Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Rosemary MacAndrew

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0214, written 2 May 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report2 May 2025
Reference2025-0214
DeceasedRosemary MacAndrew
CoronerBeth Brown
Coroner areaNottingham and Nottinghamshire
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1.  Secretary of State for Transport

1

CORONER

I am Beth Brown, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Nottingham and
Nottinghamshire.

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 4 November 2024 an inquest was opened into the death of Rosemary MacAndrew,
aged 64. The inquest concluded on 28 April 2025. I made a determination at inquest that
she died as a result of a road traffic collision.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Rosemary MacAndrew died on 5 July 2024 at Waitrose, Newark, Nottinghamshire, as a
result of chest injuries, sustained in a Road Traffic Collision, when she was a pedestrian
in the carpark of the store.  She was struck by a motor car that was reversing at speed
and became trapped beneath the vehicle.  The motor vehicle was being driven by an 89-
year-old male who was not able to account for the manner in which the vehicle was
driven.  It was suspected by paramedics who attended the scene that the driver may
have had a neurological event whilst driving the vehicle.  In the two years preceding the
collision his mobility had reduced, he reported back and leg pains to his GP, and in
October 2023 he presented to the local Emergency Department with neurological
symptoms, suspected to be as a result of a TIA.  In the months preceding the collision
he had seen his GP with itching and pains in his legs.   He died eight months after the
collision of dementia and gangrene in both feet.  As the guidance currently stands, none
of the above conditions present prior to the collision were notifiable to the DVLA
pursuant to the ‘Assessing Fitness To Drive: a Guide for Medical Professionals’.  The
above conditions would have been self-reportable by the driver if he considered they
could affect his driving safety. No such self-referral had been made.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

1

 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –

The UK population is of increasing age and the number of older drivers is increasing
rapidly. The current system for vehicle licensing relies largely upon the self-awareness
of a driver and their willingness and\or ability to self-report medical conditions to the
DVLA.   I am concerned that older drivers with vulnerabilities, including age, decreasing
mobility and cognitive decline pose a risk of future deaths through compromised driving
ability thereby creating a risk of deaths in the future.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the
power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 01 July 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:

1.  Rosemary MacAndrew’s family.
2.  The Driver’s GP

I have sent a copy of the report to the Nottinghamshire Police Serious Collision
Investigation Unit as I believe they may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response and all
interested persons who, in my opinion, should receive it. I may also send a copy of your
response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.

9

Dated: 2 May 2025

Beth Brown
HM Assistant Coroner
For Nottingham and Nottinghamshire

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department for Transport (PDF)
Beth Brown 
HM Assistant Coroner 
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire 

From the Parliamentary
Under Secretary of State 

Great Minster House 
33 Horseferry Road 
London 
SW1P 4DR 

Tel: 0300 330 3000 
E-Mail: 

Web site: www.gov.uk/dft 

Our Ref:

1 July 2025 

Dear Beth, 

Thank you for your report made under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
following the inquest you conducted into the death of Rosemary MacAndrew. 
I am responding as Minister for the Future of Roads and am grateful for the 
opportunity to consider and respond to the concerns you have raised.  

I was very sorry to learn of the tragic circumstances that led to Rosemary 
MacAndrew’s death and would like to express my sincere condolences to her 
family.  

I have considered your report and its recommendations very carefully. Your 
report raises concerns about the risks to road safety posed by the current 
driver licensing system which is based on drivers self-declaring medical 
conditions.   

The current driver licensing arrangements are underpinned by the Road 
Traffic Act 1988, which makes it a legal requirement on all drivers to inform 
the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) if at any time they develop a 
medical condition that may affect safe driving. The current arrangements 
balance the risks that an individual poses to road safety with personal mobility 
and are designed to be fair and proportionate to all drivers who remain fit and 
competent to drive, regardless of their age.  

When drivers reach the age of 70, they must renew their licence and then do 
so at most every three years thereafter. The driving licence renewal process 
provides a timely reminder to individuals to consider their health in the context 
of driving. Drivers are encouraged to discuss any concerns about their driving 
fitness with their own medical professionals. 

 
 
 The DVLA is responsible for ensuring that drivers with medical conditions 
meet the required medical standards of fitness to drive and will investigate 
those who notify a medical condition. This investigation involves obtaining 
information from the driver and or their doctor or healthcare professional or 
asking the driver to attend a medical examination or driving assessment. 

The law states that the DVLA must have reasonable grounds to initiate 
medical investigations into anyone holding or applying for a driving licence. In 
practice, this means that an applicant or driver must notify the DVLA of a 
medical condition before an assessment of their medical fitness to drive can 
begin. However, the DVLA can also investigate where a notification of a 
health condition has been made by a third party, for example the police, 
healthcare professionals, family or friends. This recognises that there may be 
occasions where a driver lacks insight into their ongoing ability to drive safely. 

Healthcare professionals play a vitally important role in the driver licensing 
process by providing advice to their patients about the implications of their 
condition, the effect of any treatment or medication they are receiving and 
when they must inform the DVLA. To support healthcare professionals, the 
DVLA publishes guidance called “Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for 
medical professionals”. The DVLA also provides a dedicated email service for 
healthcare professionals to contact one of its doctors for either case-specific 
advice or general guidance.  

While healthcare professionals are not legally obliged to notify the DVLA 
about a patient who may be medically unfit to drive, guidance issued by the 
regulatory bodies does state that they should consider the safety of their 
patient and the public and notify the DVLA in certain circumstances. This 
aims to ensure that individuals who are potentially unfit to drive or lack self-
awareness into their condition are identified and appropriately assessed by 
the DVLA.  

The General Medical Council provides guidance to doctors regarding 
circumstances where it is justifiable to breach patient confidentiality. This 
guidance advises that doctors do not have to seek a patient’s consent to 
contact the DVLA if they do not feel it is “safe and practicable to do so”.  The 
guidance also states that doctors should still “make every reasonable effort” 
to persuade patients to contact the DVLA voluntarily.  

To ensure that the DVLA is notified about drivers who have conditions that 
may impair their insight into their health and driving abilities, my Department 
will continue to engage with healthcare professionals and their regulatory 
bodies to understand if there may be circumstances where doctors and health 
care professionals could be encouraged or supported in notifying the DVLA 
when appropriate.  

 In 2023, the DVLA carried out a call for evidence about driver licensing for 
people with medical conditions. The call for evidence sought views on the 
current legislative basis for establishing whether an individual is medically fit 
to drive and what may be improved and changed. The DVLA is considering 
the research and evidence provided and the additional research needed. The 
DVLA will also consider the evidence presented during the inquest to inform 
potential changes to the law that governs driver licensing for those with 
medical conditions. Work in this area is ongoing and includes consideration of 
the process of self-declaration and the challenges posed by an ageing 
population where certain conditions may become more prevalent. 

Following the Sheriff’s determinations from a Fatal Accident Inquiry (FAI) into 
the death of 
 in Scotland, the DVLA has initiated discussions 
with the Secretary of State for Transport’s Honorary Medical Advisory Panel 
on driving and psychiatric disorders to consider the challenges that 
impairment of cognitive function presents in the context of the medical 
licensing process. The panel met on 8 May 2025 to discuss the expert papers 
and recommendations made at the FAI. The DVLA will continue to work 
closely with the panel to consider this important issue.  

The Government takes road safety very seriously and we are focused on 
ensuring that only those who are fit and safe to drive hold a valid driving 
licence. My Department will continue to work with healthcare professionals, 
driving organisations and regulatory bodies to enhance the safety of our 
roads and ensure that those who pose a risk to road safety are appropriately 
identified and assessed. The Department is also developing its Road Safety 
Strategy and will set out more details in due course. 

Best wishes, 

MINISTER FOR THE FUTURE OF ROADS

Related reports

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.