Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Kenneth Clarke

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0088, written 27 Feb 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Feb 2020
Reference2020-0088
DeceasedKenneth Clarke
CoronerEmma Serrano
Coroner areaDerby and Derbyshire
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Normanton Village View Nursing Home, Derby;

2. Rushcliffe Care;

3. Care Quality Commission;

4. Chief.Coroner; and

5. Family of the deceased.

1 | CORONER

| am Emma Serrano, Assistant Coroner, for the Coroners Area of the Derby and
Derbyshire.

2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS ; |

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST |

On the 3% August 2017, | commenced an investigation into the death of Mr Kenneth
Clarke. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25 February 2020. The
conclusion of the inquest was misadventure contributed to by neglect of the Nursing
Home Mr Kenneth Clarke was resident in.

The cause of death was:

1a Inhalation of food material.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

i) Mr Clarke was a 74 year old gentleman who was. resident in Normanton
Village View Nursing home. “His past medical history included strokes,
which had left him with issue swallowing, and thus a high risk of chocking.
He also suffered with dementia. He was on a puree only food diet but his
dementia meant he did not appreciate this and would often wonder round
the home in search of food.

ii) .Mr Clarke had been risk assessed by the home and to reduce his risk of

: choking, measures were put in place. Firstly, he was on a puree food diet.
Secondly, he had a he had a pressure sensor mat to the side of his bed to
alert staff when he left his room.. Thirdly, staff.were to be. stationed at
observation points around to observe if patients left their rooms. . Fourthly,
the kitchen, where food could be accessed, was to be locked and had.a pin
operated lock'was in place. Finally, food was to be kept in cupboards in the
kitchen or in the fridge.

[IL1: PROTECT]

iii) On the 23 July 2017 Mr Clarke left his room. The pressure sensor mat did
not activate. It is not clear whether this was because it was not working.
Whether it was in the correct place, or whether Mr Clarke moved it himself.
The staff at the home were not at the designated observation points and did
not see him leave his room. He made his way to the kitchen, which was
unlocked. He ate a piece of bread that had been left out and not put away
in a cupboard or fridge. He choked and died.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. in
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. :

.| The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1. Evidence emerged during the inquest.that Normanton Village View Nursing
Home had no formal policies covering how residents were to be observed, how
foods were to be ‘stored, locks on the kitchen and cupboards, dementia
residents or residents on.a liquid food diet.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the
power to take such action.

1. -You may wish to consider a review of the policies governing Normanton Village
View Nursing Home and other Homes within the group.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to.this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 16 April 2020.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. .

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:

1. Family of the deceased;

2. Normanton Village view Care Home;

3. . Rushcliffe care; and

4. . Care Quality Commission.
| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send _a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful

or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication. of your response by the Chief Coroner.

27 February 2020

[IL1; PROTECT]

Se Risser

Miss Emma Serrano
Assistant Coroner
Derby and Derbyshire Coroners Area

[IL1: PROTECT]

Related reports

Other reports by Emma Serrano

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.