Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0218, written 28 Aug 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Aug 2013 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2013-0218 |
| Deceased | Terence O’Connell |
| Coroner | Louise Hunt |
| Coroner area | Powys, Bridgend & Glamorgan Valleys |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS r REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT !S BEING SENT TO: 1. ABMU Health Board, One Talbot Gateway, Baglan Energy Park, Baglan, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR 2. The Monkstone House Care Home, 1 Locks Common, Porthcawl, Bridgend CF36 3HU 3 a The Grove Medical Centre, Uplands Terrace, Swansea CORONER | am Louise Hunt, senior coroner, for the coroner area of Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS _ | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 10" May 2013 | commenced an investigation into the death of Terrance O'Connell, aged 70. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22 August 2013. The conclusion of the inquest was that he died from da. Right Coronary Artery Thrombus 1b. Sepsis and dehydration te. Urinary tract infection The conclusion reached was: the deceased died from a urinary tract infection which went undiagnosed and untreated before his admission to hospital on the 5" May 2013, his condition was contributed to by neglect. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 22" April Mr O'Connell was admitted to Monkstone Care home for a 2 week respite period whilst his principal career, his daughter, went on holiday. He had a permanent indwelling urinary catheter. On the 3 May 2013 he complained of abdominal pain and penile pain. It was noted his catheter was not draining as much as before. The care home called for the out of hours GP. The out of hours GP referred the case to the district nurse. The district nurse referred the case back to the out of hours. Due toa communication breakdown no one attended. The following day no further calls were made to either the district nurse or a doctor by the care home. ON the 5"" May at 1pm Mr O'Connell's daughter visited him and found him extremely unwell. She calied for an ambulance and he was taken to the Princess of Wales Hospital in Bridgend. He was diagnosed with sepsis from a urinary tract infection. He died later that evening. CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern, in my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) There was a communication breakdown between the care home, district nurses and out of hours GP on the 3 May 2013 resulting in Mr O'Connell not being seen by any clinical staff. (2)There was no direct monitoring of his oral input and urinary output at the care home which would have provided further evidence in support of a urinary tract infection. (3) Mr O'Connell did not have any clinical assessment of his condition for 2 days until his admission to hospital ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 18" October 2013. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION ( have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons, Department of Health, Wales and the family. 1am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. [DATE] 23 [s i 3 [SIGNED BY CORONERS | | (
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
250 years of excellence gabbandco Our ref. GFM/FC/31 14 October 2013 Your ref: LH/AMM/33350 Louise Hunt HMC Her Majesty's Coroner for Bridgend Glamorgan Valleys & Powys Rock Grounds First Floor Aberdare CF44 7AE © Dear Ms Hunt Terence O’Connell (deceased) We represent the proprietor of Monkstone House Residential Home of 1 Locks Common, Porthcawl, CF36 3HU and have been asked by them to respond to your letter dated 28"" August 2013 in which you required a response to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths. We note that in paragraph 5 you have raised three specific and particular concerns and you have asked for a response to each of these, which we will now deal with as below. 1 Communication Failure You have indicated that in your view there was a communication breakdown between the care home, the district nurses and the out of hours GP service on € 3" May 2013 resulting in Mr O'Connell not been seen by any clinical staff. With respect, our clients do not accept that there was a communication problem between the three parties who you have indentified. The communication breakdown (assuming that such was the case) was between the district nurses and the GP out of hours service. On 3% May our client's staff contacted the district nurses on three separate occasions during the evening. There was also a series of conversations between the out of hours doctor and district nurses which our clients have been made aware of. Our client's staff also spoke to the family of the late Mr O'Connell on three separate occasions. a O'Connell's son in law) was the person who was spoken to and there are phone records available to prove this. RECEIVED 15 OCT 2013 Partners Consultants Associates Oid Bank House Beaufort Street Crickhowell Powys NP&8 1AD Te! 01873 810629 Fax 01873 810485 DX 100751 CR ELL E-mail crickhowell@gabb.co.uk www.gabb.co.uk The last phone call to ME was at 12.40am. During the course of this telephone conversation a senior member of staff at Monkstone House informed 2 neither the district nurses nor the out of hours GP was going to attend to Mr O'Connell at Monkstone House. did not want to arrange for Mr O’Connel! to go to A&E. informed the member of staff that he had spoken to the GP out of hours and he was happy for Mr O’Connell to remain at Monkstone House and he would ring in the morning to see what progress had been made. Staff at Monkstone continued to monitor Mr O'Connell throughout the night and there is documentation available to confirm this. No concerns were noted during this time. Notwithstanding this, the Morikstone House policy has now been changed with regard to clinical assessment. The effect of this is that if a health professional (either district nurse or GP) will not attend Monkstone House within one hour of being called, the patient will be sent to the local A&E Department. Direct monitoring of all input and urinary output The late Mr O’Connell was a gentleman who remained in his room throughout his stay. He did not interact with any other residents or take meals in any of the dining rooms. He would call for assistance when necessary. His routine was to watch TV all day, only leaving his room to smoke. The information given to Monkstone House by his family detailed his daily routine, with no concerns with regard to his catheter. Accordingly, it would have been difficult to monitor his urinary input and output as his supply of fluids was supplied by his family and kept in his room, which he drank at his leisure. Also, the information that Monkstone House received from Social Services, provided by his social worker, did not provide any express instructions regarding Mr O’Connell’s catheter or fluid input and output and only reference to his catheter being emptied three times a day. In addition, there was no mention of any concern made by his family or professionals regarding past or present problems with his catheter before or during his admission to Monkstone House. Notwithstanding this, the Monkstone House policy has been reviewed following Mr O'Connell's death. The catheter care policy has been reviewed and all staff have now been given extra training. In addition, urinary input and output monitoring charts have been put in place for all clients. The Monkstone House Policy and procedures which are now in place have also been reviewed and approved by CSSIW, as documented in Monkstone House’s recent inspection report which took place in August 2013. 3.‘ Failure to undergo clinical assessment From the Friday to Sunday Mr O’Connell was monitored by staff at Monkstone House and this was recorded in Monkstone House’s daily logs. Mr O'Connell was checked hourly throughout the night and his family were kept informed of his condition. No concerns were expressed and no visits were made by the family. Senior staff followed the family’s decision not to send Mr O’Connell to A&E. However, if senior staff felt at any point that Mr O’Connell’s condition was deteriorating any further, then medical advice would have been sought immediately, notwithstanding the fact that Mr O’Connell’s family had requested that he should not be admitted to hospital. Throughout the period from Friday to Sunday Mr O’Connell’s catheter was draining. Mr O’Connell appeared to be his normal self and in a jovial mood, evidence of which is contained in his daily records. His condition only began to deteriorate on Sunday to the extent that emergency treatment then became necessary. Mr O'Connell's daughter arrived at Monkstone House at 12.40pm to pick Mr O'Connell up to return home. She expressed concern to a senior member of staff that Mr O’Connell was not himself. The senior member of staff, accompanied Mr O'Connell’s daughter to his room where she agreed that his condition had deteriorated since she had seen him last at 12 noon. The GP out of hours was called, however further deterioration was noted by and an ambulance was called for by her. An ambulance arrived promptly and Mr O'Connell left Monkstone House by ambulance at approximately 1.40pm. Following these events, Monkstone House have reviewed all of their policies and procedures regarding GP out of hours, district nurses requests for visits etc. and the appropriate action in summary has been taken:- 1 Telephone calls are now recorded to confirm the substance of all conversations between families and all other professional agencies. 2 Catheter policy and procedure has been reviewed; fluid input and output has been revised and approved by CSSIW. 3. Meetings have been held with senior staff and if there are any concerns regarding clients, staff are to seek medical advice, ensuring that all clients are seen by a professional. If, for whatever reason clients cannot be seen at Monkstone House and if out of hours GP and nurses will not attend, Morikstone House will send the client to A&E department for assessment as soon as practical. 4 Monkstone House is no longer offering respite facilities to clients. In conclusion, we are attaching a copy of the Protection of Vulnerable Adults Strategy Meeting minutes, which took place on 18" September 2013 regarding Mr O'Connell together with some other additional policy and procedure documents which are relevant to this matter. These are:- e Policy and Procedure for Catheter Care e Policy and Procedure for a client needing clinical assessment e Pre-Admission Assessment Form e Fluid Balance Chart e CSSIW Inspection Report August 2013 We trust that the above information will be of assistance and if there anything further we can assjst you with in dealing with, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yowts faithfully PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE ADULTS STRATEGY MEETING 18" September 2013, 3pm, Pyle Life Centre Terence O’Connell (Deceased) Date, Time and Venue: Name of Vulnerable Adult: Social Services ID No: 310476 Date of Birth: 05.06.1942 Date of Referral: 07.05.2013 1. PEOPLE PRESENT, APOLOGIES, NON ATTENDANCE In Attendance: Adrian Bradshaw Russ Warwick Karen Merrett Designated Lead Manager, Chair Adult Safeguarding Officer, BCBC South Wales Police Clive Bevan South Wales Police Penny Evans Social Worker, BCBC Paul Rowley Contract Monitoring Officer, BCBC Liz Collier Integrated Community Network Manager (Locality Lead for District Nursing) Morag Liddell Operational Lead, ABMU GP Out of Hours Dr Bryn John ABMU GP Out of Hours Carol Rice Inspector, C.S.S.1.W. Paula Aplin Manager, Monkstone House Karen Davies Miranda Evans Apologies: Gweirydd Williams Phillip Stanton Louise Barraclough DC Clayton Ritchie Mark Adams Monkstone House Admin Support Senior Environmental Health Officer, BCBC Head of Environmental Health, BCBC Operational Team Leader District Nursing, ABMU South Wales Police H.M. Coroners Officer PURPOSE OF THE MEETING Adrian Bradshaw welcomed everyone to the meeting and introductions were made. The meeting is held under the Wales Interim Policy and Procedures for the Protection of Vulnerable Adults. The issues discussed are confidential to the members of the meeting and the agencies they represent. They will only be shared in the best interests of the vulnerable adult. Minutes of the meeting are circulated on the strict understanding that they will be kept confidential and stored securely. Name: Terence O'Connell \D No: 310476 In certain circumstances it may be necessary to make the minutes of the meeting available to the civil and criminal courts, solicitors, psychiatrists, other local authority social workers or other professionals involved in the care of the vulnerable adult. N.B. When you sign the attendance sheet/protection plan please note that you are signing up to the above confidentiality statement. The purpose of today’s meeting is to share information; consider issues relating to the vulnerable adult referral and in particular the level of risk and to decide on a course of action. Mr Terence O’Connell sadly passed away on 5'" May 2013 at the Princess of Wales Hospital. 3. NATURE OF ALLEGATION The allegation is the neglect of Mr O’Connell during a respite stay at Monkstone House Care Home between 22™ April 2013 and the 5" May 2013. 4. | MENTAL CAPACITY/CONSENT/VIEWS & WISHES OF THE VULNERABLE ADULT AND/OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE Mr O’Connell was deemed to have capacity although no formal assessment had been documented. 5. PRESENTATION OF REPORTS BY AGENCIES As a result of the first POVA Strategy Meeting on 15'" May the police and local authority carried out a joint investigation regarding the sudden death of Mr O’Connell. Karen Merrett presented a report for the POVA panel in relation to Mr Terence O'Connell following a period of respite at Monkstone House Care Home in Porthcawl and into the allegation of events prior to his death - at the time it was thought he had capacity. Statements were taken from a large number of witnesses and included family members, staff working at Monkstone House and the on-call District Nurses and GP working on Friday 3° May 2013. The information obtained from the statements allowed the police to formulate a report that was presented at today’s meeting. From the statements and the evidence, the investigators concluded that there was no criminal element regarding the death of Mr O’Corinell. However, from the decision made by Her Majesties Coroner during the inquest there had evidently been a missed opportunity by agencies to provide adequate care to Mr O’Connell which may have prevented him from passing away. Statements maintained the events leading up to his death showed no signs of severe illness, Mr O’Connell had been smoking and laughing with the staff at Monkstone House. However from the report there were a lot of missed opportunities and concerns. Name: Terence O’Connell ID No: 310476 The police felt whilst there is no Criminal element in the enquiry there are several important matters that need to be addressed to prevent a similar future incident occurring. Russ advised under policy and procedure and due to missed opportunities this Adult Protection should be considered as a Serious Case Review in view of lessons to be learnt. The panel acknowledged the importance of agencies communicating and working together. Liz confirmed that she had been working with Chris Griffiths and Carol Killa since the incident. She referred to the Out of Hours contact, and at no point did the District Nurse refuse to attend — the problem was assessed and there was nothing they could do as the Catheter was patent and draining. Karen Merrett confirmed the District Nurse did maintain this in her statement. It appears that there had been a breakdown in communication between the GP and District Nurse Out of Hours and a number of situations arose. Subsequently, Clinician to Clinician changes have been implemented in respect to the Out of Hours service. Dr Bryn John outlined that the GP Out of Hours service is based in Swansea but there are 2 GP’s in each area of Neath Port Talbot and Bridgend and each GP can identify patients waiting to be seen on screen. In respect to Monkstone House, Paula advised that all policies and procedures at the home have been revised, clear guidelines have been given and if there is no response in future, the client would be admitted to A&E for assessment. Russ advised on a handover recommendation; a course of action should be agreed, even if the circumstances change someone should take responsibility. It is understood structures are now in place. Carol Rice confirmed she has been shown the new policies and procedures at Monkstone House. Staff have reviewed training and changed some policies and procedures — there are no issues with the changes in place and she is happy Monkstone House can provide a level of care regarding a catheter. Adrian reminded the meeting that no agency/person had been singled out as being the alleged perpetrator, but a missed opportunity noted in Her Majesties Coronor’s report, contributed to by neglect. Karen noted that Mr O’Connell was thought to have had capacity. District Nursing notes for Mr O’Connell were not provided by the family to the home — Russ asked that care managers ensure client’s notes are provided for any stays in care homes. The District Nurses are currently on a 3 shift pattern, however they will be moving towards a day and night service. The nurses covering the day/evening will therefore be familiar with their clients and they will have specific shifts in order to provide continuity of care. Paula informed the panel she has ceased respite stays at Monkstone House. Name: Terence O’Connell ID No: 310476 6. INFORMATION ABOUT THE ALLEGED PERPETRATOR No individual person(s)/agency is responsible, issues relate to multi-agency working and communication. 7. INVESTIGATION Completed. 8 RISK ASSESSMENT No Risk to this adult as sadly he has passed away, however we have to consider risk to others in this care setting and any other care setting agencies may support. Risk of reoccurrence of events unless clear structures are in place which would ensure matters of this nature do not re occur when agencies are required to provide support. 9. INDIVIDUAL/GENERAL VULNERABLE ADULT PROTECTION PLAN/SUMMARY OF AGREED ACTIONS 1. Clear instructions to be provided to clinicians involved with ill patients/residents that they are to speak directly to each other and agree on a course of action and identify who accepts responsibility for the patient/resident - ABMUHB 2. If the service provider has no response from clinicians involved in the care of the ill patient/resident then they should consider emergency admission to hospital. This should be incorporated in Policy & Procedure and should provide clear guidance to Care Staff — Service Provider 3. BCBC Adult Services to ensure that Care Managers ensure that records (District Nurse Notes etc.) are provided to the service provider upon acceptance in a care setting whether that be for a respite period or permanent residence. Care Manager should link with relevant persons (including family)/agencies to ensure that records are kept with the service user. In particular when records are kept at the home address of the service user - BCBC / DLM 4. The service provider should request the relevant records of any service user they accept in the care setting whether for respite purposes or for permanent residency — Service Provider 5. Agencies to reply to request from Her Majesties Coroner and inform her what actions have been undertaken to prevent/minimise risk of reoccurrence of events. These actions to be shared with POVA process in review meeting which will be arranged in due course — All agencies requested 6. Matter to be referred to the Western Bay Safeguarding Adult Board (WBSAB) for consideration of this matter being subject of an Adult Serious Case Review Process — DLM & Russ Warwick Name: Terence O'Connell ID No: 310476 10. 11. 12. 13. FEEDBACK TO VULNERABLE ADULT/FAMILY/CARERS/REFERRER/OTHERS Family members will receive an update from this meeting, however they will not receive the notes presented by Karen Merrett in terms of the investigation - DLM & Russ Warwick OUTCOMES OF ALLEGATIONS Liz Collier, Dr Jonn and Morag Liddell felt the allegation was likely on the balance of probability but the consensus of opinion was a matter of Proven. Proven was therefore agreed. NOTE CONCERNS AND DISAGREEMENT DATE OF NEXT MEETING Tuesday 5th November, 2pm at Pyle Life Centre. Name: Terence O’Connell ID No: 310476 Policy and Procedure for Catheter Care 1. All staff must be aware of policy content and control measures required to minimise infection and risk of harm to any client with an indwelling urinary catheter. 2. Any clients with a catheter must have the necessary documentation district nurse notes at Monkstone house. Carers are to seek advice from district nurses at all times. ****D/N notes are to be brought in with the client on admission**** 3. ONLY district nurses are to carry out any procedures with indwelling catheters. Care assistants are only permitted to empty the bag. 4. Strict hygiene procedures to be carried out at all times, gloves and aprons to be worn when attending to catheter. Hands must be washed prior and after handling the bag. 5. The bag/urine must be disposed in an appropriate manner. The bag is to be placed in a yellow bag in soiled waste disposal. A single use disposable container must be used for each client, avoiding contact between urinary drainage bag tap and container. 6. All documentation, (fluid balance chart), must be completed immediately after emptying, input and output must be recorded to monitor to daily total of intake and output, along with any concerns, where the district nurse can be informed immediately. 7. The colour and flow of the urine must always be documented. 8. Ensure the tap is in the appropriate position after emptying to avoid any spillage. 9. Ensure the client drinks adequate amounts and stays hydrated. 10.Monitor for any signs of infection. All staff are to familiarise themselves with symptoms. These could be decreased output, pain, temperature, and change in urine colour/blood. If any of these symptoms are noted, medical advice should be sought. 11.Any concerns where medical advice needs to be sort, ring prime care. Note the time of the call. If you have not received a response within 30 minutes, repeat the call. If after another 30 minutes, there is still no response, arrange to take the client to A and E. Policy and procedure: in the event of a client being unwell/funny turns etc If a client is unwell or has funny turn: monitor and if you have any concerns, call the GP or prime care for advice. If you are waiting for feedback from prime care and they have not responded within 30 minutes, repeat the call for advice. If you have still not received a response from prime care after another 30 minutes, arrange for the client to go to A and E. If at any time, the client suffers any further deterioration, ring for an ambulance immediately. Document any advice given in general recordings and inform next of kin. If a client has to go to hospital, follow admission procedures. If in doubt seek medical advice always. Pre-Admission Assessment Residents File 17/01/11 SERVICE USER PRE-ADMISSION ASSESSMENT PLEASE COMPLETE ALL PAGES AND SIGN BELOW NAME: SIGNATURE: Page 1 of 7 Pre-Admission Assessment Residents File 17/01/11 ADMISSION DETAILS REASONS FOR ADMISSION SERVICE USERS PERSPECTIVE FOR ADMISSION INTO CARE FAMILYS PERSPECTIVE FOR ADMISSION OTHER AGENCYS PERSPECTIVE (please comment on social work, GP. Etc) Page 2 of 7 Pre-Admission Assessment Residents File 17/01/11 HEALTH ISSUES PHYSICAL HEALTH PROBLEMS (comment on past and present problems) LAST SEEN BY THE GP CONTINENCE ISSUES (PLEASE TICK APPROPRIATELY) COTINENT......... INCONTINENT.......... URINE........... DOUBLY........... CATHETER........... COLOSTOMYV............ **** ANY DISTRICT NURSE NOTES MUST BE BROUGHT IN ON ARRIVAL**** MENTAL STATE (comment on past and present mental health problems) SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL ISSUES Page 3 of 7 Pre-Admission Assessment Residents File 17/01/11 CURRENT MEDICATION (please state if person self-medicates PLEASE LIST ALL CORRECT MEDICATION WITH ANY WARFARIN TREATMENT, THE ANTICOAGOLANT BOOK MUST BE BROUGHT IN ON ARRIVAL. Page 4 of 7 Pre-Admission Assessment Residents File 17/01/11 SERVICE USER PERSONAL DETAILS Title: Date of Birth: Surname: Age: Forenames: Known As: Nationality/ Origin: Address: First Language: Religion: Married/ Single/ Widowed/ Divorced PRINCIPAL CARE DETAILS NEXT OF KIN Name: Name: Relationship: Relationship: Address: Address: Telephone: Telephone: PRIMARY CARE TEAM Doctor: CPN: Tel No. Surgery: Address: Chiropodist: Telephone: Social Worker: District Nurse: Clinic: Tel No. Telephone: Other: Tel No. HOSPITAL DETAILS (Inpatient) Date of admission: Ward: Date of planned discharge: Consultant: ADMISSION DETAILS Date of admission: Temp placement: Residential/ Nursing Care/ Other Respite Care Permanent placement: Room No: Page 5 of 7 Pre-Admission Assessment Residents File 17/01/11 ADDITITONAL INFORMATION SPECIALIST SERVICES YES NO COMMENTS Occupational Therapy Physiotherapy Regular out patient appointments Chiropodist Dentist Dietician Speech Therapist Community Psychiatric Nurse District Nurse Optician Counselling Palliative Care Other FINANCIAL DETAILS Person responsible for finances Funding Details: Name: Self Funding Address: Part Funded rs | Relationship: AGENT | APPOINTEE EPA | COURT OF PROTECTION WISHES ON DEATH SOLICITOR FUNERAL DIRECTOR NAME NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS Tel No. Tel No. Burial Cremation Special considerations to be made Comments Page 6 of 7 Pre-Admission Assessment Residents File 17/01/11 ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING SOCIAL NEEDS YES NO COMMENTS Good social skills Enjoys company Enjoys group activities Prefers to spend time alone Maintain interests/ hobbies Enjoys outdoor activities Regular church goer Member of any organisations Enjoys reading Enjoys listening to the radio/ music Enjoys watching television Is the person a welsh speaker Other —o RELATIONSHIPS YES NO COMMENTS Strong family relationships Long standing friendship Enjoys forming lasting friendships Enjoys going out with family/ friends Regular visitors COMMUNICATION YES NO Difficulty in expressing themselves COMMENTS Speech difficulties Visual impairment Wears glasses/ contact lenses Any visual aids/ equipment required Hearing impairment Wears a hearing aide Any hearing equipment required Other Page 7 of 7 Fluid Balance Chart Resident File 07/03/2011 Fluid Balance Chart Date Time Input Output Comment eg ACup= | eg 100ml E.g Draining/flow 08:00 am | 250 ml measuring jug or mark out a Urine colour disposable cup | Total Daily Intake Total Daily Output Any Comments Ocssiw Arolygiaeth Gofal a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol Cymru Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales Care Standards Act 2000 Inspection Report Monkstone House Care Home 1 Locks Common Road Porthcawl CF36 3HU Type of inspection — Focussed Date of inspection — 1 August 2013 Date of publication — 30 August 2013 You may reproduce this report in its entirety. You may not reproduce it in part or in any abridged form and may only quote from it with the consent in writing of Welsh Ministers. Please contact CSSIW National Office for further information Tel: 0300 062 8800 Email: cssiw@wales.gsi.gov.uk www.cssiw.org.uk Version 1.1 07/2012 Summary About the service Monkstone House, owned and operated by J & P Residential Homes Ltd is situated in Porthcawl, a short distance from the town centre. The home is within walking distance of nearby small shops, pubs, takeaways and cafes. The building is set back from the main road in its own grounds. The home enjoys views of the Bristol Channel. There are good bus links and the motorway is only minutes away by car. Monkstone House is registered to provide personal care and/or dementia/mental infirmity care for up to 41 people over the age of 65 years. The home can also provide care for two younger persons requiring personal care. The registered manager and responsible individual is Paula Aplin. This was a scheduled focussed inspection which took into account a recent concern received by the Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) regarding catheter care and fluid intake. The inspection focussed on Quality of Life. What type of inspection was carried out? Information was collated for this report following an unannounced visit to the home, information held by CSSIW, scrutiny of the returned self assessment of service and annual data collection documents. We spent time in the lounges observing staff with people using the service, examined the care files of two individuals and had discussions with staff and people resident at Monkstone House. What does the service do well? There was a warm welcoming atmosphere at the home and it was evident that the staff make considerable effort to provide person centred care. What has improved since the last inspection? Parts of the building have been upgraded. Seven new ensuite facilities have been provided. There was a secure outdoor area with a waterfall which was very pleasant. The laundry room had been extended. What needs to be done to improve the service? There were no areas of non compliance. Version 1.1 07/2012 Quality of life People using the service at Monkstone can be assured that they receive a good standard of care. From discussion and care records we saw that people are supported to make choices with regards to their care. People told us that staff treat them with dignity and respect. There was an activity co-ordinator at the home, however all staff were expected to assist with the delivery of the activity programme. The day we visited, people were sitting outside and enjoying the sunshine. The outside area of the home had been improved and a water feature installed. This was a very pleasant area and was safe for people to wander and easily accessible. We saw evidence of the activity programme that had been delivered in July which included armchair aerobics, singers, bible reading, church services, music for health, games and film afternoons. A fete was planned for the following Saturday, which people said they were looking forward to. Previous fetes at the home had been well supported by friends and relatives of people using the service. There were life histories on people's files which outlined their preferences in regards to activities and socialising. This was taken into account when planning the activity programme. We looked at the care records of two people using the service. The care plans were detailed and reflected personal choice. The care documentation was supported by a range of risk assessments, and both the care plans and the risk assessments had been reviewed on a monthly basis. It was evident that for one individual whose condition had deteriorated, the documentation had been reviewed often according to changes in her needs. We visited this individual who looked well cared for and looked peaceful and comfortable. We saw evidence that staff had visited regularly and were providing fluids on a regular basis. Following the receipt of a concern regarding fluid intake and catheter care, we saw that people using the service were receiving a good level of hydration and that drinks were available throughout the home. We checked the records of one individual with a catheter and he had a detailed care plan in place regarding his catheter care. There was also an intake/output record and staff were carefully monitoring this, and ensuring he had a good fluid intake and that his output was satisfactory. Staff had received training on how to provide catheter care and we talked to two staff members who described in detail how to care for this individual's catheter. We found no concerns regarding catheter or provision of fluids for people at this visit. Records also showed that the health and welfare of people using the service was promoted and timely input from other health professionals was evident. The staff had a good rapport with the district nurses who visited the home regularly and also a good rapport with the local authority. The home was recently scored by the local authority as part of their quality monitoring. The home scored 95.5% and should be commended on their efforts to provide a high standard of care, services and facilities. We talked to people using the service about the facilities and services at Mankstone. They spoke very highly of the home and the staff, and were happy living there. They commented positively on the food served and stated that they could order alternatives if they didn’t like what was on the menu. Alternatives were offered at each mealtime and on the day of the visit a roast chicken dinner was served with freshly cooked vegetables and rhubarb crumble and custard for dessert. This looked and smelled appetising and people were enjoying their meal. Staff closely monitor people during mealtimes and observe what they are eating to ensure that they have a good nutritional intake. Version 1.1 07/2012 We observed the care staff with people using the service. The care staff were trained, experienced and skilled in recognising the needs of the people in their care. We saw good relationships between staff and people using the service. People were supported to go out and receive their visitors in private if they so wished and a visitor's room was available to allow people to make tea and coffee for their quests. Overall Monkstone provides a good standard of care to people in clean, comfortable surroundings. Version 1.1 07/2012 Quality of staffing The inspection focussed on Quality of Life. CSSIW did not consider it necessary to focus on Quality of Staffing on this occasion. However this theme will be considered at future inspections. Version 1.1 07/2012 Quality of leadership and management The inspection focussed on Quality of Life. CSSIW did not consider it necessary to focus on Quality of Leadership and Management on this occasion. However this theme will be considered at future inspections. Version 1.1 07/2012 Quality of environment The inspection focussed on Quality of Life. CSSIW did not consider it necessary to focus on Quality of Environment on this occasion. However this theme will be considered at future inspections. Version 1.1 07/2012 Version 1.1 07/2012 How we inspect and report on servicesWe conduct two types of inspection; baseline and focussed. Both consider the experience of people using services. e Baseline inspections assess whether the registration of a service is justified and whether the conditions of registration are appropriate. For most services, we carry out these inspections every three years. Exceptions are registered child minders, out of school care, sessional care, créeches and open access provision, which are every four years. At these inspections we check whether the service has a clear, effective Statement of Purpose and whether the service delivers on the commitments set out in its Statement of Purpose. In assessing whether registration is justified inspectors check that the service can demonstrate a history of compliance with regulations. ¢ Focussed inspections consider the experience of people using services and we will look at compliance with regulations when poor outcomes for people using services are identified. We carry out these inspections in between baseline inspections. Focussed inspections will always consider the quality of life of people using services and may look at other areas. Baseline and focussed inspections may be scheduled or carried out in response to concerns. Inspectors use a variety of methods to gather information during inspections. These may include Talking with people who use services and their representatives Talking to staff and the manager Looking at documentation Observation of staff interactions with people and of the environment Comments made within questionnaires returned from people who use services, staff and health and social care professionals We inspect and report our findings under ‘Quality Themes’. Those relevant to each type of service are referred to within our inspection reports. Further information about what we do can be found in our leaflet ‘Improving Care and Social Services in Wales’. You can download this from our website, Improving Care and Social Services in Wales or ask us to send you a copy by telephoning your local CSSIW regional office.
a Q. G IG Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol
“Se oP N HS Abertawe Bro Morgannwg
University Health Board
Eich Cyf Your ref: INQ1530C %
Dyddiad/Date: 16" October 2013
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
Louise Hunt
HM Coroner for Bridgend, Glamorgan & Powys
Rock Grounds
First Floor
Aberdare
CF44 7AE
Dear Mrs Hurt,
Re: Terence O’Connell Inquest (deceased) Schedule 5
| write in response to your letter of 28'" August 2013, with regard to the above matter.
The Health Board respectfully acknowledges and accepts the findings of the inquest
held on 22™ August 2013.
The Health Board held a Post Inquest meeting to discuss the verdict and practical
solutions to reduce future risk. Following the meeting the ABMU General Practitioner
Out of Hours Service and the District Nursing Services have provided the attached
action plan and reports.
The matters of concern relating to the Health Board were as follows:-
1. There was a communication breakdown between the care home, district nurses
and out of hours GP on the 3% may 2013, resulting in Mr O'Connell not being
seen by any clinical staff.
The Health Board has implemented a clear and accurate message sheet, SBAR
(Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), for the switchboard staff at the
Princess of Wales Hospital to record all out of hours requests for District Nurses in
greater detail. The SBAR forms will ensure clear, audible records of referrals to the
District Nursing Service in the Bridgend Locality, supporting safe, high quality patient
care and the ability to review information and audit.
3. Mr O’Connell did not have any clinical assessment of his condition for 2 days
until his admission to hospital.
Bwrdd lechyd ABM yw enw gweithredu Bwrdd techyd Lleol Prifysgol Abertawe Bro Morgannwg
ABM University Health Board is the operational name of Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board
Pencadlys ABM / ABM Headquarters, 1 Talbot Gateway, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR. Ffon/ Tel: (01639) 683344
www.abm.wales.nhs.uk
Clinical Manager for the GP OOH Service has discussed this case on
two occasions with nurse management and agreed that in future all handover of care
should be made person to person and not via messages left at switchboard.
The District Nurses in Swansea and Neath Port Talbot Locality currently provide the GP
OOH Service with a weekend rota of the District Nurse’s on duty mobile telephone
numbers. lt is planned that this system will to be introduced in October 2013, in
Bridgend, once the new 24 hour shift pattern is introduced.
a 2: written to all the out of hours GP’s to remind them that they must
speak directly to the clinician who they wish to involve in the patient’s care and ensure
that responsibility has been passed to that person. It has been pointed out that this
procedure must be followed at shift changing times and outstanding problems are
communicated verbally and directly to the GP coming on shift.
| hope that the information provided satisfies the questions that you raised and
demonstrates the changes implemented and evidences how seriously the Health Board
has considered this matter.
Please do not hesitate to contact me further if my staff or | can be of any further
assistance to you in this matter.
Yours sincerely
PAUL ROBERTS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Enc. GP OOH report, DN’s report, DN’s action plan.
Qe GIG Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol
Abertawe Bro Morgannwg
ae N HS University Health Board
ABMU GP OOH Service
c/o The Grove Medical Centre
6 Uplands Terrace
Uplands
Swansea
SA2 0GU
23° September 2013
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Re Terence O'Connell - No 310476
The ABMU GP OOH Clinical Managers became aware of this case on 9" May 2013.
The clinical notes were seen by all Clinical Managers and I listened to all recorded
conversations on 10™ May 2013.
1st Call indicated that patient complaining of lower abdominal pain and pain where
catheter was inserted. Catheter was draining but not as much as usual. GP judged
this to be a catheter drainage problem and contacted District Nurse
2" call DN explained to the triage GP, FY she had talked to the home
already; she informed GP that she would not be able to flush the catheter as there
were no DN notes or equipment there and suggested that the home monitor the
fluid input and output. After a long discussion it was suggested by EEE that
there may be a UTI with some iil might need a washout and that
there may be notes available. agreed to locate the notes and the
nurse agreed to assess - actually said “yes we can sort something out that’s fine”
following EEE statement that “if you find any issues and he needs to go in
for a flush let us know”
3° Call HE phoned Care Home & was informed that son was already
bringing notes and equipment to the home.
4/5" Call DN informed that equipment has been delivered to the care
home but no notes and that she couldn’t do anything even if she attended. Home
visit agreed by
ABM Headquarters/ Pencadlys ABM, One Talbot Gateway, Seaway Parade, Baglan Energy Park, Port Talbot. SA12 7BR.
Telephone: 01639 683300 Ffon 01639 683300 FAX: 01639 687675 and 01639 687676
Bwrdd lechyd ABM yw enw gweithredu Bwrdd lechyd Lleol Prifysgol Abertawe Bro Morgan
ABM University Health Board is the operational name of Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board
www.abm.wales.nhs.uk
6" call made by OOH GP in error to son-in-law - meant to talk to care home
7” ca re-triaged call with staff. He suggested that the patient wouid
have to go to A&E for catheter change. Carer suggested that she should phone the
matron who may be trained in Catheter management
8 Call Matron declined to attend but son in law had just phoned the home to say
that he had found the DN notes and was bringing the notes down. She had phoned
the DN and was waiting for a rep|y. a sic that if for any reason the DN
could not visit he would be happy to do so.
9" cal attempted to contact the DN via POW switchboard. There was
split recording due to the patching of the call and 1 was unable to establish whether
there was a direct person to person conversation.
10" cal EE cated the Care Home. He said he had left a message for the
DN and he saw no reason for her not to call. He told (the care worker who
he had dealt with all along) that he was closing the cal! but if there was any
problem she was to contact OOH again.
The Clinical Managers agreed that the advice given by both
was reasonable at the time and that Jad “safety netted” the
patient in his final call. However all agreed that there was a communication
problem and that as he had not been contacted by the DN on duty
following the 8" call, should have checked with the DN or the Care home to ensure
that the patient had been seen.
OOH had requested on several occasions the statement from this DN and asked for
" reasons why she had not made further contact with after making the
decision that she would not visit.
I have discussed this case on two occasions with nurse management and agreed
that in future ali handover of care should be made person to person and not via
messages left at switchboard.
DNs in Swansea and NPT give OOH a rota of DNs on duty over the weekend with
mobile contact numbers. It is hoped that this system will be extended to Bridgend
when the new 24 hour shift pattern is introduced in October 2013. Between
Monday and Fridays contact is made with DNs via the Hospital Switchboards in each
of the three localities.
OOH had informed the DN Service in Bridgend that the most efficient way to
contact OOH Drs was to use the contact telephone number for the Primary care
Centre in Morriston a | rather than using the Primecare call
handling service as all such calls are logged as urgent by the OOH Reception staff
and responded to as rapidly as possible by the OOH GPs.
I feel that there is a lack of understanding of the ABMU OOH Service, particularly in
Bridgend and NPT. I have extended an invitation to the nurse managers in both
areas to the OOH admin office to see the recording and clinical systems and to visit
one of the OOH Centres to see the system in operation.
I have written to all GPs working for the OOH Service reminding them that they
MUST speak directly to the clinician who they wish to involve in the patient’s care
and make it clear that responsibility has been passed to that person. I have pointed
out that this procedure must be followed at shift changing times and any
outstanding problems are communicated verbally and directly to the GP coming on
shift.
—_ —
ABMU GP OOH Service
Report Regarding The DN Care of MR TO’C by the out of hours district nursin
service on 3% May 2013
At 7.30pm on 03.05.13 staff nurseff received a phone call via her
mobile to contact Monkstone House residential home.{fcontacted the home and
was advised that TO’C was a respite patient with an indwelling urinary catheter
insitu. TO’C was reported as having abdominal pain and penile burning not relieved
by analgesia but was otherwise his usual self. {J was informed the catheter was
draining clear urine and seemed to be working fine. As the catheter was draining
freely [lf assessed that the catheter was not blocked and the most likely cause was
a urinary tract infection. The carer advised there weren't any district nursing notes
available for Mr TO’C at the home.[then advised the carer she would speak to
the out of hours GP service and she then spoke to the out of hours receptionist for
the GP triage doctor to make contact with the care home to assess further.
At approx 19.50hrs firang the care home and advised the carer that the GP would
ring her shortly.
At approx 20:15hrs il received a phone call on her mobile from the cP
EE who requested I visit the care home and administer a washout or change
the catheter.Jbdvised she did not have any washouts as they are prescribed for
individual patients and she did not feel it was the appropriate course of action as the
catheter was draining freely and her assessment indicated an infection which
required a medical review. [J further advised that the reason there weren't any
district nursing notes at the home to verify the need for the catheter as the DN
service had not been alerted to Mr Oc’s admission for respite GE contacted
again and again requested that [visit and have a look at the catheter. J
declined and stated she thought TO’C needed a GP visit to rule out an infection and
a medical review of the cause of the abdominal pain. Mifaqvised she would attend
after the GP visit if the GP deemed it necessary.
At 20:25hrefE again phoned land asked if she would visit TO’C as the
district nursing notes were now being taken to the home. [contacted the care
home who again advised there we not any district nursing notes in the home and the
catheter was draining freely. Hi ano a on requested a GP attend to
assess the abdominal pain as the catheter was still patent and draining and the
patient needed a medical assessment, the GP visit was agreed.
Wspan of duty finished at 21:00 hours however owing to the workload that
evening she remained on duty lated contacted night staff nurse I at
approx 21:15hrs to inform her of what had happened and that the GP was going to
visit.
At approx 21:20hrs the carer from Monkstone rang MMM and stated the GP had
referred TO’C back to the district nurses as it was a catheter problem, the carer
further stated that the GP had informed her the district nurses were refusing to
attend. Wil informe the carer the district nurses were not refusing to but that from
the information they were given this was nota catheter problem and that a medical
assessment was required in order to find out the cause for his abdominal pain. ll
asked if the catheter was continuing to drain freely and she was informed the bag
was now % full. [iilwas then satisfied that the catheter was draining freely.
Asfl was aware that{J would be visiting patients at this point she contacted the
switchboard herself despite being off duty at 21:35hrs and it was confirmed that
they had received a call from the GP, had alerted [Jj to this and were waiting for
Mio ring them back.
At approx 22:20hrs the Health Care Support Worker accompanying il observed the
missed call on the mobile phone and rang switchboard to be informed that they didn’t
need to worry as the situation regarding TO’C had been sorted out we are unsure
why this information was relayed to fiat that time.
At approx 00:30hrs switchboard rang i asking her to ring Monkstone house.
then rang Monkstone House and the carer advised that nobody had visited and she
had been told to expect a visit from the GP. The carer advised TO’C was still
experiencing abdominal and penile pain and the catheter was draining ‘fine’.
explained that it was probably an infection which required antibiotics, which would
need to be prescribed by the GP. asked if the carer wanted her to ring the GP for
her but the carer said she was happy to do so herself lll epeated the conversation
out loud to her Health Care Support Worker colleague, which is her general practice.
The phone conversation ended with an agreement that the carer would contact the
GP.
This was the last contact made to the district nursing service regarding TO’C.
Conclusion
The district nursing staff made an appropriate assessment on the information
supplied by the care home i.e. that the catheter was draining freely, and therefore
the cause of the pain would not have been a blocked catheter.
There was a dispute between the district nursing staff and out of hours GP’s in
relation to the fact that this gentleman required a medical not a nursing assessment
at that point in time.
The communication between the Nurse and the GP was not clear in what was being
requested and the reasons why.
Messages were passed between switchboard and clinicians which reduced the
opportunity for clinical dialogue between the nurse and the GP which may have led
to a different outcome.
There is a gap in information available as to why the nurse fll was told by the
switchboard that she did not need to attend to MR OC at 22.20, however the system
for recording messages in Princess of Wales switchboard did not contain sufficient
details to audit the messages or identify the person responding to this call.
SUVAS Jo ssn
au} 10} pasmbas
Sururery,
azeo yuayjed Aqiyenb
ysty ‘ayes Suysoddns ‘aorasas
SUISINN JOLNSIG] 10y
dD sinoy JO no puke sd1AJ0s peor] [BUOIssajorg | ‘sure poorde SOIAISS gD
SUISINU JOLNSTIP UseANJOQ pusspug pue s[eliojer | = SIMOY JO yno YA
UOTPOTUNUWOD UT AYLIETO jo preyop uoeoTunuTU09
JO SUIPI10I93 | Ul ALIRID IO} PION
pure s[enayor
Uy AyLeyo Joy
SUVS JO 981)
ELOT QOWO > TE
Ayyeooy] puss pug
yIpne pue uoYeUoOyul ay) Ut sinoy Jo
MOIADL Of AQIQe oy) pue pIVOgyojIMs | No Buryom voy
ares juatjed Aytyenb ysry ‘ayes BUISINN JOUNSIC 10} SOTVAA | prBoquaiIms MOd
Sunioddns ‘Aj1Jeo0'7] pusspug pes] jeuorssayo1g Jo ssoouLig Aq yjeys Bulsinu
oy) Ul «=f oTAJos = Sursanu pusspug |; Ul pastyin aq 0} PINSIP 0} UO
yULIsIp ay} Of sfeuayar Sy20Ys 9dessoul passed sa8essoul
JO spiooo1 a]qeypne ‘IeajD ayenose JO spsooa1
pure raya ayemnoor pur
sopra] £107 Tea[o JO souasgy
wea jeuonesedg | €10Z 124000 ..1 Jaquiaydeg
Ad NOILATANOD SdALLD aldo aLvgd Noswad GalalLLNaGi
qaLaTdWwood 40 ALVG /AWODLNO GauinOM | LAV.LS ATAISNOdSAY SNOLLOV aassi
€VOr.o aeq
QOL “Ad
NVId NOLLOV
| J
A@
GaLaTdWoo
E107 49900,
NOLLATHNOO
40 ALva
i
sinoy jo
qNO 0} SaNsst JEOTUTTD ayejeoso
0} OY pue Udy Jo AyLTE[D
oreo quaryed Aytyenb
Ysry ‘ayes Sunioddns ‘aoiwsss
dQ smoy JO No pue soIAJos
SUISIMU JOLSIp UssMy9q,
WOBSTUNUAUIOS UT AILE[D
SHALLOALIO
/ANODLNO aawinowa
0.0L au
NW'Id NOLLDV
SUISINN JOLNSIC] 10J
peo] [euorssayoig
puss pug
SUISINN PLUYSIG 10}
peo’] jeuorssayolg
puo’piig
NOSaad
a TaISNOdSau
smoy
Jo mo ssao0id
uoTyBpeose Ieayo
e dopaasp of,
peynuspt
ansst pue
SUVS fo osn
oy} 1OJ permbes
Sururely,
‘suonjoe poalde
pur sjesioyor
JO Prejop
jo Zulpi0se1
pure sye.Liejor
Ul ALE] IOF
S.UVAS JO 8s-)
SUBLOTUTIS 044} 94}
uaemjeq andsIp
dU} O1 ONnssT ot}
ayeyeosa 0} soejd
UT ssaz0id Jo youyT
oreo
jo uonenuyuoa
/suoyoe
Sutpueysyno Aue
10y Aytpiqisuodsez
Surooie
uOISsnosIp
ueropuryo
0} UeTOTUT]D
jo souevodaly
crore eq
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.