Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0481, written 17 Oct 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 17 Oct 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0481 |
| Deceased | Elisa Fuller |
| Coroner | Katy Skerrett |
| Coroner area | Gloucestershire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
H M Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire Ms Katy Skerrett REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Chief Executive, Ms D Lee, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester, GL1 3NN 1 2 CORONER I am Katy Skerrett, Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 16th February 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Elisa Fuller. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 10th October 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion. The medical cause of death was 1A Cardiac Arrest, 1B Unexplained idiosyncratic reaction to suxamethonium, 2 Prematurity. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH At 10.46 hours on the 9th February 2018 Elisa Fuller was delivered by elective Caesarean section at 36 weeks gestation due to placenta praevia. Elisa showed no evidence of compromise at delivery. From approximately 12.50 hours she began to display emerging symptoms of respiratory distress. Concerns about these symptoms were not escalated to either a Senior Midwife and / or a Senior Paediatrician. No medical review occurred until approximately 16.25 hours. This resulted in Elisa’s admission to the neonatal unit being delayed. However that delay did not contribute to her deteriorating condition. As her condition continued intubated. Premedication with morphine and suxamethonium (a muscle relaxant) was prescribed prior to intubation together with atropine. These drugs were administered at approximately 19.27 hours, and immediately thereafter Elisa suffered an idiosyncratic reaction to suxamethonium which triggered a cardiac arrest. Full resuscitation efforts were carried out, to which Elisa did not respond. The underlying cause of her reaction to the relaxant remains unclear. It is likely to be related to a neuromuscular disorder, but no genetic cause has been identified. Resuscitation efforts were ceased at 20.28 hours, and Elisa was pronounced deceased. to deteriorate she was 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. Although I acknowledge that the Trust have put in place systems to address the second concern. In relation to the first concern, further training has been put in place. However there remains work to be done. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage Junior Midwives and Junior Doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more Senior Colleagues, (2) Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tel 01452 305661 for a specified time period prior to disposal. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 4pm 12th December 2019. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons (1) (2) Clinical Improvements Manager, , NHS England and Improvements, St Chads Court, 213-215 Hagley Road, Birmingham BI6 9RG (reference point 2 in paragraph 5.) I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated 17th October 2019 Signature_________________________ Ms K Skerrett Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tel 01452 305661
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
NHS
Gloucestershire Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
Alexandra House
Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham
Gloucestershire
GL53 7AN
12th December 201
Ms K Skerrett
HM Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire
Gloucestershire Coroner's Court
Corinium Avenue
Barnwood
Glocuester GL4 3DJ
Dear Ms Skerrett
Elisa Fuller deceased
I am writing in response to your letter dated 18 October 2019 in which you raised concerns arising
from the evidence heard during this inquest. It is your view that there is a risk that future deaths will
occur unless action is taken about these concerns.
The matters of concern are:
1. Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage junior midwives and
junior doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more senior colleagues
2. Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post-delivery for a
specified time period prior to disposal
The Trust's responses are as follows:
1. Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage junior midwives and
junior doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more senior colleagues
In addition to the training and practice which midwives and doctors undertake during their
professional qualifying courses and degrees, the Trust provides the following events and
tools for the support and ongoing education of clinical colleagues about the importance and
clear expectations of the need for escalation of all concerns which have the potential to
impact upon the safety of patients in our care:
Chair: Peter Lachecki
Chief Executive: Deborah Lee
'NWW giriStIOSpit.115
t
11
BEST CARE FOR EVERYONF
Gloucestershire Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
NHS
I.
Mandatory Update day - Midwives
The midwives mandatory update day for 2018 - 2019 included a focussed presentation from
the Divisional Risk Manager on lessons learned from recent inquests and clinical incidents.
The poster highlights five situations where practice has been improved through embedding
learning from incidents. Two of these situations ('Syntocinon' and 'documenting') included
reference to the importance of escalating concerns. Attendance level for midwives was
94.4% for the year.
•
•
Enclosure 1 — Midwives Mandatory Update Day Programme 2018/2019
Enclosure 2 — Poster presented by Risk Manager
II.
SBAR referral tool - Midwives and Doctors
The escalation which is encouraged should be undertaken in the form of the 'SBAR'
(Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendation) referral tool. The tool suggested on
Enclosure 2 for the 'Documenting...' case is the 'RSVP' referral tool. This has been replaced
in the Trust by the 'SBAR' referral tool, explained in Enclosure 3. In this tool, the reasons for
the referral i.e. the escalation and the plan for review of the patient (as a result of the
escalation) are formalised in the 'S' and 'R' parts of the tool.
This is a structured referral tool widely used nationally, across maternity services.
•
Enclosure 3 - SBAR (Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendation) referral
tool
III. Rotation Day programme - Midwives
This is a programme directed at midwives new to the Trust, recently qualified midwives,
those returning to work after a break or midwives moving to work in a new clinical area.
These colleagues are required to attend this programme twice during their `preceptorship
period'. Preceptorship is the period immediately following qualification, and extra support
given in that period is intended to guide the newly qualified practitioner through a successful
transition from student status, and to develop their practice through a structured program of
support, lasting between 18 months and 2 years. This teaching day covers professional
issues including escalation, documentation, time management and professional behaviour
such as assertiveness and communication.
•
Enclosure 4 - Rotation Day programme June and November 2018; June and
December 2019
IV. Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training — PROMPT' - Midwives and Doctors
This is an emergency skills study day attended by both midwives and medical staff. The
PROMPT day included a session looking at 'human factors' i.e. the relationship between
human beings and the systems with which they interact and a 60 minute presentation on
'APVW ilur,tio..1)itokilir, uF
BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
NHS
'resilience' both of which can impact on a clinicians ability and attitude to escalation.
Attendance for the year was midwives 96.4% and obstetric doctors 80.6%
All drills are delivered with a focus on team work and effective communication. The course is
endorsed by the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and the Royal College of Obstetricians
and Gynaecologists (RCOG) with further information available from on the PROMPT website
and RCOG.
•
Enclosure 5 — PROMPT training programme for 2018-2019
V.
Newborn Early Warning Observation charts — documented by Midwives, consulted by
Doctors
The New Early Warning Observation Chart for Newborn Infants (NEWS chart) has been in
use in clinical areas for a number of years and has escalation criteria clearly presented on
the reverse of the chart. This has recently been updated as the Newborn Early Warning
Trigger and Track chart (NEWTT chart) and includes details of observation frequencies and
conditions that trigger an immediate clinical review.. The specific question as to whether the
infant is exhibiting 'grunting' is made clearer on the first page; grunting is a sign of respiratory
distress and was a feature of this case as it should have been effectively escalated.
The NEWTT chart will be launched in all relevant clinical areas on December 30th 2019.
•
•
Enclosure 6 — Newborn early Warning Observation Chart
Enclosure 7 — Newborn early Warning Trigger and Track chart
2. Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery
At the time of Elisa's birth, the placenta was not retained as it appeared that she was born in
good condition. Current guidelines on retention for pathological examination (dated October
2019) indicate that on the basis of prematurity (32 to 36+6 weeks) it "may be desirable" to
refer placenta for examination (Appendix A). Elisa was born at 36 weeks, marginally
premature, but also with none of the conditions that that require 'essential' referral for
placental examination (Appendix A).
The policy in place at the time of Elisa'a death required placentas to be retained only if
certain criteria were met at the time of birth. Unfortunately Elisa's placenta was not retained
as concerns did not become apparent until some hours after birth
However, in response to the evidence heard at the inquest from the pathologist that his
determination of the cause of death was considerably limited by the absence of the placenta,
the Trust has revised its policy on retention of placentas so that all placentas are retained for
24 hours after birth, and are sufficiently identified so that they can be reliably retrieved in the
event that there are any subsequent adverse clinical events affecting the baby.
J1/ WV,
1(1'4 )It ,11%
BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
NHS
The Trust's proposed process for retention of placentas is as follows:
o
o
At birth, the placenta is placed in a bag and labelled with the patient's details on a
sticker. Patient details are also written on the bag with an indelible pen to safeguard
against the loss of the patients identification sticker
The bagged placenta is placed inside the usual human waste disposal container
(usually to a maximum of 5 placenta) the lid is NOT sealed.
o When the 5`' or last placenta is added to the waste disposal container, a sticky label is
placed on the lid with the date and time of when the lid is due to be sealed shut ie 24
hours after the last placenta is placed in the container .
o
The lid is closed securely 24 hours after the addition of the last placenta. The container
is then disposed of.
There is no national guidance on how long we should retain a placenta, but a reasonable time
might be 24 hours, after which before the waste disposal container can be removed in the usual
way.
This new procedure is in place in the Trust, supported by teaching sessions on the delivery suite
and birthing units. A brief guide to undertaking this procedure, and relevant signage to assist
colleagues, has also been developed. The formal Trust policy has yet to be ratified but it is hoped
this will be finalised in early 2020.
•
Enclosure 8 — Tissue pathway for histopathological examination of the placenta
(RCOG October 2019)
Finally, I can also add that as a result of the inquest into Elisa's death, the following additional
review and learning has taken place, for the clinical staff involved, and for any interested
colleagues:
a)
There has been a 'debrief 'with the midwifery staff to further explore and understand barriers
to escalation
b) A 'Black Box' event is planned for January 2020 led by the Trust Safety Department. This is
a bespoke learning event (originating in the risk management processes of the aviation
industry) and will focus on how to better understand and improve multi professional learning
from incidents. The aim is to further explore barriers to escalation and what we could do to
improve escalation in all care settings across the Trust.
c)
A "What Matters to you?" event took place on 6th December 2019 to provide an opportunity
for staff to further consider and address issues in the working environment that impact on
professionals' performance e.g. understanding the roles and responsibilities of the whole
team, the need for kind and respectful communication and support from core staff for less
experienced staff working in specialist areas such as delivery suite.
VVVVW
BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
NHS
I am confident that there has been considerable reflection, learning and changes in practice as a
result of Elisa's death all of which will significantly contribute to the reduction in the likelihood of
such an incident occurring in the future.
I hope this response adequately answers your questions but please do not hesitate to return to me
if you require any further information
Yours sincerely
Deborah Lee
Chief Executive
yvvvvy
BIC I CARE FOR EVERYONE
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.