Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Francis Leech

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0298, written 2 Jun 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report2 Jun 2026
Reference2026-0298
DeceasedFrancis Leech
CoronerDavid Reid
Coroner areaWorcestershire
Sourcejudiciary.uk record
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
REGULATION 28 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS
2013

Please do not include any living persons’ names in this document, in
accordance with the Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026).

1.

2.

3.

CORONER
I am David REID, HM Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Worcestershire.

DATE OF REPORT
02 June 2026

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations)
Regulations 2013.

4.

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO

1.  The Managing Director, Adept Care Homes, 1 Lutterworth Road,

Burbage, Hinckley LE10 2DJ

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by July 28, 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period if an
appropriate application is made.

5.

YOUR RESPONSE
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action
is proposed.

I have a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner.

In accordance with the Chief Coroner’s Publication Policy, you should send
me any representations regarding publication of your response. These
representations should be made at the same time as the response is provided.
I will pass any representations received to the Chief Coroner for a decision.

Please note any links to webpages included in the response will not be
checked for sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is
already online.

The names of those who do not respond to PFD reports are regularly
published on the Chief Coroner’s webpages Non-responses to Prevention of
Future Death (PFD) reports - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary.

6.

SUMMARY OF CORONER’S CONCERN

(a) staff at Bowood Court Care Home, Redditch did not understand the

 importance of updating residents’ care plans and behavioural support plans;
(b) management at the care home had not instituted a system of checking and
ensuring those plans were updated; and
(c) a subsequent internal investigation carried out by the care home failed to
recognize the deficiencies in those plans, or to put in place measures to
ensure that those deficiencies were not repeated.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there
is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe you, as the Managing
Director of the company which owns and runs Bowood Court Care Home,
Redditch have the power to take such action.

8.

INVESTIGATION AND INQUEST

On 05 September 2024 I commenced an investigation and opened an inquest
into the death of Francis Phillip LEECH aged 80. The investigation concluded
at the end of the inquest on 02 June 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was
that Mr. Leech "died from natural causes, to which traumatic facial injuries
inflicted by a fellow care home resident and a resulting lengthy hospital
admission contributed."

9.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH

In February 2024 Francis Leech, who lived with advanced dementia and a
number of other significant medical conditions, was admitted to Moundsley
Hall Nursing Home, King’s Norton having spent the previous four months in
hospital recovering from severe traumatic facial injuries sustained when he
was struck repeatedly by a fellow resident at Bowood Court Care Home,
Redditch. Over the next few months, he continued steadily to decline and died
there on 26.8.24. His final decline was contributed to by the injuries which he
had sustained and by the functional decline associated with the resulting
lengthy hospital admission.

10. CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest I heard evidence giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In
the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:

The care home resident who inflicted the facial injuries on Mr. Leech lived with
advanced dementia, and over the six weeks leading up to that incident had
been showing signs of unpredictably aggressive and violent behaviour.
Although many of these episodes had been the subject of incident reports,
neither his care plan nor his behavioural support plan had been properly
updated to reflect these episodes, the risk which he presented, and measures
to be taken to reduce that risk. The evidence at inquest showed that: (a) staff
at the care home did not understand the importance of updating the care plan
and behavioural support plan; (b) management at the care home had not
instituted a system of checking and ensuring those plans were updated; and

 (c) the internal investigation carried out by the care home after the assault on
Mr. Leech failed to recognize the deficiencies in those plans, or to put in place
measures to ensure that those deficiencies were not repeated.

11. COPIES AND PUBLICATION OF THIS REPORT

I have a duty to send a copy of my report to every Interested Person who in
my opinion should receive it.

I also may send a copy of the report to any other person who I believe may
find it useful or of interest.

I can confirm I have sent the report to:
[please do not use individual’s names, but instead roles/titles]

(cid:127)  Mr. Leech’s widow and daughter;
(cid:127)  The former Care Home Manager of Bowood Court Care Home;
(cid:127)  The former Care Manager of Bowood Court Care Home;
(cid:127)  Adult Social Care services, Worcestershire County Council;
(cid:127)  The Care Quality Commission.

I also have a duty to send a copy of the report to the Chief Coroner.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, about the publication of the
contents of this report in line with Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy
(2026). Any representations will be sent to the Chief Coroner alongside the
report. Please refer to box 4 above for additional information relating to the
publication of reports and responses.

12. SIGNATURE

David REID
HM Senior Coroner for
Worcestershire

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Adept Care Homes Bowood Court
a superb place to live or work 

Dear Coroner,  

Adept Care Homes Limited 
Home Support Centre 
1 Lutterworth Road 
Burbage 
Leicestershire 
LE10 2DJ 

I write in relation to the Regulation 28 report which was issued in connection with the 

Inquest into the death of Francis Leech, who was a resident of Bowood Court Care Home 

(“the Home”).  

The Inquest into Mr Leech’s death was held at Worcestershire Coroner’s Court on 26 

May to 2 June 2026. Prior to and during the course of the Inquest the Home provided 

evidence to assist your inquiry into the care arrangements in place and the reflection 

which has taken place to strengthen the Home’s systems and procedures following the 

incident involving Mr Leech and another resident on 25 October 2023.  

A Regulation 28 Report was, however, issued to myself as Managing Director of Adept 

Care Home’s Limited on 2 June 2026 which raised concerns regarding the following:  

1.  Staff did not understand the importance of updating care plans and behavioural 

support plans; 

2.  Management of the Home had not instigated a system of checking and ensuring 

those plans were updated; and 

3.  The  internal  investigation  carried  out  after  the  incident  did  not  recognise 
deficiencies  in  those  plans  or  put  in  place measures  to  ensure they  were not 

repeated.  

I can  confirm  that  a copy  of  the Regulation  28  Report  has  been  disseminated  to the 

wider  management  team  for  their  consideration  and  that  the  below  reflects  the 

company’s response.  

Resident Care Plans and Behavioural Support Plans 

The  Home’s  management  and  senior  care  team  are  principally  responsible  for  the 

creation, review and amendment of resident care plans and Behavioural Support Plans. 

Following creation, resident care plans and Behavioural Support Plans are reviewed and 

updated on a monthly basis or as required in response to changing resident care needs. 

Support from an individual with dementia expertise is also available to the Home to 

draw upon as required.  

The importance of reviewing and updating resident care plans and Behavioural Support 

Plans is regularly communicated to responsible staff from the point of joining the Home 

and forms part of the training delivered. During evidence it was explained that monthly 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 audits  of  care  plans  and  Behavioural  Support  Plans  by  the  Care  Manager  have  been 

introduced.  

Following the conclusion of the Inquest into Mr Leech’s death, a further instruction was 

issued to the Home management and senior care team reaffirming the expectations in 

relation to the review and amendment of Behaviour Support Plans and the introduction 

of supporting risk assessments in reflection of lessons learnt. We would also note that 

a new Home Manager and Care Manager are now in place with oversight of the Home 

following the incident involving Mr Leech.   

In respect of incident investigations, the Home acknowledges that the investigation into 

the  incident  involving  Mr  Leech  did  not  identify  gaps  within  the  care  plans  and 

Behavioural Support Plans in place. Having reflected upon this, steps have been taken 

to  require  that  an  individual  with  dementia  expertise  assist  in  completing  internal 

investigations where an individual involved is considered to be living with dementia. By 

introducing this additional expertise to the investigation process, we believe that this 

will  allow  for  more  in  depth  scrutiny  of  care  arrangements  and  behaviours,  and  for 

appropriate actions to be taken.  

In addition, as advised during the Inquest, practices are now in place to ensure that 

spot  checks  are  conducted  on  a  twice weekly  basis    of  incident  and  accident  report 

completion  and  feedback  is  provided to the  Home as required.  This  is in  addition to 

their regular in person visits to the Home. 

Accordingly,  the  Home  has  taken  steps  to  review  the  arrangements  in  place  for  the 

oversight of care plans and Behavioural Support plans which are now considered to be 

appropriate in all the circumstances.  

I  hope  that  this  response  is  of  assistance  to  the  Coroner  in  confirming  the  care 

arrangements  currently  in  place.  I  would  like  to  conclude  by  expressing  my  sincere 

condolences to Mr Leech’s family for their loss.  

Signed 

Managing Director

Related reports

Other reports by David Reid

See all →

Track David Reid

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching David Reid, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.