Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Marco Lima De Araujo

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0093, written 3 Mar 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report3 Mar 2014
Reference2014-0093
DeceasedMarco Lima De Araujo
CoronerDavid Horsley
Coroner areaPortsmouth & South East Hampshire
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Commander N. Hare, Queen's Harbour Master, Portsmouth 

1 

CORONER 

I am David Clark Horsley, senior coroner, for the coroner area of Portsmouth and South 
East Hampshire 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 20th August 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Marco Antonio 
Lima De Araujo The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13th February 
2014. The conclusion of the inquest was: The aforementioned person died due to an 
accident. The medical cause of his death was drowning. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 8th August 2012 the body of Marco Antonio Lima De Araujo was recovered from the 
water in Portsmouth Dockyard. On 26th July 2012 at about 15.45 hours he had gone into 
the sea by the Round Tower, Portsmouth, to assist in the rescue of two children who 
had got into difficulties in the sea. He was not seen alive again. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

I was told at the Inquest hearing that there is no formal protocol for reporting and co-
ordinating rescue in relation to life threatening incidents in Portsmouth Harbour. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 28th April 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons [NAMES] [and to the LOCAL SAFEGUARDING BOARD (where the deceased 
was under 18)]. I have also sent it to [NAMED PERSON] who may find it useful or of 
interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

3rd March 2014                                              David Clark Horsley 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Maritime Coastguard Agency (PDF)
Maritime Operations

Bay 2/07

Re Spring Place
q 105 Commercial Road
is _ Southampton RECEIVED
Maritime & S015 1EG 17 APR 2014
Coastguard BY H.M CORONER
Agency
To: David C. Horsley rel
The Coroner’s Office E-mait:
The Guildhall
Guildhall Square ; Your ref: Report 3 Mar 14 De
Portsmouth Araujo
PO1 2AB 15 April 2014

Dear Sir,

This letter is in response to the Regulation 28 matter of concern outlined in your
report “that there is no formal protocol for reporting and coordinating rescue in
relation to life threatening incidents in Portsmouth Harbour”.

Her Majesty’s Coastguard is responsible for the initiation and coordination of civil
maritime search and rescue within the United Kingdom search and rescue region.
This includes the mobilisation, organisation and tasking of adequate resources to
respond to persons either in distress at sea, or to persons at risk of injury or death
on the cliffs or shoreline of the United Kingdom. (Secretary of State for Transport,
House of Commons, 9 March 1992).

The formal protocols, for persons on land, for the alerting of HM Coastguard are by
calling 999 and ask for coastguard. Persons or vessels at sea use the global
maritime distress and safety systems (GMDSS) protocols. Her Majesty’s Coastguard
have long standing arrangements with the Queen’s Harbour Master, Portsmouth
(QHM) (and all Harbour Authorities) that allow for mutual communication and
cooperation during search and rescue activities within harbour limits. Both
organisations have direct dial telephone lines between each other and can also
communicate on marine band radio frequencies within the GMDSS.

When a Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC) of HM Coastguard is alerted
to an incident within harbour limits they will task and coordinate appropriate search
and rescue units to resolve the incident, at the same time they will communicate with
QHM and often request resources to assist. Where the QHM is made aware of an
incident they will alert HM Coastguard and frequently task their own resources and
hand coordination to the MRCC. The appropriate MRCC in the case of QHM
Portsmouth is MRCC Solent.

& gS, INVESTORS SEA ai
@ 4,’ IN PEOPLE ‘G) VISION

HM Coastguard

MRCC Solent and QHM are members of the SOLFIRE multi-agency response group
encompassing all harbour, emergency and local authorities that would respond to
major incidents in the Solent. These organisations take part in annual multiagency
exercises.

| hope that this answers the matter of concern in your report.

For Chief Coastguard
Maritime Operations
HM Coastguard

Copy to:

— “ Portsmouth

] SEA

NE)
UKAS

4, 2h IN PEOPLE

i” Sy INVESTORS ©)
4 | SEA

Related reports

Other reports by David Horsley

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track David Horsley

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching David Horsley, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.