Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0470, written 27 Oct 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Oct 2014 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2014-0470 |
| Deceased | Cherylin Norrell-Goldsmith |
| Coroner | Richard Travers |
| Coroner area | Surrey |
| Category | State Custody related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
IN THE SURREY CORONER’S COURT IN THE MATTER OF: __________________________________________________________ The Inquests Touching the Death of Chrylin Angela Maria NORRELL‐ GOLDSMITH A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths __________________________________________________________ THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP – Lord Chancellor in relation to paragraph 5(1). The Governor of HMP Downview in relation to paragraphs 5(1) and 5(2). The Chief Executive of the Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust in relation to paragraphs 5(2), 5(3) and 5(4). The Chief Executive of Virgin Care in relation to paragraphs 5(2) and 5(4). 1 CORONER Richard Travers HM Coroner for Surrey 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 5 to The Coroners and Justice Act 2009. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST The inquest into Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith’s death was opened on the 2nd August 2013 and was resumed on 2nd October 2014 with a jury. It was concluded on 27th October 2014. The jury found that the cause of death was: 1a – Hanging. They concluded with the following verdict: Cherylin Angela Maria Norrell‐Goldsmith took her own life. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH At shortly before midnight on the 26th July 2013 Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith was found in her cell at HMP Downview. She was partially suspended by a ligature which had been attached to some exposed pipe work in the 1 Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014 lavatory area within her cell. Assistance was summoned and CPR commenced. Paramedics later attended but despite continued effort on the part of those in attendance they were unable to revive her. Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith had been in custody since the 1st March 2012 and had been on an ACCT for almost the whole of that time. In addition, she had had long periods of counselling and, at the time of her death, was receiving Dialectical Behavioural Therapy. She had been a prolific self‐ harmer whilst in prison and had been diagnosed as suffering from an Adjustment Disorder. There was substantial documentation in relation to her treatment and care. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed a number of matters that gave rise to concerns that circumstances creating a risk of other deaths will continue to exist in the future unless action is taken. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1. Open pipe work with the cell Whilst it may not be possible to remove all potential ligature points within a cell, removal of easily accessible and obvious ligature points may serve to reduce the risk of self harm and suicide to vulnerable prisoners. 2. Multi‐Disciplinary Attendance / Input at ACCT Reviews Consideration should be given to ensuring that all staff, including prison staff, healthcare staff and In Reach staff understand the importance of requiring and providing multi‐disciplinary attendance, or alternatively, multi‐disciplinary input at all ACCT reviews. 3. Retention of Primary Source Data within the Phoenix Programme Consideration should be given to ensuring that all primary source data (ie data provided by the prisoner to the therapist), should be kept either in hard copy format or by way of faithfully recoding all the detail contained therein on the prisoner’s System One record. 4. Recording Significant Medical Events on a prisoner’s Non‐medical Records Consideration should be given to ensuring that all members of healthcare and In Reach staff working within a prison environment record all significant medical events that may impact upon a prisoner’s risk assessment for self‐harm or suicide in a 2 Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014 place or manner that is readily accessible to the discipline staff at the prison, in addition to any entry made in respect thereof in the System One record. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that the people listed in paragraph one above have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I may extend that period on request. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES I have sent a copy of this report to the following: 1. The Lord Chancellor 2. The Chief Executive of the Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust in relation to paragraph 5(3). 3. The Chief Executive of Virgin Care 4. The Governor of HMP Downview 5. The Interested Persons in the Inquest: Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith’s Family (Bhatt Murphy) Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith’s daughter SABP NHS Foundation Trust (Weightmans) MOJ – (T.Sols) Virgin Care 6. The Chief Coroner 9 Signed: Richard Travers 3 Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014 DATED this 27th October 2014 4 Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
“ Equality, Rights and Decency National Offender Group 3 National Offender Management Service Management Service 4th Floor, Clive House, 70 Petty France, London, SW1H 9HD Email: Coroner Mr Richard Travers HM Coroner for Surrey 18 December 2014 Dear Mr Travers, Re: the death of Cherylin Angela Maria Norrell- Goldsmith on 22 July 2013 whilst in HMP Downview Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report of 27 October 2014 to the Secretary of State, the Governor of HMP Downview and others, concerning the recent inquest into the death of Cherylin Angela Maria Norrell-Goldsmith. Your letter has been passed to Equality, Rights and Decency (ERD) Group, in the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), as we have the policy responsibility for suicide prevention, self-harm management and for sharing learning from deaths in custody. You will be aware that since Ms Norrell-Goldsmith’s death HMP Downview no longer has a population of female prisoners and is currently being re-roled to provide accommodation for Category C male prisoners. The prison will reopen in Spring 2015. | am responding to the concerns you have raised in your report as follows: (1) Open pipe work within the cell- removal of easily accessible ligature points may serve to reduce the tisk of self harm and suicide to vulnerable prisoners The Ministry of Justice Estate Directorate (MoJ ED) are responsible for the delivery of prison and construction projects. MoJ ED now routinely provide ‘safer cells’ in all new prison construction projects. “Safer cells” are specifically designed to remove known ligature points thereby reducing the opportunities for a prisoner to self-harm by means of ligature. MoJ ED also routinely provide “safer cells” when refurbishing existing accommodation wherever it is physically possible to do so. The programme of new construction and planned refurbishments means that the numbers of safer cells are increasing across the prison estate. If a particular establishment identifies that a cell presents opportunities for self harm, the Governor of that establishment may commission the establishment's local works team to refurbish it to reduce the risk. However, it must be noted that no cell can be described as “safe” and while one ligature point may be removed, there will be others which remain. A “safer cell” provides staff with a location to relocate a prisoner in immediate crisis. MoJ ED, as attached, publishes a guide to safer cell design which sets out the specific requirements for a cell to be a designated “safer cell’. Most establishments maintain some designated safer cells which can be used to accommodate prisoners identified at risk of self harm. (2) Multi-disciplinary attendance and input_at Assessment Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) Reviews PSI 64/2011 on Safer Custody aims to support effective multi-disciplinary case management and sharing of information to reduce incidents of harm. In line with PSI 64/2011 Safer Custody, HMP Downview when it re-opens in 2015, will issue a notice to staff explaining the importance of and procedures for conducting multi-disciplinary ACCT case reviews. Particular emphasis will be given to the fact that multi-disciplinary case reviews are to be held at the appropriate times, and where possible, a consistent case manager and relevant personnel must attend the reviews. Where a relevant member of staff cannot attend an ACCT review, then in exceptional circumstances, and per the instructions of PSI64/2011, a written report will be submitted. When HMP Downview was a female prison, a system was in place to ensure that all staff who arrived for duty were provided with a list of prisoners subject to an ACCT and the date of the next ACCT case review in order that they could arrange to attend the review if they were involved in that prisoner's care. This system will be reintroduced in Spring 2015. In addition, case managers will record in the ACCT document any significant personnel who are involved with the offender, including, health care, offender management and interventions or learning and development. The case manager will also email relevant persons prior to the case review requesting their input to add to the details of the review and report. Prior to the re-opening of HMP, Downview, all prison staff, including personnel employed by partnership agencies within the prison will receive initial training or refresher training in the application of the ACCT procedures as part of their induction programme. The 2.5 hour training package will then be delivered by trained facilitators to each member of staff every 2 years, and the programme of training will be monitored by the HR hub at the prison. (3) Retention of primary source data within the Phoenix Programme - Consideration should be given to ensuring that all primary source data should be either kept in hard copy format_or by way of faithfully recording all the detail contained on the Prisoner's Systm One record The local policies and procedures at HMP Downview have been reviewed and strengthened where necessary. The NHS England Area Team has produced data sharing Agreements which set out the required standard for sharing data between clinicians and also for a non-clinical (secondary) purpose. NHS England is responsible for managing the audit and reporting for access to records in the clinical system (TPP SystmOne and its successor) and for the appropriate use of patient information. Providers are required to undertake spot checks of their own adherence to these Agreements either directly or through monitoring of the standards referred to above. Any resulting report on the findings of the audits concerning these Agreements can be reasonably requested by any Party to the agreement. (4) Recording significant medical events on a prisoner's non-medical records All staff, including health care staff, will be reminded of the ACCT procedures and the requirement to record significant information about an individual’s self-harm or suicide risks, on Cnomis (Custodial National Offender Management Information System) in addition to recording the information on SystmOne- (the electronic medical records system). The induction pack available for health care staff has also been updated to include governance information about ACCT procedures and what information can be shared with non healthcare professionals. | hope this provides assurance that the specific issues identified in this case, both at the inquest and by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, are being addressed. Yours sincerely, NOMS Equality, Rights and Decency Group
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.