Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Mary Nelson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0036, written 24 Feb 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report24 Feb 2020
Reference2020-0036
DeceasedMary Nelson
CoronerNicholas Shaw
Coroner areaCumbria
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Kally Cheema LLB 
HM Senior Coroner for County of Cumbria 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  
CORONER 

1 

 Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency 

I am Dr Nicholas Shaw Assistant Coroner for County of Cumbria 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 25/09/2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mary Nelson. The investigation 
concluded at the end of the inquest 10th February 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was Mary Nelson 
died at her home 
hypertensive heart disease and the toxic effect of a  properly prescribed medication.  
Hypertensive Heart Disease and Fluoxetine toxicity 

Cumbria on 9th July 2019 due to a combination of 

4 

5 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
Mary Nelson was a 75 year old lady who had a long history of chronic depression. She had been on a 
regular prescription of Fluoxetine 60mg daily from her GP since 2009 along with Amitriptyline 10-20mg at 
night. She rarely attended her GP surgery but did have an ECG suggestive of mild LV hypertrophy and was 
also on a long term prescription of Bisoprolol 5mg & Ramipril 1.25mg daily and had a previous history of 
excess alcohol use. The circumstance of her death was simply that she was found deceased on the sofa in 
her living room when her husband awoke one morning, this appeared to be a sudden death during the 
night. At post mortem the only significant physical finding was a slightly enlarged heart, coronary arteries 
were less than 50% occluded by atheroma. Toxicology however revealed a blood Fluoxetine level of 
3460ng/ml [lethal range >1300] & Norfluoxetine 1832ng/ml. Amitriptyline however was in therapeutic 
range. There was no evidence to suggest anything other than that Mary took her regular medication as 
prescribed. I have discussed this case with the reporting forensic toxicologist. It is acknowledged that 
Fluoxetine has a large volume of distribution but even allowing for that this is a very high level [and of 
course lethal ranges are based on PM levels obtained from other cases].  
CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory 
duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] 
(1) I am concerned that Fluoxetine accumulated in Mary’s body over the course of her treatment 
reaching a dangerous level that could trigger sudden cardiac rhythm disturbance [?torsades de pointes] 
and death. Should the guidance for dosage be revised [especially in the elderly], is there any indication to 
consider in life testing of drug levels? 
(2)This death has not been reported on the Yellow card system and clearly the MHRA needs to be aware 

Fairfield, Station Road, Cockermouth, Cumbria CA13 9PT 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 of it. 
(3)------------------------------ 

Fairfield, station Road, Cockermouth, Cumbria CA13 9PT 

 
 
 
 6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you The MHRA have the 
power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 20th 
April 2020 I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for 
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Person 

I have also sent it to 

 Mary’s GP who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a 
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

24/02/2020 

Dr Nicholas Shaw Assistant Coroner County of Cumbria 

Fairfield, station Road, Cockermouth, Cumbria CA13 9PT

Related reports

Other reports by Nicholas Shaw

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.