Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0292, written 11 Nov 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 11 Nov 2013 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2013-0292 |
| Deceased | Kathleen Rosemary Dixon |
| Coroner | Ian Smith |
| Coroner area | Cumbria (South & East) |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Care Quality Commission 2. Department of Health 1 CORONER I am Ian Smith senior coroner, for the coroner area of South and East Cumbria 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. [HYPERLINKS] 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 24 December 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kathleen Rosemary Dixon, 64 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 1 November 2013. The conclusion of the inquest was that Kathleen Rosemary Dixon died as a consequence of her own actions whilst suffering from an acute episode of mental illness. The medical cause of death was Drowning. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mrs Dixon was receiving treatment for mental illness which was escalating and its severity was not recognised by those treating her. She drowned in a river. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) This is a repetition of similar circumstances in a number of previous Inquests and I think the Trust needs to be assessed independently. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 3 January 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 1 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 11 November 2013 Ian Smith 2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
ae | Department of Health POCL 821412 Your Ref: 2012-891/DP From the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP Secretary of State for Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SWIA 2NS Tel: 020 7210 3000 Mb-sofs@dh.gsi.gov.uk Mr I Smith Senior Coroner Central Police Station Market Street Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria 10 DEC 2013 LAI4 2LE De he tah, Thank you for your letter following the inquest into the death of Kathleen Rosemary Dixon. She had been in the care of Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (the FT) and drowned herself in the local river on 19 December 2012. You found that she had a history of mental health problems, had been in the care of. the FT and was assessed and released into the community. She committed suicide shortly afterwards. You raised your concerns that: i) this case mirrored the circumstances of a number of other cases, within the same FT, where the mental health of either an in-patient or a community patient has been wrongly assessed and within a very short time of being released into the community the person committed suicide; ii) these deaths have occurred sufficiently frequently to cause you to question whether this is a symptom of a deep rooted problem within the FT. You have also written to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) about this matter. My officials have discussed this case with CQC and have confirmed that the CQC is aware that there are problems of the nature you describe at the FT. In October 2013 the CQC issued two warning notices to the FT in relation to the care and welfare of people who use services and staffing and has told the FT that it must make improvements to comply with national standards of quality and safety. On 28 November 2013 the CQC published an inspection report following the inspection of the FT’s Ramsey Unit, an adult mental health facility at Furness General Hospital, Barrow, which identified shortfalls against three of the national standards reviewed. The FT has agreed to fully address all areas of concern and CQC, working closely with NHS England, Monitor and commissioners, will monitor the position to ensure that the required improvements are implemented. This Government is committed to ensuring that the health and care system prevents problems, detects problems quickly and takes action promptly where they occur. Since the publication of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry, the Government has instigated a number of changes which will improve inspection, increase transparency, put a clear emphasis on compassion, standards and safety, increase accountability for failure, and build capability, “Hard Truths”, the government’s response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, set out additional actions to improve patient safety. In relation to the care of mental health patients generally, we would advise that everyone referred to secondary mental health services should receive an assessment of their mental health needs. If it is agreed that the person’s needs are best met by a secondary mental health service, a care plan should be devised. Services should aim to develop one assessment and care plan that will follow the service user through a variety of care settings to ensure that correct and necessary information goes with them. In reviewing a care plan as part of discharge planning from hospital or other residential settings, appropriate liaison with mental health services in the community is essential. The period around discharge is a time of elevated risk, and particularly of self-harm. This underlines the need for thorough review and assessment prior to discharge and effective follow-up and support after discharge. Mental health trusts should ensure that individuals with higher support needs are identified and appropriately supported. All care plans must include explicit crisis and contingency plans. This includes arrangements so that the service user or their carer can contact the right person if they need to at any time with clear details of who is responsible for addressing elements of care and support. ae Department of Health I hope that this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Kathleen Dixon’s death to my attention. Ne sar ey a JEREMY HUNT
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.