Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Christopher Talbot

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0427, written 29 Nov 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report29 Nov 2017
Reference2017-0427
DeceasedChristopher Talbot
CoronerNicholas Rheinberg
Coroner areaPreston and West Lancashire
CategoryState Custody related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Governing Governor H.M.P.Preston 
2.  Secretary of State for Justice 
3.  Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Prisons and Probation 

1 

CORONER 

I am Nicholas Leslie Rheinberg, assistant coroner for the coroner area of Preston and 
West Lancashire 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 4th December 2014 an investigation into the death of Christopher Shaun Talbot aged 
65 was commenced. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28th 
November 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was that Christopher Talbot had died as 
a result of self-inflicted asphyxiation by means of a plastic bag placed over his head 
whilst in his cell at Preston Prison. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Christopher Talbot had been recalled to prison on revocation of his licence. He arrived 
on 26th November 2014. Reception staff failed to record details of a warning that he was 
at high risk of suicide. An Officer concerned about Mr Talbot’s manner on 27th November 
2014 opened an ACCT. At 9.30 pm on 28th November 2014, Mr Talbot was observed by 
the night patrol officer on C Wing, lying on his back in his cell with his right hand either 
holding or resting on a plastic bag. Recognising Mr Talbot as a vulnerable prisoner, the 
Officer sought help but failed to ask for immediate assistance, failed to clearly state the 
nature of the risk and did not keep the prisoner under constant observation. In the event 
Mr Talbot put the plastic bag over his head before officers arrived in his cell at which 
point he was not breathing and there was no cardiac output. Although both were 
restored Mr Talbot died later in Preston Hospital. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  
For the attention of the Governor 
(1) The Supervising Officer on duty at Reception when Mr Talbot arrived had never 
received training in her duties but merely gained experience by shadowing another 
officer. It did not appear that any written material was provided so as to inform her of her 
duties, including the PSI “Early Days In Custody, Reception In, First Night In Custody 
And Induction To Custody” or a guidance document summarising the main provisions of 
the PSI. Lack of such written material and reliance solely on shadowing as a means of 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 training might bring about a position where bad habits are proliferated or important 
considerations missed. 
(2) A Senior Officer gave mouth to mouth resuscitation to Mr Talbot without the use of a 
guard. It is understood that although mandatory for more junior officers at HMP Preston, 
carrying a breathing guard at all times is discretionary for certain senior grades. Lack of 
such a guard might put an officer in personal danger when attempting to revive a 
prisoner or dissuade that officer from intervening, with potential adverse consequences 
for the prisoner. 
(3) It is understood that following the death of a prisoner a notice to this effect is issued 
to the prisoners and staff but that staff are not informed of the manner of an unnatural 
death. Thus, it appeared that staff attending to give evidence at the inquest were 
unaware of another recent previous death involving a plastic bag, knowledge of which 
might have led to extra vigilance in the case of Mr Talbot, when as a vulnerable prisoner, 
he was observed holding a plastic bag. 
For the attention of the Secretary of State for Justice / Prisons Minister 
Following the investigation into the death of Mr Talbot by the Prisons and Probation 
Service Ombudsman a recommendation was made to the Governor at HMP Preston, 
which was accepted This was to the effect that night staff who have concerns about the 
behaviour of a prisoner identified as at risk of suicide or self-harm, should request 
immediate assistance, clearly stating the nature of the risk and keeping the prisoner 
under observation until help arrives. The Governor implemented the recommendation by 
issuing a written local instruction. You are asked to consider whether such an instruction 
might be issued nationally. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 25th January 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons namely the legal representatives of the family of the deceased, the prison 
health provider, HMP Forest Bank and Greater Manchester Police and the Government 
Legal Department 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Dated      29th November 2017       SIGNED 

   Nicholas Rheinberg Assistant Coroner 

2

Related reports

Other reports by Nicholas Rheinberg

See all →

More reports categorised “State Custody related deaths”

See all →

Track State Custody related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.