Officers took him to Worthing General Hospital Emergency Department to receive help.
They helped him sign in at 1840 and he told reception that he was experiencing suicidal
thoughts. Officers left him in the care of hospital staff. He was seen around an hour later
appearing calm. He was not called for triage until 1946 but did not respond. ED staff
notified the MHLT who confirmed he was known to their service. They were only told he
was experiencing suicidal thoughts and made internal notification to his lead practitioner.
Both teams attempted contact by telephone to Mr Summersett’s mobile, to no avail. MHLT
were unaware that he had been brought to hospital by Police, who were not informed he
had left the ED. Nor were his former partner or GP informed. Neither Police nor his
partner therefore attempted contact.

On 7th February Police and SECAMB were called at 1415 to report that a male had been
found deceased in his car in Arundel, subsequently identified as Mr Summersett.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:

Regulation 28 – After Inquest

Template Updated 15/10//2024 TG

 Whilst I heard evidence that the UHS Foundation Trust has a Missing Person policy –
Walkouts/absconding patients (approved 23 May 2024), in Mr Summersett’s case there was
a lack of recorded and/or shared information across all the agencies and teams with whom
he had had contact, or to whom he was known, such that an accurate and fully reflective
risk assessment was not achieved, exacerbated by delays in the triage process in the ED.

Mr Summersett was not notified to Police as a missing person and nor were Police informed
he had left the ED, despite them simultaneously raising a safeguarding risk via a Vulnerable
Adult Single Combined Assessment of Risk Form.

In sum, there was therefore a lack of information sufficiency, flow and sharing across the
agencies whilst he was present in, and at and after the point he left, the ED, which might
have enabled greater efforts to locate, contact and more urgently treat him.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by March 06, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. You may wish to invite other agencies to contribute to any response.
Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons

(former partner)

Sussex Police
Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or
of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Dated: 10/01/2025

Joseph TURNER
Area Coroner for
West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Regulation 28 – After Inquest

Template Updated 15/10//2024 TG

 Regulation 28 – After Inquest

Template Updated 15/10//2024 TG

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from University Hospitals Sussex (PDF)
Our Ref: GF 

3 March 2025 

Mr J Turner 
Area Coroner for West Sussex, Brighton and Hove 

Dear Mr Turner 

Worthing Hospital 
Trust HQ 
Lyndhurst Road 
Worthing 
West Sussex 
BN11 2DH 
Tel: 01903 205111 
www.uhsussex.nhs.uk 

RE: Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths:  Mark SUMMERSETT 

I write to formally acknowledge receipt of the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths and to 
respond to your matters of concern.  Please be assured that the report has been considered by the 
Medicine Division Leadership and operational team (Worthing, St. Richards and Southlands), and also 
Trust wide across the four main UHSx hospital sites with the Medicine, Specialist, Surgical, and 
Cancer Divisions who manage all the wards and Emergency Departments (EDs).  

Please find below the response to your concerns raised, which I hope will give the assurance required 
that the Trust has fully reviewed and communicated the current processes to be followed following 
absence of a patient to reduce the likelihood of a similar incident occurring again.   

There was a lack of information sufficiency, flow and sharing across the agencies whilst he 
was present in, and at and after the point he left the ED, which might have enabled greater 
efforts to locate, contact and more urgently treat him.  

Following the investigation report into Mr Summersett’s attendance and suicide in February 2024, I 
would firstly confirm that the two key actions in the action plan (support for triage at times of high 
demand and handover from police to Trust staff) have been addressed. 

Since this incident in February 2024, the Trust has undertaken a large amount of work in relation to its 
processes around missing persons from wards or EDs.  This has also been as a response to the Right 
Care and Right Person National Programme (RCRP) and changes to the Police response to following 
up Welfare checks (Phase 1), and Missing Persons (phase 2), and also later phases (3 & 4) of 
reduction to conveyances and time spent in hospital with those under s136. 

Over the past 12 months (January 24 – January 25) Worthing ED has had 199 patients recorded on 
their electronic system who have absconded from the department (range between 6 – 22 per month).  
Of these from the electronic records we are aware that 51% (102 patients) were referred for police 
follow up.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Prior to May 25th when the RCRP missing persons became live across Sussex, the referrals to police 
for follow up were between 50 – 75% per month and post Phase 2 go-live, the EDs have reduced the 
referrals to police, in line with the referral criteria for only critical concern/high-risk patients to be 
referred to between 40 – 50% (1 month only).  Prior to the policy change the ED had referred patients 
to the police considered medium to high risk, and this has now changed to only those of critical 
concern/high risk. This risk is assessed on a case-by-case basis prior to referral and after liaison with 
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SPFT) as first line, to review any existing mental health 
history, prior to calling police.  If there is any doubt in whether to refer or not to the police, they will 
refer, for police to decide whether they will follow up.  

The Divisional Directors of Nursing for both medicine divisions, together with the Managing Director for 
Urgent/unplanned care, have attended the system wide meetings led by the Sussex ICB, to represent 
the Trust with system partners, SPFT, Police, Local authority (AMHP service) and East Sussex Health 
Care NHS Trust (ESHT).  These commenced early 2024 and have continued throughout last year and 
into 2025, with working groups still ongoing for both missing persons and s136 phases.  

The Trust has fully reviewed and revised the Missing Persons policy, with more information around the 
required processes in relation to patients who are at risk of absconding, and actions to be taken when 
patients do leave.   This was done collaboratively across primarily the medical divisions and ED 
teams, but also with the other Divisions.  There is detailed information around the legal principles and 
powers available to staff to detain and prevent patients from leaving (Mental Health Act and Mental 
Capacity Act) alongside more detailed information about the police response to missing persons, and 
criteria of those patients of critical concern who they will respond to.   There are clear guidelines, flow 
charts and documentation to be used for the assessment of vulnerable patients, a process if concern 
are intending to leave and once have left.  This includes the communication needed to patient, next of 
kin (NOK), and other system partners who may or may not be involved in the patient’s care pathway or 
management plan, and police involvement if deemed at high risk.  The new policy also highlights that 
any patient self-presenting to ED will be escalated directly by the receptionist to the triage or nurse in 
charge to ensure early review regarding risk and follow up.   

The policy essential documentation and guidelines therein, were circulated to all wards and EDs 
before May 25th when phase 2 of RCRP was introduced across Sussex, and the main documents and 
flow charts to be used sent as separate, ready to hand information.    These were further recirculated 
in Q2 (following slight update/ minor amendments to the policy early September, which included the 
system escalation responses) to ensure there was a renewed focus for clinical teams. 

There was also trust wide communication to all staff as part of the Trust’s “Theme of the Week” in 
December 2024, where targeted information is shared at daily safety huddles across all the clinical 
areas for a week.  This included key points around managing patients who have absconded, who 
should be contacted, documentation and follow up via incident reporting. 

The Divisions of Medicine have continued to work collaboratively with SPFT colleagues over the year 
reviewing ED documentation (reviewing assessments of both triage and Mental Health Liaison Team 
(MHLT), enhanced observation processes, and the communications between the EDs and the 

 
 
 
 
 
 MHLTs).  There will be a further review and update to the documentation following a further meeting 
planned in early March 2025. 

There has been ongoing discussion with Sussex Police since October with regard to the handover 
process of patients when conveyed to ED by the police (outside of s136 process), to ensure this is 
robust and any such patient is handed over directly to an ED nurse when booking in at reception, so 
they can be immediately reviewed and prioritised for triage assessment.   The police have developed 
a handover form (draft copy can be sent if required). This has taken 3 months to finalise and take 
through police governance processes and is being taken for ratification by the police service on March 
5th.  Once this is able to be used this will greatly help with pre-hospital information about the vulnerable 
person and aid ongoing risk assessments and follow up, especially in a scenario should the patient 
leave before being seen by MHLT.  

The RCRP missing persons working group is also working on a pan Sussex poster for ED waiting 
rooms to encourage patients not to leave without seeking advice from reception or ED personnel and 
also information for external help and support services. This is currently being reviewed by Experts by 
Experience (EbEs) and, once more feedback has been received by them, the poster will be designed 
and used in all EDs. 

Further work being undertaken in the ICB wide missing persons group will be commencing with regard 
to how to proceed with a whole system policy ‘Missing from Emergency Department’.  Trust senior 
nursing staff will continue to work collaboratively in these groups to ensure these pieces of work are 
taken forward for UHSx.  

Since May 2024, UHSx have worked further with Sussex Police to review missing patients who have 
been referred to police for follow up post absconding.  Daily reports are sent to the hospital nurse 
directors, medicine divisional directors of nursing, and ED matrons/heads of nursing, in order to review 
the patients, to confirm if request for police follow up was appropriate in terms of risk of patient or not, 
and also to share any feedback and learning.  

The Trust has commenced on the Royal Sussex County Hospital and Princess Royal Hospital sites a 
fortnightly meeting to discuss cases with senior nurse leads/ED, police, SPFT and security teams 
present.  This is helping to inform learning and improve processes and communication between all 
system partners.  Similar meetings will be set up for Worthing Hospital and St Richard’s Hospital sites 
to facilitate the same shared learning and improvements in processes. It is hoped these can 
commence in March 2025.  

Post coroner’s inquest, the Divisional Director of Nursing for Medicine, Worthing, has further followed 
up with lead in SPFT for Worthing site, and having reviewed the guidelines produced for MHLT 
colleagues, has developed some similar bullet point guidelines for wards and EDs for quick easy 
reference, and is recirculating these across the Trust with the key flowcharts and missing person 
documentation from the policy.  This will provide further quick reference laminated guidance at point of 
care to help staff at the time when faced by an absconding patient, to ensure correct processes are 
followed to promote the patient’s safeguarding to reduce potential harm after leaving the department.  
This can be provided as evidence should HM Coroner request this.     

 
 
 
 
 
 
 The ED at Worthing has also commenced a ‘streaming’ model at the front door during the day, i.e a 
nurse situated within the reception area to help with capacity and redirection of some patients away 
from ED and into Urgent treatment centre or Same day emergency care services.  As well as providing 
immediate brief assessment by a nurse at point of booking in, this will reduce numbers waiting to be 
seen by the ED team, and both of these improvements should assist with prompt risk assessment of 
MH patients self-presenting, and also the time to first triage and MH risk assessment.  Both issues for 
ED in this sad case.  

I hope the above information provides HM Coroner with the assurance that UHSx has learnt from this 
extremely sad incident, and that there are processes in place and embedded across our EDs and 
wards with the aim to reduce the likelihood of such harm happening in the future.  We will continue to 
work collaboratively with ongoing improvements with colleagues in SPFT and the Police in order to 
improve the pathway of care for these patients.   

Yours sincerely  

Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Joseph Turner

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.