Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Billy Jenkins

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0068, written 21 Feb 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report21 Feb 2020
Reference2020-0068
DeceasedBilly Jenkins
CoronerJacqueline Devonish
Coroner areaSouth London
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Community health care · Suicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedOxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Matthew Trainer, Chief Executive Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust 
2. 

ADAPT, Bexley Locality Community Mental Health Team, 

Erith Centre 

1 

CORONER 

I am Jacqueline Devonish, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of South London 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 17 October 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Billy James 
Jenkins, 31. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 February 2020. 
The medical cause of death was asphyxia due to being suspended by the neck, with 
underlying alcohol and cocaine intoxication. The conclusion of the inquest was that Billy 
Jenkins took his own life by hanging following an assessment after which he felt helpless 
because there had been no clear mental state examination and a potential missed 
opportunity to consider an appropriate referral. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 12 August 2019 Billy Jenkins was found hanging by the neck in a hotel room 
bathroom.  He had checked in in the early hours of the morning after visiting his mother 
and presenting as unusually calm. Billy Jenkins had a long history of alcohol and 
cocaine abuse when he was feeling in low mood.  An empty bottle of vodka was found in 
the room.  There were a number of social factors contributing to his low mood at the time 
of the incident.  He had reported ongoing suicidal ideation, and reported three previous 
suicide attempts but no active plan.  He had been prescribed anti-depressants by his 
GP. 

He generally presented as agitated and impulsive but had always sought support from 
clinical services but had been resistant to alcohol and drug support believing that he had 
an undiagnosed bipolar disorder. 

He was assessed by ADAPT on 3 July 2019 but left the assessment feeling hopeless.  
His mother was present throughout his assessments and felt that he had not been 
listened to, that he had not been diagnosed and that insufficient information had been 
gathered at assessments to be able to properly support him. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) The findings of the internal investigation by Oxleas NHS were that the assessment 
undertaken by the Community Mental Health Nurse did not illicit sufficient information to 
enable the multidisciplinary team to properly review Mr Jenkins’ mental health.  Despite 
this the multi-disciplinary team proceeded with a review and decided that he did not 
have a mental health condition, without seeking a further assessment 
(2) The Community Mental Health Nurse did not document her formulation or 
impression.  The plan moving forward was not robust and did not explore protective 
factors or minimisation of harm and there was an over-reliance on alcohol and drug use 
as the cause of his suicidal ideation.  There appeared to be no proforma of questions to 
ask. 
(3) As a direct consequence of the limited information gathering Billy Jenkins was not 
properly assessed and it was not known whether he had a mental health diagnosis 
which required treatment.  
(4) It was not known whether as a result of this death there had been any lessons 
learned by the teams involved in care and treatment of Billy Jenkins, or whether there 
had been any training or support requirements identified for the Community Mental 
Health Nurse. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and  
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 17 April 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Person: 
may find it useful or of interest. 

 I have also sent it to 

 Trust Investigator who 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

21 February 2020                                              Jacqueline Devonish

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation (PDF)
11 April 2020 

Private & Confidential 

Ms Jacqueline Devonish 
Assistant Coroner 
South London Coroner’s Office 

Dear Madam, 

Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust 

Pinewood House 
Pinewood Place 
Dartford 
Kent 
DA2 7WG 

Tel: 01322 625700 
Fax: 01322 625727 

Regulation 28 response to Prevent Future Deaths Report following the inquest touching the 
death of Mr Billy Jenkins  

Thank you for your correspondence of 21 February 2020 containing a regulation 28 Report to 
Prevent Future Deaths (PFD), following the inquest into the death of Mr Billy Jenkins which 
concluded on the 20 February 2020. This response is made on behalf of Oxleas NHS Foundation 
Trust in regard to the issues of concern outlined below; 

1.  The findings of the internal investigation by Oxleas NHS were that the 

assessment undertaken by the Community Mental Health Nurse did not elicit 
sufficient information to enable the multidisciplinary (MDT) team to properly 
review Mr Jenkins mental health. Despite this the MDT proceeded with a review 
and decided that he did not have a mental health condition without seeking 
further assessment. 

2.  The Community Mental Health Nurse did not document her formulation or 
impression. The plan moving forward was not robust and did not explore 
protective factors or minimise harm and there was an over reliance on alcohol 
and drug use as the cause of is suicidal ideation. There appeared to be no 
proforma of questions to ask. 

3.  As a direct consequence of the limited information gathering Mr Jenkins was not 

properly assessed and it was not known whether he had a mental health 
diagnosis which required treatment. 

4.  It was not known whether as a result of this death there had been any lessons 
learned by the teams involved in care and treatment of him, or whether there 
had been any training or support requirements identified for the community 
mental health nurse. 

My response provides further context regarding the expectations of the Trust regarding the 
assessment process. As outlined in the Trust Root Cause Analysis (RCA) investigation the 
assessments conducted did not meet the expected standards of the organisation.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The nurse referred to in your concerns, who conducted the assessment, is an agency member 
of staff who has worked with various teams within the Bexley community mental health service 
for over two years. Whilst we endeavour to recruit permanent members of the Team we 
invariably utilise agency staff as vacancies arise and due to the individual’s knowledge of the 
service she has been utilised in different teams during those two years as vacancies arose.  

Due to her on-going work she has been treated as a permanent member of the Team receiving 
supervision and training regarding the expectations of the role as well as clinical cases reviews 
and discussions. Her work had always been deemed to be of a high standard by differing Team 
managers she had come into contact with. Despite this however, the quality of the assessment 
process did not meet the Trusts expectations and standards in the case of Mr Jenkins. This has 
been followed up in detail with the nurse in question who has been very distressed by the 
death of Mr Jenkins and noted gaps in her practice. A plan has been put in place to carefully 
monitor and evaluate her work to ensure that she has understood the expectations of the role 
and demonstrates an improvement in her practice whilst she remains working in the Trust. The 
operational manager of the community mental health service is responsible for ensuring this is 
achieved. 

Following this incident we have taken further measures to ensure the assessment of patients 
within the community mental health team are robustly managed in order to ensure that the 
MDT has sufficient information to review an assessment and to ensure that where there is any 
disparity in diagnosis that a further face to face assessment is conducted. The operational team 
manager is monitoring this practice through discussions in Team meetings, supervisions and 
MDT case discussions. 

I will set out in more detail below the changes we have made in relation to all four issues you 
have outlined. 

As a result of the incident the community mental team core induction tool was sent to all CMHT 
managers to go through with all the new starters and other established colleagues to reinforce 
the expectations of their roles and the assessment process. This was shared with all staff in 
supervision and an email has also been sent to all members of staff. Reflective practice sessions 
have also been conducted focusing on documentation and record keeping, particularly 
assessment (needs and risk) and formulation. The impact of this is being monitored in Team 
meetings and in reflective practice meetings. This will be reviewed again after the current 
unusual working practices in relation to Covid 19. 

In addition to the above, the quality of the assessments being carried out is monitored within 
team meetings and in 1:1 supervision. Monthly care plan audits is an additional system to 
monitor quality and standards of practice, it also dictates that we are reviewing the quality of 
assessments conducted. The operational team manager is responsible for reviewing and 
actioning areas of improvement arising from this. 

In order to further support staff we have instigated a Trust wide rolling programme of training 
for mental health community teams. This consists of STORM, a two day suicide prevention 
programme which offers skills based training in risk assessment and safety planning. Also we 
have rolled out DICES an evidence based approach to assess and manage risks. The checklist 
provided during this training support the formulation of risk in the risk assessment utilised by 
the Team. The training supports staff to notice and assess any risks present, manage the risk 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 take action to minimise the possibility of the risk happening and demonstrate that you have 
assessed and managed the risk as well as it is possible to do so  and thus supporting timely and 
effective treatment. The operational manager of the community mental health team is 
monitoring to ensure all new and existing staff have attended the training and sessions will be 
on-going following the current Covid 19 situation. We are also exploring online versions of 
training in the meantime.  Other individual training needs are being picked up in Supervisions to 
ensure practice meets the required standards. Although the community mental health nurse is 
an agency worker as she has worked across a number of the teams that form the community 
mental health service she will also access the training and supervision outlined. 

Since the death of Mr Jenkins the RCA report has been shared with the team and across the 
Trust so that similar Teams can reflect on the lessons learnt. The actions arising from the 
investigation have also been implemented including areas addressed above. Additional learning 
reflects the need to ensure that all service users who are receiving care and treatment from 
Oxleas mental health services and also use drugs and or alcohol have equal access to all strands 
of treatment available to those who are not using substances. Only if there is clear evidence 
that the use of substances will impact on the ability to clinically benefit from any treatment 
would a decision be made to withhold treatment and in these instances this would be reviewed 
regularly with the service user and the team. 

I hope my response has adequately addressed your concerns. 

Yours sincerely  

Dr Ify Okocha 
Acting Chief Executive 

cc 

 Service Director 
 Clinical Director 
 Associate Director 

3

Related reports

Other reports by Jacqueline Devonish

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.