Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Kevin Lawrenson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0577, written 18 Dec 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report18 Dec 2014
Reference2014-0577
DeceasedKevin Lawrenson
CoronerDarren Salter
Coroner areaOxfordshire
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Mr Graham Dalton, Chief Executive, Highways Agency 

1 

CORONER 

I am Mr D M Salter, HM Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Oxfordshire. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 26 June 2014 I opened an Inquest into the death of Mr Kevin Lawrenson who was 
39  years  of  age  when  he  sadly  died  following  a  road  traffic  collision  on  the  M40 
Motorway (just past Junction 6) in Oxfordshire. I concluded the Inquest on 17 December 
2014 at Oxford Coroner’s Court. A copy of the Record of Inquest is attached. It will be 
seen that I gave a conclusion of ‘Accident’ and made the following findings:  

Kevin  Lawrenson  was  driving  his  works  van  at  approximately  18.55  hours  on  18  June 
2014  Southbound  on  the  M40  Motorway  between  Junction  6  towards  Junction  5  at 
Lewknor  near  Stokenchurch,  Oxfordshire  when  he  collided  with  the  rear  of  a  slow 
moving lorry in lane 1 on an incline uphill.  

There  was  oral  evidence  at  the  Inquest  from  4  witnesses.  This  included  the  Police 
Collision  Investigator  and 
  from  the  Traffic  Management  Unit  of 
Hampshire Constabulary/ Thames Valley Police Roads Policing. Additionally, I arranged 
for a representative from the Highways Agency to attend and give evidence. Mr Michael 
Freeman,  Departments  Representative,  based  at  Bedford,  gave  evidence.  My  office 
provided  the  Highways  Agency  with  a  copy  of  the  Inquest  file  prior  to  the  hearing. 
Consequently,  I  have  not  provided  you  with  a  copy  of  the  file  with  this  letter  but  I  do 
attach  a  copy  of  the  report  of 
  Collision  Investigator,  and  the 
report prepared by 

 dated 31 July 2014.    

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The circumstances are briefly set out above but are explained in more detail in the report 
of the Collision Investigator. Mr Lawrenson drove into the rear of a Romanian HGV as it 
drove very slowly (22mph according to the Tachograph) uphill in lane 1 of the M40. The 
collision occurred just past Junction 6. The HGV was loaded with 23 tonnes of bricks. It 
was not overladen however. It is understood that the HGV was initially driving behind a 
recovery vehicle which was towing a vehicle and that this is also partly the reason why 
the HGV was driving so slowly.  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my  opinion  there  is  a  risk  that  future  deaths  will  occur  unless  action  is  taken.  In  the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to make this report to you. 

The  MATTERS  OF  CONCERN  are  in  relation  to  slow  moving  vehicles  at  the  location, 
signage  and  steps  that  may  be  possible  to  reduce  the  likelihood  of  a  similar  accident 
occurring in future.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   report  that  there  have  been  a  large 
It  will  be  seen  from  paragraph  2.3  of 
number of similar accidents at or near this  location, including 3 fatalities since  2008. It 
will also be seen from paragraph 3.1.1 that there are two signs prior to the location of the 
scene  warning  of  slow  moving  vehicles.  On  page  10  of 
  report  there  is  a 
photograph of the first of the 2 signs. It does not appear to be a very large sign; it is sited 
quite low down.  

I  heard  oral  evidence  from  Mr 
  about  the  system  of  monitoring  and 
reporting  in  place  and  that,  as  recommended  in  the  2013  Safety  Monitoring  Report 
prepared on behalf of UK Highways Limited, a further study between junction 5 to 6 has 
been undertaken and a report is due to be completed very shortly. it is understood that 
the  report  is  likely  to  outline  possible  improvements  to  signage  and  other  steps.  For 
example, there is the potential of increasing signage and/ or making the additional signs 
more visible. I was told there was insufficient room in the central reservation to place a 
sign. I understand chevrons for lane separation is a possibility, as is an electronic sign 
which  detects  slow  moving  vehicles  and  warns  other  motorists.  I  appreciate  of  course 
that there  will be considerations around the issue of funding  if improvements are to be 
implemented.   

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I  believe  that  your 
organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report. I 
may extend the period on request. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to 

. 

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or  summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Mr D. M Salter – HM Senior Coroner 

Thursday 18 December 2014

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Highways Agency (PDF)
HIGHWAYS
AGENCY

Safe roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers

Our ref: 2nd Floor

Your ref: Woodlands
Manton Lane
Bedford MK41 7LW

Mr D M Salter

HM Senior Coroner Direct Line: FY
Oxfordshire Coroner's Court

The Oxford Register Office 40 February 2015

2nd Floor

1 Tidmarsh Lane
OXFORD OX11NS

COsOMERS OFFICE
E :
Dear Mr Salter 12 FEB 2615 '
KEVIN ROBERT LAWRENSON | _
REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS =

DATE OF DEATH: 18 JUNE 2014
INQUEST AT OXFORD CORONER'S COURT ON 17 DECEMBER 2014

Further to your letter dated 18 December and my acknowledgement of 29 December |
now provide a substantive response to your report.

We are now in possession of an investigation report commissioned from UK Highways
M40 Limited, the company that operates the M40 motorway on behalf of the Secretary
of State for Transport, which has studied accidents on the M40 between Junctions 6
and 5, Stokenchurch Cutting.

We have carefully considered the recommendations in this report and we have now
instructed UK Highways M40 Limited to initiate work to improve signing on the
southbound approach to the Stokenchurch Cutting.

UK Highways M40 Limited will be producing detailed designs, road safety audits and
site surveys as part of this work and we expect the improved signing to include an
additional sign ‘Slow Moving Lorries’ closer to the steeper section of the carriageway.
They will also raise the height of existing signing and provide yellow, high visibility
backing boards to increase their conspicuity.

We currently expect this work to be completed this summer.

Yours sincerely

Regional Director
Network Delivery and Development (East)
Email: catherine.brookes@highways.gsi.gov.uk

we ©) INVESTORS An executive agency of the
“aan? IN PEOPLE Department for Transport.

Related reports

Other reports by Darren Salter

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.