Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0140, written 13 Jul 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 13 Jul 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0140 |
| Deceased | John Cheetham |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Greater Manchester South |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Emergency Services related deaths |
| Organisation named | Stockport NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Secretary of State for Health; Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership 1 CORONER I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Greater Manchester South 2 CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 25th January 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of John Cheetham. The investigation concluded on the 26th June 2020 and the conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from the complications of an unwitnessed fall whilst unobserved during a prolonged wait In the Emergency Department for a hospital bed. The medical cause of death was 1a) Cerebral oedema; 1b) lntracranial haemorrhage (right parietal haematoma); 1c) Falli II) Clostridium difficile infection, cervical odontoid fracture, metallic aortic valve replacement, rib fractures I I I I 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH John Cheetham had an accidental fall at his home address and was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital on 22nd December at 08:11. A CT scan identified he had fractured his odontoid peg and ribs. A decision was made to admit him to hospital. He was a high falls risk, A medical bed was not available due to bed capacity. At 02:00 he remained in the Emergency Department, 18 hours after his arrival awaiting a bed. Whilst unobserved he fell. A CT scan Identified he had sustained a subarachnoid haemorrhage from the fall. He was moved to a medical ward at 16:40 on 23rd December from the Emergency Department. A repeat CT scan on 23rd December showed the bleed was increasing. His GCS was 9. His anticoagulation had been reversed and his INR was 1.2. On 31st December his infection markers were raised and on 1st January antibiotics were given for a chest infection. His NEWS improved and on 8th January antibiotics were stopped. On 18th January 2020 he deteriorated with a GCS of 3 and NEWS of 7. A CT scan showed significant cerebral oedema. He had also developed Clostridium Difficile. Treatment was given including antiwseizure medication and antibiotics. He continued to deteriorate and died on 19th January 2020 at Stepping Hill Hospital. 5 CORONER'S CONCERNS I I I During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATIERS OF CONCERN are as follows. - 1. The inquest heard that since the events leading up to Mr Cheetham's death the Trust has taken steps to reduce the risk of falls in the Emergency Department. The inquest heard evidence that a number of the issues that led to his death are part of a wider national issue. 2. The evidence given to the inquest was that the Trust and all other acute hospitals in Greater Manchester were at that time facing significant challenges in terms of ED capacity. The capacity issues on that day were not one off but had been on going throughout December and continued through the winter months. As a result the ED was regularly overcrowded and elderly, vulnerable patients were regularly waiting for very long periods of time in unsuitable conditions in the ED. 3. The prolonged wait Mr Cheetham had was a result of lack of bed capacity. The inquest was told that this was due to delayed discharges of elderly in-patients back into the community because of challenges faced by adult social care. On the day that Mr Cheetham was waiting for a bed there were over 20 other patients in a similar position waiting for an in-patient bed. 4. The inquest was also told that a shortage of nurses nationally trained to work in ED had meant that the unit was short staffed on the night he fell and suffered a catastrophic injury. 5. In his case a risk assessment was not carried out at the earliest opportunity. The inquest heard that when an ED is facing the demands caused by capacity issues risk assessments are not always prioritised increasing the risks faced by elderly patients at risk of falls. I 2 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 7th September 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons, namely Mrs the deceased, who may find it useful or of interest. wife of I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time ·of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Alison Mutch OBE HM Senior Coroner 13.07.2020 3 •
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Greater Manchester Health & Social Care Partnership 4th Floor 3 Piccadilly Place London Road Manchester M1 3BN Telephone No: Email address: @nhs.net Ms Alison Mutch OBE HM Senior Coroner By email Ref: 1629209 28 August 2020 Dear Ms Mutch I would like to advise you that Dr Health and Social Care Partnership which is why I am responding to your concerns in his stead. has left the Greater Manchester I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 report you issued on the 13th July 2020, following the inquest into the death of John Cheetham at Stockport Hospital. You raised a number of concerns and requested a response to confirm actions taken and any further proposed actions. I have responded to each of your individual points below. Points 1 and 2 – high levels of demand and Emergency Department capacity The national and local pressures on the urgent and emergency care system have been well publicised during the course of the last year, with Greater Manchester experiencing significantly higher levels of attendances during the winter months. Attendances were, on average, 9% higher than the previous year which is about an extra 9000 attendances per month across Greater Manchester. This also resulted in a higher number of patients requiring admission to acute hospital beds and therefore crowding and delays within Emergency Departments. As a result of this, the Greater Manchester Urgent and Emergency Care (UEC) Transformation Board agreed a revised transformation plan in early January this year with two principle ambitions: • To reduce attendances to Emergency Departments (ED) by improving access to, and utilisation of, primary and community-based services by rapidly developing and testing a GM ‘UEC by Appointment’ model • By April 2022, we will reduce: • Ambulance attendances by 100 per day across GM • ED walk in attendances by 300 per day across GM The onset of the COVID 19 crisis delayed the transformation programme until more recently where we have refreshed our planning work and agreed to rapidly implement new models of care during September and October this year (ahead of winter). The new approach will incorporate two elements: • • Implementation of the new national NHS 111 First Initiative, which will ask patients to call 111 prior to attending an Emergency Department A new pre-Emergency Department triage and streaming system Both of these will help ensure patients are streamed or referred to the most appropriate service for their needs. This will include a wide range of community and acute-based services and will ensure only patients who need an Emergency Department go to an Emergency Department. A large proportion of patients will receive early local clinical assessment prior to being referred which will help ensure safety. We estimate that the new models of care will reduce Emergency Department attendances by around 900 per day across Greater Manchester. It is also worth noting that GMHSCP has a Greater Manchester Urgent and Emergency Care Operational Hub, which is designed to provide real time support to local systems by monitoring and managing patient flow. The hub has a near to real time data feed from all acute hospital sites, which it uses to support decision making around deflection of ambulances to alternative destinations when a hospital emergency department is showing signs of pressure. The hub also supports the management of discharges from hospital and repatriations between hospital sites (in and out of the GM area). The hub is under constant development and is working closely with systems to develop more sophisticated methods of managing demand to reduce the likelihood of emergency department crowding even further and proactively managing flow to prevent blockages. Point 3 – hospital bed capacity and the discharge of patients As part of the initial COVID 19 response, Greater Manchester localities worked to rapidly develop updated Discharge to Assess Pathway Guidance, which were formally approved in late April and have now been adopted across all localities within Greater Manchester. The purpose of the guidance is to improve the flow of all patients being discharged from acute care and to help ensure patients’ needs are assessed in the home or usual place of residence. The guidance is also designed to improve consistency across organisational and geographical boundaries, thereby minimising unnecessary delays for patients. To help improve the consistency and operation of the pathways at the interface between different organisations, it has been agreed that the following elements of the guidance are required to be implemented by all localities: Adoption of a single GM Discharge to Assess Referral Form • Triage of discharge to assess referrals within 30mins • Adherence to the guidance for COVID 19 testing for discharge and PPE requirements • The supply of 2 weeks medication supplies at the point of discharge from an • acute hospital Operation of a next day follow up process following discharge (localities to determine how this is delivered) The guidance is fully aligned with national policy and guidance and there has been significant additional community-based capacity created to support this. As a result, there has been a significant reduction in the proportion of long stay patients and acute hospital bed occupancy levels across all Greater Manchester sites. This has helped to improve flow from Emergency Departments and therefore helped reduce crowding. Bed occupancy is currently on average 83% across Greater Manchester, which is at least 10% lower than the same period last year. Point 4- nursing workforce Nurse recruitment and retention is a priority for the Greater Manchester system and work is underway with Greater Manchester service colleagues, NHSE/I and Health Education England, in order to maximise opportunities for improved nurse staffing in all localities. The GMHSCP executive workforce lead is planning to meet with the Stockport Trust HR lead over the next month and will agree any further support that is required. I am also aware that Stockport Trust have recently recruited 30 nurses following an overseas recruitment exercise. These staff will be used to improve ward staffing levels which will also have a positive impact in terms of ongoing care and flow of patients. The national Emergency Care Intensive Support Team (ECIST) have also recently completed a review of Emergency Department Staffing and agreed a plan with the trust to make improvements ahead of winter. Point 5 – risk assessment of patients in the Emergency Department Ensuring patient safety and quality of care in Emergency Departments, particularly in times of increased pressure, is highly important in Greater Manchester. All of the acute trusts in Greater Manchester now utilise a patient safety checklist in their Emergency Departments. These checklists are time-based frameworks that outline clinical tasks that need completing for each patient in the first hours of their admittance to an ED. It ensures that assessments and tests happen in a timely way in order to improve patient satisfaction and reduce risks. These have been adopted from the national checklist template which was published in 2017 and which has been proven to improve clinical processes and reduce harm and serious incidents from unrecognised patient deterioration. In addition to this, clinical leads from Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in Greater Manchester carry out regular walkrounds of their respective acute trusts and as part of these, usage of the checklist is monitored. I hope this response is satisfactory and provides sufficient assurance on the work we have undertaken to help mitigate risks to patients in the future. Your sincerely Interim Chief Officer, Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership
ae From Edward Argar MP
Departm ent Minister of State for Health
of Health & 39 vidocs Stet
Social Care SWIH OEU
020 7210 4850
Your Ref: 1629209
Our Ref: PFD-1239582
Ms Alison Patricia Mutch
HM Senior Coroner, Manchester South
HM Coroner's Court
1 Mount Tabor Street
Stockport SK1 3AG
Thank you for your letter of 13 July 2020 to Matt Hancock about the death of John
Cheetham. | am responding as Minister with portfolio responsibility for NHS operational
performance, including emergency care and winter planning and | am grateful for the
additional time in which to do so.
ms
28 September 2020
Let me start by offering my sincere condolences to Mr Cheetham’s family and loved ones.
| was very saddened to read about the circumstances of Mr Cheetham’s death. The
length of time Mr Cheetham spent in the emergency department at Stepping Hill Hospital,
Stockport is clearly unacceptable and his fall and the injuries he sustained there, are
deeply regrettable. It is important that we take the learnings from Mr Cheetham’s death to
improve the safety and quality of NHS care.
My officials have made enquiries with the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the
independent regulator of quality, and NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSEl) and |
am aware that regulatory action was taken by the CQC following an inspection at Stepping
Hill Hospital in January and February this year. The CQC’s inspection looked at urgent
and emergency services, among other services, and identified significant concerns similar
to those identified in your investigation of Mr Cheetham’s death. The CQC found that
people were not always kept safe and were at high risk of avoidable harm during periods
of heavy demand on urgent and emergency care services. Emergency care was
consistently unable to be provided in a timely way; and there were significant issues with
the flow of patients through the emergency department and the Hospital. The report of the
CQC’s inspection is available on its website’.
It is essential that health system partners in Stockport take the necessary action, quickly,
to respond to these findings and improve the safety and quality of urgent and emergency
services in Stockport.
‘ https:/Avww.cqc.org.uk/provider/RWJ
| am advised that following the CQC's inspection, health system partners in Stockport
formed a system improvement board, that has representation from CQC and NHSEI, to
oversee the implementation of an improvement plan to address the concerns identified. |
expect this work to also take into account the findings of your investigation into Mr
Cheetham's death. My officials have brought the concerns in your report to the attention
of NHSEI and the CQC.
| am assured that progress is being closely monitored by the Trust Board and that the
CQC is also monitoring progress and conducted a follow up inspection in August 2020.
{ would like to explain the national level action we are taking to support the NHS to
respond to the year-on-year increase in demand on NHS services and in particular,
alleviate the impact of increased activity in the winter.
In 2019/20, this involved continued work to tackle both the increases in demand in urgent
and emergency care and to ensure patients receive the quality of care they need and
expect in a timely and safe manner. For example, the continued roll out of Urgent
Treatment Centres, offering a consistent service to patients and introducing the ability to
book appointments through NHS 111, as well as initiatives such as Same Day Emergency
Care, to reduce non-elective admissions to hospital.
This year, we have provided an extra £3billion to alleviate the particular challenges
brought by the Covid-19 pandemic ahead of winter and are maintaining the Nightingale
Hospitals and their surge capacity, as well as the NHS's use of independent sector
hospital capacity.
Other elements of the NHS winter plan for 2020/21 include ‘NHS 111 First’ which will
provide low complex care digitally and ensure those who need more care can receive it in
the right setting more quickly, rather than waiting in A&E2.
NHS Trusts across England, including the Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, will receive a
share of £300million additional capital funding to upgrade their facilities ahead of this
winter and ensure the NHS is prepared to cope with winter pressures and reduce the risks
associated with further outbreaks of Covid-19.
The NHS Long Term Plan3, published in January 2019, is supporting the reform of urgent
and emergency care services to ensure that patients get the care they need quickly,
relieve pressure on A&E departments, and manage winter demand spikes. The NHS Long
Term Plan is supported by an NHS budget increase of £33.9billion in cash terms by
2023/24.
This year we made £1 .3billion funding available via the NHS to support the hospital
discharge process in March. As part of the £3billion funding for winter, an extra
£588million has been confirmed to continue enhanced discharge arrangements over
winter and maintain the safe and timely discharge of patients from hospital.
3 https:/Avww.longtermplan.nhs.uk/
We know that aduit social care capacity can become increasingly pressured over the
winter months and this can have a knock-on effect on NHS hospitals. It is important that
suitable packages of care are available to ensure that patients who are medically fit to be
discharged are able to return home and into their communities. This frees up hospital beds.
and ensures that people who really need hospital care, receive it.
Despite the fact that the NHS is busier than ever before, with hospital admissions rising by
18 per cent from 2009/10, the majority of patients are discharged quickly. Both the NHS
and social care services have been working hard to reduce delays and free up beds.
Itis the responsibility of the NHS and its local partners, including social service
departments, to ensure that no patient remains in a hospital bed for longer than clinically
necessary and that any ongoing care and support can begin promptly. Discharge
arrangements from hospital should start well before a patient is actually ready for
discharge, and the hospital should involve local social services at the earliest opportunity
to plan post-discharge care and avoid delays.
The NHS Long Term Plan commits funding worth £4.5billion per year by 2023/24 to be
focused on primary and community care. This includes a national roll-out of support for
care home residents so more people can be looked after where they live. The NHS also
aims to place therapy and social work teams at the beginning of the acute hospital
pathway, setting an expectation that patients will have an agreed clinical care plan within
14 hours of admission, including an expected date of discharge.
In relation to the matter of concern in your report about a shortage of nurses trained to
work in emergency departments, | would like to assure you that ensuring the NHS has the
Staff it needs, especially our nursing staff who are the absolute bedrock of the NHS and
care system, is and will remain, a priority for this Government. That is why we made our
manifesto pledge to deliver 50,000 more nurses in our NHS by 2025, which we will
achieve through a combination of investing in and diversifying our training pipeline, as well
as recruiting and retaining more nurses in the NHS.
In relation to emergency nursing specifically, the Health Education England (HEE)
‘Securing the Workforce strategy’*, confirmed that the emergency department registered
nursing workforce had grown by 17 per cent, from 12,491 to 14,613 WTE between 2012
and 2017. More recent figures show that between March 2019 and March 2020 there was
a 7.2 per cent increase in the number of full-time equivalent nurses working in A&E®.
However, we know that attendances and admissions have continued to rise, as has the
overall complexity of the needs of patients.
* https:/improvement.nhs.uk/documents/1826/Emergency department workforce plan _-
111017 Final.3.pdf
5 Figures published by NHS Digital in its NHS Workforce Statistics publication show the number of full time
equivalent (FTE) nurses reported as having the Area of Work ‘A&E’ at March 2020 was 15,593, an increase
of 7.2 per cent from March 2019. This includes paediatric A+E nurses. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-
information/publications/statistical/nhs-workforce-statistics/march-2020. Note the definition used for AGE staff
by HEE is not consistent with the definition used to present changes over the past year.
Emergency Nursing is a post graduate career choice, and while there is no NMC®
mandated post graduate education for nurses who choose to work in emergency
departments, HEE supports post graduate learning through the Workforce Development
and Workforce Transformation Funding and more recently with increased Continuing
Professional Development allocations of £1,000 per registrant over three years.
In addition, HEE has worked with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine to develop an
education and training pathway to credential advanced practitioners alongside masters’
level education and standardise the development pathway for more senior nurses in the
emergency department.
Finally, with regard to fails prevention, the National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence (NICE) has published a clinical! guideline on Falls in older people: assessing
risk and prevention (CG1617) that includes guidance on preventing falls in older people
during a hospital stay. The guideline says:
1.2.2.1 Ensure that aspects of the inpatient environment (including flooring, lighting,
furniture and fittings such as hand holds) that could affect patients' risk of falling are
systematically identified and addressed
This recommendation would apply to wards, toilets and other parts of the hospital. The
guideline recommends that for patients at risk of falling in hospital, an assessment of the
patient’s individual risk factors should be conducted and where necessary, appropriate
intervention put in place. NHS trusts are expected to take account of NICE guidelines
when planning care.
[hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention.
EDWARD ARGAR MP
§ Nursing and Midwifery Council.
7 hitps://www.nice.org.uk/quidance/cg161
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.