Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0206, written 9 Oct 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 9 Oct 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0206 |
| Deceased | Noah Poole |
| Coroner | Laurinda Bower |
| Coroner area | Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
The Royal College of Nursing and Midwifery
1
CORONER
I am Laurinda Bower, HM Assistant Coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28
and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 20 January 2019, I commenced an investigation into the death of NOAH RICHARD POOLE.
The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest heard over 5 days on Monday 14 September 2020
with judgment handed down today, 9 October 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was that NOAH
RICHARD POOLE died as a result of a head injury sustained during his delivery by caesarean section
1a. Head Injury
1b
1c
II
CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH
4
Noah Richard Poole was born by emergency caesarean section delivery at the Pilgrim Hospital, Boston,
Lincolnshire, on 11 January 2019. He was transferred to the Neonatal Tertiary Centre at the City Hospital,
Nottingham, on 12 January 2019, and died there on 19 January 2019, aged 8 days.
Noah died as a result of complications of a head injury that was sustained during his difficult extraction by
caesarean delivery. The Doctor or Nurse attempting to free Noah’s head from inside the maternal pelvis
caused a depressed fracture to his skull by the force applied from a finger or fingers. The fracture more
than minimally contributed to his death.
There was a missed opportunity to deliver Noah safely by way of a caesarean section at 36 weeks in
accordance with maternal wishes. The Trust failed to expressly inform Noah’s Mother of her right to
request an elective caesarean section, in accordance with NHS guidance for a twin pregnancy.
Furthermore, the medical professionals caring for Mrs Poole, failed to properly take account of her
expressed wishes to have a pre-planned caesarean section.
The Trust failed on multiple occasions to properly counsel Noah’s Mother as to the risks and benefits of
the two modes of delivery.
##DW<<corAddress>>
Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>>
Senior Obstetric Staff were confused about what guidance ought to be given to Mother’s expecting
multiple births, and when those conversations ought to happen. This important conversation was
repeatedly deferred to the next appointment such that it never happened and there was no agreed birth
plan. The Trust’s guidance is unclear and excluded any reference to elective caesarean sections, in conflict
with national guidance.
As a result, Noah’s Mother was not in a position to provide properly informed consent to the induction of
labour procedure that occurred on 11 January 2019. If Noah’s mother had been properly counselled as to
the two modes of delivery, she would have chosen a pre-planned caesarean section delivery at around 36
weeks gestation when there is no reason to suggest Noah would not have survived.
Therefore, the failings with regards to agreeing a mode of delivery between patient and any doctor, more
than minimally contributed to Noah’s death.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there
is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
(1) Lack of professional Guidance regarding the use of a vaginal push to disimpact the fetal head
Almost all of the Midwives in this case told me that they had been asked perform a ‘vaginal push’ in
theatre at some point in their career, but it is not something that frequently occurs, nor is it something they
are trained to do.
Furthermore, practice varies between doctors as to whether they ask a fellow doctor to provide the vaginal
push, or a midwife, and whether they provide the individual with any guidance on exactly what they
should do.
The Midwife did exactly what was asked of her to “push” Noah’s head. She performed this in the usual
way that midwives perform a vaginal examination, that is, with two pointed digits.
I have been unable to determine whether it was the Doctor’s fingers or the Midwife’s fingers that caused
the depressed fracture to Noah’s head, but both are a possibility, and the issue remains that midwives are
asked to perform a manoeuvre in a theatre environment for which they have received no training nor is
there any professional guidance.
Equally, there is no guidance for the Doctor as to whether and what information they ought to impart to
the midwife before they embark on the procedure.
(2) Lack of Professional Guidance in relation to the use of fetal pillows
The inquest further discovered that the understanding on the use of fetal pillows in this scenario is
inconsistent. The manufacturers appear to suggest that the mother’s cervix should be at least 8cm dilated,
but again, practice and understanding seems to vary.
I made enquiries of the Health Sector Investigation Branch. They were not aware of any national guidance
either on vaginal pushes in theatre or the use of fetal pillows. Nor could I find any guidance on the RCNM
website. The Trust has made enquiries of the RCOG and other Trusts, but again there appears to be an
absence of guidance and variation of practice across the Country.
While I accept the incidence of traumatic head injury as a result of difficult fetal extraction is, thankfully,
rare, and that midwives are only asked to provide a vaginal push ‘in extremis’, any procedure should be
performed by a competent and capable individual who has the support of robust professional guidance to
assist them.
##DW<<corAddress>>
Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>>
All witnesses in this case said it would be useful to have multidisciplinary guidance and training on this
issue.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take
action in relation to the above matters.
The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
The Royal College of Nursing and Midwifery
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 4
December 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period upon consideration of a written request.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
In addition to the organisations identified in section 6 above, I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief
Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:
The Poole Family and their Lawyers
United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust and their Lawyers
The Care Quality Commission and
The Health Sector Investigation Branch
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of the responses received from the organisations
listed in section 6 above.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
9 October 2020
Signature_________________________
Miss Laurinda Bower, Assistant Coroner, Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire
##DW<<corAddress>>
Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>>
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
By email Laurinda Bower HM Assistant Coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 3 December 2020 Dear Miss Bower, Re: Regulation 28 report into the death of Baby Noah Richard Poole Thank you for your letter of 9 October detailing the sad death of Baby Noah Richard Poole in January 2019. For background, impacted fetal head (IFH) at caesarean section delivery is an emerging issue nationally that has been recognised by NHS Resolution [1] who made a series of recommendations: • Increase awareness of impacted fetal head and difficult delivery of the fetal head at caesarean section, including the techniques required for care. • Research to understand the prevalence, causes and management of impacted fetal head is a priority, along with effective training in the management techniques IFH is also recognised as an emerging problem in Australia and the US. In your report you raise two matters of concern: (1) Lack of professional guidance regarding the use of a vaginal push to disimpact the fetal head (2) Lack of professional guidance in relation to the use of fetal pillows In our response we would like to address these issues in turn, setting out the current guidance and state of the evidence around each issue. 1. The use of a vaginal push to disimpact the fetal head Several techniques are described to deliver an IFH: • The push technique: assistant inserts a hand into the vagina to elevate the head with cupped fingers [2]. • The pull technique, or reverse breech extraction: operator grasps one/ both fetal legs from the upper segment delivering them through the uterine incision [3, 4]. • The Patwardhan method for occipito-anterior and transverse positions: operator delivers shoulders first and applies gentle traction at the fetal waist to deliver the body. The technique for occipito-posterior positions is a modification of the pull technique [5]. • The Fetal Pillow : a disposable soft silicone balloon device is inserted vaginally and inflated with saline to elevate the fetal head [6]. • Use of tocolytic agents to relax the uterus [7]. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2015, including 9 observational studies and 3 prospective randomised comparative studies (734 births) [8], demonstrated a lower risk of maternal complications such as extension of the uterine incision with the pull method compared with the push method. Although there were no statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes, one randomised comparative study suggested a possible increased risk of fetal morbidity with the push method. Studies of the Patwardhan method were small but there were fewer maternal complications compared with the push method [8]. A Cochrane review of IFH (4 randomised studies) [9], identified that the pull method may improve maternal outcomes, particularly reduced operative duration, compared to pushing. Tocolysis did not confer any significant benefit [9]. Currently, the first line approach for management of IFH tends to be based on individual familiarity and experience, rather than evidence of effectiveness. The pull and Patwardhan methods are infrequently used, despite possible advantages. In conclusion, given the lack of training in alternative techniques, it is reasonable that teams use the vaginal push technique. 2. The use of fetal pillows Please see our formal response to the NICE consultation on their fetal pillow guidance – enclosed. Summary The RCOG recognises that there is a current dearth in both guidelines and training for the management of IFH and we are committed to addressing this: • We have commissioned a Scientific Impact Paper on the management of IFH to inform practice. • There are at least two research groups in the UK working on training for IFH, including new mannequins. The RCOG commits to scaling this training nationally to improve outcomes. Thank you for your letter. I hope the above is helpful and demonstrates that the RCOG is very much committed to working to prevent tragedies such as the death of Baby Noah. If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely, Vice-President, Clinical Quality References 1. Resolution, N., Early Notification Scheme - Year 1. 2019, NHS Resolution: London. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Landesman, R. and E.A. Graber, Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1984. 148(6): p. 707-10. , A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014. 124(2): p. 99-105. second stage caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2012. 32(6): p. 548-51. et al., Second stage caesarean section: evaluation of patwardhan technique. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014. 8(1): p. 93-5. Reverse breech extraction in cases of , et al., Does elevating the fetal head prior to delivery using a fetal pillow reduce maternal and fetal complications in a full dilatation caesarean section? A prospective study with historical controls. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014. 34(3): p. 241-4. , Nitroglycerin to facilitate fetal extraction during cesarean delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998. 91(1): p. 119-24. deeply impacted fetal head at full dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015: p. n/a-n/a. , Comparison of techniques used to deliver a section., Editor. 1996, : Chichester. p. 45. Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.