Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0319, written 24 Jun 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 24 Jun 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0319 |
| Deceased | Naeem Ahmed |
| Coroner | Rachael Griffin |
| Coroner area | Dorset |
| Source | judiciary.uk record |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013 Please do not include any living persons’ names in this document, in accordance with the Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026). 1. CORONER I am Rachael Clare Griffin, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Dorset. 2. DATE OF REPORT 24th June 2026 3. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3. THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO 1. Minister of State for Health 2. Chief Executive of NHS England You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 19th August 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period if an appropriate application is made. 4. YOUR RESPONSE Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. I have a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner. representations In accordance with the Chief Coroner’s Publication Policy, you should send me any response. These representations should be made at the same time as the response is provided. I will pass any representations received to the Chief Coroner for a decision. regarding publication of your Please note any links to webpages included in the response will not be checked for sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already online. The names of those who do not respond to PFD reports are regularly published on the Chief Coroner’s webpages Non-responses to Prevention of Future Death (PFD) reports - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 5. SUMMARY OF CORONER’S CONCERN 1. Depending on the methods adopted by hospitals in England and Wales when disposing of unused liquids in sharps bin, there is a risk that the liquids could be used and lead to fatal consequences. 2. There is no legal requirement for doctors to notify NHS Trusts of their private work patterns or notify private providers of their NHS work patterns which can result in continuous periods of working without rest which could put both patient and doctors’ lives at risk. 6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to take such action. 7. INVESTIGATION AND INQUEST On 24th June 2025, I commenced an investigation into the death of Naeem Ahmed, aged 50 years, born on 1st October 1974. The Inquest concluded on the 19th June 2026. The medical cause of death was: Ia Combined and alcohol toxicity How when and where Naeem came by his death was recorded as: At around 11am on the 21st June 2025, the deceased was found in a collapsed and unresponsive condition, slumped forward in the chair, in the anaesthetic registrar room, which is a doctor's mess room, at Poole Hospital, Poole. On the floor next to him, on a bloodstained towel, was a used needle with a syringe and an alcohol attached which was subsequently found to contain wipe. In his bag, in the room, was also located a half empty bottle of whiskey. The conclusion recorded was misadventure. 8. CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH Naeem was a Consultant Anaesthetist who was working at Poole Hospital, Poole at the time of his death. He began a run of 9 nights work on the 12th June 2025 as the anaesthetist working in the hospital overnight, and due to staff illness agreed to cover a further 2 night shifts. He was working overnight from the 20th to the 21st June 2025. He had last been seen alive at around 06.17am on the 21st June when he made his way to a room allocated for rest for doctors working overnight in the hospital. He did not attend for the handover meeting at 8am and as he had not responded to attempts to contact him by 11am, staff entered his locked room and found him collapsed and unresponsive in the room. He was found to have died from use of alcohol and however it could not be ascertained where the drugs had come from. 9. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest I heard evidence giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: Following Naeem’s death the Trust, University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (UHD) instructed an independent review of the circumstances of his death and the processes in place within the Trust. This led to the Trust taking action to amend their practice around disposal of drugs and working patterns of doctors at the Trust. I am concerned that the practices in place at the time of Naeem’s death at Poole Hospital, which have now been changed, will be operating in other Trusts nationally. Evidence at the Inquest revealed that at the time of Naeem’s death a process in place at Poole Hospital that if there were small volumes of medicines to be disposed of by representatives of the Trust which were less than 50ml in volume, such as after surgery had taken place, these would be squirted into the sharps bins and then the needles would also be disposed of in the sharps bin too. This was identified in the independent review which concluded that this practice posed a risk that fatal medicines could be accessed from the sharps bin. As a result, UHD now use gels in the sharps bins which immediately denature and destroy the liquids squirted into the sharps bins. I am concerned that what was happening at the time of Naeem’s death continues to happen at other Trusts across England and Wales and could lead to future deaths. The review and the coronial investigation also revealed that Naeem died whilst working the 9th shift in a run of 11 night shifts for UHD which began on 12th June 2025 and that in June 2025 he undertook clinical work for more than one provider on the same calendar day on different occasions, and on one occasion he undertook daytime work for an external provider before commencing a resident overnight shift for the Trust later the same day. The review also identified that trust systems for job planning, rostering, appraisal, and secondary employment operated independently and were not designed to provide an integrated view of timing, sequencing, or cumulative workload across employers, whether over short periods or across an annual cycle. Whilst UHD have undertaken work to resolve this issue, I am concerned that this practice exists at other Trusts in England and Wales and could lead to fatigue and fatal outcomes to patients and doctors. w 10. COPIES AND PUBLICATION OF THIS REPORT I have a duty to send a copy of my report to every Interested Person who in my opinion should receive it. I also may send a copy of the report to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. I can confirm I have sent the report to: 1. Naeem’s family 2. University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust 3. General Medical Council I also have a duty to send a copy of the report to the Chief Coroner. You may make representations to me, the coroner, about the publication of the contents of this report in line with Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026). Any representations will be sent to the Chief Coroner alongside the report. Please refer to box 4 above for additional information relating to the publication of reports and responses. SIGNATURE
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Minister of State Department of Health and Social Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU HM Coroner Rachael Griffin Dorset 11 August 2026 Dear Rachael, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 24 June 2026 about the death of Naeem Ahmed. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Ahmed’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns about disposal of medicines and lack of joined up systems to show the cumulative workload of clinicians undertaking both NHS and private clinical work. In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that the concerns you have raised are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. The matters relating to the disposal of medicines are operational issues that fall within NHS England's remit. This includes responsibility for coordinating the regional response. Accordingly, NHS England is best placed to respond to these aspects of your correspondence. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response to the operational concerns you have raised. On staff working patterns, employers have a duty of care to balance the demands of providing continuous care with consideration for staff rights and wellbeing. The national terms and conditions of employment for consultants provide safeguards related to working patterns which go beyond the minimum legal requirements established by the Working Time Regulations. As set out in their contract of employment, a consultant is expected to inform their employer of any private practice work they are undertaking to ensure safe working hours and shift patterns are maintained within their job plan. The Government also expects employers across the NHS to have their own arrangements in place for supporting their staff, including occupational health provision and employee support programmes. On a national level, NHS England has made available additional support including emotional and psychological health and wellbeing support and in 2023, published a strategy to grow occupational health and wellbeing, setting out a roadmap for the NHS and partner organisations to work together to develop and invest in occupational health and wellbeing services for NHS staff over the next 5 years. For those NHS staff in need of specialist mental health support, including doctors, they can access the National Staff Mental Health Treatment Service (provided by NHS Practitioner Health), a national support service for staff with more complex mental health needs brought about by serious issues such as trauma or addiction. I hope this response is helpful Yours sincerely, MINISTER OF STATE
Ms Rachel Clare Griffin
HM Senior Coroner
Coroner’s Office for the County of Dorset
BCP Civic Cente
Bourne Avenue
Bournemouth
BH2 6DY
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
17th August 2026
Dear Ms Griffin,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Naeem Ahmed who died
on 21 June 2025
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 24th
June 2026 concerning the death of Dr Naeem Ahmed on 21st June 2025. In advance
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express
my deep condolences to Dr Ahmed’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to
assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised have been listened to and
reflected upon.
Your Report raised the following concerns:
1. Depending on the methods adopted by hospitals in England and Wales when
disposing of unused liquids in sharps bin, there is a risk that the liquids could
be used and lead to fatal consequences.
2. There is no legal requirement for doctors to notify NHS Trusts of their private
work patterns or notify private providers of their NHS work patterns which can
result in continuous periods of working without rest which could put both patient
and doctors’ lives at risk.
1. The process for the disposal of drugs in Trusts
NHS England recognises the risk of obsolete controlled drugs being recovered from
sharps bins, whether from discarded syringes or where their contents have been
squirted into them. NHS England has previously reminded organisations and
individuals of the need to render obsolete controlled drugs irrecoverable as part of any
disposal process, as is now the case in Poole hospital with the use of gels in sharps
bins.
The National Controlled Drugs Accountable Officer (CDAO) function will address this
matter again at an upcoming national learning event on 22nd September 2026. We will
remind designated bodies of their obligations under both the misuse of drugs and
health and safety legislation which require that controlled drugs are securely disposed
of and not ordinarily capable of being accessed accidentally or deliberately.
In addition, we recognise the risk to colleagues’ health and wellbeing where life
stresses, including any associated with work, may increase their risk of misusing
controlled drugs where they have access to them.
We routinely remind organisations and colleagues of the need to ensure that there is
adequate support for their employees especially those working in potentially stressed
and/or traumatic clinical environments.
NHS England will also raise this case with the Care Quality Commission as the
medicines governance component of their inspection will include the disposal of
controlled drugs in operating departments.
2. Doctor’s working patterns and requirements to inform of other NHS and
private work
NHS England would expect doctors to declare and review their full scope of practice
to their appraiser, for the purpose of licensing and revalidation. This forms part of their
appraisal which is shared with their Responsible Officer (RO) which should include
appraisal of any work they are undertaking, including the location and frequency of
any work. This includes any private work they are undertaking. As Dr Ahmed was
working in secondary care their RO would be a senior clinician (typically the Medical
Director) of their main clinical employer, which is usually their NHS Trust where they
have their substantive NHS contract.
The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) is an EU initiative to prevent employers
from requiring their workforce to work excessively long hours, with implications for
health and safety. The UK version of the EWTD is also known as the Working
Time Regulations (WTR). Post Brexit the UK remains bound by core rules originating
from the European Union's law, but under domestic UK legislation rather than direct
EU authority.
The WTR, which implements the EWTD in law, came into force on 1 October 1998,
with full compliance by 2009. These safeguards are particularly relevant to workers in
the health service:
• a limit of an average of 48 hours worked per week, over a reference period
• a limit of 8 hours worked in every 24-hour period for night work
• a weekly rest period of 24 hours every week
• an entitlement to 11 hours consecutive rest per day
• an entitlement to a minimum 20-minute rest break where the working day is
longer than 6 hours
• a requirement on the employer to keep records of hours worked. However, it
is still possible for doctors to work longer hours by signing an opt-out clause.
It is not possible to opt out of the rest requirements, so doctors still need to ensure
they take the necessary breaks, and their employer still needs to monitor the hours
they work. NHS England therefore expects doctors to declare their full scope of work,
including any additional work undertaken for other employers, to their Clinical Director
or line manager, to ensure compliance with the WTR for the safety of both the doctor,
and for the patients they treat.
Regional Response
NHS England’s South West regional colleagues have been in contact with the South
West CDAO who has informed us that the following actions have been taken:
• They have written to South West CDAOs (South West NHS Trusts,
Independent Hospitals, Hospices) regarding the learning around the disposal
of medicines.
• They have also shared the report with South West Integrated Care Board (ICB)
Pharmacy Leads for their awareness.
• They have raised the issue at a recent National CDAO network meeting and
shared this learning with regional NHS England CDAO colleagues (England
only).
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Dr
Ahmed, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us
to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Rachael Griffin, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.