Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Donald Brown

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0037, written 31 Jan 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report31 Jan 2023
Reference2023-0037
DeceasedDonald Brown
CoronerKaty Skerrett
Coroner areaGloucestershire
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

H M Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire 
Ms Katy Skerrett 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

 Chief Executive, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester 

Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN 

1 

CORONER 

I am Katy Skerrett, His Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire.                                   

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 8th March 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Donald Charles Brown. The 
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 13th December 2022. The conclusion of 
the inquest was a narrative conclusion. The medical cause of death was 1A Aspiration pneumonia, 
1B C1/C2 fracture dislocation.                                                             

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
Donald Charles Brown “Donald” was an 87 year old man who suffered a fall at home on the 31st 
January  2021.  He  was  taken  to  hospital  and  underwent  CT  examination.  No  fractures  were 
reported. Following further investigations he was discharged home. Following discharge Donald 
continued to experience neck pain and difficulty swallowing. He was readmitted to hospital on the 
26th February 2021 and was treated for aspiration pneumonia. Further CT imaging demonstrated 
that he had suffered a displaced fracture of the C2 vertebra with spinal cord compression. This 
injury had been sustained in his fall on the 31st January. It was visible on the CT imaging taken on 
that day. However it was not reported. It is likely that the severity of this injury led to his swallowing 
difficulties  and  caused  aspiration  pneumonia.  Neurosurgical  opinion  was  sought  and  advised 
against operative intervention. Donald’s condition thereafter steadily deteriorated and he passed 
away at 08.15 hours on the 4th March 2021.  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it 
is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

1.  The significant understaffing of the Radiology department at the hospital. 
2.  The national shortage of radiology trainee posts. 
3.  The expectation that the reporting of all scans including non urgent, will be done within 

an hour. 

4.  The appointment of call handlers to triage calls to reduce the demands on the 

radiologists’ time has been delayed due to cost.  

Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ 
Tel 01452 305661    |    coroner@gloucestershire.gov.uk 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power 
to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 
4pm 28th March 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 

(1)  Taynton’s Solicitors representing the family of Donald Brown, 

(2)  National Medical Director, 
(3)  Royal College of Radiologists, 63 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2 3JW. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Dated    31st January 2023 

Signature_____

____________________ 

Ms K Skerrett 
His Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire 

Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ 
Tel 01452 305661    |    coroner@gloucestershire.gov.uk

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Gloucestershire Hospital (PDF)
Gloucestershire  Hospita Is 
NHS  Foundation Trust 

Alexandra  House 
Cheltenham General Hospital 
Cheltenham 
Gloucestershire 
GL53 ?AN 

27 March 2023 

Ms K Skerrett 
HM Senior Coroner for Gloucestershire 
Gloucestershire Coroner's Court 
Corinium Avenue 
Barnwood 
Gloucester 
GL4 3DJ 

Dear Ms Skerrett 

Mr Donald Charles Brown -Inquest 13 December 2022 

I am  writing  in  response  to your letter dated  31  January 2023  in  which  you  raised  concerns arising 
from  the evidence heard  this  inquest.  It is  your view that there  is  a  risk that future  deaths will  occur 
unless action  is taken about these concerns. 

The matters of concerns are: 

1. 
2. 
3. 
4 . 

The significant understaffing of the Radiology department at the hospital 
The national  shortage of radiology tra inee posts 
The expectation that the reporting of all scans including non-urgent, will be done within one hour 
The appointment of call handlers to triage calls to reduce the demands on the radiologist's time 
has  been delayed due to cost 

The Trust's response is as follows: 

1. 

The significant understaffing of the radiology department at the hospital 

The  department  has  an  establishment  of  31  whole  time  equivalent  radiologists  and 
presently has one vacancy, which is filled  by a locum consultant. This equates to a vacancy 
rate of c3% This compares to  a national vacancy rate of 29%. The Trust has an excellent 
reputation for training radiologists, coming top in the national survey for trainee experience. 
The  last four appointments have  all  been former trainees  of the  organisation  and  we are 
confident we can continue to  maintain a fully established workforce. 

 
 
 
 
 Gloucestershire Hospita Is 
NHS  Foundation Trust 

2. 

The national shortage of radiology trainee posts 

The allocation of trainees is the responsibility of Health Education England. Concerns have been 
expressed  about  the  distribution  of  trainees  nationally,  reflecting  the  bias  to  distribution  to 
London.  HEE 
the  process  of  redistributing  a  proportion  of  these  trainees  and 
Gloucestershire Hospitals  has  been  successful  in  securing  an  additional  (eighth) trainee from 
the Severn Deanery commencing in  post in  August 2023. Additionally, we  are aiming  to  create 
a fellowship post (post training role) for further applicants. 

is  in 

3. 

The expectation that the reporting  of all scans including non-urgent. will be done within  one hour 

The Trust works to  the  national  NHS  Seven  Day Services  Clinical  Standards,  Version  2, 
(8  February 2022) which for inpatients and patients attending the emergency department 
reflects the following minimum standards, which the department strives to exceed. 

• 
• 

• 

Within one hour for critical patients (scans that immediately alter a patient's management) 
Within  12  hours for urgent  patients  (scans that will  alter a  patient's  management,  but  not 
necessarily on that day) 
Within 24 hours for non-urgent patients. 

4. 

The appointment of call  handlers to triage calls to reduce  the demands on  the  radiologist's time 
has been delayed due to  cost 

The  service  has  a  number of initiatives  in  hand  to  reduce  the  administrative  burden  on 
radiologists including  but not limited to 

•  Recruitment  of three  "inpatient  navigators" who will  undertake call  triage  amongst other 

• 

duties. 
training  our  radiographers  to  'vet'  scans  under the  radiologist  pre-defined  protocols,  to 
further reduce the administrative burden on the radiologists. 

•  Production  of a list of 'Frequently Asked  Questions' for radiography staff with  the aim  of 

reduce the need for interruptions to radiology sessions 

•  We  are investigating an  Artificial  Intelligence tool to facilitate better triage between urgent 

and  less urgent scans 

I have also enclosed a copy of the completed  and  updated Action  Plan. 

I hope this information is useful. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can  be of further assistance. 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive 

• 1 ·1'-11  ,1  j  ll.: l- ,-, , ; , rf (  ' !)  r, h s  t_l. 

Bt5T  CARE  f {)R  EVER ·,c~;-,t

Related reports

Other reports by Katy Skerrett

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.