Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Elizabeth Self

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0308, written 29 Oct 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report29 Oct 2018
Reference2018-0308
DeceasedElizabeth Self
CoronerChristopher Dorries
Coroner areaSouth Yorkshire (West)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
This report is being sent to:
The Chief Executive, NHS England

CORONER
Christopher P Dorries OBE, HM Senior Coroner for South Yorkshire (West)

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

2 | | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION

In November 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of Mrs Elizabeth Glen
Self. The investigation concluded following an inquest in June 2018 where the narrative
conclusion set out that:
Mrs Self was admitted to hospital on 11th April 2017 following a heart attack. The
court finds it more likely than not the she would have survived this episode.
3 Unfortunately Mrs Self suffered a serious fall in hospital when she became entangled
ina line attached to her left leg, this left her with serious injuries which were not
immediately recognised. Necessary scans and x-ray examinations were ordered some
hours later but did not take place for another nine hours or so.
The court has closely considered these most regrettable delays but the expert advice is
that a faster response either in investigation or transfer to Sheffield would probably
not have saved Mrs Self’s life.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The circumstances of the death are set out in the narrative conclusion shown above. In
addition | attach a copy of my closing remarks which is just a single sheet.

In summary, this lady with severe heart disease suffered a fall in hospital. She was
unlikely to survive from that point onwards but there was a delay in dealing with two x-
ray requests and one CT request of more than thirteen hours.

CORONER’S CONCERN

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to a
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.
| am satisfied that the hospital in question has taken appropriate and significant remedial
action and | do not therefore find it necessary to address this report to the hospital itself.
However, my concern is that this situation can arise elsewhere which is why | address
this report to NHS England.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as set out in my closing remarks (attached), that is
to say --

a) A moderately senior doctor had put in not one but two x-ray requests that had to
5 be rejected which is suggestive of a lack of necessary training

b) Avvalid CT request had laid unattended for a full morning, the reasons for which
were never established but the hospitals own investigation report team formed
an impression of a breakdown in communications.

c) The overall circumstances were such that neither requests was actually
completed until more than thirteen hours after what was a significant fall. The
inquest found this to be a criticism of the system then in place rather than of
particular individuals.

In essence my concern is that those inspecting hospitals in other places should include
in their programme establishing that senior staff do actually know how to make a proper
x-ray request which will not therefore be rejected and checking systems to ensure that
x-ray and CT requests cannot go for a period of hours without resolution.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

6 | In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you, the
named authorities, have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
7 | namely by 15th January 2019. | may extend this period upon request.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, the CQC, Barnsley District General
Hospital and to the family of Mrs Self.

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.

Christopher P Dorries _>

29th October 2019

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
ere) G) zs2ali> BOLE

LW ALOU?

INHS

Professor Stephen Powis
National Medical Director

| RECEIVED

04 SEP 2019

HUM. CU nie ui CE

Mr. C Dorries Skipton House
HM Senior Coroner : 80 London Road
The Medico -Legal Centre SE1 6LH
Watery Street ~

Sheffield

$3 7ES 3” September 2019

Dear Mr Dorries

Regulation 28 report in relation to Mrs Elizabeth Glen Self (deceased)

| write in response to the above report sent to NHS England on 30th October 2018. Firstly,
! would like to apologise to the family of Mrs Self and yourself for the delay in this
response. Whilst it is not an excuse, we have been in a period of significant organisational
change and this has delayed the response. | would like to offer my condolences to the
family of Mrs Self and apologise for any added distress this delay has caused.

| note that you have been satisfied that the trust has ensured appropriate learning has
been taken to ensure this situation does not arise again.

You have asked NHS England and Improvement to ensure that those inspecting hospitals
should ensure they gain assurance that senior staff are aware of the appropriate process
and method to request urgent radiology requests and that trusts have a process in place to °
ensure urgent requests are reviewed in a timely manner.

Inspection of hospitals is undertaken by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and | note
they have received a copy of the notice. The CQC’s regulatory function is independent of
NHS England/improvement, so | am not in a position to require a response from them in
relation to this matter. NHS England/improvement have however been working with
hospitals to improve standards of care provided: to patients under the 7 day services
programme. This includes ready access to appropriate diagnostic imaging which would be
relevant to this case. Further details of this programme can be found at
https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/seven-day-services/#h2-the-four-pri

NHS England and Improvement has responsibility for quality oversight and assurance and |
will ensure this matter. and the learning that can be taken from it is disseminated through °
the quality structures across England.

Yours sincerely,

Professor Stephen Powis
National Medical Director
NHS England and NHS Improvement

NHS England and NHS Improvement

0) Mien eree EES eee

Related reports

Other reports by Christopher Dorries

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.