Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Darren King

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0090, written 6 Apr 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report6 Apr 2020
Reference2020-0090
DeceasedDarren King
CoronerNigel Parsley
Coroner areaSuffolk
CategoryCommunity health care
Organisation namedNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Head of the Adult and Community Services 
Suffolk County Council 
Endeavour House 
8 Russell Road 
Ipswich 
IP1 2BX 

The Chief Executive Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, 
Trust Headquarters 
Hellesdon Hospital 
Drayton High Road 
Norwich 
NR6 5BE. 

1 

CORONER 

I am Nigel Parsley, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Suffolk. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 3rd August 2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Darren Edward 
KING 

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 24th February 2020. The 
conclusion of the inquest was that the death was the result of:- 

Darren King died as the result of an accidental death following an epileptic 
seizure whilst in his bath.  

The medical cause of death was confirmed as: 

1a Drowning  
1b Epileptic seizure 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Darren King died on or before the 8th April 2017 at his home address of 
Dell Road East, Lowestoft in Suffolk. 

When found by his mother, late on the 8th April 2017, Darren was unresponsive with 
his head under the water in the bath. Darren had a known history of epilepsy, autism 
and learning difficulties. 

Following his death, a post-mortem examination concluded that Darren’s medical 
cause of death was drowning as the result of an epileptic fit. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 At the time of his death Darren was under the care of Suffolk County Council Adult 
and Community Services, the Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust and his local 
General Practitioner. 

Because of the complexity of Darren’s case he was on a multi-disciplinary/agency 
CPA (Care Plan Approach) the management of which was undertaken by a care co-
ordinator. 

When the CPA was commenced, it was documented that the agencies involved were 
aware of the significant risk bathing posed to Darren, due to his epilepsy.  

Darren had an identified poor record for attending both medical and social care 
meetings, however his poor attendance increased after June 2016. 

This increased lack of engagement appeared to have coincided with staff changes 
and a new management responsibility for a newly designated care co-ordinator.  

The last contact his care coordinator from the Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust 
had in person with Darren was in June 2016. 

In September 2016 Darren saw his GP. At this time Darren was having seizures up to 
three times a week (previously Darren had suffered from these approximately three 
times per month). Darren’s epilepsy medication was increased, and he was told he 
needed a further epilepsy treatment review in three weeks time.  

This was the last reported contact with a medical or mental health professional 
regarding Darren’s epilepsy treatment plan and, although seen by support workers 
from other CPA agencies, there was no further contact made with him by medical or 
mental health professionals in the 6 months leading up to his death. 

As a result of this lack of contact, there was no opportunity to review Darren’s 
epilepsy treatment regime and no opportunity to effectively monitor his seizure 
history.  

On a balance of probability basis had opportunities to provide adequate monitoring 
and treatment relating to Darren’s epilepsy been taken, then his death may have been 
prevented. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In 
the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you; 

the MATTERS OF CONCERN as follows.  –  

In Darren’s case it was clear that due to his learning disability and autism, 
engagement with him could be difficult. 

However, the following three areas of concern were identified. 

1. The lack of effective follow up action when a patient with learning disabilities 
disengages, especially when they are a high-risk patient (such as Darren). 

2. The lack of a clear escalation process when an increased risk is identified 
and this risk cannot be easily addressed (as it was in Darren’s case). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3. The lack of a structured medication review as part of the overall Care Plan 
Approach so that staff from all agencies involved are aware of the importance 
of medication compliance and understand the referral/escalation routes should 
they have a concern.   

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you or 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 2nd June 2020 I, the Senior Coroner, may extend the period if I consider it 
reasonable to do so. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting 
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons; Darren’s family and 

 GP. 

I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it 
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the 
time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the 
Chief Coroner. 

9 

Nigel Parsley    6th April 2019

Related reports

Other reports by Nigel Parsley

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care”

See all →

Track Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.