Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0090, written 26 Mar 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 Mar 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0090 |
| Deceased | Rachel Johnston |
| Coroner | David Reid |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Worcestershire Coroner D.D.W. REID SENIOR CORONER REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) | Managing Director, Holmleigh Care Homes Ltd., Unit 1, Mill Place, 90 Bristol Road, Gloucester, GL1 5SQ; 2) HR Plexus Law, 30-36 Monument Street, London EC3R 8NB; 3) [ER Field Fisher Solicitors, 2 Swan Lane, London EC4R 3TT; 4) EER Care Quality Commission, Citygate, Gallowgate, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4PA; 5) The Chief Coroner of England and Wales. CORONER 1am David Donald William Reid, HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/S/paragraph/7 http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 24/12/2018 | commenced an investigation into the death of Rachel Bernadette Johnston, a resident at Pirton Grange Nursing Home, Pirton, Worcs. ( Pirton Grange ). Holmleigh Care Homes Ltd. owns Pirton Grange. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 26th March 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was as follows: “On 26.10.18 Rachel Johnston, who had significant physical and learning disabilities, underwent necessary and extensive dental surgery under general anaesthetic. Having been discharged that evening back to Pirton Grange Nursing Home, Pirton, where she lived, she developed aspiration pneumonia which resulted in her being admitted as an emergency to Worcestershire Royal Hospital on 28.10.18, where she was found to have suffered an unsurvivable hypoxic brain injury. She was discharged back to Pirton Grange Nursing Home for end of life care, and died there on 13.11.18. Nursing staff at Pirton Grange Nursing Home failed to carry out adequate physiological observations on Rachel after her discharge following the dental surgery and failed to seek emergency medical assistance for Rachel from the evening of 27.10.18 when her condition clearly required it. Had emergency assistance been sought for Rachel at that time, she would probably have survived, and not have died when she did.” Rachel’s medical cause of death was: 1a cerebral hypoxia 1b aspiration pneumonia 1c dental extractions 2 hydrocephalus and epilepsy following childhood meningitis. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH see above. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The Civic Martins Way Stour, The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:— (1) Following Rachel's death, there appears to have been no adequate internal investigation or disciplinary procedure which was able to identify the gross failings of the nurses mentioned above. Accordingly, both nurses continued working at Pirton Grange for some time, without any action being taken to ensure that patients were not put at risk by their actions. Furthermore, no effort was made to report the conduct of the nurses concerned to the Nursing and Midwifery Council ( NMC ), the appropriate regulatory body, until February 2021, over 2 years after Rachel’s death; (2) Even now, there appears to be no Policy in place at Pirton Grange which sets out a suitable and robust procedure for: (a) identifying and investigating possible misconduct by nursing staff, e.g. where they have ignored a Policy; (b) imposing an interim suspension on a member of the nursing staff, pending the completion of such an investigation, if in the interests of ensuring the ongoing safety of residents; (c) if appropriate after the investigation has been completed, ensuring that member of the nursing staff does not work at Pirton Grange again; and (d) if the internal investigation has identified likely misconduct, reporting that member of the nursing staff to the NMC. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 21st May 2020. |, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1) | Plexus Law, the solicitors representing Pirton Grange at the inquest; 2) | sO Field Fisher Solicitors, the solicitors representing Rachel’s family at the inquest; 3) | | Care Quality Commission. 1am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 26/03/2021 Signature ‘yud a David Donald William Reid HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire The Civic Martins Way Stourport on Severn DY13 8UN
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Worcester road
Pirton,
Worcester
WR8 9EF
Pirton Grange Specialist Care Centre
HM Coroner Senior David Donald William Reid
Worcestershire Coroner
The Civic
Martins Way
Stourport on Severn
DY13 SUN
Dear Mr Reid
Inquest touching on the death of Rachel Johnston
Response to Regulation 28 Report
25 May 2021
We refer to the Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 Report issued by HM
Senior Coroner, David Donald William Reid following the investigation into the death of Rachel
Bernadette Johnston. This response is provided on behalf of Pirton Grange Specialist Services (‘the
Home’). The Home is committed to the care, safety, and well-being of its service users.
Matters of Concern for HM Coroner
1. Following Rachel's death, there appears to have been no adequate internal investigation or
disciplinary procedure which was able to identify the gross failings of the nurses mentioned
above. Accordingly, both nurses continued working at Pirton Grange for some time, without
any action being taken to ensure that patients were not put at risk by their actions. Furthermore
e, no effort was made to report the conduct of the nurses concerned to the Nursing and
Midwifery Council (‘NMC’), the appropriate regulatory body, until February 2021, over 2 years
after Rachel's death.
Following Rachel’s death, the Home introduced training for all nurses, reviewed its policies to ensure
that there would be a consistent approach across the board.
Those concerned in carrying out the initial investigation believed that they had identified training issues
and arranged for appropriate training to be provided. The Home became fully aware of the significance
of the physiological observations on Rachel after her discharge following the dental surgery when it
received the expert report prepared by Dr
. The Home received this on 3 September 2020.
In the interim period, the Home had discussions with the CQC, was involved in Learning Disabilities
Mortality Review Programme (LeDer) meetings and was also in receipt of legal advice. At no time did
anyone raise the issue that any member of staff should be reported to their professional body including
the NMC. However, on full consideration of Dr
report, the Home informed the Agencies
that it did not want either nurses to work for it again. This was in early January 2021.
2. Even now, there appears to be no Policy in place at Pirton Grange which sets out a suitable
and robust procedure for:
Worcester road
Pirton,
Worcester
WR8 9EF
Pirton Grange Specialist Care Centre
a.
identifying and investigating possible misconduct by nursing staff, e.g. where they have
ignored a Policy;
b.
imposing an interim suspension on a member of the nursing staff, pending the
completion of such an investigation, if in the interests of ensuring the ongoing safety of
residents;
c.
if appropriate after the investigation has been completed, ensuring that member of the
nursing staff does not work at Pirton Grange again; and
d.
if the internal investigation has identified likely misconduct, reporting that member of
the nursing staff to the NMC.
As result of the HM Coroners concerns the Home has made its procedures more robust. This includes
independent oversight to identify and investigate possible misconduct by staff, including nursing staff.
This comprises of the engagement of a Solicitor’s firm on a retainer basis to provide general
employment advice, support on all HR matters and assistance and oversight with and/or advising on
any investigation, disciplinary matters, and considering whether any reports to professional bodies
should be made. The Home will engage its Solicitors at the very outset where there is an issue which
may give rise to any misconduct issues by staff.
The Home has also recently changed its Registered Manager/Nominated Individual. The new
nominated individual has introduced a Quality Assurance Audit to take place quarterly. This audit follows
the same quality standards investigated by the CQC as part of its assessment (i.e. Key Lines of
Enquiries). The CQC and local CCG, who place service users at the Home, will also continue to inspect
the Home on a regular basis.
Enclosed alongside this letter are relevant policies from the Staff Handbook, namely:
1. Conduct and Standards Policy
2. Disciplinary Policy and Procedure
3. Handling and Security of DBS Disclosure Information Policy
4. Performance Management Policy
5. Professional Boundaries Policy
6. Safeguarding Service Users from Abuse or Harm
7. Staff Retention Policy
The Staff Handbook was prepared by an external company and was been in place prior to Rachel’s
death. The Staff Handbook is regularly reviewed and updates are communicated to all staff. All staff
are taken through the Staff Handbook on induction. The Staff Handbook is made available to all staff,
both employed and agency in the Home.
Conduct and Standards Policy
The Home’s Conduct and Standards policy, which applies to all staff (including agency workers) sets
out what is expected from its staff in terms of the provision of care so that it is safe, effective, caring and
responsive to the service user’s needs. Staff are required to comply with the standards of conduct and
Worcester road
Pirton,
Worcester
WR8 9EF
Pirton Grange Specialist Care Centre
practice of their respective occupation or professions and comply with the Home’s Operating Policies
and Procedures. This policy provides that if there is a failure to provide the required care resulting in
any harm or near miss of harm, then this will treated as misconduct, and will be fully investigated,
instigating a disciplinary/performance management procedure. It also sets out that this may result in a
report being made to a professional body in respect of the staff concerned.
This Policy sets out examples of care which fall below the required standard, such as omitting to carry
out sufficient observations (check-ups, physiological observations), omitting to call emergency services
or external support when necessary.
It also includes a non-exhaustive list of actions which are considered to constitute gross misconduct,
this includes, serious or gross negligence and serious breach of policies and procedures. This policy
also covers the consequences of failing to provide adequate care.
Disciplinary Policy and Performance Management Policy
The Disciplinary Policy applies to the Home’s employees and addresses the Home’s disciplinary
procedures and sanctions. The Policy also addresses interim suspension from work, which is immediate
if a service user has been seriously harmed, or if there a risk to service user safety. The possible
sanctions include dismissal.
The Performance Management Policy, which applies to all staff (including agency workers) deals with
how the Home investigates adverse events, near misses, staff performance, competence and conduct
issues. The policy also covers the outcomes and sanctions and is to be considered alongside the
Home’s Disciplinary policy.
In accordance with the Performance Management Policy, if a service user has suffered significant harm
or there is a risk to service user safety, then the Home’s Senior Management team, in conjunction with
the Quality Assurance Manager and external advisors will implement: -
•
•
Immediate suspension of the member/s of staff involved, including agency staff, with
notification to the agency, or other relevant party (if appropriate), that the worker is being
investigated for possible misconduct/lack of competence.
Immediate referral of the member(s) of staff involved on determination that the issue is one
of lack of competence or misconduct to regulatory or other bodies, such as the NMC or
GMC, in accordance with fitness to practice requirements.
In terms of procedure to be followed in respect of disciplinary considerations, the employment status of
the individual dictates how the Home deals with any resulting action. In respect of employees of the
Home, where misconduct is both contemplated and/or identified, there is a HR procedure to be followed
in line with the Home’s Disciplinary Policy and Procedure which includes suspension of the employee
during an investigation. If the investigation concludes misconduct, disciplinary actions can result in
dismissal of the employee. Furthermore, the Home will report the employee to the appropriate
professional body on concluding that there has been misconduct in accordance with the Professional
Boundaries policy.
Worcester road
Pirton,
Worcester
WR8 9EF
Pirton Grange Specialist Care Centre
In relation to agency staff, where the agency worker is part of an investigation (internal, poor
performance or disciplinary investigation) in which their conduct may be called into question, the Home’s
Staff Retention policy states that it shall not use their services and shall notify the agency that the
agency worker shall not carry out any work for the Home until the investigation is completed. If the
investigation concludes misconduct, the agency will be informed that the agency worker is not permitted
to carry out any future work for the Home again. Furthermore, the Home will report the agency worker
to the appropriate professional body on concluding that there has been misconduct.
Professional Boundaries Policy
The Home’s Professional Boundaries policy provides that care, nursing and any other professional staff
must comply with the standards of conduct and practice for their respective profession/occupation. The
policy sets out that where the Home’s investigation concludes a finding of misconduct of any member
of staff, a report will be made to the relevant professional body.
The Home feels that all of the measures outlined above will effectively deal with the areas of concern
raised by HM Coroner. We trust that this response is to the satisfaction of HM Coroner as to the
procedures in place at the Home which will ensure that any failures are identified which have the
potential of leading to risk of service user safety.
Should HM Coroner have any further queries arising from this response, we will be happy to assist.
We would also like to take this opportunity to express, once again, the Home’s sincere condolences to
Rachel Johnston’s family and friends for their loss.
Yours sincerely
CEO
Holmleigh Care Homes Limited
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.