Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

William Armstrong

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0257, written 23 May 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report23 May 2025
Reference2025-0257
DeceasedWilliam Armstrong
CoronerTimothy Brennand
Coroner areaManchester (West)
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS |

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Home Office
2 Masham Street
LONDON
SW1P 4DF

— ——————

CORONER

I am Mr Timothy W Brennand, HM Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Manchester West.

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 30 March 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of William James Armstrong aged 24.
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 06 June 2023.
The medical cause of death was determined to be:

12. es ©oxicity

I returned a narrative conclusion that William James Armstrong died as the consequence of the
effects of a significant quantity of [NY deliberately self-administered in
circumstances where his intentions remain unclear by reason of a combination of recently consumed
alcohol and a prodromal insidious onset of an undiagnosed psychotic illness.

Reporting restrictions were imposed in this case because of an ongoing criminal investigation in the
United Kingdom, Europe and the United States of America, the case being one of a cluster of eight
similar cases upon the Greater Manchester West jurisdiction.

Reporting restrictions were lifted on the 19th of April 2024.

This report is being published following updates from Greater Manchester Police and suicide
prevention organisations received on the 14th of March 2025.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The deceased had a history that had included episodic low mood, with fleeting examples of previous
suicidal ideation, but no formal mental health diagnosis had been made. He had been treated
conservatively and discharged by local community-based mental health services following the
deceased’s non-engagement.

In October 2022, a consultant psychiatrist assessed the deceased to be in a phase of gradual decline
with fluctuating symptoms that included hallucinations with distorted thinking and perception
suggestive of a prodromal insidious onset of a psychotic illness with decline in social functioning. The
views of the psychiatrist were communicated to the deceased’s general practitioner, who having

Regulation 28 — After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

discussed matters with the deceased and his family, persevered with a conservative, reactive
pathway of primary care and did not refer the deceased to further community mental health
intervention as suggested by the psychiatrist, but whether this decision had any bearing upon the
outcome remains unclear.

At 10.58pm on the 22nd of May 2021, North West Ambulance Service received an emergency call
from the deceased, informing them that he had consumed an quantity of i with
‘metformin blue’ 15 minutes earlier, that he was now not breathing normally and in effect, he was
seeking to be rescued. The call was categorised as a ‘Category 2’ response using the prevailing
Medical Priority Dispatch System. By reason of operational conditions that evening, there was an 89-
minute delay in response with an ambulance arriving on scene at 11.27pm. The deceased was found
collapsed, unresponsive in room 49 of the hotel. He failed to respond to resuscitation and was
confirmed as dead at 11.37pm.

Police investigations established that the deceased had booked into the hotel at about 9pm that night
and had earlier acquired the EEEEEusing the internet from a source in Russia. No note or
other evidence of intention was discovered. Toxicological samples from the deceased confirmed the
presence of significant levels of alcohol and a fatally toxic amount of i albeit the
precise quantity or time of ingestion could not be quantified. The consequence of the delayed
paramedic response cannot be established due to the rapidity of effect and highly toxic consequence

of methemoglobinemia that arises following ingestion of xy

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is
my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(brief summary of matters of concern)

1 EE is @ reportable poison as well as a reportable explosives precursor within the
terms, meaning and effect of Part 4 of Schedule 1A of the Poisons Act 1972 with the consequence
that:

a. The Poisons Act 1972 sets out the legal obligations in relation to the sale, purchase, and use of
these chemicals for suppliers, professional users and members of the public.

b. The published Guidance (commenced in 2014 and updated in August 2024) does not give specific
guidance or suggested training to sellers, particulary acquired by members of
the public, particularly over ‘online marketplaces’ in circumstances of the purchase on a ‘one off’
basis for the means of self-harming.

c. Whilst there is a legal duty on persons selling this substance to report “suspicious” transactions
within 24 hours to the Home Office, the purchase of small quantities is being presumed to be
connected to the many legitimate uses of the substance (such as food preservation, fertilizer etc)
rather than in fact, being evaluated as a member of the public seeking purchase of modest quantities
used as their chosen means by which to end life.

d. The current Home Office guidance and supporting video, leaflet and posters do not reference
HE @s a specific example of concern and focuses on the phenomenon of ‘malicious’
misuse and not deliberate misuse in the sense of suicide/self-harm.

2. The police investigation into one UK based source of supply revealed in 247 cases separate
supplies of 500 grams of less of + customers in the UK and Europe, police established
that 85 of these individuals who were traceable had either died as the consequence of self-ingestion

Regulation 28 — After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

of the substance, or had purchased it with a view to having the means to use this method to end
their life in circumstances where:

a. the vendors of the iE were not aware of this potential misuse of the substance.
b. the small quantities being purchased had been incorrectly evaluated to be an increase in
individuals pursuing recreationa! home-curing/food preservations as a hobby, being an artefact of
‘lockdown’ living following the COVID national pandemic emergency.

c. Vendors were unaware that their website/details were being distributed as part of internet
information platforms designed to aid, abet, assist or promote suicide methods.

3. The police investigation revealed the ability of members of the public to access a number of
websites, primarily created in the USA, Canada and Mexico that promoted information as to how to
access:

a. Poisons that could bring about death

b. How, in what way and with with other necessary preparations (in particular -antiemetic
medications) the poisons should be administered.

c. Sourcing such poisons/chemicals/medications in the UK and abroad.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your
organisation) have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by May 16, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable
for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons

1. The family of William James Armstrong i
2. HHJ Alexia Durran - The Chief Coroner of England and Wales
Chief Coroner’s Office
11‘ Floor, Thomas More Building
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand |
LONDON i

I have also sent it to

Greater Manchester Police
North West Ambulance Service
Greater Manchester Mental Health

who may find it useful or of interest.

Iam also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested
persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.

Regulation 28 — After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or
the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9 | Dated: 234 May 2025

Mr Timothy W Brennand
HM Senior Coroner for
Manchester West

Regulation 28 - After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Related reports

Other reports by Timothy Brennand

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.