Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Antonio Galisi-Swallow

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0608, written 4 Dec 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Dec 2025
Reference2025-0608
DeceasedAntonio Galisi-Swallow
CoronerOliver Longstaff
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire (Eastern)
CategoryChild Death (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published3

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

OFFICE OF THE
SENIOR CORONER
for the County of West Yorkshire
(Eastern District)

His Majesty’s Coroner’s Office
The Coroner’s Courts
Burgage Square
Wakefield WF1 2TS

Telephone: 01924 302180
Email: hmcoroner@wakefield.gov.uk

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

    1. Professor Simon Kenny, National Clinical Director for Children and Young People,
NHS England
    2. Paediatric Critical Care Society

CORONER

I am Oliver Robert Longstaff, HM Area Coroner for the Coroner Area of West Yorkshire (East).

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 12/10/2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Antonio Galisi-Swallow who died
aged 15 in the Leeds General Infirmary on 7th October 2021, three weeks short of his 16th
birthday. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 04/12/2025.

The medical cause of death was 1a) Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome (“PRIS”); b)
Prolonged Propofol Administration Post Cardiac Surgery; 2) Trisomy 21 with Surgically-
Corrected Congenital Cardiac Malformation.

In summary, the narrative conclusion to the inquest was that Antonio died from the effects of
receiving a continuous propofol infusion of 5634 milligrams plus additional bolus doses over a
period of 121 hours, while in post-operative sedation on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit
(“PICU”).

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Antonio had Downs, ADHD and was on the Autistic Spectrum Disorder. He was born with
Tetralogy of Fallot, a congenital cardiac malformation that required a series of surgical
interventions.

He underwent a pulmonary valve implantation procedure on 30th September 2021 to address his
severe pulmonary valve regurgitation. Following surgery, Antonio was admitted to the PICU under
sedation with significant ventilatory requirements related to a presumed chest infection for which
he  was  given  antibiotics,  requiring mechanical  ventilation  for  a  longer  period  than  originally

1

2

3

4

 intended. Antonio’s sedation was maintained from 30th September by a constant propofol infusion
and  occasional  bolus  doses, the  overall  rate  of  infusion  being  gradually  reduced,  but  never
stopped.

From  4th October,  Antonio  developed  a  persistent  and  increasing  fever,  though  his  infection
markers were falling. On 5th October he was noted to have a Stage 1 acute kidney injury, although
his infection markers were either normal or still falling. His clinical features were consistent with a
resolving  chest  infection,  his  worsening  pyrexia  and  renal  failure  being  likely  due  to  another
pathological process.

On 6th October, concern was raised for the first time that Antonio’s deterioration might be due to
PRIS. His  propofol  was  stopped  and  replaced  with  fentanyl.  Blood  tests  for  creatine  kinase,
triglycerides and lactate were strongly supportive of the suggested diagnosis. By the evening of
that day, Antonio was displaying what an expert witness described as almost all the classically
reported features of PRIS.

Tests  and  investigations  to  confirm  a  diagnosis  continued  into  the  early  hours  of  7th October,
although  Antonio’s  parents  expressed  concerns  that  their  son  had  been  through  enough  and
should be allowed to pass away. He went into cardiac arrest at 0337h and, despite attempts at
resuscitation, was pronounced deceased at 0400h.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it
is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –

During the inquest, the court was told that there is no national guidance for the use of propofol
for short term sedation in children and young people on PICU’s.

Following Antonio’s death, the Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust has devised and implemented a
“Guideline of the use of propofol for short term sedation in children and young people on PICU
(by consultant approval only)”. The consultant paediatric intensivist who appeared at the inquest
as an independent expert witness wholeheartedly endorsed that document, and opined that, had
its provisions been in place in October 2021, it is likely that Antonio would not have died when he
did. A copy of that document is attached.

As a coroner making a report of this nature, it is not for me to recommend to any third party that
the document developed by the Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, or any document like it, should
be either more widely disseminated or adopted as official guidance.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you or your
organisation have the power to take such action. I have been advised by Professor Jonathan
Benger, Chief Executive, National Institute for Health and Care Exellence (to which organisation
this report was originally sent) that your organisation is more appropriately placed to act upon it.
I attach a copy of Professor Benger’s letter to me dated 14/01/2026.
YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely
by 26/03/2026. I, the Coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons or

5

6

7

8

 their legal representatives: Antonio’s parents; Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; Professor
Stephen Playfor.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
Signed:

9

OLIVER LONGSTAFF
HM Area Coroner
West Yorkshire (E)

Date: 29 January 2026

Responses

3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Oliver Robert Longstaff  
HM Area Coroner for West Yorkshire (East) 
Coroner’s Service 
71 Northgate 
Wakefield 
West Yorkshire 
WF1 3BS 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

23rd March 2026  

Dear Coroner, 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Antonio Galisi-Swallow 
who died on 7th October 2021.  

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 29th 
January 2026 concerning the death of Antonio Galisi-Swallow on 7th October 2021. 
In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like 
to  express  my  deep  condolences  to  Antonio’s  parents  and  family.  NHS  England  is 
keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Antonio’s care 
have been listened to and reflected upon.   

Your Report raises concerns that there is no national guidance for the use of propofol 
for short term sedation in children and young people on Paediatric Intensive Care Units 
(PICUs).    

Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the British National Formulary (BNF) 
entry for propofol do include an indication for the sedation of children under 16 years, 
however it is a specific contraindication in section 4.3 of the SPC: ‘Propofol must not 
be used in patients of 16 years of age or younger for sedation for intensive care. Safety 
and efficacy for these age groups have not been demonstrated (see section 4.4)’. 

We have had sight of Professor 
 response to your Report and concur with 
him that the above does not mean that propofol cannot be used in clinical practice as 
many  drugs  are  not  licensed  for  use  in  children  due  to  a  lack  of  specific  paediatric 
research  evidence.  However,  use  of  these  types  of  drugs  should  be  supported  by 
strong 
include  patient  selection, 
contraindications, cautions, and local prescribing issues (such as who can prescribe, 
review and monitoring details, and limitations on use). 

local  protocols.  Such  protocols  should 

NHS England commission PICU services in line with Paediatric Critical Care Society 
(PCCS)  standards.  Standard  L3-505  lists  clinical  guidance  that  each  PICU  should 
have in use and these include ‘Drug administration and medicines management’ and 
‘Procedural  sedation  and  analgesia’.  PICU  services  are  responsible  for  developing 
their own local guidelines as a requirement of PCCS standards.  

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 Locally developed guidance (taken through Trust governance) is mandated and is part 
of NHS England’s commissioning documentation as well as professional standards. 
Locally developed guidance allows guidance to be specific to the Trust’s PICU and the 
population being treated there, as there are different uses for drugs in different PICUs. 
For example a cardiac PICU will use different doses of drugs.  

In response to the Inquest touching the death of Antonio Galisi-Swallow NHS England 
and the PCCS will take forward the following actions: 

1. 

2. 

3. 

The PCCS communications team has shared a "President's message" - an 
email bulletin to all PCCS members ( professionals actively involved in or 
contributing to paediatric critical care, including doctors, nurses, and allied 
health professionals) referencing the Regulation 28 Report and the risk of 
propofol  infusion  syndrome  in  PICUs.  This  has  been  completed  as  of 
February 2026. 
PCCS will produce a position statement on the use of propofol in Paediatric 
Intensive Care to formally raise awareness amongst the PICU community. 
This will be produced in collaboration with the National Paediatric Pharmacy 
Group (NPPG) and the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists (APA). This 
statement will be shared with all PCCS members and hosted on the PCCS 
website. (Expected completion date: Summer 2026).  
The  next  iteration  of  the  PCCS  standards  (  Version  7  is  currently  under 
development)  will  include  a  specific  requirement  that  all  PCC  units  must 
have a local guideline for the use of propofol in PICU.  (Expected completion 
date: end of 2026)  

NHS England will support with the development and implementation of the actions to 
ensure all PICUs have appropriate arrangements in place for the safe use of propofol. 
Action 2 allows engagement with the relevant professional groups (anaesthetists and 
pharmacy)  and  is  a  formal  communication  to  ensure  units  take  swift  action  without 
waiting  for  the  longer-term  action  of  the  overall  standards  re-write  (Action  3  listed 
above).  

I  would  also  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHS  England  work 
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are 
discussed  by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical 
Directors,  and  other  clinical  and  quality  colleagues  from  across  the  regions.  This 
ensures  that  key  learnings  and  insights  around  events,  such  as  the  sad  death  of 
Antonio, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us 
to  pay  close  attention  to  any  emerging  trends  that  may  require  further  review  and 
action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

 
 
  
 
 National Medical Director  
NHS England
Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (PDF)
2nd Floor 
2 Redman Place 
London 
E20 1JQ 
United Kingdom 

+44 (0)300 323 0140 

14 January 2026 

Oliver Longstaff 
HM Coroner  
The Coroners Court 
Burgage Square 
Wakefield 
WF1 2TS 

Dear Mr Oliver 

Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Antonio Galisi-
Swallow) 

I write in response to your regulation 28 report dated 4 December 2025 and 
addressed to my predecessor 
Antonio Galisi-Swallow. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Antonio’s 
family.   

, regarding the very sad death of 

The patient safety leads at NICE have discussed the report and understand that your 
request is that we develop national guidance on propofol for short term sedation in 
children and young people on paediatric intensive care units (PICUs).  

Our conclusion is that NICE is not the appropriate organisation to develop guidance 
in this area, and I have explained the reasoning for this below.  

The summary of product characteristics (SPC) and the British National Formulary 
(BNF) entry for propofol do include an indication for sedation of children under 16 
years, however it is a specific contraindication in section 4.3 of the SPC: ‘Propofol 
must not be used in patients of 16 years of age or younger for sedation for intensive 
care. Safety and efficacy for these age groups have not been demonstrated (see 
section 4.4)’.  

I would like to make it clear that we are not saying that propofol should not have 
been used in this situation, as many drugs are not licensed for use in children due to 
a lack of specific paediatric research evidence. However, use of these types of drugs 
should be supported by strong local protocols. Such protocols should include patient 
selection, contraindications, cautions, and local prescribing issues (such as who can 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 prescribe, review and monitoring details, and limitations on use). As these issues will 
vary by locality, they are best described in local guidance.  
.  

The Paediatric Critical Care Society Standards outline the requirements for care, and 
Standard L3-505 lists the clinical guideline that each PICU should have; these 
include ‘Drug administration and medicines management’ and ‘Procedural sedation 
and analgesia’. We would expect guidance on the use of propofol to be included in 
this.  

Our view is that this issue would be best addresses by NHS England or the 
Paediatric Critical Care Society (PCCS) who could consider the suggestion that all 
PICUs develop local protocols such as the one used in Leeds.  
The following contacts may be useful to you for this purpose:  

•  NHS England’s national clinical director for children and young people, 

Professor 
•  PCCS via  

I hope that the information above is helpful and would like to reiterate my sincere 
condolences to Antonio’s family.  

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive 

CBE MD FRCS FRCEM  

                                                                                                                                 Page | 2
Response from Paediatric Critical Care Society (PDF)
Attention! 
This email originates from outside of Wakefield Council. 
Do not open attachments or click links unless you are sure this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe. 

. 

To: 
Oliver Robert Longstaff 
HM Area Coroner 
West Yorkshire (East) 

Dear Mr Longstaff, 

Re: Regulation 28 Report – Death of Antonio Galisi-Swallow 

Thank you for your report dated 29 January 2026. On behalf of the Paediatric Critical Care 
Society (PCCS), I wish to acknowledge the concerns you have raised and to outline the actions 
we are taking to reduce the risk of future deaths.  We have liaised closely with NHS England 
colleagues regarding the actions required in response the Reg28 report.  Below are the PCCS 
actions we have agreed to undertake. 

1. Communication to PCCS Members

We have informed all PCCS members—over 1300 multidisciplinary professionals across the 
UK—of the risk of Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome (PRIS). In this communication, we 
highlighted the issues raised in your report and referenced the case.  We also emphasised the 
need for every paediatric critical care unit to maintain local guidance for the use of propofol in 
PCC.  This communication was disseminated in February 2026. 

2. Joint Position Statement

PCCS has convened a specialist group including paediatric intensivists, anaesthetists and 
pharmacists, with representation from PCCS, the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists (APA) 
and the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group (NPPG). This group is producing a joint 
position statement on the use of propofol in paediatric critical care. We expect to publish this on 
our respective websites in the Summer of 2026. 

3. Revision of PCCS Quality Standards

As part of the scheduled update to the PCCS Quality Standards (Version 7), we will introduce 
a mandatory minimum standard requiring all Level 3 paediatric critical care units to have an 
agreed local guideline for propofol use. This revision will be published later this year. 

We are committed to supporting safe sedation practice across paediatric critical care and believe 
the actions above represent meaningful steps to address the concerns identified in your report. 
Please let me know if further information would assist your consideration. 

On behalf of PCCS, 

 
 Yours sincerely, 

President, Paediatric Critical Care Society

Related reports

Other reports by Oliver Longstaff

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.