Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0024, written 2 Feb 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 2 Feb 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0024 |
| Deceased | Michael Yemm |
| Coroner | Yvonne Blake |
| Coroner area | Norfolk |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS . REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Director of Adult Social Services Norfolk County Council Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2DH Chief Executive Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Colney Lane Norwich NR4 7UY CORONER I am YVONNE BLAKE Area Coroner for the coroner area of NORFOLK CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 8 October 2020I commenced an investigation into the death of Michael Yemm aged 77years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 2 February 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was Cause of Death 1a) Advanced Dementia and at 2 Fractured Neck of Femur, Ischaemic Heart Disease. Conclusion- Natural Causes contributed to by several falls and fractured neck of femur. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Yemm had a complex medical history including diabetes, hypertension, LVF, hypothyroidism and thyrotoxicosis. He had developed vascular dementia in 2017. He was cared for at home by family until his care needs increased. He was admitted to hospital and discharged to a residential home, despite protests from his family that a nursing home was safer and more appropriate. He had several falls whilst there and was admitted to hospital again. Every time he was admitted and discharged, he had to isolate (covid) upon his return he the care home, exacerbating his distress. After his second admission the manager of the care home told the hospital that they would not accept him back as his needs could not be met by them. Despite this without notifying the care home, Mr Yemm was dropped off by hospital transport and the home had no option but to keep him as he was left there. They did manage to obtain extra help, but his care needs increased, and he was again admitted to hospital. He had an in-patient fall after climbing over raised bed rails in a bay with staff present and fractured his left hip which required and hemiarthroplasty. The operation was successful, but Mr Yemm deteriorated and died in hospital with his family at his bedside (not being informed as the consultant report stated) CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: That Mr Yemm was placed into a totally unsuitable and unsafe residential setting. Shortly after his arrival, the next day, the manager contacted Mr Yemm's social worker and told them they couldn’t look after him properly. Despite this he was left in this care home. Adult Social Services asking for help in finding a suitable placement and did not receive the courtesy of a reply. She was also told that after his falls that he had hairline fractures of his left hip before the fall in hospital. wrote to the Director of The hospital dropped Mr Yemm off back at the care home without any warning after being informed that they could not have him back. He was also discharged on insulin which the home could not administer as they do not have trained nursing staff. That he was able, in a cohorted patient bay, to climb past raised bedrails, he did not have a lowered bed, whilst staff were present. A cohorted bay has extra staff to deal with challenging patients and fell fracturing his hip, necessitating surgery. For the whole of his stay Mr Yemm was agitated, confused anxious and distressed, he had to move wards because of the need for surgery which further exacerbated his condition. [BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) The care home placement (2) The hospital discharge despite being told they couldn’t send him back, and just leaving him there. (3) The in-patient fall and care of dementia patients. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 30 March 2021. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: I have also sent it to: Department of Health Care Quality Commission HSIB Health Watch Norfolk who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9. Dated: 02 February 2021 Yvonne BLAKE Area Coroner for Norfolk Norfolk Coroner Service Carrow House 301 King Street Norwich NR1 2T
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Adult Social Services
County Hall
Martineau Lane
NORWICH
NR1 2DH
Tel:
Please ask for:
.
Direct dial:
Our ref:
Yvonne Blake
Area Coroner
Carrow House
301 King Street
Norwich
NR1 2TN
11 March 2021
Dear Yvonne
I understand how busy your department is at present and have attempted to contact
you several times by telephone. I had wanted to discuss this matter with you before
putting it in writing, but given the difficulties with the telephone system I wanted to ask if
you would be able to telephone me so we can discuss it further. My number is
.
I am writing to express some concerns and to request your review of the evidence
regarding the inquest held for Mr Michael Yemm on Tuesday 2 February 2021.
You will be aware that a Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths has been issued
to Norfolk County Council. However, I note that Norfolk County Council was not asked
to provide a report for the Coroner about our involvement with Mr Yemm, nor to
contribute to the inquest in any way.
There are a number of points I would like to raise with you regarding this matter from
the perspective of Norfolk County Council’s Adult Social Services Department, and to
ask that you would re-examine the evidence using the information received by Adult
Social Services from the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH).
You may be aware that in March 2020, the Department of Health and Social Care
published guidance requiring hospitals and local authorities to work together to
implement new Discharge to Assess (D2A) arrangements.
COVID-19 Discharge Service Requirements (March 2020, HM Government/NHS)
Hospital Discharge Service: Policy and Operating Model (August 2020, HM
Government/NHS)
D2A is a concept whereby patients are transferred from acute hospital at the point
where they no longer require acute hospital care through one of three pathways; either
Page 1 of 3
at home with support (pathway 1), in community based sub-acute bed with
rehabilitation and reablement (pathway 2) or in a care home sub-acute bed with
recovery and complex assessment (pathway 3). Thereafter any further health or social
care assessments are delivered outside of the acute hospital environment. There is a
focus on the hospital’s integrated discharge team who work with the ward to assess
and define health care needs in order to identify which pathway it is most appropriate.
At the point of discharge, care is fully funded by the NHS.
1) Mr Yemm was placed into a totally unsuitable and unsafe residential
setting
On 24 May 2020, Adult Social Services was contacted by a member of the
ward staff at Langley Ward, NNUH, advising that Mr Yemm required ‘Support
following hospital discharge. Unplanned admission to NNUH. Short term 24
hour residential support required while delirium resolving.’ Mr Yemm
had been placed on D2A pathway 2. Norfolk County Council is not able to
place people in nursing home care without a nursing needs assessment
carried out by a health professional. We were advised by health professionals
that nursing care was not needed at this time and residential placement was
sourced at Melton House, in line with the hospital’s assessment.
As you are aware this placement broke down and Mr Yemm was readmitted
to NNUH on 26 July 2020 following a fall. On 4 August a referral was
received by Adult Social Services advising that Mr Yemm was now on the
Discharge to Assess pathway 3 and required enhanced nursing care. It was
noted at this point that Mr Yemm’s delirium had resolved which raises a
question about why a lower level of care had been requested by the hospital
in May.
A total of 31 nursing homes were contacted but none considered that they
would be able to meet Mr Yemm’s needs.
On 2 September 2020, on receipt of Mrs Yemm’s letter, the CCG agreed to
fund a bed in a neurological unit. I suggest the need for a neurological
specialist bed was evident prior to the initial discharge, as the behaviours
were apparent at this point and an issue on the initial discharge.
2) Mrs Yemm wrote to the Director of Adult Social Services asking for help
in finding a suitable placement and did not receive the courtesy of a
reply
A letter has been identified which Mrs Yemm shared with the community
response team social worker. The community response team social worker
shared this with her senior managers and at that point the meeting was called
with the CCG on 2 September 2020.
Mrs Yemm’s letter was not escalated to
the community response team and as a consequence, the matter was
escalated appropriately and led to action by the CCG for an appropriate
placement to be sourced and funded.
as it was received by
This case highlights a known issue where people with highly agitated behavioural
needs due to dementia or other health conditions, whose needs are outside of the
ability of registered dementia nursing homes to care for the needs being displayed. This
is evidenced in that 31 homes were contacted and yet no placement was available
Page 2 of 3
because the nursing homes were unable to meet Mr Yemm’s level of need. Until the
CCG agrees to fund a specialist neurological placement, adult social care is not able to
source a placement with a higher level of care. It was not until Mrs Yemm complained
that her husband’s needs were assessed for specialist provision by healthcare services.
I would be grateful if you would give this matter your attention and consider reviewing
the evidence taking account of information shared by Norfolk County Council. It would
be most helpful if you would be able to contact me by telephone to discuss this further.
Kind regards
Director of Community Social Work
Page 3 of 3
yath the care we wart i
for those we love the most N#S Foundation Test
Our Vision 5 > . .
ro. To prow every patient Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS
Legal Services Department
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
Private & Confidential Norwich Research Park
Ms Y Blak 1 Colney Lane
Ss ake Norwich NR4 7UY
Area Coroner
Carrow House direct “i
301 Kings Street
Norwich
NR1 2TN
9 April 2021
Dear Ms Blake
Response to Regulation 28 report —- Death of Michael Yemm
| am writing in response to the above Regulation 28 report (Report) that | received on
10 February 2021. | hope that this letter and the accompanying documents will
satisfy you and Mr Yemm’s family that the matters of concern raised in the Report
have been carefully considered by the Trust and appropriate action has been or is
being taken.
The Report raises three matters of concern. The Trust’s response in relation to each
one is set out below.
1. The care home placement
Mr Yemm was admitted to the Trust on 24 May 2020 and discharged on 17 June
2020 to Melton House Care Home. Mr Yemm was discharged on a D2A3 (Discharge
to Access) = for a short term community bed for the assessment of his long
term needs. was involved in the discharge planning arrangements. It was
initially hoped Mr Yemm could be discharged home with a package of care.
However, his increased needs and falls risk meant a short term community bed was
the most appropriate option. requested a bed close to home. A referral
was raised on 10 June 2020 suggesting a “Residential/Nursing home’. The
placement at Melton House was sourced by Social Services and confirmed on 15
June 2020.
Mr Yemm was readmitted on 18 June 2020 from Melton House following a fall.
Concerns were raised by Mr Yemm’s Community Care Nurse about the suitability of
Melton House due to a lack of adequate supervision. A new D2A3 discharge referral
was raised on 23 June 2020. The referral states: “Please assess for short term bed.
Wife wishes to be involved in planning as feels Morton House [sic] was unsuitable.” It
was subsequently agreed that Mr Yemm could be discharged back to Melton House
but with 1:1 supervision funding for 2 weeks. This was to allow time for the needs
{
assessment to be undertaken. Social Services has confirmed the 1:1 supervision
was provided but is unable to provide any information about arrangements beyond
the initial two week period.
Mr Yemm was readmitted again on 26 July 2020 from Melton House following
another fall and with a urinary tract infection. Melton House informed the Trust it was
unable to meet Mr Yemm’s needs. A further D2A3 discharge referral was therefore
made on 29 July 2020. The referral states that: “He is unable to return to Melton
House as they are unable to manage his falls risks and unable to manage his
diabetes.” Unfortunately, Mr Yemm deteriorated and a new fast track referral was
completed on 16 September 2020. This referral stated that: “patient was in
residential care, they are no-longer able to meet his needs so requires a new
placement’. Sadly, however, Mr Yemm passed away in hospital.
2. The hospital discharge despite being told they couldn’t send him back, and
just leaving him there
The Report states that:
“The hospital dropped Mr Yemm off back at the care home without any warning after
being informed that they could not have him back. He was also discharged on insulin
which the home could not administer as they do not have trained nursing staff.”
It also states that:
“After his second admission the manager of the care home told the hospital that they
would not accept him back as his needs could not be met by them. Despite this
without notifying the care home, Mr Yemm was dropped off by hospital transport and
the home had no option but to keep him as he was left there. They did manage to
obtain extra help, but his care needs increased, and he was again admitted to
hospital.”
Mr Yemm was started on insulin during the May 2020 admission. A District Nurse
referral was made on discharge as Mr Yemm was unable to manage his own
injections. On 17 June 2020 a “verbal handover’ was given to Melton House
including confirmation that the District Nurse referral had been completed in respect
of Mr Yemm’s “insulin administration’ .
After Mr Yemm’s admission on 18 June 2020, the Manager of Melton House was
informed during discussions between 24 and 26 June 2020, that Mr Yemm was on
long acting insulin and that the District Nurse would administer his regular doses. It
was also confirmed that 1:1 supervision had been requested and approved by Social
Services. Both Mand Melton House agreed the discharge to Melton House
on this basis.
Mr Yemm’s discharge was delayed pending the return of his Covid-19 swab test
results. — Melton House were notified that the discharge had been
moved to 27 June 2020 and transport was arranged for 12:00 hours. The Trust does
not have its own non-emergency transport facilities, and all such transport is
arranged via ERS Medical.
3. The in-patient fall and care of dementia patients
2
Mr Yemm’s fall on 3 September 2020 has been the subject of a Serious Incident (SI)
investigation. | confirm that work has been undertaken in accordance with the actions
recommended in the SI Action Plan attached to the SI Report (see attached). The
relevant teams have also been notified of your concerns so they can ensure these
are covered by the work being carried cut.
The relevant issues identified in the Action Plan are referenced below, together with
details of the associated actions that have been undertaken:
The patient was not referred to the Dementia Specialist Team
There are a number of actions being taken to address this issue:
1. Ward Manager, has issued a reminder (see attached email)
to all ward staff requiring them to ensure they are familiar/up to date with (i)
the “Memory Matters” page on the Trust intranet which contains a range of
educational resources; and (ii) Dementia awareness and DOLS training, both
of which can be accessed via the Trust’s online training facility (ESR).
2. Ward Manager ME has met with and organised ward based education
sessions with the Dementia Support Team (DST) (see attached emails).
Some ward based sessions have already been delivered via the Clinical
Educator and this is ongoing. Arrangements are also being made for ward
staff to spend a day with the DST.
oy Funding is being sought for the implementation of a ward based Dementia
Support Worker post. Regular support is being provided to the ward by the
DST in the meantime.
The Fails Risk and Safety Sides assessments are not adequate and require
review
The Falls Risk and Safety Sides assessments are under reviewas part of an ongoin
project. MG b2s been working i | _—_e
Deputy Chief Nurse on the project. A NICE compliant Falls Risk assessment has
been trialled and a final draft has been put together (see attached). The assessments
and the associated policy are currently at the final adjustment/review stage. It will
then be a question of implementing the roll out of the documents. These presently
form part of a risk assessment booklet which means complete roll out is dependent
on other risk assessment documents being reviewed. There is no final completion
date at the moment. Alongside the change in risk assessments, it is planned that
there will be an education package to support staff through the changes and to
recognise the multifactorial elements of falls prevention.
The patient had a prolonged stay in hospital due to delay in acquiring a
suitable placement
The SI findings have been shared with the complex discharge team.
| confirm that in addition the following steps have been taken to ensure that learning
is shared as a result of the SI findings:
|
1) The SI learning was shared at the Endocrinology Clinical Governance meeting for
January 2021 (see attached slides). It was also shared in the Team Medicine
Newsletter for February 2021 (see attached) and with the Governance leads vig
Divisional Governance in January 2021 (Agenda attached).
2) Award newsletter was sent to all staff (see attached).
| hope that this information provides you with the assurances you require that the
Trust has implemented changes in practice and put in place training to ensure that
the risk of future deaths from similar circumstances will not occur again.
Yours sincerely
{chit Executive Us & C oh ¢ f We (Vw
Enc
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.