Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Tony Goodridge

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0172, written 28 Mar 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report28 Mar 2019
Reference2019-0172
DeceasedTony Goodridge
CoronerSarah Bourke
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Coroner ME Hassell 
HM Senior Coroner 
Inner North London 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Executive Directors of Supporting Communities 
London Borough of Camden  

1 

CORONER 

I am: Assistant Coroner Sarah Bourke 
         Inner North London 
         Poplar Coroner’s Court 
         127 Poplar High Street 
         London 
         E14 0AE 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 27 November 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Tony 
Goodridge (aged 55 years). The investigation concluded at the end of the 
inquest on 27 March 2019.  

The conclusion of the inquest was that: Mr Goodridge died in a fire at his home 
on 19 November 2018.  

The medical cause of his death was: 1a inhalation of fire fumes and airway 
burns 

I recorded a short-form conclusion that Mr Goodridge’s death was an accidental 
death.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

. The landlord is the London 

Mr Goodridge was the tenant of 
Borough of Camden. He returned home to his flat around 2 am on 19 November 
2018. At about 4 am a neighbour to the rear of the property noted that there 
was a fire in a 2nd floor flat on Brassey Road. Firefighters were called to the 
scene and identified that the fire was located in Mr Goodridge’s flat. They 
forced entry to the flat by removing the front door. Mr Goodridge was found 
unresponsive on the floor behind the front door to the flat. He was recovered 
from the property and attempts were made to resuscitate him initially by 
firefighters, then paramedics and ultimately a doctor from the HEMS service. He 
did not recover consciousness. His death was confirmed shortly after 5 am. The 
fire was investigated by the London Fire Brigade. It is evident that the fire was 
intense and caused extensive damage to the property including a partial 
collapse of the roof. The Fire Investigator’s view was that the fire started in Mr 
Goodridge’s bedroom. The likeliest cause of the fire related to smoking 
materials, incense sticks or an electric heater coming into contact with 
combustible materials. There was no smoke alarm in the property. The evidence 
from the fire service was that smoke alarms can alert occupiers to the existence 
of a fire earlier and therefore possibly improve their prospects of escaping from 
a property. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless 
action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1) Mr Goodridge did not have a smoke alarm in his property.  
(2) The London Fire Brigade had some difficulty reaching the property due to 
parked vehicles in the vicinity.  

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
and your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 23 May 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons: 

 (daughter) 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

Sarah Bourke 
Assistant Coroner 
28 March 2019

Related reports

Other reports by Sarah Bourke

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Sarah Bourke

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Sarah Bourke, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.