Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

JJ Wilson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0243, written 17 Jul 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report17 Jul 2019
Reference2019-0243
DeceasedJJ Wilson
CoronerAnna Loxton
Coroner areaSurrey
CategoryAccident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

IN THE SURREY CORONER’S COURT 
IN THE MATTER OF: 

__________________________________________________________ 

The Inquest Touching the Death of JJ Wilson  
A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths 
__________________________________________________________ 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

  Mr Dave Rothery, Principal Inspector, Health & Safety Executive – 

Field Operations Division, Council Offices, Station Road East, Oxted, 
RH8 0BT  

1  CORONER 

Ms Anna Loxton, HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 5 to The Coroners 
and Justice Act 2009. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 
The inquest into the death of JJ Wilson was opened on 5th March 2018.  It 
was resumed on 2nd July 2019 before a Jury and was concluded on 4th July 
2019.  

The Jury found the medical cause of death to be:  

     1a. Blunt Head and Neck Trauma 

The Jury determined that JJ Wilson died as a result of an Accident. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

JJ Wilson (“JJ”) worked as a Mechanic for Double R Racing. He trained as 
a mechanic at the National College for Motorsport and began working for 
Double R Racing in 2012. JJ left Double R Racing for 18 months before 
returning to the Company to work as a Senior Mechanic from February 
2016 until his death. 

RT4563 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 At the time of his death, JJ had completed building a Tatuus Formula 3 
car (“the Tatuus”) with some limited assistance from another mechanic. 
He along with 3 other work colleagues took the Tatuus to Longcross Race 
Track on 21st February 2018 for what is called a shakedown test, and JJ 
was the driver for this. The Court heard evidence that the shakedown 
was meant to be completed at between 50 and 70 miles per hour, but that 
JJ had driven at speeds of up to 137 miles per hour. 
During the final laps of the shakedown, a bolt which was meant to hold 
the front nearside upper wishbone of the Tatuus came undone and the 
Court heard evidence this was because it had not been tightened to the 
correct torque when then Tatuus was constructed. This caused an 
irreparable loss of control of the Tatuus, which left the track and the front 
nearside wheel collided with a concrete block, became detached and 
caused the car to rotate and roll onto its offside before colliding with a 
tree. JJ suffered serious head and neck injuries as a result of this collision 
which caused his instantaneous death.  

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

The Court heard evidence that whilst there are regulations regarding 
clothing to be worn during race events, set by the FIA, there are no 
regulations for clothing to be worn whilst testing a racing car on a test 
track.  
The Court heard evidence that JJ was wearing racing boots, gloves and a 
new Schuberth race helmet, but was wearing ordinary combat trousers. 
The Court heard evidence that racing overalls were available had JJ 
wanted to wear these.  
Whilst 
Unit confirmed in her evidence that JJ’s clothing would not have made 
any difference to the sad outcome in this case, I am concerned that fire 
retardant overalls are not a requirement to be worn by all test track 
drivers.  

 for the Surrey Police Collision Investigation 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are: 

- 

It is not obligatory for fire retardant overalls to be worn by test 
track drivers which creates a potential risk of death or serious 
injury in the event of a crash in circumstances similar to that which 
caused the death of JJ Wilson; 

Consideration should be given to whether any steps can be taken to 
address the above concerns.  

RT4563 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
   
 6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe that the people listed in paragraph one above have the power to 
take such action.  

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I 
may extend that period on request. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise you must 
explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES 

I have sent a copy of this report to the following: 

1.  See names in paragraph 1 above 
2. 
3.  Double R Racing Ltd 
4.  Longcross Test Track and Proving Ground 
5.  The Chief Coroner 

In addition to this report, I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a 
copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who, 
he believes, may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me at the time of your response, about the release or 
the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.  

Signed: 

ANNA LOXTON  

DATED this 17th day of July 2018 

RT4563 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Hse (PDF)
Health and Safety 

   Executive 

FOD Ops Unit 4-6 

Dave Rothery 

FOD Ops Unit 6 Group 24 
Oxted - The Council Offices 

Station Road East 
Oxted 
SUR 
RH8 0BT 

Tel: 02030282820 
Fax:  

http://www.hse.gov.uk/ 

Regulatory Inspector 

Ms Anna Loxton 
HM Coroner for Surrey 
Station Approach 
Woking GU22 7AP 

Reference DER/Group 24 

Date 27.9.19 

Dear Ms Loxton 

TITLE  

DEATH OF JJ WILSON - REGULATION 28 REPORT – ACTION TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

I refer to the above report which was sent to me by email on 18.7.2019. You kindly gave HSE an 
extension until 30th September to respond to the letter. 

I have consulted with the relevant central policy section and HQ safety unit in preparing this HSE 
response. 

At section 5 of the report you express concern about a lock of obligation ‘for fire retardant overalls to be 
worn by test track drivers which creates a potential risk to death or serious injury in the event of a crash 
in circumstances similar to that which caused the death of JJ Wilson’ 

In support of this concern you highlight evidence heard that FIA Regulations do not require or stipulate 
clothing to be worn when testing a racing car on a test track. These Regulations are not made with 
regard to UK legislation or by HSE and are, in fact the regulations of the Sport’s international governing 
body. Despite this the manufacturers of racing cars when instructing employees or third parties 
undertaking work for them under a master/servant relationship have a duty under UK legislation. The 
Management of Health and Safety Regulations 1999, Regulation 3 require the assessment of 
foreseeable risk from the activities to be completed and the findings of any assessment to be made 
known, and understood, by employees and any persons under their control. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Having reviewed the information and legislation in place, regarding the need for assessment of 
foreseeable risk, it is concluded that there is no gap when the applicable legislation in relation to duties 
and the workplace if the current requirements are implemented and instructions followed. HSE 
considers that no action is required because existing UK law includes the requirement to assess, along 
with many other risks surrounding the activity, the need for wearing of fire-retardant overalls. 

The requirements within the FIA Regulations are outside the comment of the HSE but as said earlier 
FIA Sports rules and regulations are required to have notice and compliance to health and safety law 
and where there is a gap it is for them as the sport’s governing body to close this gap and ensure 
compliance. 

Yours  

Regulatory Inspector 

2

Related reports

Other reports by Anna Loxton

See all →

More reports categorised “Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths”

See all →

Track Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.