Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Oliver Sharp

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0328, written 1 Oct 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report1 Oct 2019
Reference2019-0328
DeceasedOliver Sharp
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Suicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Secretary of State for Health,
Secretary of State for Education, Chief Executive of Stockport Clinical
Commissioning Group (CCG), Greater Manchester Health & Social Care
Partnership

CORONER

| am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Greater
Manchester South

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 18" October 2018 | commenced an investigation into the death of
Oliver Sharp. The investigation concluded on the 20" September 2019
and the conclusion was one of: Narrative: Suicide contributed to by a
failure by mental health services to recognise the increasing level of
risk he presented as he transitioned from child and adolescent
mental health services into the reduced provision and support
available post 16.

The medical cause of death was 1a) Heroin Overdose

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Oliver Richard Sharp was a year ahead of his chronological age
at school and excelled academically. Whilst at Manchester
Grammar School he began to change his approach to school
and his friends. He disclosed to a CBT therapist the extent of
how he was struggling with how he felt about himself and his
friendships. On 17" April 2016 he disclosed he was self-

harming. On 21* April 2016 he saw the GP and was referred to
CAMHS. On 25' April 2016 Oliver took 48 Paracetamol tablets

and disclosed that to his family who took him to Stepping Hill
Hospital. He returned to school and continued under CAMHS.
He was put on a 6 month waiting list for an ADOS assessment,
which took place in November 2016 and was inconclusive.

In September 2016 he returned to year 11 at Manchester
Grammar School. He was struggling to cope with the academic
demands and there was a focus on trying to help him catch up
academically and keep him safe. He showed signs of becoming
concerned about failing and struggled to cope with friendship
groups. The delayed ADOS assessment indicated he was not
autistic.

He continued to self-harm over Christmas 2016, and on 2"
January 2017 he took an overdose of paracetamol and was
admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital. It was agreed with CAMHS
that a 2nd opinion would be sought about him. The psychiatric
assessment identified a complex picture including difficuities with
emotional literacy and empathy. The overall diagnosis was of
Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD), ADHD and Emotional
Behavioural Dysregulation.

Following his January overdose, work continued with CAMHS
and he returned to school. He became increasingly isolated and
by the time of GCSEs he took only English and Maths but did not
answer the papers. He left Manchester Grammar School and
transferred to Beech Hall School in September 2017, dropping
back to a year below his chronological age to repeat year 10.
Over summer 2017 he began to work with the Autism Team and
they helped support him into Beech Hall School.

In October 2017 he went missing from home and was found on a
motorway bridge at 5am. He had not been taking his medication.
Family therapy and sessions with his case manager continued.
There were discussions about post 16 provision as he
approached his 16th Birthday. CAMHS within Stockport is a
service for children up to 16. Discussions regarding discharge
continued and because of the way in which Mental Health
Services were structured the plan was to discharge to the GP.
Overall he had settled at Beech Hall, although attendance was
erratic. In June 2018 the last family therapy session was due to
take place. He had gone missing from home.

On 12'* June 2018 he presented at Manchester Royal Infirmary
seeking help having slept rough in Manchester and reporting
thoughts of suicide. He was discharged to CAMHS for follow up.
On 714 June 2018 he told Beech Hall he was likely to harm

N

himself if he went home. They took him to Macclesfield A&E
where a detailed assessment and gathering of information
resulted in him being admitted on a voluntary basis to the Hope
unit.

He arrived there at 1am on 15" June. He did not like it. He was
assessed and was allowed to leave the unit on 15th June.
Following further psychiatric assessment from the unit whilst in
the community he was placed on quetiapine. Concordance was
initially good but deteriorated. The planned discharge from the
Hope Unit services took place on 2™4 July 2018. On 2™ July
2018 he went missing from home and was found at Crewe
Railway Station. The CAMHS plan was to discharge him and
move him to the transition team which was discussed on 20
August 2018. He was to have a new therapist.

On 24" August 2018 he went missing from home. He was found
and taken to Stepping Hill Hospital and assessed by RAID. He
had bought paracetamol with the intention of taking his life. He
expressed concern about his discharge from CAMHS. He was
discharged to see CAHMS on 315 August 2018. He was due to
return to Beech Hall on 5" September 2018.

On 5" September he was reported as missing from home. He
was found by a member of the public in the early hours of the
morning having taken an overdose of heroin. Medical
intervention reversed the outcome of the overdose. He was
assessed by the RAID team. There was a failure to consider the
full circumstances of his history and a failure by mental health
providers involved in his care to effectively communicate. As a
result the level of risk he presented was not adequately
understood. He was discharged to the Home Treatment Team.
The Home Treatment Team saw him on 13 September 2018.
Professionals in his care recognised the increasing risk in
relation to his behaviour. The Home Treatment Team failed to
appreciate the level of risk he presented.

On the evening of 14" September 2018 he presented at A&E at
Stepping Hill Hospital with suicidal ideation. He was seen and
assessed by RAID. There was a failure to fully assess him or
understand the complexities and level of risk he presented. He
was discharged home into the community to see the Home
Treatment Team on 15" September 2018. He saw the Home
Treatment Team on 15", 18" and 30 September 2018. On 30h
September he was discharged from the Home Treatment Team.
On 8" October at school he appeared to accept the reduced
academic aspirations for him. A further reduced academic

timetable was sent to him on 12" October 2018.

On 17" October 2018 he went missing from home. This was
reported to Greater Manchester Police. On the morning of 18"
October 2018 he was found by a dog walker in Gatley Hill. A
typed note was found on him. He was taken to Wythenshawe
Hospital and his death was confirmed. Toxicology confirmed that
he had taken a fatal dose of heroin.

CORONER'S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise
to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to
report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

The inquest was told that the provision of mental health services post 16
varies widely across the country. In some areas there is a CAMHS 16-25
mental health service provision similar to the national 16 and under
service whereas in other areas there a limited transition service or move
back to primary care for re-referral to adult services. The inquest was told
that this creates a cliff edge high risk situation for adolescents. The
reason for the difference was resources and decisions taken by CCGs.

The inquest was told that it is important for autism to be diagnosed as
early as possible so that appropriate support can be put in place. Early
diagnosis was impacted by a national picture of long waiting lists for
ADOS assessments. In Stockport there was approximately a 6 month
waiting list for assessment. This was against a national picture of 12-24
month waits in some areas.

During the inquest evidence was heard that acceleration ahead of a
chronological school age might cause relatively few difficulties in peer
relationships up to about year 9 but post that as children entered
adolescence it could become a significant issue impacting a child's
mental health and ability to cope. Where it did happen, there needed to
be an understanding by schools of the risks and early signs indicating a
need for additional support to try to reduce the likelihood of self-harming
behaviours and the potential need for additional support.

The inquest heard that Oliver had found the autism label and the label of
disability that was attached to it very difficult to accept as time went on.
There was evidence that particularly with high achieving children with
autism the idea that they had a disability created additional challenge.

The language that it would have been more helpful to use widely would
have been difference rather than disability.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe you have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 26" November 2019. |, the coroner, may extend
the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons namely 1 EE on behaif of the family 2)
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council 3) Manchester Grammar School
4) Beech Hall Schoo! 5) Pennine Care NHS FT 6) Greater Manchester
Mental Health NHS FT, who may find it useful or of interest.

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your
response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Alison Mutch OBE
HM Senior Coroner

01.10.2019

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.