Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0007, written 7 Jan 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 7 Jan 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0007 |
| Deceased | Thomas Kingston |
| Coroner | Katy Skerrett |
| Coroner area | Gloucestershire |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
H M Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire Ms Katy Skerrett REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 3rd Floor, 3 Piccadilly Place, Manchester, M1 3BN Emailed address: ( The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) 10 South Colonnade, London E14 4PU Email address: ( ) ) The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) 30 Euston Square, London NW1 2FB Email address: ( ) 1 2 CORONER I am Katy Skerrett, Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 26th February 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Thomas Henry Robin Kingston. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 3rd December 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion; see below Mr Kingston took his own life using a shotgun which a caused a severe traumatic wound to the head. Intent remains unclear as the deceased was suffering from adverse effects of medications he had recently been prescribed. The medical cause of death was 1A Traumatic wound to head. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased was a 45 year old man who was visiting his parents in Kemble Gloucestershire for the weekend. He had recently been experiencing anxiety, but had not expressed any suicidal ideation. On Sunday 25th February 2024 after lunch he began to unload his car, and prepared to return to London. Between approximately 1700-1800 hours he removed a shotgun from his vehicle which he had recently borrowed from his father for a shoot. He then accessed an annex attached to his parent’s property. Within a locked bathroom he self inflicted a gun shot to the head, and sustained injuries incompatible with life. He was subsequently found by his father. He was pronounced deceased at 1854 hours by attending police, who confirmed there were no suspicious circumstances surrounding his death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tel 01452 305661 | coroner@gloucestershire.gov.uk During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. Whether there is adequate communication of the risks of suicide associated with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications, and 2. Whether the current guidance to persist with SSRI medication or switch to an alternative SSRI medication is appropriate when no benefit has been achieved and/ or especially when any adverse side effects are being experienced. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 4pm on 3rd March 2025. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons (1) (2) , counsel for the family of Thomas Kingston, counsel for the GP, I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated 7 January 2025 Signature Ms K Skerrett His Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tel 01452 305661 | coroner@gloucestershire.gov.uk
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency 10 South Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 4PU United Kingdom gov.uk/mhra Ms K Skerrett His Majesty's Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire Gloucestershire Coroners Court By Email: Reference: Ss 12 February 2025 Dear Ms Skerrett, Regulation 28 Report into the death of Thomas Henry Robin Kingston Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report relating to the death of Thomas Henry Robin Kingston. | would like to offer my sincere condolences to Mr Kingston’s family on their tragic loss. In the Matters of Concern section of the report relating to Mr Kingston you ask the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) whether there is adequate communication about the risks of suicide associated with the Selective Serotonin Reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medicines and whether the current guidance to persist with SSRI medicine or switch to an alternative SSRI is appropriate when no benefit has been achieved and/ or especially when any adverse side effects are being experienced. May | start by outlining the current information with SSRI antidepressant medicines regarding the risk of suicidal behaviour. The product information for all SSRI medicines contains warnings about the risk of suicidal behaviour. These warnings were introduced following UK and European reviews of the evidence of such a risk which were started in 2003 and concluded that the risk of suicidal acts and behaviour is increased with the use of sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine in young patients (under 25 years of age). The product information for all SSRIs warns that the risk of suicidal behaviour is considered to be greatest in the early stages of antidepressant treatment. This is likely to be related to antidepressants being effective only after a few weeks of taking the medicine and depression itself being associated with an increased risk of suicidal behaviour. There are no marked differences in suicidal risk between the different antidepressants within the SSRI class of medicines. The product information for all SSRIs recommends that close supervision of patients and particularly those at high risk should accompany drug therapy especially in early treatment and following dose changes. Patients (and caregivers of patients) should be alerted about the need to monitor for any clinical worsening, suicidal behaviour or thoughts and unusual changes in behaviour and to seek medical advice immediately if these symptoms present. The current warnings in the SSRI medicines’ Patient Information Leaflets (PILs), including citalopram and sertraline, were subject to user testing and section two contains a bold headline on “Thoughts of suicide and worsening of your depression or anxiety disorder’. Use of emboldened text and bullet points are used throughout the PIL to highlight key safety information and action for people who experience thoughts of self-harm. There is also advice in the PIL to inform family and friends about a diagnosis of depression or anxiety as it is recognised people with depression may not have insight into their own behaviour and in some patients leaflets this is emboldened. To supplement this information, the MHRA has informed healthcare professionals in the UK about the risk of suicidal behaviour associated with antidepressants via articles in the MHR&’s bulletin Drug Safety Update in April 2008' and published guidance for prescribers on the MHRA website in December 2014 to summarise key safety messages’. The British National Formulary (BNF) states, “the use of antidepressants has been linked with suicidal thoughts and behaviour; children, young adults, and patients with a history of suicidal behaviour are particularly at risk. Where necessary patients should be monitored for suicidal behaviour, self-harm, or hostility, particularly at the beginning of treatment or if the dose is changed.” The information in the product information and the BNF should form the basis of a discussion between the doctor and patient when deciding on the most appropriate medicine for them. Despite all the currently available information about the risk and benefits of SSRI antidepressants designed to supplement and support the clinical conversation and monitoring of patients by the healthcare professionals prescribing antidepressants, the MHRA is aware that some patients and families have ongoing concerns about the effectiveness of the current warnings in the patient information leaflets. In 2022, the MHRA sought the advice of the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) on the need to convene an Expert Working Group (EWG) to review how the risk of suicidal behaviours is communicated in the patient leaflets to establish if this can be improved or if it would be more helpful for patients to receive this information in different formats within the regulatory framework. The first meeting of the EWG was held on 4 July 2024. Round table meetings involving patient charities and families of those bereaved by suicide will be held in March 2025. The membership and remit of the EWG can be found here Commission on Human Medicines - GOV.UK. 1 https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/a ntidepressants-suicidal-thoughts-and-behaviour 2 https:/Avww.gov.uk/government/ ublications/ssris-and-snris-use-and-safety/selective- serotonin-reu take-inhibitors-ssris-and-serotonin-and-noradrenaline-reu take-inhibitors- snris-use-and-safety The considerations of the EWG are anticipated to complete in 2025. We will communicate to healthcare professionals, patient groups and relevant voluntary organisations any updates on how the risk of suicidal behaviours associated with antidepressants is presented in the antidepressant PILs following the conclusions of the EWG and subsequent CHM advice. Secondly in your letter you also ask about the guidance around the use of SSRIs, particularly if no benefit has been seen or adverse reactions have been reported. Clinical guidance issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (Clinical Guideline NG222) on depression in adults recommends that if a person with depression is started on antidepressants and is considered to be an increased suicide risk or is between 18 and 25 years (because of the potential increased prevalence of suicidal thoughts in the early stages of antidepressant treatment for this group) they should be reviewed after one week of starting antidepressants or after increasing the dose and again after this as often as needed, but no later than four weeks after the appointment at which the antidepressant was started. Clinical Guideline 90 advises prescribers to follow a stepped-care model in which to organise the provision of services and supports patients, carers and practitioners in identifying and accessing the most effective interventions; the least intrusive and most effective intervention is provided first. More details of this stepped-care model can be found at httos:/Awww.nice.org.uk/quidance/cg90/resources/de! ression-in-adults-recognition-and- management-pdf-975742636741 NICE guidelines advise healthcare professionals that if a person's depression has had no or a limited response to treatment with antidepressant medication alone, and no obvious cause can be found and resolved, to discuss further treatment options with the person and make a shared decision on how to proceed based on their clinical need and preferences. Finally | should add that your report of Mr Kingston's adverse reaction to SSRI medicines has been added to the Yellow Card database (reference number ADR 34440796), which is the UK's system for collecting and monitoring information on suspected Adverse Drug Reactions. | ™ " _ have -_ further = please do not hesitate to contact my office: Yours sincerely Chief Executive Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency E:
NI Cc National Institute for 3rd floor
Health and Care Excellence 3 Piccadilly Place
Manchester
M1 3BN
United Kingdom
+44 (0)300 323 0140
31 January 2025
Ms Katy Skerrett
HM Area Coroner
Gloucestershire Coroners Court
Corinium Avenue
Barnwood
Gloucestershire
GL4 3DJ
Sent via em: IRD
Our reference:
Dear Ms Skerrett
Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Thomas Henry Robin Kingston)
| write in response to your regulation 28 report dated 7 January 2025 regarding the very sad
death of Thomas Henry Robin Kingston. | would like to express my sincere condolences to
Thomas's family.
Our patient safety leads at NICE have discussed the contents of your report and the summary
information given relating to the death of Mr Kingston, while considering the relevant published
NICE guidance on this topic, in this case depression in adults: treatment and management
(NG222).
Given that the matters of concern relate to the side effects and safety of medication, specifically
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), we believe that the key issues raised are best
addressed in the first instance by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
(MHRA), and | note that your report has also been sent to them.
Therefore, we are currently working collaboratively with the MHRA on this issue. The outcome
of that work will inform any action NICE may need to take in respect of its recommendations.
Please consider this our initial reply. We will write to you again as soon as possible with further
information once our work with the MHRA has concluded. Please note that given the complex
nature of the MHRA work, our final response is unlikely to be submitted by the original response
date required by your report.
| hope this is an acceptable way forward and would like to assure you that | will send my further
reply as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely,
De
NICE nice.org.uk | nice@nice.org.uk
Chief Executive
{Insert footer here] 2 of 2
RC Royal College of ee General Practitioners Honorary Secretary of Council Ms K Skerrett His Majesty’s Seqj for Gloucestershire Sent by email to: 26 February 2025 Dear Ms Skerrett Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths - touching on the death of Thomas Henry Robin Kingston Thank you for sharing a copy of your report touching on the tragic death of Thomas Henry Robin Kingston. | am responding on behalf of the Royal College of General Practitioners as Honorary Secretary to Council. Firstly, can | convey our sincere condolences to the family and friends of Thomas. You asked me to specifically comment on two matters of concern: 1. Whether there is adequate communication of the risks of suicide associated with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications, and 2. Whether the current guidance to persist with SSRI medication or switch to an alternative SSRI medication is appropriate when no benefit has been achieved and/ or especially when any adverse side effects are being experienced. General comments The GP Curriculum includes within its Clinical topic guides a section on Mental Health mentioning a role of the GP to specifically communicate effectively, professionally, and sensitively with patients, relatives and carers, recognising potential difficulties in communicating with people with mental health conditions and the importance of generating and maintaining rapport. There is a recognition to assess risk to make the patients safety a priority and offer patients relatives and carers advice and support regarding prevention, prescribing monitoring, and self-management of both mental and physical multimorbidity. The curriculum recognises the emerging issue of suicide prevention in mental health care. Royal College of General Practitioners 30 Euston Square, London, NW1 2FB Tel: 020 3188 7400 | info@rcgp.org.uk | rcgp.org.uk Patron: HRH The Duke of Edinburgh (1972-2021) | Registered Charity Number 223106 Shared Decision making 10 years ago, the RCGP recognised that GPs were leading the way in shared decision making and called for more guidance on shared decision making. The College has pioneered the development of a Person-Centred Care toolkit which includes support for shared decision making and in 2023 RCGP Scotland's joint chair Chris Williams Commenting on the prescription of antidepressants by GPs, RCGP Scotland Joint Chair Dr Chris Williams said: “Depressive illness affects many adults and causes a huge burden of disease worldwide. “When prescribed appropriately, evidence shows that antidepressants can be an effective treatment for many patients suffering from mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety. As with any medication, GPs carefully consider the benefits and risks when prescribing antidepressants, the various factors relevant to the individual patient, alongside new Clinical guidance as it is published. “Shared decision-making is an evidence-based health communication framework that is commonly used in general practice. A person with mild to moderate depression may have more than one treatment option, including where medication might be used on its own or in combination. “GPs are highly trained to have frank and sensitive conversations with our patients, and this includes any potential side effects which may occur from taking antidepressants. Once a prescription has been made, follow-up appointments and ongoing medication reviews can assist GPs to assess whether a patient’s symptoms have improved, any side effects they may have experienced as well as if additional support is needed. “Improved access to alternatives to anti-depressant medication, such as talking therapies and CBT, may be beneficial, but resourcing and access issues persist for these treatments. Improved access to these treatment pathways through further resourcing may be beneficial for patients.” The Royal College of Psychiatrists published a Position statement in 2019 on antidepressants and depression. They mentioned the importance of shared decision making. ‘To ensure informed consent and shared decision-making, the use of antidepressants should always be underpinned by a discussion with the patient, and family/carer (as appropriate), about the potential level of benefits and harms, including withdrawal, and concordance about initiation and continuation. Greater emphasis is also required on regularly reviewing antidepressant use (supported by adequate resourcing and better use of technology) to monitor how well the treatment is working and any side effects, as well as to ensure that long-term use remains clinically indicated’. They also raised the issue of risk of suicide when using antidepressants looking at the current evidence at that time. The Royal College of Psychiatrists have also published comprehensive information for patients on how to stop antidepressants which is as important as starting them. Specific comments In answer to the two specific questions: Is there adequate communication of the risks of suicide with SSRI medication? There can always be more effective communication of risk and in General Practice we use a personalised care approach with an emphasis on the domain of shared decision making. Shared decision making is a process where effective communication between the GP and the patient reaches a decision based on a shared understanding of the risks and benefits of different treatment options. Shared decision aids have been produced to help patients_in_ managing depression . This shared decision aid (SDA) is not specific to particular medication such as SSRIs and does not highlight suicide risk. An SDA for SSRIs which balances the benefits and risks for patients would be an effective basis for a discussion between the GP and their patient before starting treatment. Is current guidance to persist with SSRI medication or switch to an alternative SSRI medication appropriate when no benefit has been achieved and/ or especially when any adverse side effects are being experienced? There are specific guidelines for Depression produced by NICE and most GPs shall follow NICE CKS (Clinical Knowledge Summaries). The guidance specifically covers the consideration of antidepressant drug treatment (using shared decision making to agree an appropriate treatment plan). The guidance includes advising ‘that symptoms of anxiety, agitation, hopelessness, or suicidal ideas may increase when starting treatment, and advise when to seek urgent review’. Advice is also given regarding review and switching antidepressant medication. This does mention considering a switch to a drug that the person has previously found helpful or prefers. In this case it is not clear whether there was a previous preference for a particular SSRI. It is however usual to switch to a different class if there has not been a benefit or side effects and there are recommendations in the guidance on how to switch drugs safely between classes due to interactions and different bioavailability. It is also important to be clear on the indication for an SSRI and use of diagnostic criteria for both anxiety as well as depression, as the conditions can be separate or mixed and this can guide various treatment options. The RCGP also has a Mental Health toolkit which provides evidence-based guidelines for medical and psychological treatments for both depression and anxiety. I trust that this reply is helpful and if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Our sincere condolences are with Thomas’ family. Yours sincerely RCGP Honorary Secretary
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.