Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Elaine Davison

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0444, written 12 Jul 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report12 Jul 2017
Reference2017-0444
DeceasedElaine Davison
CoronerDavid Hinchliff
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire (East)
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Simon Hodgson, Chief Executive, National Tree Safety Group, Forestry

Commission, 620 Bristo! Business Park, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol,
BS16 1EJ

1 CORONER

| am David Hinchliff, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of West Yorkshire (Eastern)

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 12" November 2010 | commenced an investigation into the death of Elaine Edith
Davison, aged 55. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 21% June
2017. The conclusion of the Inquest was a Narrative Conclusion including the medical
cause of death of 1(a) Abdominal Haemorrhage due to (b) Penetrating injury to the
Abdomen. | attach a copy of the Jury’s findings in respect of their Narrative
Conclusion.

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On 11" November 2010 Elaine Edith Davison was the front seat passenger in a car
driven by her husband. At approximately 8.25pm they were travelling along the A642
Aberford Road, Wakefield, West Yorkshire and were passing the grounds of a
disused churchyard called St Peter’s, which is the responsibility of Wakefield Council
to maintain. It was a stormy night with gusts of wind up to 90 miles an hour. Part of a
tree fell onto the car, a part of which penetrated the windscreen, and entered Mrs
Davison’s abdomen, causing her to sustain fatal injuries, her death being confirmed at
2130 hours on 11" November 2010.

5 CORONER'S CONCERNS

During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
in my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) The subject tree had been examined on several occasions and had been
diagnosed as suffering with Phytophthora Pseudomonas, more commonly referred to
as bleeding canker. The tree had been given a life expectancy of between nought
and ten years. At that time it was not considered to be a danger, but will have
ultimately been felled.

(2) Post incident the tree was examined by an expert Arboriculturalist who determined |
that the tree was severely decayed at 8.5 metres in height with insufficient sound
timber at this point to support the weight of the tree. The decay was caused by a
fungal infection Polyporus Squamosus. The decay was longstanding and
progressive. The decay was hidden from sight, but the tree contained visible defects
worthy of closer inspection, which would have led to the discovery of this condition,
and a recommendation for it to be felied as a matter of urgency.

(3) | am informed that your view is that the risk of people being killed by falling trees is
extremely low, in fact one in ten million, but you recognise the duty of holders who are
required to take reasonable siens to minimise the risk. Notwithstanding this |
recommend that your organisation as having a major influence nationally on tree
safety, bring to the attention of those who are responsible for the upkeep and
maintenance of trees, particularly in places frequented and used by the public, and for
trees that are abut and overhang a highway, when such a tree or trees are recognised
as having fault or disease, that such trees are automatically examined and tested for
Polyporus Squamosus and if such a disease is identified then the tree should be
recommended for felling.

(4) It is apparent that the condition Polyporus Squamosus may well be mistaken for
the more common condition Phytophthora Pseudomonas or bleeding canker, and the
urgency of felling might not be considered.

(5) It would be helpful if you would bring this case and my recommendations to those
organisations that you can influence.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action shouid be taken io prevent future deaths and | believe you have
the power to take such action.

7 | YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 6" September 2017. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8 COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, Minton Morrill Solicitors, BLM
Law Solicitors and Weightmans Solicitors.

! am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.

x

7. oA z
42" July 2017 [SIGNED] Riaand Phan opp :

Related reports

Other reports by David Hinchliff

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.