Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Cherylin Norrell-Goldsmith

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0470, written 27 Oct 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Oct 2014
Reference2014-0470
DeceasedCherylin Norrell-Goldsmith
CoronerRichard Travers
Coroner areaSurrey
CategoryState Custody related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

IN THE SURREY CORONER’S COURT
IN THE MATTER OF:
__________________________________________________________
The Inquests Touching the Death of Chrylin Angela Maria NORRELL‐
GOLDSMITH
A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths
__________________________________________________________
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
 The Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP – Lord Chancellor in relation to
paragraph 5(1).
 The Governor of HMP Downview in relation to paragraphs 5(1)
and 5(2).
 The Chief Executive of the Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS
Foundation Trust in relation to paragraphs 5(2), 5(3) and 5(4).
 The Chief Executive of Virgin Care in relation to paragraphs 5(2)
and 5(4).
1 CORONER
Richard Travers HM Coroner for Surrey
2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 5 to The Coroners
and Justice Act 2009.
3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
The inquest into Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith’s death was opened on the
2nd August 2013 and was resumed on 2nd October 2014 with a jury. It was
concluded on 27th October 2014.
The jury found that the cause of death was:
1a – Hanging.
They concluded with the following verdict:
Cherylin Angela Maria Norrell‐Goldsmith took her own life.
4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
At shortly before midnight on the 26th July 2013 Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith
was found in her cell at HMP Downview. She was partially suspended by
a ligature which had been attached to some exposed pipe work in the
1
Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014
lavatory area within her cell. Assistance was summoned and CPR
commenced. Paramedics later attended but despite continued effort on
the part of those in attendance they were unable to revive her.
Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith had been in custody since the 1st March 2012 and
had been on an ACCT for almost the whole of that time. In addition, she
had had long periods of counselling and, at the time of her death, was
receiving Dialectical Behavioural Therapy. She had been a prolific self‐
harmer whilst in prison and had been diagnosed as suffering from an
Adjustment Disorder. There was substantial documentation in relation to
her treatment and care.
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed a number of
matters that gave rise to concerns that circumstances creating a risk of
other deaths will continue to exist in the future unless action is taken.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
1. Open pipe work with the cell
Whilst it may not be possible to remove all potential ligature points
within a cell, removal of easily accessible and obvious ligature
points may serve to reduce the risk of self harm and suicide to
vulnerable prisoners.
2. Multi‐Disciplinary Attendance / Input at ACCT Reviews
Consideration should be given to ensuring that all staff, including
prison staff, healthcare staff and In Reach staff understand the
importance of requiring and providing multi‐disciplinary
attendance, or alternatively, multi‐disciplinary input at all ACCT
reviews.
3. Retention of Primary Source Data within the Phoenix Programme
Consideration should be given to ensuring that all primary source
data (ie data provided by the prisoner to the therapist), should be
kept either in hard copy format or by way of faithfully recoding all
the detail contained therein on the prisoner’s System One record.
4. Recording Significant Medical Events on a prisoner’s Non‐medical
Records
Consideration should be given to ensuring that all members of
healthcare and In Reach staff working within a prison
environment record all significant medical events that may impact
upon a prisoner’s risk assessment for self‐harm or suicide in a
2
Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014
place or manner that is readily accessible to the discipline staff at
the prison, in addition to any entry made in respect thereof in the
System One record.
6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that the people listed in paragraph one above have the power to
take such action.
7 YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I
may extend that period on request.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise you must
explain why no action is proposed.
8 COPIES
I have sent a copy of this report to the following:
1. The Lord Chancellor
2. The Chief Executive of the Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS
Foundation Trust in relation to paragraph 5(3).
3. The Chief Executive of Virgin Care
4. The Governor of HMP Downview
5. The Interested Persons in the Inquest:
 Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith’s Family (Bhatt Murphy)
 Mrs Norrell‐Goldsmith’s daughter
 SABP NHS Foundation Trust (Weightmans)
 MOJ – (T.Sols)



 Virgin Care
6. The Chief Coroner
9 Signed:
Richard Travers
3
Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014
DATED this 27th October 2014
4
Rt/doc/02536-2013/Reg28/27.10.2014

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Noms (PDF)
“ Equality, Rights and Decency

National Offender Group
3 National Offender Management Service
Management Service 4th Floor, Clive House,

70 Petty France,
London, SW1H 9HD

Email:

Coroner Mr Richard Travers
HM Coroner for Surrey
18 December 2014

Dear Mr Travers,

Re: the death of Cherylin Angela Maria Norrell- Goldsmith on 22 July 2013 whilst in HMP
Downview

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report of 27 October 2014 to the Secretary of State, the Governor
of HMP Downview and others, concerning the recent inquest into the death of Cherylin Angela Maria
Norrell-Goldsmith. Your letter has been passed to Equality, Rights and Decency (ERD) Group, in the
National Offender Management Service (NOMS), as we have the policy responsibility for suicide
prevention, self-harm management and for sharing learning from deaths in custody.

You will be aware that since Ms Norrell-Goldsmith’s death HMP Downview no longer has a population
of female prisoners and is currently being re-roled to provide accommodation for Category C male
prisoners. The prison will reopen in Spring 2015.

| am responding to the concerns you have raised in your report as follows:

(1) Open pipe work within the cell- removal of easily accessible ligature points may serve to reduce the
tisk of self harm and suicide to vulnerable prisoners

The Ministry of Justice Estate Directorate (MoJ ED) are responsible for the delivery of prison and
construction projects. MoJ ED now routinely provide ‘safer cells’ in all new prison construction projects.
“Safer cells” are specifically designed to remove known ligature points thereby reducing the opportunities
for a prisoner to self-harm by means of ligature. MoJ ED also routinely provide “safer cells” when
refurbishing existing accommodation wherever it is physically possible to do so. The programme of new
construction and planned refurbishments means that the numbers of safer cells are increasing across the
prison estate.

If a particular establishment identifies that a cell presents opportunities for self harm, the Governor of that
establishment may commission the establishment's local works team to refurbish it to reduce the risk.
However, it must be noted that no cell can be described as “safe” and while one ligature point may be
removed, there will be others which remain. A “safer cell” provides staff with a location to relocate a
prisoner in immediate crisis. MoJ ED, as attached, publishes a guide to safer cell design which sets out
the specific requirements for a cell to be a designated “safer cell’. Most establishments maintain some
designated safer cells which can be used to accommodate prisoners identified at risk of self harm.

(2) Multi-disciplinary attendance and input_at Assessment Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT)
Reviews

PSI 64/2011 on Safer Custody aims to support effective multi-disciplinary case management and sharing
of information to reduce incidents of harm. In line with PSI 64/2011 Safer Custody, HMP Downview when
it re-opens in 2015, will issue a notice to staff explaining the importance of and procedures for conducting
multi-disciplinary ACCT case reviews. Particular emphasis will be given to the fact that multi-disciplinary
case reviews are to be held at the appropriate times, and where possible, a consistent case manager and

relevant personnel must attend the reviews. Where a relevant member of staff cannot attend an ACCT
review, then in exceptional circumstances, and per the instructions of PSI64/2011, a written report will be
submitted. When HMP Downview was a female prison, a system was in place to ensure that all staff who
arrived for duty were provided with a list of prisoners subject to an ACCT and the date of the next ACCT
case review in order that they could arrange to attend the review if they were involved in that prisoner's
care. This system will be reintroduced in Spring 2015. In addition, case managers will record in the ACCT
document any significant personnel who are involved with the offender, including, health care, offender
management and interventions or learning and development. The case manager will also email relevant
persons prior to the case review requesting their input to add to the details of the review and report.

Prior to the re-opening of HMP, Downview, all prison staff, including personnel employed by partnership
agencies within the prison will receive initial training or refresher training in the application of the ACCT
procedures as part of their induction programme. The 2.5 hour training package will then be delivered by
trained facilitators to each member of staff every 2 years, and the programme of training will be monitored
by the HR hub at the prison.

(3) Retention of primary source data within the Phoenix Programme - Consideration should be given to
ensuring that all primary source data should be either kept in hard copy format_or by way of faithfully
recording all the detail contained on the Prisoner's Systm One record

The local policies and procedures at HMP Downview have been reviewed and strengthened where
necessary. The NHS England Area Team has produced data sharing Agreements which set out the
required standard for sharing data between clinicians and also for a non-clinical (secondary) purpose.

NHS England is responsible for managing the audit and reporting for access to records in the clinical
system (TPP SystmOne and its successor) and for the appropriate use of patient information.

Providers are required to undertake spot checks of their own adherence to these Agreements either
directly or through monitoring of the standards referred to above. Any resulting report on the findings of
the audits concerning these Agreements can be reasonably requested by any Party to the agreement.

(4) Recording significant medical events on a prisoner's non-medical records

All staff, including health care staff, will be reminded of the ACCT procedures and the requirement to
record significant information about an individual’s self-harm or suicide risks, on Cnomis (Custodial
National Offender Management Information System) in addition to recording the information on
SystmOne- (the electronic medical records system). The induction pack available for health care staff has
also been updated to include governance information about ACCT procedures and what information can
be shared with non healthcare professionals.

| hope this provides assurance that the specific issues identified in this case, both at the inquest and by
the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, are being addressed.

Yours sincerely,

NOMS Equality, Rights and Decency Group

Related reports

Other reports by Richard Travers

See all →

More reports categorised “State Custody related deaths”

See all →

Track State Custody related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.