Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0252, written 25 Nov 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 25 Nov 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0252 |
| Deceased | Trinder Birdi |
| Coroner | Nadia Persaud |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths · Community health care |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD
SENIOR CORONER
EAST LONDON
Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP
Telephone 020 8496 5000 Email coroners@walthamforest.gov.uk
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
Ref: 112405
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Professor
, Interim Chief Executive, North East London
Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, Barley Lane, Goodmayes, Ilford, Essex,
IG3 8XJ – Email:
@nelft.nhs.uk
1
CORONER
I am Nadia Persaud, senior coroner, for the coroner area of East London
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 30th July 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Trinder Kaur Birdi, 34
years old. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17th November 2020.
The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion:
Trinder Birdi had a history of depression and personality disorder. She presented with
low mood to her general practitioners from the 16th January 2020. On the 29th January
2020 she presented to her general practitioner and reported having taken two
paracetamol overdoses in the past two days. Her general practitioner assessed her as
high risk of suicide and referred her for an urgent psychiatric assessment in A & E. Ms
Birdi was seen by a psychiatric nurse on the same day who reduced the risk of suicide
to low. Ms Birdi reported to the nurse that she no longer wished to harm herself. A non-
urgent referral was made to the Community Mental Health Team. On the 12th February
2020 Ms Birdi was taken to hospital in acute liver failure. Maximum medical therapy was
provided but she did not recover. She passed away from the likely effect of drug toxicity
1
(self-administered). She was not seen by the Community Mental Health Team following
the non-urgent referral on the 29th January 2020.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
See narrative conclusion above.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
The general practitioner who had known Ms Birdi over a number of years and had seen
her for multiple mental health consultations had raised concerns with the A & E
psychiatric team that Ms Birdi was at a high risk of suicide. The GP considered that Ms
Birdi required an urgent psychiatric assessment and that Ms Birdi was at a high risk of
taking a further overdose with a higher number of tablets. Following assessment, the
same day, by a psychiatric liaison nurse who had never met the deceased before, the
risk to self was reduced to low. The risk was lowered from high to low, without any
consultation with the general practitioner or second opinion sought and documented
from a fellow psychiatric professional.
It is concerning that the risk to self can be downgraded by a member of staff, new to the
patient, following referral from a doctor who knows the patient well. There were no
safeguards in place for this circumstance, such as a discussion with the referring
general practitioner, second opinion from a fellow psychiatric clinician or assessment by
a psychiatric doctor.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the
power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 20th January 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons [family of Ms Birdi] I have also sent it to the CQC and the Director of Public
Health who may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it
useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest.
2
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
DATE: 25/11/2020
(Ms Nadia Persaud)
3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Ms Nadia Persaud
Senior Coroner
Waltham Forest Coroners Court
Queens Road
Walthamstow, London
E17 8QP
Sent via email:
Your Ref:
Our Ref:
Dear Ms Persaud
Chief Executive
Trust Head Office
West Wing
CEME Centre
Rainham
Essex
RM13 8GQ
17 December 2020
Re: Inquest touching upon the death of Trindi Kaur Birdi
I refer to your letter dated 25 November 2020 and the enclosed Regulation 28 report issued in
respect of your concerns regarding the risk assessment and management at Psychiatric
Liaison Service (PLS).
The Trust has taken into consideration concerns highlighted in the Regulation 28 report and
would like to briefly outline the current systems of safeguarding the service users’ risks as well as
inform you on what action will be taken to make these systems even more robust to address your
concerns.
Current Risk Assessment and Management arrangements
At present the systems to safeguard the patients risk within the trust include the following:
Clinical Risk Assessment and Management policy;
Clinical Risk Assessment and Management mandatory training – standard (one off) and
advanced modules (3-yearly)
Learning from Serious Incidents through quarterly directorate-led Lessons Learned
events and monthly team business meetings
Monthly risk assessment compliance audits
Monthly clinical supervision with all staff whereby 2-3 clinical cases are reviewed for
quality of assessment and care planning, including risk assessment
Policy
NELFT’s Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Policy outlines that NELFT staff should
recognise that other agencies may be carrying out risk assessments and have risk
management plans in relation to the same patients and that these should be considered.
The policy goes on to address actions that are to be taken where there is a significant
difference of opinion between professionals in the risk level or risk management of a patient.
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
It supports clinicians faced by complex presentations of significant levels of risk to seek
advice and support from senior colleagues on duty. Specifically, it outlines that, in the case
of different opinions/ conclusions between clinicians it is important for all involved in the risk
assessment to review their findings and to discuss the basis for their respective views.
Clinicians are instructed that it is not acceptable for an assessment of risk by one
professional, or team, to simply be ‘over-ruled’ or ignored by another. It is vital that any such
differences are identified, explored, understood and resolved.
The policy goes on to instruct staff to resolve this difference in opinion of risk by obtaining
the opinion of a suitably skilled senior clinician, or turning to a senior manager. All such
involvement should be documented. This should be done immediately if there is possibility of
a serious acute risk.
Further escalation in such matters includes encouraging involvement of the on-call
consultant and on-call manager, where required.
Training
The Trust has mandated Clinical Risk Training for clinical staff (non-medical and medical). The
standard module is mandated to be completed once and the advanced module is to be
completed every three years.
The training content includes outlining Best Practice guidance in risk assessment, learning from
the Francis Report and highlights key factors to consider in risk assessment, as documented in
the NELFT Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Policy. Two of these factors pertain to
this report: one is that positive risk management as part of a carefully constructed plan is a
required competence of all mental health practitioners, the other is that the risk management plan
should include a summary of all risks identified, formulations of the situations in which these risks
may occur and actions to be taken by the practitioner and service user in response to crisis.
Whilst the Clinical Risk Standard training does not go into detail regarding difference of opinion in
the risk level rating of a service user, the Clinical Risk Advanced training covers a variety of case
scenarios of which this may be one.
Risk assessment quality monitoring
The Trust has a system in place to proactively monitor the quality of the risk assessments. This is
to ensure that any deviation from the required standard will be proactively identified in a timely
fashion, instead of relying on a serious incident investigation, after a serious incident has taken
place, to review the quality of the risk assessments.
In the main, this is conducted through monthly ‘live’ RIO supervision where recent assessments,
risk assessments and care plans are scrutinized by the clinician and their immediate supervisor in
order to ensure practice standards are maintained. Performance issues that are identified within
these meetings are managed in line with the Trust’s Capability Policy.
I can confirm that the monthly supervision compliance for the Psychiatric Liaison Service
substantive staff is 100%. Bank staff who are employed temporarily in this service, who have
substantive roles in other teams, complete their monthly supervision as part of their substantive
roles.
Chair:
Interim Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
Action to improve the service
In order to improve the current systems briefly outlined above the trust has agreed to take further
actions as follows:
1. A requirement will be introduced for a referral to the on-call psychiatrist to be completed
where the presenting risk is significantly different to that of another clinician (including GP)
who has reviewed the patient on the same day.
2. The assessment template used within the Psychiatric Liaison Service will be amended to
to concerns raised by
prompt
friends/family/healthcare staff, protective factors and risk management plan.
the consideration given
the documentation of
3. A requirement will be introduced to conduct regular monthly clinical supervisions with all bank
staff who work on a temporary basis with the Psychiatric Liaison Service, where they are not
already receiving this within their substantive team.
4. The Psychiatric Liaison Service have committed to introducing a regular monthly session for
all staff within this service to learn from historic serious incidents and unexpected deaths.
5. A review of the Clinical Risk Advanced level training to include case scenarios that indicate a
difference in clinical opinion, and to reiterate guidance how to address these scenarios.
I hope that the above and the enclosed action plan provides reassurance to you that the Trust
has taken this sad incident very seriously and that it reflects our commitment to improve care
quality and patient safety. If you have any further queries, please contact my office on
.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
Chair:
Interim Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.