Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Naeem Ahmed

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0319, written 24 Jun 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report24 Jun 2026
Reference2026-0319
DeceasedNaeem Ahmed
CoronerRachael Griffin
Coroner areaDorset
Sourcejudiciary.uk record
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 
REGULATION 28 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 
2013 

Please do not include any living persons’ names in this document, in 
accordance with the Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026). 

1.  CORONER 

I am Rachael Clare Griffin, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Dorset. 

2.   DATE OF REPORT 

24th June 2026 

3.  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

3.  THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO 

1.  Minister of State for Health 
2.  Chief Executive of NHS England 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 19th August 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period if an 
appropriate application is made. 

4.   YOUR RESPONSE 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be  taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

I have a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner. 

representations 

In accordance with the Chief Coroner’s Publication Policy, you should send me 
any 
response.  These 
representations should be made at the same time as the response is provided. 
I will pass any representations received to the Chief Coroner for a decision. 

regarding  publication  of  your 

Please note any links to webpages included in the response will not be checked 
for sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already online. 

The names of those who do not respond to PFD reports are regularly published 
on the Chief Coroner’s webpages Non-responses to Prevention of Future Death 
(PFD) reports - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5.  SUMMARY OF CORONER’S CONCERN 

1.  Depending on the methods adopted by hospitals in England and Wales 
when disposing of unused liquids in  sharps bin, there is a risk that the 
liquids could be used and lead to fatal consequences. 

2.  There  is  no  legal  requirement  for  doctors  to  notify  NHS Trusts  of  their 
private  work  patterns  or  notify  private  providers  of  their  NHS  work 
patterns which can result in continuous periods of working without  rest 
which could put both patient and doctors’ lives at risk. 

6.  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there 
is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to 
take such action. 

7. 

INVESTIGATION AND INQUEST 
On  24th  June  2025,  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of  Naeem 
Ahmed, aged 50 years, born on 1st October 1974. 

The Inquest concluded on the 19th June 2026. 

The medical cause of death was: 

Ia Combined 

 and alcohol toxicity 

How when and where Naeem came by his death was recorded as:  

At around 11am on the 21st June 2025, the deceased was found in a collapsed 
and  unresponsive  condition,  slumped  forward  in  the  chair,  in  the  anaesthetic 
registrar room, which is a doctor's mess room, at Poole Hospital, Poole. On the 
floor next  to him,  on a  bloodstained  towel,  was  a  used needle  with  a  syringe 
  and  an  alcohol 
attached  which  was  subsequently  found  to  contain 
wipe. In his bag, in the room, was also located a half empty bottle of whiskey. 

The conclusion recorded was misadventure. 

8.  CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH 

Naeem  was  a  Consultant  Anaesthetist  who  was  working  at  Poole  Hospital, 
Poole at the time of his death. He began a run of 9 nights work on the 12th June 
2025  as  the  anaesthetist  working  in  the  hospital  overnight,  and  due  to  staff 
illness agreed to cover a further 2 night shifts. He was working overnight from 
the 20th to the 21st June 2025. He had last been seen alive at around 06.17am 
on the 21st June when he made his way to a room allocated for rest for doctors 
working overnight in the hospital. He did not attend for the handover meeting at 
8am  and as  he  had  not  responded  to  attempts  to  contact him  by  11am,  staff 
entered his locked room and found him collapsed and unresponsive in the room. 
He was found to have died from use of alcohol and 
 however it could 
not be ascertained where the drugs had come from.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9.  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest I heard evidence giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In 
the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

Following Naeem’s death the Trust, University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation 
Trust (UHD) instructed an independent review of the circumstances of his death 
and the processes in place within the Trust. This led to the Trust taking action to 
amend their practice around disposal of drugs and working patterns of doctors 
at the Trust. I am concerned that the practices in place at the time of Naeem’s 
death  at  Poole  Hospital,  which  have  now  been  changed,  will  be  operating  in 
other Trusts nationally. 

Evidence at the Inquest revealed that at the time of Naeem’s death a process in 
place  at  Poole  Hospital  that  if  there  were  small  volumes  of  medicines  to  be 
disposed of by representatives of the Trust which were less than 50ml in volume, 
such as after surgery had taken place, these would be squirted into the sharps 
bins and then the needles would also be disposed of in the sharps bin too. This 
was  identified  in  the  independent  review  which  concluded  that  this  practice 
posed a risk that fatal medicines could be accessed from the sharps bin. As a 
result, UHD now use gels in the sharps bins which immediately denature and 
destroy the liquids squirted into the sharps bins. I am concerned that what was 
happening  at  the  time  of  Naeem’s  death  continues  to happen  at other Trusts 
across England and Wales and could lead to future deaths.  

The review and the coronial investigation also revealed that Naeem died whilst 
working the 9th shift in a run of 11 night shifts for UHD which began on 12th June 
2025  and  that  in  June  2025  he  undertook  clinical  work  for  more  than  one 
provider on the same calendar day on different occasions, and on one occasion 
he  undertook  daytime  work  for  an  external  provider  before  commencing  a 
resident  overnight  shift  for  the  Trust  later  the  same  day.  The  review  also 
identified that trust systems for job planning, rostering, appraisal, and secondary 
employment  operated  independently  and  were  not  designed  to  provide  an 
integrated  view  of  timing,  sequencing,  or  cumulative  workload  across 
employers, whether over short periods or across an annual cycle. Whilst UHD 
have undertaken work to resolve this issue, I am concerned that this practice 
exists at other Trusts in England and Wales and could lead to fatigue and fatal 
outcomes to patients and doctors. 
w 

10.  COPIES AND PUBLICATION OF THIS REPORT 

I have a duty to send a copy of my report to every Interested Person who in 
my opinion should receive it. 

I also may send a copy of the report to any other person who I believe may 
find it useful or of interest. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I can confirm I have sent the report to: 

1. Naeem’s family 
2. University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust 
3. General Medical Council 

I also have a duty to send a copy of the report to the Chief Coroner. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, about the publication of the 
contents of this report in line with Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy 
(2026). Any representations will be sent to the Chief Coroner alongside the 
report. Please refer to box 4 above for additional information relating to the 
publication of reports and responses. 

SIGNATURE

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Minister of State 
Department of Health and Social Care 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

HM Coroner Rachael Griffin   
Dorset 

11 August 2026 

Dear Rachael, 

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 24 June 2026 about the death of Naeem Ahmed. 

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Ahmed’s 
death, and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances 
your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to 
my attention.  

The report raises concerns about disposal of medicines and lack of joined up systems to 
show the cumulative workload of clinicians undertaking both NHS and private clinical work.  

In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care made 
enquiries with NHS England and concluded that the concerns you have raised are more 
appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. The matters relating to the disposal of 
medicines are operational issues that fall within NHS England's remit. This includes 
responsibility for coordinating the regional response. Accordingly, NHS England is best 
placed to respond to these aspects of your correspondence. I am advised that NHS 
England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response to the 
operational concerns you have raised. 

On staff working patterns, employers have a duty of care to balance the demands of 
providing continuous care with consideration for staff rights and wellbeing. The national 
terms and conditions of employment for consultants provide safeguards related to working 
patterns which go beyond the minimum legal requirements established by the Working 
Time Regulations. As set out in their contract of employment, a consultant is expected to 
inform their employer of any private practice work they are undertaking to ensure safe 
working hours and shift patterns are maintained within their job plan. 

The Government also expects employers across the NHS to have their own arrangements 
in place for supporting their staff, including occupational health provision and employee 
support programmes.  On a national level, NHS England has made available additional 
support including emotional and psychological health and wellbeing support and in 2023, 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 published a strategy to grow occupational health and wellbeing, setting out a roadmap for 
the NHS and partner organisations to work together to develop and invest in occupational 
health and wellbeing services for NHS staff over the next 5 years. For those NHS staff in 
need of specialist mental health support, including doctors, they can access the National 
Staff Mental Health Treatment Service (provided by NHS Practitioner Health), a national 
support service for staff with more complex mental health needs brought about by serious 
issues such as trauma or addiction.  

I hope this response is helpful 

Yours sincerely,  

MINISTER OF STATE
Response from NHS England
Ms Rachel Clare Griffin  
HM Senior Coroner  
Coroner’s Office for the County of Dorset  
BCP Civic Cente 
Bourne Avenue  
Bournemouth  
BH2 6DY 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

17th August 2026  

Dear Ms Griffin,  

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Naeem Ahmed who died 
on 21 June 2025 

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated  24th 
June 2026 concerning the death of Dr Naeem Ahmed on 21st June 2025. In advance 
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express 
my deep condolences to Dr Ahmed’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to 
assure  the  family  and  yourself  that  the  concerns  raised  have  been  listened  to  and 
reflected upon.   

Your Report raised the following concerns:  

1.  Depending on the methods adopted by hospitals in England and Wales when 
disposing of unused liquids in sharps bin, there is a risk that the liquids could 
be used and lead to fatal consequences.  

2.  There is no legal requirement for doctors to notify NHS Trusts of their private 
work patterns or notify private providers of their NHS work patterns which can 
result in continuous periods of working without rest which could put both patient 
and doctors’ lives at risk. 

1.  The process for the disposal of drugs in Trusts 

NHS England recognises the risk of obsolete controlled drugs being recovered from 
sharps  bins,  whether  from  discarded  syringes  or  where  their  contents  have  been 
squirted  into  them.  NHS  England  has  previously  reminded  organisations  and 
individuals of the need to render obsolete controlled drugs irrecoverable as part of any 
disposal process, as is now the case in Poole hospital with the use of gels in sharps 
bins.  

The National Controlled Drugs Accountable Officer (CDAO) function will address this 
matter again at an upcoming national learning event on 22nd September 2026. We will 
remind  designated  bodies  of  their  obligations  under  both  the  misuse  of  drugs  and 
health and safety legislation which require that controlled drugs are securely disposed 
of and not ordinarily capable of being accessed accidentally or deliberately.  

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 In  addition,  we  recognise  the  risk  to  colleagues’  health  and  wellbeing  where  life 
stresses,  including  any  associated  with  work,  may  increase  their  risk  of  misusing 
controlled drugs where they have access to them. 

We routinely remind organisations and colleagues of the need to ensure that there is 
adequate support for their employees especially those working in potentially stressed 
and/or traumatic clinical environments.  

NHS  England  will  also  raise  this  case  with  the  Care  Quality  Commission  as  the 
medicines  governance  component  of  their  inspection  will  include  the  disposal  of 
controlled drugs in operating departments.  

2.  Doctor’s  working  patterns  and  requirements  to  inform  of  other  NHS  and 

private work  

NHS England would expect doctors to declare and review their full scope of practice 
to their appraiser, for the purpose of licensing and revalidation. This forms part of their 
appraisal which is shared with their Responsible Officer  (RO) which should include 
appraisal  of any  work they  are  undertaking,  including  the  location and  frequency of 
any  work.  This  includes  any  private  work  they  are  undertaking.  As  Dr  Ahmed  was 
working in secondary care their RO would be a senior clinician (typically the Medical 
Director) of their main clinical employer, which is usually their NHS Trust where they 
have their substantive NHS contract. 

The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) is an EU initiative to prevent employers 
from  requiring  their  workforce  to  work  excessively  long  hours,  with  implications  for 
health  and  safety.  The  UK  version  of  the EWTD  is  also  known  as  the  Working 
Time Regulations (WTR). Post Brexit the UK remains bound by core rules originating 
from the European Union's law, but under domestic UK legislation rather than direct 
EU authority. 

The WTR, which implements the EWTD in law, came into force on 1 October 1998, 
with full compliance by 2009. These safeguards are particularly relevant to workers in 
the health service: 

•  a limit of an average of 48 hours worked per week, over a reference period 
•  a limit of 8 hours worked in every 24-hour period for night work 
•  a weekly rest period of 24 hours every week 
•  an entitlement to 11 hours consecutive rest per day 
•  an  entitlement  to  a  minimum  20-minute  rest  break  where  the  working  day  is 

longer than 6 hours 

•  a requirement on the employer to keep records of hours worked. However,  it 
is still possible for doctors to work longer hours by signing an opt-out clause. 

It is not possible to opt out of the rest requirements, so doctors still need to ensure 
they take the necessary breaks, and their employer still needs to monitor the hours 
they work. NHS England therefore expects doctors to declare their full scope of work, 
including any additional work undertaken for other employers, to their Clinical Director 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 or line manager, to ensure compliance with the WTR for the safety of both the doctor, 
and for the patients they treat.   

Regional Response 

NHS England’s South West regional colleagues have been in contact with the South 
West CDAO who has informed us that the following actions have been taken:  

•  They  have  written  to  South  West  CDAOs  (South  West  NHS  Trusts, 
Independent Hospitals, Hospices) regarding the learning around the  disposal 
of medicines.  

•  They have also shared the report with South West Integrated Care Board (ICB) 

Pharmacy Leads for their awareness.  

•  They have raised the issue at a recent National CDAO network meeting and 
shared  this  learning  with  regional  NHS  England  CDAO  colleagues  (England 
only).  

I  would  also  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHS  England  work 
taking  place around  the  Reports  to  Prevent Future  Deaths.  All  reports received  are 
discussed  by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical 
Directors,  and  other  clinical  and  quality  colleagues  from  across  the  regions.  This 
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of  Dr 
Ahmed, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us 
to  pay  close  attention  to  any  emerging  trends  that  may  require  further  review  and 
action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

National Medical Director  
NHS England

Related reports

Other reports by Rachael Griffin

See all →

Track Rachael Griffin

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Rachael Griffin, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.