Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013

Kathleen Rosemary Dixon

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0292, written 11 Nov 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 Nov 2013
Reference2013-0292
DeceasedKathleen Rosemary Dixon
CoronerIan Smith
Coroner areaCumbria (South & East)
CategoryMental Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Care Quality Commission 
2.  Department of Health 

1 

CORONER 

I am Ian Smith senior coroner, for the coroner area of South and East Cumbria 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
[HYPERLINKS] 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 24 December 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kathleen 
Rosemary Dixon, 64 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 1 
November 2013. The conclusion of the inquest was that Kathleen Rosemary Dixon died 
as a consequence of her own actions whilst suffering from an acute episode of mental 
illness.  The medical cause of death was Drowning. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mrs Dixon was receiving treatment for mental illness which was escalating and its 
severity was not recognised by those treating her.  She drowned in a river. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

 (1)  This is a repetition of similar circumstances in a number of previous Inquests and I 
think the Trust needs to be assessed independently. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 3 January 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

11 November 2013                                              Ian Smith 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health (PDF)
ae

| Department
of Health

POCL 821412

Your Ref: 2012-891/DP

From the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP
Secretary of State for Health

Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London

SWIA 2NS

Tel: 020 7210 3000
Mb-sofs@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Mr I Smith

Senior Coroner

Central Police Station

Market Street

Barrow-in-Furness

Cumbria 10 DEC 2013
LAI4 2LE

De he tah,

Thank you for your letter following the inquest into the death of Kathleen Rosemary
Dixon. She had been in the care of Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (the
FT) and drowned herself in the local river on 19 December 2012.

You found that she had a history of mental health problems, had been in the care of.
the FT and was assessed and released into the community. She committed suicide
shortly afterwards.

You raised your concerns that:

i) this case mirrored the circumstances of a number of other cases, within the same
FT, where the mental health of either an in-patient or a community patient has been
wrongly assessed and within a very short time of being released into the community
the person committed suicide;

ii) these deaths have occurred sufficiently frequently to cause you to question
whether this is a symptom of a deep rooted problem within the FT.

You have also written to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) about this matter.
My officials have discussed this case with CQC and have confirmed that the CQC is
aware that there are problems of the nature you describe at the FT.

In October 2013 the CQC issued two warning notices to the FT in relation to the
care and welfare of people who use services and staffing and has told the FT that it
must make improvements to comply with national standards of quality and safety.

On 28 November 2013 the CQC published an inspection report following the
inspection of the FT’s Ramsey Unit, an adult mental health facility at Furness
General Hospital, Barrow, which identified shortfalls against three of the national
standards reviewed.

The FT has agreed to fully address all areas of concern and CQC, working closely
with NHS England, Monitor and commissioners, will monitor the position to ensure
that the required improvements are implemented.

This Government is committed to ensuring that the health and care system prevents
problems, detects problems quickly and takes action promptly where they occur.
Since the publication of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry, the
Government has instigated a number of changes which will improve inspection,
increase transparency, put a clear emphasis on compassion, standards and safety,
increase accountability for failure, and build capability, “Hard Truths”, the
government’s response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, set out
additional actions to improve patient safety.

In relation to the care of mental health patients generally, we would advise that
everyone referred to secondary mental health services should receive an assessment
of their mental health needs. If it is agreed that the person’s needs are best met by a
secondary mental health service, a care plan should be devised. Services should
aim to develop one assessment and care plan that will follow the service user
through a variety of care settings to ensure that correct and necessary information
goes with them.

In reviewing a care plan as part of discharge planning from hospital or other
residential settings, appropriate liaison with mental health services in the
community is essential. The period around discharge is a time of elevated risk, and
particularly of self-harm. This underlines the need for thorough review and
assessment prior to discharge and effective follow-up and support after discharge.

Mental health trusts should ensure that individuals with higher support needs are
identified and appropriately supported. All care plans must include explicit crisis
and contingency plans. This includes arrangements so that the service user or their
carer can contact the right person if they need to at any time with clear details of
who is responsible for addressing elements of care and support.

ae

Department
of Health

I hope that this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the
circumstances of Kathleen Dixon’s death to my attention.

Ne sar
ey

a
JEREMY HUNT

Related reports

Other reports by Ian Smith

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Mental Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.