Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0335, written 2 Oct 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 2 Oct 2018 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2018-0335 |
| Deceased | Joshua Edwards |
| Coroner | Kevin McLoughlin |
| Coroner area | West Yorkshire (East) |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (2) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 7 0OCtiédz of Highways Infrastructure, Leeds City Council, Middleton Complex, Middleton Ring Road, Leeds, LS10 4AX 1 | CORONER lam Kevin McLoughlin, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner area of West Yorkshire (East) 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 18 May 2017 an Investigation was commenced into the death of Joshua Lee Edwards, aged 19. The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 1* October 2018. The conclusion of the Inquest was a drug-related death in which the cause of death was 1(a) Hyperthermia, Metabolic Acidosis, Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Cardiac Dysfunction 1(b) Methylenedioxy-Methamphetamine and Cocaine Use. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Joshua Lee Edwards aged 19 was observed to be acting in a bizarre fashion around midday on Sunday 14% May 2017 in Leeds. The Police were called and found him on the ground under a parked car thrashing his limbs. An ambulance was called at 1219 hours but did not arrive until 1244 hours. He was taken to Hospital but despite maximal treatment deteriorated and died on 15" May 2017 at 0905 hours at St James’s University Hospital, Leeds. Toxicology analysis revealed he had taken ecstasy and cocaine. 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) The ambulance despatched to the scene encountered roads closed for the Leeds 10K run that day. It then navigated a route around the course, thus encountering a delay in reaching the casualty. The Police Officers at the scene telephoned three times to ask where the ambulance was but this did not result in the situation being escalated in | the control room at Yorkshire Ambulance Service. q | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN | YOUR RESPONSE | 2°° October 2018 (2) Evidence taken at the Inquest indicated that ambulance crews were unclear as to | whether they were entitled to cross ‘road closure’ signs in an emergency. Clarification of the Ambulance Service authority to do so in an emergency has been given, but has not yet been circulated to all ambulance crews. This needs to be done on the morning of such events. Ambulance crews should be reminded of this power by way of a refresher briefing. Similar considerations arise in relation to the Fire and Rescue Service. | (3) In the preparation for such public events, the organisers should be required to brief their Marshalls that at specified crossing points, the event may require to be halted momentarily to allow emergency response vehicles to cross. In short, that an emergency may take precedence. Participants in the event should also be forewarned of the possibility of this occurring. (4) Road closure signs at such designated crossing points should be replaced by signs indicating ‘Access to emergency vehicles only’ or equivalent wording. In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 5 December 2018. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION id to the following Interested | have sent a copy of my report Persons. | have also sent it to Tom Riordan (Chief Executive, Depar 's City Council), est Yorkshire Police), iia eee Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Servi Rachel Reeves vP, ER (The Yorkshire Post) nal oo Evening Post) who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. | The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. KEVIN McLOUGHLIN Senior Coroner
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
{+5 3/4le.W/as / as
meee CITY COUNCIL
03 DEC 2018
Highways & Transportation
3” Floor
St George House
Mr K McLoughlin
Office of the Senior Coroner
ner’s Office and Court
Ss Northgate ee 40 Great George Street
Leeds
efi
Wakefield (et 3DL
WF1 3BS
Contact:
Tel: 0113 378 7590
Ref; KM/CS/1753/17
Date: 30 November 2018
Dear Mr McLoughlin,
Inquest touching the death of Joshua Lee EDWARDS (deceased)
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths
| refer to your letter of 2 October 2018 enclosing your report under paragraph 7, schedule 5, of
the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations)
Regulations 2013.
The concerns raised within that report and my responses are set out below in the order within
your report.
(1) The ambulance despatched to the scene encountered roads closed for the Leeds "10K
run that day. It then navigated a route around the course, thus encountering a delay in
reaching the casualty. The Police Officers at the scene telephoned three times to ask where
the ambulance was but this did not result in the situation being escalated in the control room
at Yorkshire Ambulance Service.
For clarification the event on the day in question was the Leeds Half Marathon. Following the
events of that day, Sunday 14" May 2017 the Ambulance Service undertook a full review of the
circumstances surrounding their response. The review took a particular focus on their response
during events when the most direct route to an emergency may be subject to road closures,
That review resulted in a number of learning points, all of which have now been implemented.
They included:
1. Education provided to the Emergency Medical Director community with regard to Police
Calls and the correct information being taken from Police call-handlers.
Continued..
www.leeds.gov.uk switchboard 0113 222 4444 Highways Helpline 0113 222 4407
2. Process in place to ensure that estimated time of arrival calls are highlighted to the
relevant persons within the Emergency Operations Centre.
3. The Emergency Medical Director Standard Operating Procedure duplicate call process
has been re-circulated and reinforced to all Emergency Medical Directors.
(2) Evidence taken at the Inquest indicated that ambulance crews were unclear as to
whether they were entitled to cross ‘road closure’ signs in an emergency. Clarification of the
Ambulance Service authority to do so in an emergency has been given, but has not yet been
circulated to all ambulance crews. This needs to be done on the morning of such events.
Ambulance crews should be reminded of this power by way of a refresher briefing. Similar
considerations arise in relation to the Fire and Rescue Service.
In addition to the actions taken in response to (1) above the Ambulance Service have taken the
following actions:
1. A process has been put in place for managing information on planned events, event road
closures and who to contact for advice and help if needed.
2. Dynamically controlled access zones to be set for major events and maintained
independently from the other dispatch bays in the Emergency Operations Centre.
These actions taken by the Ambulance Service provide a more secure outcome than simply
briefing the Ambulance crews on the morning of the event. Ambulance crews may become
available to respond to emergencies during shift changes or brought to the location from outside
of the area at short notice. Individual response direction from the Emergency Operations Centre
will ensure that crews are informed of the most appropriate response at the time in a more
holistic way.
West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service (WYFRS) crews/control are aware that road closures
can be compromised and events stopped for emergency purposes. This is WYFRS
default/standard practice for all events, unless WYFRS resilience team instigates a command
structure for a bespoke response procedure. As a result the Fire Service have suggested that a
briefing for staff of this procedure before every event is not required. The Fire Service have
agreed to publish an Operational Policy Information Document (OPID) to reiterate and confirm
the procedures for WYFRS staff.
(3) in the preparation for such public events, the organisers should be required to brief their
Marshalls that at specified crossing points, the event may require to be halted momentarily to
allow emergency response vehicles to cross. In short, that an emergency may take
precedence. Participants in the event should also be forewarned of the possibility of this
occurring.
Every major event such as the half-marathon and Leeds 10k run includes an Event
Management Plan which sets out the process for emergency responses, emergency vehicle
access and the training of Marshalls. Emergency routes are agreed with emergency services
during the planning for each event. Specific locations to cross the routes are designated. These
are used wherever possible. Other locations can be used under the control of Event Control. All
road closure points are staffed with marshals capable of assisting access and halting events in
the case of an emergency.
Continued..
www.leeds.gov.uk switchboard 0113 222 4444 Highways Helpline 0113 222 4407
The YAS Controller in Event Control, as employed by not just the half marathon organisers but
most organisers of major events in Leeds, will also be briefed to ensure that communications
between Event Control and Ambulance Control are fully operational.
(4) Road closure signs at such designated crossing points should be replaced by signs
indicating ‘Access to emergency vehicles only' or equivalent wording.
Road closure signs during events are placed for the safety of event participants and road users
alike. In the current climate of vehicle incursion we would not seek to weaken their prohibition of
vehicles by allowing anyone to confuse or misinterpret the message to suggest that any form of
access is permitted. In doing so there will always be road users who interpret the signs to their
advantage. In discussions with emergency services and traffic regulation colleagues | feel it is
preferable to maintain the road closure signing as it is set out in the Traffic Signs Regulations
and General Directions legislation and take other measures such as those described above.
This will provide authority to those who legitimately need access in a controlled way. This will
ensure that any delays to genuine emergencies are minimised and the safety of event
participants is not compromised.
In addition to the above | would like to assure you that we take the safety of all participants in
events in Leeds and the surrounding district extremely seriously. The council hosts a joint
emergency services/council Safety Advisory Group on a regular basis. The Safety Advisory
Group promotes the clarity of roles and responsibilities relevant to events within the groups
remit, and works to create a consistent, coordinated, multi-agency approach to event planning
and management. In line with their responsibilities, the events of 14°" May 2017 have been
discussed at length at this group and reassurance has been sought from alll parties that the
learning from this event has been actioned and changes have been made.
The council is clear that the Safety Advisory Group has a vital role to play in the event planning
stage to ensure that organisers:
e Ensure that emergency services procedures are clear and well communicated with all
stakeholders.
¢ Make sure that marshals are well briefed around emergency protocol.
e Effectively communicate with event participants around the potential for the most
appropriate course of action being taken in the event of an emergency.
Whilst some road closures are inevitable with the events in the city, we are also continually
reviewing these to make sure they are appropriate, kept to a minimum and are as safe as
possible.
Yours Sincerely
Head of Highways Infrastructure
www.leeds.gov.uk switchboard 0113 222 4444 Highways Helpiine 0113 222 4407
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.