Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Joe Robinson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0074, written 15 Mar 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report15 Mar 2021
Reference2021-0074
DeceasedJoe Robinson
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaGreater Manchester South
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Police related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  Home Secretary and National Police 
Chiefs Council 

1  CORONER 

I am Alison Mutch , Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Greater Manchester 
South 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 15th June 2020, I commenced an investigation into the death of Joe Peter 
Robinson. The investigation concluded on the 11th February 2021 and the 
conclusion was one of drug related death.  

The medical cause of death was: 
1a) combined drug toxicity. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

In the early hours of 14th June 2020, Joe Peter Robinson became unwell and 
collapsed by the side of Ashton Canal near Cinderhall Farm. Attempts to 
resuscitate him were unsuccessful. The post mortem examination found he had 
died from a combination of MDMA and Ketamine.  

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

The inquest heard that Joe Peter Robinson attended a large gathering with 
approximately 4,000 people in attendance. The gathering was not licensed and 
was in breach of the Coronavirus legislation. Alcohol and drugs were available 
and there were no first aid or paramedic facilities available on the site of the 
event. Social distancing was not followed. 

The evidence before the inquest was that Greater Manchester Police became 
aware of the event but felt unable to prevent it from continuing. The inquest was 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 told that at the time GMP did not have a clear plan to deal with such a situation. 
However, since this event at Daisy Nook and a similar one that same night also 
in South Manchester they have developed a robust plan and there have not 
been similar large scale illegal gatherings. 

What was not clear from the inquest was whether the lessons learnt of the need 
for policing plans to prevent such events occurring and reduce the risk of future 
deaths occurring had been shared and embedded in other Force Areas. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
have the power to take such action.  

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 10th may 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons, namely 

, Joe Robinson’s brother and 
 Joe Robinson’s Uncle who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Alison Mutch 
Senior Coroner for the Coroner Area of Greater Manchester South  

15/03/2021 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Home Office (PDF)
Home Secretary

2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF

Home Office www.gov.uk/home-office

Ms Alison Mutch

Senior Coroner for the Coroner Area of Greater Manchester South
1 Mount Tabor Street

Stockport

Greater Manchester

SK1 3A

{

L July 2021

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report of 15 March into the death of Joe Peter
Robinson. | am replying in my capacity as the Minister for Crime and Policing. Please
accept my apologies for the delay in responding to your report.

| would like to express my regret for Mr Robinson’s death. Any death related to drug
misuse is a tragedy and we are committed to supporting the Department of Health and
Social Care in understanding the complex factors involved in order to inform both
national and local action to protect individuals from these harms.

As | am sure you will be aware, this government could not be clearer in saying that
these unlicensed events are illegal. Such events encourage multiple harms such as
criminal activity, safeguarding concerns, and risks to public health, particularly during a
global pandemic.

The police have a variety of powers under public order legislation to deal with illegal
raves, including powers to direct people to leave events and to arrest those who do not
comply with the direction.

However, decisions about what and who to deploy and how to deal with specific
unlicensed music events (UMEs) is an operational matter for the police. It is
appropriate that the government does not directly involve itself in operational matters.

We have been in touch with Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and the National Police
Coordination Centre (NPoCC) in regard to this report. We understand that GMP have
shared lessons learned with NPoCC and the National Police Chiefs Council have
published national guidance in relation to UMEs.

The Government remains committed to tackling the harms caused by drug misuse.

That is why, in January, we announced £148 million of new funding to support a system-
wide approach to tackling illegal drugs. This includes £40 million to tackle drug supply
and county lines, £80 million on drug treatment services in England, and £28 million on
Project ADDER, which will pilot an intensive approach to enforcement, treatment and
recovery in five areas with some of the highest rates of drug misuse.

Thank you for work leading the inquest into Mr Robinson's death, | hope this letter
addresses the concerns set out in your report.

wu Fs
I
|

Rt Hon Priti Patel MP

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.