Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Peter Kollar

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0234, written 27 Sep 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Sep 2017
Reference2017-0234
DeceasedPeter Kollar
CoronerAndrew Harris
Coroner areaLondon Inner (South)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Child Death (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. President, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 5-
11 Theoboalds Road, WC1 8SH

2. Mr Gordon Miles, Chief Executive, Royal College of Emergency Medicine,
7-9 Bream’s Buildings, Chancery Lane, London EC4A 1DT

CORONER

I am Andrew Harris, Senior Coroner, London Inner South jurisdiction

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INQUEST

On 16th December 2016, I opened an inquest into the death of:
Master Peter Kollar who died aged 3 ¥%, on 14th May 2015 at King’s College
Hospital (01351-15) (MM)

It was concluded on 6th June 2017, The medical cause of death was:
la Multi-organ failure with pulmonary haemorrhage

ib Acute liver failure

Ic Unidentified inborn error of metabolism

Il Viral infections

The conclusion was natural causes.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The child presented to AGE in a local hospital with diarrhoea and jaundice. He
was diagnosed by a locum paediatric registrar with carotenemia despite his parents
evidence that he disliked carrots. He was not admitted and sent home against the
wishes of his parents, without a blood test or any investigation. He was not
escalated for opinion by a consultant and one of the reasons was a normal
Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS).

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the coutse of the inquest, the evidence revealed a matter giving rise to
concern that in my opinion means that there is still a risk that future deaths will
occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report
to you.

The MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows. -

Professor of Paediatric Hepatology, Birmingham gave an
expert opinion. She said that jaundice is rare in children after the neonatal period
and that its seriousness was under recognised by both paediatricians and
emergency doctors. She considered that, whilst it made no difference to the

outcome in this case, the non escalation of a young child with jaundice to a
suitable specialist adversely affects their care and is potentially life threatening.
There will be instances when a child presents with a primary liver cause of hepatic
failure where prompt referral for support and the possibility of organ
transplantation was critical.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

| recommended that your joint Royal Colleges should be notified of the
tisk of future deaths occurring through under recognition of the seriousness of
jaundice and her recommendation that jaundice should be added to the Paediatric
Early Warning Score as a matter requiring immediate escalation.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by Wednesday, 22 November 2017. 1, the coroner, may extend the
period.

Your response must contain details of action taken ot proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is
proposed.

If you require any further information or assistance about the case,
the case ocr aii

please contact

COPIES and PUBLICATION

Ihave sent a copy of my report to the following Interested Persons:

(parents)
SE consultant Royal Berkshire Hospital

Tam also sending this report to the following, who may have an interest:

Department of Health

Tam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes
may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the
coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your
response by the Chief Coroner.

[DATE] [SIGNED BY CORONER]

27- Y-1) ,

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (PDF)
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine

Patron: HRH Princess Royal

7-9 Bream's Buildings Tel +44 (0)20 7404 1999
London Fax +44 (0}20 7067 1267
EC4A IDT www.rcem.dc.uk

DrA

Lb nad
Southwark Coroners Court 4h fag thdpe
1 Tennis Street
Southwark of }
SE1 1YD

1 November 2017
. Dear Dr Harris,
Re: Preventing Future Deaths Report for Master Peter Kollar

Thank you for asking the Royal College of Emergency Medicine to consider this
tragic case. We are committed to learning from cases where there have been bad
outcomes. ,

The specific question we have been asked to consider is whether the presence of
jaundice should be added to the Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS). This
question was discussed in detail at the most recent meeting of the Quality
Emergency Care Committee of the Royal College. This group is comprised of around
30 experienced Consultant Emergency Physicians with specific expertise in patient
safety and best practice.

Early Warning Scores are usually developed by rigorous primary research studies. The
presence of jaundice after the immediate neonatal period is rare. Many other
features that would indicate a seriously ill child are not part of the PEWS, such as
abnormal cry or bulging fontanelle. Early Warning Scores are never designed to
replace clinical judgement, but merely indicate to a clinician that the patient may
be ill. The group unanimously concluded that it would not be justifiable or effective
fo amend the Paediatric Emergency Warning Score to include jaundice.

Yours sincerely,

~~ Gla I, 7 oo fle

Gordon Miles
Chair, Quality in Emergency Chief Executive
Care Committee

Excellence in Emergency Care
Incorporated by Royal Charter, 2008 VAT Reg. No: 173205823
Registered Charity number 1122689 Scottish Charity number $C044373

Related reports

Other reports by Andrew Harris

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.