Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0136, written 5 Apr 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 5 Apr 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0136 |
| Deceased | Mark Seward |
| Coroner | David Clark |
| Coroner area | Warwickshire |
| Category | Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1.
Masons Road, Stratford-upon-Avon CV37 9LQ
Managing Director, AGD Equipment Limited, Avonbrook House, 196
1
CORONER
I am David Clark, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Warwickshire.
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 28 May 2015, I commenced an investigation into the death of Mark Richard Seward,
aged 49 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the jury inquest on 31 March
2016. The conclusion of the jury was that Mr Seward died from a head injury and that his
death was the result of an accident.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Mr Seward was an experienced fitter, mechanic and engineer who had started work at
AGD Equipment Limited (AGD) on 11 May 2015. On 27 May 2015, in the course of his
employment, he was using a portable Enerpac pump to test a cylinder for an oil leak. At
11.19, the valve block on the cylinder fractured due to excessive pressure. The resulting
explosion caused an ejection of metal and other debris at high speed. Mr Seward was
crouching at close proximity to the cylinder. He was not wearing protective headware
and was not shielded by a protective screen. He was struck by debris, resulting in a
serious head injury. He was taken by air ambulance to University Hospital, Coventry,
where he died at 14.35 the same day.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
(1) It was unclear who had responsibility for Health and Safety issues at AGD at a
strategic (ie. Board) level and operationally.
(2) There was no specific risk assessment or method statement for the type of work
being carried out by Mr Seward.
(3) No instruction manual had been provided to AGD to give clear instruction on
how the Enerpac pump should be used.
(4) AGD managers and staff had not accessed computer-based material relating to
health and safety issues.
1
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your
organisation have the power to take such action. I recognise that the particular
circumstances which led to Mr Seward’s death are unlikely to recur at AGD because
pressure testing is now sent off-site. However, my concerns relate more widely to the
approach taken by AGD to manage health and safety risks appropriately.
The action should include an explanation of the steps you have taken to raise
awareness of health and safety issues at AGD; how you train staff and monitor
compliance; and how guidance from the HSE and others is stored and disseminated.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 31 May 2016. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to Mr Seward’s family and legal
representatives. I have also sent a copy to
HM Inspector of Health and
Safety. I am aware that
report to the Chief Executive of the Construction Plant-hire Association relating to the
effective dissemination of guidance on pressure testing.
has recently visited AGD. I have sent a separate
I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
DATE of REPORT
5 April 2016 David Clark, Assistant Coroner
2
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Mr Colin Wood, Chief Executive, Construction Plant-hire Association, 27/28
Newbury Street, Barbican, London EC1A 7HU
1
CORONER
I am David Clark, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Warwickshire.
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 28 May 2015, I commenced an investigation into the death of Mark Richard Seward,
aged 49 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the jury inquest on 31 March
2016. The conclusion of the jury was that Mr Seward died from a head injury and that his
death was the result of an accident.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Mr Seward was an experienced fitter, mechanic and engineer who had started work at
AGD Equipment Limited (AGD) in Stratford-upon-Avon on 10 May 2015. On 27 May
2015, in the course of his employment, he was using a portable Enerpac pump to test a
cylinder for an oil leak. At 11.19, the valve block on the cylinder fractured due to
excessive pressure. The resulting explosion caused an ejection of metal and other
debris at high speed. Mr Seward was crouching at close proximity to the cylinder. He
was not wearing protective headware and was not shielded by a protective screen. He
was struck by debris, resulting in a serious head injury. He was taken by air ambulance
to University Hospital, Coventry, where he died at 14.35 the same day.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
(1) There was a lack of clarity as to what type of activity amounted to pressure
testing.
(2) The degree of compliance with the Provision and Use of Work Equipment
Regulations 1998 (PUWER) and guidance issued by the HSE such as GS4 was
called into question, not only at AGD but more widely within the industry.
Witnesses gave evidence that the poor practices followed at AGD were
replicated elsewhere.
1
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your
organisation have the power to take such action. The particular circumstances which led
to Mr Seward’s death are unlikely to recur at AGD because pressure testing is now sent
off-site. However, my concerns relate more widely and include the proper understanding
of pressure testing and the safe management of associated risks across the industry.
Your organisation appears to be well-placed to assist with raising awareness of these
concerns.
The action I am asking of you should include an explanation of the steps you are taking
to raise awareness of the risks associated with pressure testing, and of how companies
and individuals can gain access to guidance from the HSE.
I have written separately to the Managing Director of AGD.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 31 May 2016. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to Mr Seward’s family and legal
representatives. I have also sent a copy to
HM Inspector of Health and
Safety. I am aware that
has recently visited AGD.
I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
DATE of REPORT
5 April 2016 David Clark, Assistant Coroner
2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
AGD Equipment Limited Avonbrook House 198 Masons Road « Stratford Enterprise Park Stratford-upon-Avon * Warwickshire * CV37 9LQ « United Kingdom t: +44(0)1789 292227 f: +44(0)1789 268350 info@agd-equipment.co.uk www.agd-equipment.co.uk Response Report This report has been prepared in response to the Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths dated 5" April 2016 from David Clark Assistant Coroner. Please find below a detailed list of actions taken by AGD Equipment Limited since 27" May 2015 together with those that are work-in-progress at the present time. The company has a health and safety policy setting out the roles and responsibilities for all personnel including directors, managers and employees. A copy of this policy is available both electronically on the computer and in a hard copy kept in the office, which is accessible to all employees. A further copy of the policy is displayed on the health and safety notice board by the canteen and another copy is on display in the office reception area. Following the Inquest all staff have been reminded about the health and safety policy and where it can be found. The AGD employees who gave evidence at the Inquest had actually been involved in drafting the original policy and should therefore have been well aware of its contents. AGD continue to use the Site Safety PowerPoint induction given to all staff before they start work. Following the Inquest, AGD have reviewed the induction with specialist advice from the company’s health and safety consultants. The induction details the key health and safety positions at the company and explains the health and safety hierarchy. All staff are being given refresher training on these elements. The company has a Health and Safety Committee with representatives from various areas of the business, as well as a representative from the company’s health and safety consultants. The Health and Safety Committee meet monthly to discuss on-going health and safety issues. These health and safety meetings are fully minuted and the minutes are sent to the Board of Directors. The minutes are reviewed during Board meetings where health and safety is a top item on the Board Agenda. The Health and Safety Committee has been in place for a long time but again refresher information has been AGD Equipment Limited Directors: W.H.Law (Chairman) R.W.Law (Managing Director) E.A.Law Registered office as above Registered in England Company number 01275753 A subsidiary of AGD Holdings Limited RCSPA Member given to all staff to remind them of the existence of the Committee and its function. Work is being underaken to ensure the Committee is a fully integrated and interactive part of the safety culture in the company. AGD are working closely with the HSE to ensure that risk assessments and safe systems of work are in place. AGD are aiso working with the close assistance of the company’s nealth and safety consultants throughout this process to identify all risks, work duties and equipment, to ensure nothing is overlooked. Following the accident on 27" May 2015 the company reviewed all risk assessments, COSHH assessments and safe systems of work. AGD's health and safety consultants were involved in this process and the Supervisory Team must access and use these documents when planning new tasks, or allocating work to personnel. Having drawn up individual safe systems of work, toolbox talks were delivered to all employees likely to be involved in the relevant tasks to ensure that they understood the task and the controls in place to work safely. A full record is kept of these toolbox talks, and they continue to be discussed by the Health and Safety Committee at monthly meetings to ensure a rolling programme of continuous improvement. The company health and safety documents including the policy, risk assessments and safe systems of work aiong with relevant HSE Guidance are held electronically on servers and computers. The company has also given the mobile engineers electronic tablets containing these documents for off-site reference. A hard copy of all electronic documents is also held in folders located in the Service Department office. This was already the case at the time of the Inquest and was within knowledge of those employees who gave evidence because they were part of the team directly involved in putting the documentation together. It is nat known why this information was not given to the Coroner at the Inquest. Refresher training and awareness raising has been rolled out across all employees to remind them where ail health and safety documents can be found. The company continue to use and update the comprehensive training matrix of skills and competencies for all employees. This matrix details all health and safety training provided, or arranged by AGD, and is reviewed regularly at the Health and Safety Committee meetings. Full minutes of the Heaith and Safety Committee meetings are not only passed to the Board but are also displayed on the health and safety notice board. The company is undertaking a full review of its safety management system to ensure that robust arrangements are in place for the future which covers (1) the company philosophy on safety; (2) the arrangements in place to plan and supervise work properly; Page 2 of 3 10. 11. (3) the arrangements in place to ensure all staff are skilled, trained and competent for the work they undertake; and (4) to ensure the monitoring arrangements are adequate and properly undertaken. Hand in hand with this review is a new communications strategy to ensure all staff are aware of the system, its rules and their own responsibilities. AGD have appointed a new Safety Officer/Assistant Manager with substantial experience in operational workshop health and safety. This new role has been recruited to ensure that working practices are up-to-date with current legislation and industry best practice. To compliment this new role, the company has altered the Paint Shop Supervisor role to the wider role of Workshops Supervisor so that the new Safety Officer/Assistant Manager can concentrate on ensuring all health and safety rules, controls and best practices are understood and fully implemented throughout the operational site for all employees and visiting suppliers. The company continue to outsource all pressure testing work and have no intention of ever bringing the work back in house. A new traffic management plan has been introduced and fully implemented to improve safety in regards to all vehicle movements in and out of our facility. AGD have invested in a new health and safety software called Cognitia Safety and Compliance, which enables the company to manage all the health and safety documentation in one place. The software holds all the risk assessments, safe systems of work, COSHH assessments, near miss/accident statistics, training certificates and occupational health medical certificates. The software will be continually updated with the latest documents and certificates. The office employees are currently receiving training on this software so that they are able to use and refer to it on a daily basis. Over the past twelve months AGD have spent in excess of £110,000 on safety, welfare and training. The company always have and always will invest in anything necessary to further ensure the safety of all employees, irrespective of any budget in place. Page 3 of 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.