Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Margaret Rodgers

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0096, written 19 Feb 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report19 Feb 2025
Reference2025-0096
DeceasedMargaret Rodgers
CoronerSusan Ridge
Coroner areaSurrey
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedSurrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

IN THE SURREY CORONER’S COURT 
IN THE MATTER OF: 

__________________________________________________________ 

The Inquest Touching the Death of Margaret Kathleen Rodgers  
A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths 
__________________________________________________________ 

1  THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Chief Executive  
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust  
Trust Headquarters  
East Surrey Hospital 
Canada Avenue 
Redhill 
RH1 5RH 

2  CORONER 

Ms Susan Ridge, H.M. Assistant Coroner for Surrey 

3  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 5 to The Coroners 
and Justice Act 2009. 

4 

INQUEST 

An inquest into Mrs Rodgers death was opened on 25 July 2024.  The 
inquest was resumed on 27 January 2025 and concluded on 19 February 
2025.    

The medical cause of Mrs  Rodgers’ death was: 

1a.Congestive Cardiac Failure 

1b Aortic Stenosis and Urinary Tract Infection 

2. Rib and Spinal Fractures, Decubitus Ulcer (operated) and Frailty of Old 

Age  

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 A narrative conclusion was recorded at Box 4 of the Record of Inquest as 
follows: 

On 3 December 2023, Margaret Kathleen Rodgers had a fall at her home in 
Warlingham Surrey. She was taken to hospital the same day and found to 
have sustained rib fractures and spinal fracture and was admitted to East 
Surrey Hospital.  Mrs Rodgers developed hospital acquired pneumonia 
during her admission for which she was treated. On 14 December 2023 
she was found to have an unstageable or advanced sacral pressure ulcer, 
its development and progress had not been identified until that point. As 
a result Mrs Rogers required two surgical procedures, on 21 December 
and 27 December 2023, under general anaesthetic to treat the infected 
ulcer. Whilst in hospital Mrs Rodgers developed a urinary tract infection 
and this together with preadmission aortic stenosis and cardiac failure led 
to her death from congestive cardiac failure on 12 January 2024 at East 
Surrey Hospital Redhill. Both Mrs Rodgers trauma injuries which resulted 
in immobility adding to her risk of pneumonia and the development in 
hospital of the advanced sacral ulcer which required surgery more than 
minimally contributed to her death in that they impacted on her physical 
reserves which were already undermined by her existing heart failure and 
frailty.   

 
 
 
 
 5  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

See narrative conclusion above. 

6  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are: 

The court heard that whilst the Trust has implemented a number of 
recommendations arising out of the patient safety review following Mrs 
Rodgers death, a number have yet to be resolved in particular: 

a. NICE and the National Wound Care Strategy guidance is that patients 
admitted to hospital have a pressure ulcer risk assessment within 6 hours 
of admission. This means that the first assessment will often need to be 
undertaken in the Emergency Department (ED). The court heard that the 
work to ensure that the ED completes such assessments is ongoing and 
not yet embedded and that there are practical difficulties, for example 
when ED patients were located on corridors.   

b. The court also heard that in December 2023 to January 2024, the period 
of Mrs Rodgers admission, the hospital was experiencing a high level of 
operational pressures and that on occasions the ward itself had 
insufficient nursing staff levels to meet the demand of acutely ill patients 
with high dependency needs. The Trust is undertaking a review of the 
staffing template for the ward, but that work is not complete and not yet 
incorporated into the budget.  

 
 
 
 
 The coroner is concerned that in not completing the above 
recommendations arising out of the patient safety review, the Trust is 
placing patients at risk of early death.  

7  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe that the people listed in paragraph one above have the power to 
take such action.  

8  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I 
may extend that period on request. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise you must 
explain why no action is proposed. 

9  COPIES 

I have sent a copy of this report to the following: 

1.  Chief Coroner  
2.  Mrs Rodgers family  

 
 
 
  
 10  Signed: 

Susan Ridge  

S K Ridge 
H.M Assistant Coroner for Surrey 
Dated this 19th day of February 2025

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Surrey Sussex NHS Trust (PDF)
Trust Headquarters 
East Surrey Hospital 
Canada Avenue 
Redhill 
RH1 5RH 

Tel: 01737 768 511 
www.surreyandsussex.nhs.uk  

15 April 2025 

HM Assistant Coroner Ms Ridge  
Woking Coroner's Court 
Station Approach  
Woking 
GU22 7AP  

Dear Madam 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Margaret Rodgers  

Thank  you  for  your  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  (hereafter  “Report”)  dated  19  February  2025 
concerning the death of Margaret Rodgers. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised 
in  your  Report,  I  would  like  to  express  my  deep  condolences  to  Margaret's  family  and  loved  ones. 
Surrey  &  Sussex  Healthcare  NHS  Trust  are  keen  to  assure  the  family  and  the  Coroner  that  the 
concerns  raised  about  Margaret's  care  and  the  circumstances  surrounding  her  death  have  been 
listened to and reflected upon.   

The  first  concern  raised  was  as  follows:  'NICE  and  the  National  Wound  Care  Strategy  guidance  is  that 
patients admitted to hospital have a pressure ulcer risk assessment within 6 hours of admission. This means that 
the first assessment will often need to be undertaken in the Emergency Department (ED). The court heard that 
the work to ensure that the ED completes such assessments is ongoing and not yet embedded and that there are 
practical difficulties, for example when ED patients were located on corridors.' 

The Trust has considered this concern carefully and we enclose a copy of our Emergency Department 
action plan, with reference to the pertinent points below. This action plan has been in place since May 
2024 and was implemented to assist with extended patient stays in the Emergency Department (ED) 
in a post-covid environment.  

An Associated University Hospital of 
Brighton and Sussex Medical School 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 1)  Purpose T (Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool) training  

Purpose T is a nationally used tool to identify patients who are at high risk of developing pressure 
damage. Once a patient is identified as high risk, Purpose T prompts a set of assessments which 
need  to  be  carried  out  by  the  nurse  caring  for  the  patient,  including  history  of  pressure 
intake,  diabetes,  perfusion,  moisture  damage  and  sensory 
damage/ulcers,  nutritional 
perception. It also prompts nurses to consider whether the patient has capacity if they refuse to 
be  assessed,  and  acting  in  the  patient’s  best  interests  if  they  are  unable  to  consent  to 
examinations and assessments.  

Purpose T is a more in depth tool to use with greater consideration of a patient’s individual risk 
factors than, for example, the Waterlow score. 

2)  Cerner prompts and ClinOps 

Any patient tasks/assessments that have not been completed are flagged  as outstanding and 
create a pop-up reminder for anyone accessing the patient’s records on Cerner. For example, if 
the Purpose T assessment has not been completed then Cerner will prompt the nurse that it 
needs to be carried out when they access the records. 

In addition to individual reminders, an overview of every ward and patient is available on the 
Ward  View  Nursing  Production  Board  on  ClinOps,  which  is  overseen  by  Matrons  and  ward 
managers. This is a projection board which shows every patient who is breaching for any reason 
and is mainly utilised by managers to have oversight of the whole ward/department. The board 
highlights outstanding tasks for each patient, which are seen as an overview bar flagged red. 

Matrons monitor the Ward View Nursing Production Board to ensure “every day is a green day”, 
whereby  the  expectation  is  that  by  the  end  of  a  nursing  shift  all  tasks/action  for  the  nurse’s 
patients should be green (i.e. completed).  When commencing a new shift and taking over care 
of patients from another member of staff, the same list will form the nurses to do list for that 
patient. 

It is important to note that patients receiving “corridor care” are always allocated to a nurse. The 
allocation is to the same ratio of staff to patients as it is if the patient was in the main Emergency 
Department. Similarly, the projection board will flag to management any outstanding tasks or 
assessments  for  corridor  care  patients  in  the  same  way  would  if  the  patient  was  located 
elsewhere in the hospital. 

3)  Train the trainer programme and a targeted teaching approach 

All  new  ED  staff  receive  training  on  pressure  damage  and  pressure  care  as  part  of  their 
mandatory  training  when  they  commence  work  at  the  Trust.  However,  it  is  recognised  that 
nursing staff cannot be removed from ED to attend training sessions as easily as they could be 
on inpatient wards. When Purpose T was first introduced an intensified training programme was 
included in ED which allowed nursing staff to be trained alongside their day to day work. This 

An Associated University Hospital of 
Brighton and Sussex Medical School 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 targeted approach included having a Practice Development Nurse on the shop floor in ED for 
two weeks to assist staff as they carried out their assessments and familiarised themselves with 
the new system. Train the trainer allows for clinical staff to be trained in certain competencies 
and to then train their colleagues utilising their new skills, and has been completed for bands 3-
7. 

In addition, Purpose T also has a guidance section to assist in completing the assessments. 

All ED staff have completed Purpose T training, including those employed via agency. 

4)  Nurse Quality Rounds 

These are designated rounds at 2 hourly intervals involving the band 7 nurse in charge, 
Matron and PDN (all three are not required for the round). They do an eyeball assessment on 
every patient, including those receiving corridor care, with the aim of supporting staff to ensure 
tasks and assessments are completed. The purpose of the round is to provide an additional 
level of safety netting as they may pick up something that a less experienced nurse might 
miss. Junior staff can also ask questions and seek guidance on any assessment their patient 
needs which they are unclear about. 

The Practice Development Nurses in ED are supernumerary (do not have their own caseload 
of patients). They monitor and provide support to nursing staff to complete assessments that 
are outstanding. PDNs will also look at accuracy of any assessments undertaken. 

The expectation is either the Matron or PDN will oversee that all patients are assessed as 
required and they receive their medication.  

5)  Planned audits to monitor progress relating to compliance in the ED 

At present the systems referred to above are only available as a live version and so we aren’t 
able to audit compliance currently. We are working with the Trust’s informatics team to build a 
report whereby compliance can be monitored and audited. 

The second concern was as follows: 'The court also heard that in December 2023 to January 2024, the period 
of  Mrs  Rodgers  admission,  the  hospital  was  experiencing  a  high  level  of  operational  pressures  and  that  on 
occasions the ward itself had insufficient nursing staff levels to meet the demand of acutely ill patients with high 
dependency needs. The Trust is undertaking a review of the staffing template for the ward, but that work is not 
complete and not yet incorporated into the budget.' 

1)  NHS England mandates evidence-based decision making for safe and effective staffing across 
all  NHS  organisations.  All  Trusts  are  required  to  conduct  a  biannual  review  of  their  ward 
establishments using the Safer Nursing Care Tool. At SASH, we have been carrying out this 
review on all wards for the past 18 months. While the results of the review and any necessary 

An Associated University Hospital of 
Brighton and Sussex Medical School 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 staffing increases have not yet been reflected in the ward budgets, Nutfield Ward has addressed 
this by incorporating additional shifts into the roster template and utilising temporary staffing. 

2)  Staffing levels on Nutfield ward are 5 qualified nurses and 3 non-qualified staff during the day, 
and 3 qualified and 3 non-qualified at night. We have already increased the night rota to have 
an extra nursing assistant than the template allows and this was recognised through the need 
for acuity, and we allow this as a cost pressure to maintain patient safety. The matrons assess 
the acuity on wards on a daily basis and will use clinical decision making to ensure that wards 
are safe, if there are any concerns they will escalate to senior management and additional staff 
will be requested for that shift if necessary. We are also able to move staff to work on different 
wards if acuity requires it.  

The Trust holds twice daily safer staffing huddles, attended by the Head of Nursing or a matron 
representative. During these meetings, each division reports staffing levels, mitigation actions 
taken,  and  any  remaining  gaps.  The  staffing  situation  is  reviewed  using  the  Safe  Care  Live 
system to identify potential cross-divisional moves or the need for temporary staffing. If these 
options are insufficient, corporate nursing teams are deployed to provide clinical support. The 
meeting  also  reviews  staffing  for  the  next  day  and  on  Fridays  the  weekend  staffing  is  also 
considered.  If  staffing  issues  cannot  be  resolved,  they  are  escalated  to  the  Chief  Nurse  for 
further action. 

The Trust would like to thank you again for bringing these issues to our attention and should you require 
any further clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact us via our legal services department.  

Yours sincerely,  

Chief Medical Officer 

An Associated University Hospital of 
Brighton and Sussex Medical School

Related reports

Other reports by Susan Ridge

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.