Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Joanna Orpin

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0457, written 31 Dec 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report31 Dec 2019
Reference2019-0457
DeceasedJoanna Orpin
CoronerCaroline Sumeray
Coroner areaIsle of Wight
CategoryMental Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

2. 

, General Manager for the National Trust on the Isle of 

Wight, Longstone Farmhouse, Mottistone, Isle of Wight, PO30 4EA 

, Director of Public Health, Suicide Prevention 

Group, Isle of Wight Council, Jubilee Stores, County Hall, Newport, Isle of 
Wight, PO30 1UD 

1 

CORONER 

I am Caroline Sarah Sumeray, Senior Coroner for the Coroner Area of the Isle of Wight. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 

and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  1st  March  2018  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of  Joanna  Sarah 

Louise Orpin, aged 42. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17th 

December  2019.  The  conclusion  of  the  inquest  was  a  short  form  conclusion  as 

follows: 

“Joanna Sarah Louise Orpin killed herself.” 

The medical cause of death was found to be: 

 1a Multiple Traumatic Injuries. 

 1b  

 1c  

  II 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

1)  Joanna Sarah Louise Orpin was born on 19th January 1976. At the time of her 

death she was 42 years old and worked as a Senior Recruitment Consultant. 

2) 

In late November 2017 Miss Orpin had developed a lingering cough and chest 

infection and visited her GP who prescribed her antibiotics. 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 3)  She  had  two  teleconsultations  with  a  GP  at  her  practice  on  16th  and  19th 

January.  During  the  course  of  the  latter  one,  it  was  clear  that  she  was  highly 

stressed, agitated and anxious, so her GP prescribed Diazepam for her severe 

anxiety. A further review was diarised for 22nd January. 

4)  At the consultation on 22nd January, it was clear to her GP that she was still very 

anxious and agitated and was not sleeping, so she was prescribed Mirtazepine 

and  a  referral  was  made  to  Primary  Care  “Improving  Access  to  Psychological 

Therapies”. 

5)  Miss Orpin’s mother contacted the GP the following day (23rd January 2018) to 

say that her daughter was still struggling to sleep and remained anxious. 

6)  On 24th January 2018, Miss Orpin attended the GP’s surgery and was seen in 

an  emergency  appointment.  The  GP  assessed  her  as  being  very  anxious  and 

she expressed many negative thoughts and a feeling of worthlessness. She had 

no  active  suicidal  plans  but  had  thoughts  of  not  wanting  to  be  there.  Her 

presentation  was  both  unkempt  and  agitated.  The  GP  arranged  for  an  urgent 

referral  to  the  Hospital  Mental  Health  Team  due  to  her  agitated  depression 

deteriorating  so  significantly  over  a  short  period  of  time.  A  face-to-face 

assessment  was  booked  for  the  following  day  with  a  Mental  Health  Nurse. 

Again, her presentation was described as being severely anxious, agitated and 

restless. She paced around the room as she spoke. The Nurse referred her on 

to the Home Treatment Team and arranged an appointment with a Consultant 

Psychiatrist  the  next  day.  Her  medication  had  been  increased  to  include 

Zopiclone  and  Quetiapine,  but  her  presentation  had  not  altered  from  agitated 

depression. 

7)  The Home Treatment team indicated that they planned to visit Miss Orpin daily 

to  help  her  manage  her  mental  health  crisis.  These  visits  commenced  on  27th 

January 2018 except when Miss Orpin requested a family day with her partner 

and  two  young  sons.  They  were  interspersed  with  appointments  to  titrate  her 

medication.  Her  agitated  depression  remained  resistant  to  treatment.  Miss 

Orpin’s presentation varied a little on occasion, and she had better days as well 

as days when she continued to feel deeply anxious and agitated. 

8)  By  7th  February  2018,  Miss  Orpin  had  asked  to  reduce  the  Home  Treatment 

Team’s visits to every third day. In reality, she declined visits over 5 consecutive 

days before agreeing to be visited again by the Home Treatment Team on 12th 

February 2018. On that occasion she was feeling very low; she was tearful and 

anxious.  She  didn’t  believe  that  her  medication  was  working,  and  she  had 

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 become stuck in a cycle of negative thinking. She had no suicidal plan or intent. 

She agreed to a visit from a Consultant Psychiatrist the following day. As with all 

her other visits from the Home Treatment Team, no risk of harm was identified, 

and she underwent a Mental State Examination and assessment of capacity. 

9)  The following morning, 13th February 2018, Miss Orpin woke up early and went 

downstairs to feed her sons breakfast and hot chocolate whilst her partner slept. 

She then told the children that she was going to go for a run, which is something 

she hadn’t done for a while. By the time her partner woke up she had gone and 

taken  the  car  –  something  she  wasn’t  supposed  to  do  whilst  on  these  potent 

medications. 

10) Miss Orpin’s partner immediately took their boys out to search for her. She was 

not at the local Tesco supermarket, and when he drove up to Culver Cliff, he did 

not see her vehicle there. Having dropped the boys with Miss Orpin’s mother, he 

heard that Miss Orpin’s car had now been located in the car park at Culver Cliff. 

(It  was  later  discovered  that  she  had  stopped  off  to  buy  some  cigarettes  at  a 

shop  en  route  to  Culver  Cliff.)  Miss  Orpin’s  partner  immediately  returned  to 

discover  a  large  police  presence  which  Miss  Orpin’s  disappearance,  as  a 

vulnerable person due to her fragile mental state, had generated. 

11) Amongst  the  Police  personnel  present  was  a  dog  handler  whose  dog  tracked 

Miss  Orpin’s  scent  approximately  a  quarter  of  a  mile  from  the  car  park,  where 

she  had  left  her  unlocked  car,  to  a  kissing  gate  in  the  main  fence  which  runs 

along  the  length  of  the  cliff  edge.  It  was  at  that  point  that  Miss  Orpin’s  scent 

could be detected no longer, and the logical inference was that she had crossed 

over the kissing gate and protective fence at that point. Later, her car keys and 

mobile  phone  were  found  and  had  been  thrown  approximately  5  metres  from 

this point. It should be mentioned that the weather conditions on this day were 

atrocious with high winds which would have forced anyone back inland from the 

edge of the cliff, with cold rain coming in sideways. No trace of Miss Orpin could 

be found on that date. 

12) Whilst  Miss  Orpin’s  trainers  were  found  at  the  base  of  the  cliff  at  a  later  date, 

Miss Orpin’s body was not located until 18th February 2018 when she was found 

naked on mudflats at Bosham Quay, Chichester, West Sussex. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 

my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 

circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  –  

1. 

I  heard  evidence  from  Inspector 

  that  there  are  at  least  3  or  4 

people per month who are found in a state of mental distress at Culver Cliff who 

require the assistance of the Police or other agencies to ensure their safety. 

2. 

I was also informed that whilst there used to be signs at the top of Culver Cliff 

akin  to  those  which  are  found  at  Beachy  Head  in  East  Sussex  and  the  Itchen 

Bridge in Southampton which have wording such as “Suicidal? Despairing? Call 

Samaritans  on  [local  number]”,  these  signs  appear  to  no  longer  be  present. 

(Since  the  Inquest,  I  have  been  provided  with  the  following  proof  that  these 

signs once existed from 

: https://www.alamy.com/culver-down-

uk-07th-july-2018-a-samaritans-sign-on-the-edge-of-culver-cliff-on-the-isle-of-

wight-uk-reads-talk-to-us-if-things-are-getting-to-you-posted-after-a-spate-of-

suicides-from-the-same-spot-yachts-can-be-seen-passing-in-the-background-

during-the-round-the-island-yacht-race-on-the-hottest-recorded-day-of-the-year-

so-far-at-33-degrees-celcius-credit-matthew-blythealamy-live-news-

image211378076.html ) 

3.  During  the  course  of  his  evidence,  Inspector 

  told  the  Inquest  that  he 

had  made  recommendations  for  these  signs  to  be  displayed  approximately  3 

years  ago,  and  he  was  aware  that  a  Consultant  Psychiatrist  had  made  similar 

recommendations  within  the  last  12  months.  Concerns  had  been  ventilated  in 

relation to how many signs would be required and at what intervals. It was the 

opinion  of  Inspector 

  that  just  a  small  number  of  strategically  placed 

signs (perhaps in the car park, and at various intervals along  the length of the 

fence as well as at places where it is easier to cross the protective fence at the 

kissing gate) would be adequate – in his words, “If they save just one life, then it 

would be worthwhile.” I agree with his views. 

4. 

I  also  heard  evidence  from 

,  a  Consultant  Psychiatrist  at  the 

Isle  of  Wight  NHS  Trust  that  he  sits  on  a  Suicide  Prevention  Group,  and  they 

had also tried to get these signs reinstated at the top of Culver Cliff, to no avail. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 namely by 11th February 2020. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following  Interested 
, Inspector 
, 
Persons: 

, 

, 
, the Isle of Wight NHS Trust.  

, 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or  summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or  of  interest.  You  may  make  representations  to  me,  the  Coroner,  at  the  time  of  your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

H.M. Senior Coroner – Isle of Wight 

31st December 2019 

5

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from The Isle of Wight National Trust (PDF)
7th March 2020 

Mrs Caroline Sumeray 
H.M. SENIOR CORONER FOR THE ISLE OF WIGHT 
Coroner’s Office 
Seaclose Offices 
Fairlee Road 
Newport 
Isle of Wight 
PO30 2QS 

Dear Mrs Sumeray, 

RESPONSE TO REGULATION 28 REPORTS ISSUED IN REGARD TO MS A LEWIS AND 
MS J ORPIN - SUICIDE PREVENTION ON NATIONAL TRUST LAND ON THE ISLE OF 
WIGHT 

In your Regulation 28 reports issued as a result of the investigations in to deaths of Joanna 
Orpin and Annette Lewis dated 31 Dec 19 and 13 Jan 20 respectively, you requested a 
response from the National Trust as to what action could be taken to prevent a recurrence of 
these incidents. 

As you may be aware, the National Trust is the largest landowner on the island and 
currently has responsibility for just over 2,100ha.  As an organisation, we take our role in 
safeguarding our visitors extremely seriously and will always seek to avoid accident, incident 
or injury wherever possible, but implicit in this is that we are also responsible for large areas 
of unsupervised open access public land with only a small team to manage it. 

Nationally within the Trust, we manage a number of areas which face similar challenges with 
attempted or completed suicide attempts, most notably in the Birling Gap and Beachy Head 
area and further east in the White Cliffs of Dover area.  The teams at those sites have been 
dealing first hand with distressed individuals and their relatives for a number of years. 

I can confirm that a number of measures were already in place at Culver Down, including a 
total of seven Samaritans signs placed within the past few years.  A schematic showing the 
locations of these signs is at Annex A.  In addition, ‘dragons teeth’ (wooden bollards to 
prevent vehicle access) are in place opposite the exits from the car park and there is a ditch 
to ground vehicles approaching the cliff edge.  There is also a barbed wire fence running the 

National Trust – Isle of WIght 
Longstone Farmhouse 
Strawberry Lane 
Mottistone 
PO30 4EA 
Tel: +44 (0)1983 741020 
www.nationaltrust.org.uk 

President: HRH The Prince of Wales 
Chair of Regional Advisory Board for 
London and South East: 
Director for London and South East: Nicola Briggs 

Registered office:  
Heelis, Kemble Drive, Swindon 
Wiltshire SN2 2NA 
Registered charity number 205846 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 length of the cliff edge in which a vehicle became entangled during one attempt, but it is 
primarily a stock fence and it would not be economically viable or aesthetically appropriate 
to fence the several miles of coastline owned by the Trust. 

In direct response to your request, the following actions have been undertaken: 

1.  Engagement with Public Health Principal: Health and Wellbeing – 

 We are due to have a meeting on Wednesday 18th March in advance of 

meeting with the groups listed below to discuss the island-wide Suicide Prevention 
Plan, how this might apply specifically to our land and how we can best support it. 
2.  Engagement with the Suicide Prevention & Intervention, Isle of Wight team.  A 

meeting with 
2020 to conduct site visits to both Culver and Tennyson Downs. 

from the group has been scheduled for Friday 3rd April 

3.  Engagement with the IOW Samaritans.  

 is also due to attend the 

meeting listed above on 3rd April. 

4.  Sought feedback from the National Trust South Downs and White Cliffs teams.  

Regarding best practice and to learn from their experience.  We have received 
detailed feedback from these teams and have their continued support whilst 
assessing what measures may or may not be suitable. 

5.  Engagement with the Police.  To seek advice and guidance.  Countryside Manager 

to speak to 

6.  Conduct a full internal review of our suicide prevention measures.  Once all the 
above meetings are complete, we will conduct a full review of our measures and 
implement changes where appropriate. 

Should you require an update beyond this response, I will be more than happy to provide 
one. I strongly believe it is in the best interests of all concerned that we work together to 
assist those in distress and ensure help is there when needed. 

Yours sincerely, 

General Manager – Isle of Wight 

Annex: 

A.  Map of existing Samaritans’ signage at Culver Down. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ANNEX A TO RESPONSE TO REGULATION 28 REPORT - MAP OF EXISTING SAMARITANS SIGNAGE AT CULVER DOWN

Related reports

Other reports by Caroline Sumeray

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Mental Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.