Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0445, written 1 Aug 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 1 Aug 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0445 |
| Deceased | Leah Croucher |
| Coroner | Tom Osborne |
| Coroner area | Milton Keynes |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Minister of State for Prisons, Parole and Probation 1 CORONER I am Tom OSBORNE, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Milton Keynes 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 1st of November 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Leah Shannon Croucher aged 19. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 19th of June 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was: Unlawful killing 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the morning of the 15th of February 2019 Leah left her home address to walk to work, however she never arrived. Later on the same day her family reported Leah as missing to the police. A police investigation followed but they were unable to locate or establish what had happened to Leah. On Monday the 10th of October 2022 Police were alerted to the presence of a body located in the loft of a Milton keynes house. The house was located on the route Leah would take to work. The body was subsequently identified as being Leah Croucher. A police investigation followed. The police confirmed that the circumstances and evidence supported that Leah Croucher had been abducted and murdered either on the day or shortly after she had gone missing. Strong evidence was obtained identifying an individual as the perpertrator. This person had died from suicide on the 20th of April 2019. He was a known repeat sex offender subject to supervison by the probation service and the police before, and at the time of the murder. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) Leah Croucher was unlawfully killed by a man who was subject to supervision by the probation service and the police. Despite that supervision he was in breach of the terms of Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 his probation and was able to kill Leah when it was known that he was a predator and danger to females. There should be a fundamental review of the process for monitoring sex offenders in the community and the sharing of information between all agencies particularly the police and probation service to ensure that a similar death can be prevented. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by September 25th, 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Chief Probation Officer England and Wales. Chief Constable Thames Valley Police. Croucher family. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 01/08/2024 Tom OSBORNE Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Regional Probation Director
South Central
Abbey Gardens
4 Abbey Street
Reading, RG1 3BA
E
T
Mr. Tom Osborne
Senior Coroner for Milton Keynes
07 Oct 2024
Dear Mr. Osborne,
Inquest into the death of Leah Shannon Croucher
Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report, issued following the Inquest into the death of Leah Croucher
and addressed to the Minister of State for Prisons, Parole and Probation. I am the Regional Probation
Director for South Central Probation and am replying on behalf of the Minister.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with the family, and I would first like to express my
sincere condolences for their loss.
You have raised the following area of concern to which I respond as follows: -
“There should be a fundamental review of the process for monitoring sex offenders in the community
and the sharing of information between all agencies particularly the police and probation service to
ensure that a similar death can be prevented”.
This recommendation was directed to the Minister of State for Prisons and Probation. That said, given
the focus of the inquest, my response will address local probation practice in the management of
people convicted of sex offences and in working with the local police force, Thames Valley Police. I
will also set out how the Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) Strategic
Management Board (SMB) will be involved to ensure this is a multi-agency response.
It has been 5 years since Leah Croucher was unlawfully killed in 2019, and the Probation Service has
undergone significant national changes during this time. This has included the unification of the
Probation Service, when the former Community Rehabilitation Companies were dissolved in 2021,
and attendant changes to organisational structure, policy and practice. Since then, the Probation
Service has taken steps to strengthen our management of those who have committed sexual
offences. We have streamlined risk assessments for such offenders and introduced a new national
learning programme for all experienced probation officers to improve their knowledge and skills in this
vital area of public protection work. We have also introduced new policy frameworks covering the
preparation of pre-sentence reports, requirements to undertake home visits and expectations when it
comes to cases managed at level 1 under MAPPA (
was managed at MAPPA level 1 at
the time Leah Croucher was killed). I now quote from the MAPPA Level 1 Policy Framework where it
states that ‘(I)t is essential that information sharing takes place’. The Policy Framework further
stipulates that the Probation Service actively seek out any new information which may affect risk
assessment and management and invite the Police to take part in reviews where the inclusion of their
expertise would be of benefit (as it would have been in this case).
I am also aware that the Home Office commissioned an independent review into the police-led
management of registered sex offenders in the community which was published in April 2023. While
the focus on the review was as the title suggests on policing, the report recognises it would be
impossible to undertake the review looking solely at the policing aspect of what is chiefly a multi-
agency process. The new Government will consider its response to the recommendations in due
course.
I now turn to what the Thames Valley MAPPA SMB will do to review the arrangements for managing
sexual offenders in the Thames Valley MAPPA Area.
In terms of the process for monitoring sex offenders in Thames Valley, the Criminal Justice Act 2003
("CJA 2003") provides for the establishment of MAPPA in each of the 42 criminal justice areas in
England and Wales. These are designed to protect the public, including previous victims of crime,
from serious harm by sexual and violent offenders. The MAPPA Responsible Authority (RA) consists
of the Police, Probation Service, and Prison Service acting jointly in each area. It is fundamental to the
operation of MAPPA and must make arrangements for assessing and managing the risks posed by
MAPPA eligible offenders in its area and monitoring the effectiveness of its arrangements. The role
and functions of the RA are exercised through the SMB. The Chair of the SMB has accepted that the
Board should oversee a piece of work to review the effectiveness of the multi-agency processes for
monitoring sex offenders and for information exchange between police and probation. This will build
on the extensive learning which came from the MAPPA Serious Case Review (SCR) and associated
action plan, which is due to be implemented in full by August 2025.
Within the Probation Service, we will focus our review on information sharing practice at the pre-
sentence report stage and throughout the management of an order or licence, building on the actions
set out in the internal Serious Further Offence (SFO) review. The Pathfinder to Improved Pre-
Sentence Advice (PIPA) project is piloting in the South Central Probation Region. This project aims to
improve the quality of Pre-Sentence advice to the Judiciary. This includes reviewing cases further in
advance of upcoming hearings. This gives staff more time to gather information from other agencies
and consider the implications for risk and the suitability of various sentencing options. We will
specifically consider how this is supporting the preparation of reports on registered sex offenders in
light of this case. We will also build on the actions set out in the internal Serious Further Offence
(SFO) review to focus on information sharing. We will conclude the review by 31st March 2025.
We will work with the national Assessment and Management of Sexual Offending (AMSO) Team
within HMPPS to share the findings from our review, to support any learning on a national basis,
disseminating any outcomes or proposed practice changes which arise from it. This will include
continued improvement of the effective and efficient delivery of ViSOR as the primary means of multi-
agency information sharing in the region. National projects are ensuring that all areas are working to
establish the use of ViSOR as a business-as-usual system in sentence management. Over the last 3
years these projects have seen a steady rise in the number of HMPPS staff with access to ViSOR,
rising from less than 300 to more than 3500. These numbers continue to increase by approximately
2
300 a month and the intention is that more than 12,000 HMPPS members of staff will have access to
ViSOR by the time it is replaced by a more dynamic and agile system (MAPPS) in 2026. In South
Central ViSOR usage has been increased steadily and now 35% of in scope staff have access to the
database. We will continue to provide capacity to train 40 staff a month and pending vetting being
timely will deliver full access in a year.
Thank you for bringing this matter of concern to my attention. Please be assured that learning from
the circumstances of this tragic death has been shared more widely with colleagues and will continue
to inform improvements across all the Probation Regions.
Yours sincerely
Regional Probation Director
3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Tom Osborne, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.