Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0165, written 28 Apr 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Apr 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0165 |
| Deceased | Greg Revell |
| Coroner | Lydia Brown |
| Coroner area | Leicester (City & South) |
| Category | State Custody related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Governor HMYOI Glen Parva 2. Chief Executive Leicestershire Partnership Trust 1 | CORONER | am Lydia Brown, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Leicester City and Leicestershire South 2 | CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 12 June 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Greg Revell. The inquest concluded on 17 April 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was “Suicide. Were Greg's individual needs, risks and vulnerabilities appropriately understood, assessed and/or recorded between 9” and 11” June 2014 — No Should Greg have been referred for an assessment by a suitably qualified mental health nurse or doctor on 10” June 2014 — Yes Should an ACCT have been opened on 9" or 10 June 2014 - Yes Should Greg have been placed in a cell with another cell mate between 9" and 11" June 2014 — Yes Is there any fact or circumstance outside prison that you consider to be relevant to the death? — yes, previous attempt at self-harm using a ligature, personal circumstances, inability to deal with life challenges.” Cause of death Hanging 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Found hanging in cell at HM YOI Glen Parva. Resuscitation at scene but unsuccessful. Detailed suicide note left in cell. CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — HMYOI Glen Parva 1. Greg had been in Glen Parva YO! earlier the same year, and on that occasion presented with a florid and undisguisable ligature mark on his neck from an attempt at self harm shortly before his imprisonment. Notwithstanding this, he was not placed on an ACCT. 2. There was confusion amongst Prison Officers who gave evidence regarding when it was appropriate to open an ACCT. 3. There was suggestion that there would be “too many ACCTS” and they would be ineffective if all prisoners with risks were placed on an ACCT. 4. There was over reliance upon what the Prison Officers were told by Greg, and 5. _ insufficient emphasis on previous recorded risk factors in documentation available to them. 6. There was a culture of over-reliance on “others” being responsible for enquiring further into statements regarding depression and self harm made by Greg, rather than any focus on individual responsibility. Leicester Partnership Trust 7. The system for capturing all available healthcare information was insufficiently robust. There was no clear monitoring of obtaining a GP summary promptly to ensure medications and previous medical history could be checked as soon as possible. An opportunity for restarting anti-depressant medication in this case was missed. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 23 June 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested | am also sending a copy to the following who may have an interest in it, and any responses will also be copied to those named below:- Prison and Probation Ombudsman HM Inspector of Prisons Lord Harris (Independent Review into self-inflicted deaths in custody of 19- 8 - 24 year olds) National Offender Management Service | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your nse by the Chief Coroner. 28" April 2015 HMAC Lydia Brown
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust A University Teaching Trust Lakeside House 4 Smith Way Grove Park 8 June 2015 ree —_ Enderby ] Leicester LE19 1SS wi tie be a | | Tel: 0116 295 0030 M Coroner | a7ways | Fax: 0116 295 0842 Leicester City & South Leicester | 6 JUN ZO1S | www.leicspt.nhs.uk The Town Hall | | Town Hall Square Leicester LE1 9BG Dear Mrs Brown, Re. Mr Greg Revell Further to your report dated 28 April 2015, in accordance with paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, | offer the following response. We have investigated the matters of concern that have arisen during the course of the inquest of Mr Greg Revell. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust takes these matters very seriously and | hope that you and Mr Revell’s family will be satisfied that we have taken the appropriate measures to prevent such an occurrence happening again. Carole Robson, Service Manager for Prison Healthcare, will be leading on our response. The system for capturing all available healthcare information was insufficiently robust. There was no clear monitoring of obtaining a GP summary promptly to ensure medications and previous medical history could be checked as soon as possible. We now have a robust system in regard how clinical information is sought and there is a flow chart (Attachment 1) identifying team member's responsibilities to ensure consistency and follow up if required. This flowchart details the responsibility of each discipline within the team to ensure that there is a robust mechanism in place to ensure that Prisoners Clinical Notes are requested and followed up The flow chart details that staff have a responsibility to escalate their concerns initially to a Clinical Nurse Manager who will then in turn liaise with the Healthcare Manager at the specific Prison. Should the matter go unresolved that the Healthcare Manager will escalate his / her concerns to the next level to the Prison Healthcare Service Manager. In addition the situation will have been reported on our risk reporting system which also ensures that this information is scrutinised at a senior level within the organisation. Ao, 4 Chair: Professor David Chiddick CBE Chief Executive: Dr Peter Miller 20S), oe oS S eS One say An opportunity for restarting anti-depressant medication in this case was missed. P| the Clinical Director for Prisoners has reviewed the patient’s case notes and has also reflected on the investigation findings. Anti-depressant medication was considered but having reviewed the clinical notes it would appear that the prescribing of anti-depressant medication was not clinically indicated. It is felt therefore that on this occasion an opportunity for restarting anti-depressant medication in this case was not missed. Yours sincerely Dr Peter Miller Chief Executive Attachment 1 — Reception Information Gathering Process Chair: Professor David Chiddick CBE Chief Executive: Dr Peter Miller
~ a Equality, Rights and Decency National Offender Group * National Offender Management Service Management Service 4th Floor, Clive House, 70 Petty France, London, SW1H 9HD | Email: shila.jassal@noms.gsi.gov,uk I Ms Lydia Brown | Assistant Coroner Leicester City and Leicestershire South 19 June 2015 Dear Ms Brown | Inquest into the death of Mr Greg Revell on 11 June 2014 whilst in HMYOI Glen Parva Thank you for your regulation 28 report of 28 April 2015 addressed to the Governor of HMYO! Glen Parva and the Chief Executive of Leicestershire Partnership Trust concerning the recent inquest into the death of Mr Revell. Your letter has been passed to Equality, Rights and Decency (ERD) Group, in the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), as are responsible for policy on suicide prevention and self-harm management and for sharing learning from deaths in custody. This response is provided on behalf of the Governor of HMYOI Glen Parva. As you have requested, | will respond to your first six concerns in turn. | understand that the Chief Executive of Leicestershire Partnership Trust will be responding separately to your seventh concern. | (1) Greg had been in Glen Parva YO! earlier the same year. and on that occasion prese! nted with a florid and undistinquishable ligature mark on his neck from an attempt at self-harm shorth ly before his imprisonment. Notwithstanding this, he was not placed on an ACCT. | It is accepted that Mr Revell should have been placed on an Assessment Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) when he first came into HMYO! Glen Parva. Local policies and procedures have since been reinforced to ensure that an ACCT is opened on reception whenever there is evidence of a recent self-harm attempt. | Anew Safer Prisons strategy was launched in October 2014. This includes anew procedure for recording decisions made in response to the risk information on the self-harm warning form. The new procedure has been disseminated through training and briefings with reception and health care staff, who have been informed that they must refer to all relevant information about newly arrived prisoners, including the Person Escort Record, and make an entry on C-| Nomis to record what they have observed and decided. Healthcare staff have also be reminded to record this information on SystmOne (the electronic medical records system). | 2) There was confusion amongst prison officers who gave evidence regarding when it was appropriate to open an ACCT. | In accordance with PSI64/2011 Safer Custody, the local Safer Prisons strategy gives clear guidance to staff on when it is appropriate to open an ACCT. All existing staff have been briefed on the strategy, and new staff will receive ‘Introduction to Safer Custody’ training to ensure that they are confident about this process. A new Safer Custody team is now in place to provide ongoing help, advice and support to staff on these matters and to monitor adherence to the strategy. All prisoners presenting with a risk of suicide or self-harm are placed on an ACCT, regardless of the number of ACCTs that are already open in the establishment. At times when there are particularly high numbers of ACCTs the Governor will ensure that resources are reallocated to ensure that they are managed appropriately. | All staff have been reminded of the local policy which states that an ACCT must be opened whenever information is received to indicate that a prisoner is at risk, even if the prisoner _ himself does not present as being at risk. Case managers have also been reminded to take account of all the relevant information and to have regard to the dynamic and static risk factors for the individual when carrying out case reviews, and not simply to rely on their assessment of the prisoner's presentation. This ensures that the level of risk is assessed on the basis of, comprehensive information. | All staff have been reminded that safer custody is everyone's responsibility, and that whenever they identify a prisoner as being at risk of suicide or self-harm they must open an ACCT. — | | hope this provides assurance that the concerns that you have identified have been addressed. Yours sincerely SS. | NOMS Equality, Rights and Decency Group
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.