Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0505, written 28 Oct 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Oct 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0505 |
| Deceased | Thomas Smyth |
| Coroner | Tom Osborne |
| Coroner area | Milton Keynes |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This from is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Joe Harrison CEO, Milton Keynes Hospital 1 CORONER I am Tom OSBORNE, Senior Coroner for the area of Milton Keynes 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 07/08/2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Thomas Henry SMYTH aged 86. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17 October 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion as follows; The deceased was admitted to Milton Keynes University Hospital on 12th July 2019 following a fall at his nursing home. A CT scan revealed a subdural haematoma and the neurosurgeons advised that his anticoagulation medication should be stopped. It was inappropriately restarted on 13th July 2019 and this resulted in his clinical deterioration and he died from the subdural haematoma on 3rd August 2019 at Mallard House Milton Keynes. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH See narrative conclusion. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS The MATTERS OF CONCERNS are as follows: During the course of the evidence I heard from consultants and more junior staff that they were unaware of certain facts relating to Mr. Smyth at the time that they were dealing with him and making decisions relating to his care, and yet the information was recorded in the electronic notes and records. It appears to me that staff are having difficulty accessing vital information that should be clearly available to them. I would ask that you carry out a review of the notes system to see whether or not it is being used correctly, whether staff members have been adequately trained with regard to its use and whether changes should be made as to how information is recorded and retrieved. Unless the system is working effectively I anticipate that further lives will be put at risk. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 16 December 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons The family of Mr Smyth The Care Quality Commission I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Tom OSBORNE Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes Dated: 28 October 2019
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
NHS 888. COMMUNICATE. Milton Keynes COLLABORATE. CONTRIBUTE. University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Our ref: 20191203JH Standing Way Date: 03 December 2019 witoneeren MK6 SLD Mr Tom R Osborne 91908 660033 HM Senior Coroner www.mkhospital.nhs.uk HM Coroner's Office Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ Dear Mr Osborne REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS -— Mr Thomas Henry Smyth Dear Mr Osbourne, 1 am writing in response to a Regulation 28 Report, issued to me as Chief Executive of Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust on 28 October 2019. The report requires a formal response by 16 December 2019 and this letter is intended as that formal response. The inquest that the Regulation 28 Report followed was into the death of Thomas Henry Smyth, aged 86. You reached a narrative conclusion which read: The deceased was admitted to Milton Keynes University Hospital on 12th July 2019 following a fall at his nursing home. A CT scan revealed a subdural haematoma and the neurosurgeons advised that his anticoagulation medication should be stopped. It was inappropriately restarted on 13th July 2019 and this resulted in his clinical deterioration and he died from the subdural haematoma on 3rd August 2019 at Mallard House Milton Keynes. Following the conclusion, you stated matters of concern that form the basis of the Regulation 28 Report. Those concerns read: During the course of the evidence | heard from consultants and more junior staff that they were unaware of certain facts relating to Mr. Smyth at the time that they were dealing with him and making decisions relating to his care, and yet the information was recorded in the electronic notes and records. It appears to me that staff are having difficulty accessing vital information that should be clearly available to them. | would ask that you carry out a review of the notes system to see whether or not it is being used correctly, whether staff members have been adequately trained with regard to its use and whether changes should be made as to how information is recorded and As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare far our Chief Executive: Joe Harrison Pattents. During your visit students may be involved In your care, or you may be asked to. Chai + Sil Lloyd participate In a clinical tial, Please speak to your docter or nurse If you have any concerns. dirman: Simon Lloy TheMKWay NHS 222. COMMUNICATE. Milton Keynes COLLABORATE, CONTRIBUTE. University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust retrieved. Unless the system is working effectively i anticipate that further lives will be put at risk. | would like to address those concerns and set out what we have done and are continuing to do to ensure that our electronic notes system is safe and effective. You may recall that we introduced an inpatient Electronic Patient Record (which we refer to as eCARE) in May 2018. The supplier of the system, Cerner, is used in more than 20 hospitals across the UK as well as in hospitals and health systems globally. To ensure the system was introduced safely, and with the minimum of disruption to patients and patient care, we undertook an extensive programme of staff training in the lead up to the eCARE system going live across hospital inpatient areas (including the Emergency Department and Maternity — some areas, including Critical Care and Paediatrics, are in the next phase of the roll-out). This programme included individual and team training; dedicated staff to support wards and departments on the use of the system after go-live; training for all temporary staff; and training materials, including videos, as well as individual and team support remaining readily available. The Trust also appointed a Chief Clinical Information Officer (a consultant vascular surgeon) and a Chief Nursing Information Officer (an experienced senior nurse), to ensure appropriate clinical oversight and input into all aspects of eCARE — from its introduction to ongoing training and future developments. We have a robust governance process and structure in place to oversee the development, implementation and continued performance of eCARE, including staff training and use of the system. This structure reports to a main board (the Health Informatics Programme Board) which | chair as Chief Executive. This board has oversight of risks and issues and works to ensure that these are mitigated and managed appropriately. In the care of Mr Smyth, the Emergency Department Doctor notes Mr Smyth was on Apixiban in the free text area of the eCARE record. It would be optimal if this were recorded in the medication history section of the eCARE record. The Pharmacist subsequently reviews and inputs an accurate medication history. By the time Mr Smyth is clerked by the Trauma and Orthopaedics Senior House Officer, the Apixiban is clearly in the medication history and this is included in the SHO’s note. As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for our Chief Executive: Joe Harrison patients. During your visit students may be Involved in your cara, or you may be asked to ; participate in a clinical trial. Please speak to your docter or nurse if you have any concerns. Chairman: Simon Lloyd A AoeO rAval ¢ CASE COMMUNICATE. Milton Keynes COLLABORATE. CONTRIBUTE, University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Mr Smyth had a Venous Thrombolytic Embolism (VTE) assessment to assess whether prophylaxis was required to prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis/ Pulmonary Embolus. The Doctor who completed this recognised that Mr Smyth should not have VTE prohylaxis due to his intracranial bleeding; however they do not check the box on the electronic form that says ‘concomitant use of anticoagulants’. If they had checked this box the Doctor may have thought to stop the Apixaban. Apixaban is given to Mr Smyth twice a day on 14 and 15 July, and one dose is given on 16 July. A VTE assessment is completed by a different Doctor on 16 July but ‘concomitant use of anticoagulants’ is again not identified. Apixaban was then stopped on 16 July as Mr Smyth's condition deteriorated; and Apixaban was not administered again during admission. Although documentation in the free text area of the eCARE record is appropriate, it is not best practice, as there are more secure designated (and specifically designed and included) sections of eCARE in which to include issues that may raise a medication alert or other safety alert in the care and management of individual patients. In this particular case, it is clear that important and relevant information was indeed recorded in the clinical record. Members of staff did not consistently review key elements of the record when assessing Mr Smyth; for example, the medication chart does not seem to have been reviewed daily when clinicians assessed Mr Smyth's condition. Review of the medication chart and observations is a key clement of routine rounding and this will be reinforced with staff. This will be addressed in training — with additional training in ED and Trauma and Orthopaedics. This specific case will be used for learning in plenary sessions during the year to reach a wide medical and multidisciplinary audience. It should be noted that the electronic system used by the Trust to communicate with neurosurgical colleagues in Oxford (OARS) offers huge advantages over the informal paper-based system which came before it. There is now a thorough audit trail of all communication between local doctors and those in the tertiary centre, with automaied alerts to the lead clinician when an individual patient's record is updated. It is important to recognise that electronic health records — whether within a hospital (such as eCARE) or within a clinical network (such as OARS) — offer very significant benefits in relation to accessibility, governance and patient safety. Electronic prescribing in particular As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to Improve healthcore for our Chief Executive: Joe Harrison patients. During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you may be asked to oc; participate in q clinical tridl, Please speak to your doctor or nurse If you have any concerns. Chairman: Simon Lloyd TheMKWey INHS) CASS. COMMUNICATE, Milton Keynes COLLABORATE: CORHIBUTE! University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has major advantages. Where care does not go according to plan and deficiencies in note keeping and communication are identified, it is imperative that we do not persuade ourselves that the medical records of old were better: lost records, illegible entries, medication charts in pharmacy, two different perspectives on the same conversation between centres with no written record of either. | am satisfied that with the actions proposed, and the governance structure in place to manage the use of and risks associated with eCARE, the risk of future recurrence is appropriately mitigated. If you require any further information or evidence, please do contact my office without hesitation. With kind regards Yours sincerely Rrofessor Joe Harrison Chief Executive Copy FS Medical Director As a teaching hespltal, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for our Chief Executive: Joe Harrison Patients. During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you may be asked to A cy participate in a dlnical trial. Please speak to your dactor or nurse If you have any concerns. Chairman: Simon Lloyd
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.